{"id":18661,"date":"2017-03-29T13:00:00","date_gmt":"2017-03-29T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.journals.cambridge.org\/?p=18661"},"modified":"2017-03-29T15:33:44","modified_gmt":"2017-03-29T14:33:44","slug":"kids-wildlife-preferences-differ-from-island-to-mainland","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/2017\/03\/29\/kids-wildlife-preferences-differ-from-island-to-mainland\/","title":{"rendered":"Kids\u2019 Wildlife Preferences Differ from Island to Mainland"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"bsf_rt_marker\"><\/div><blockquote><p>Growing up on an island or mainland location can shape the way children think about wildlife, including which species they prefer, according to North Carolina State University research. Comparison surveys of children living in the Bahamas and in North Carolina reveal significant differences and potential challenges for wildlife-conservation efforts on islands.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It\u2019s important to understand the next generation\u2019s priorities for wildlife conservation, says lead author Hannah Shapiro, an undergraduate student who surveyed students from Andros, an island in the Bahamas, and compared the results with those of children in North Carolina for a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/journals\/environmental-conservation\/article\/wildlife-species-preferences-differ-among-children-in-continental-and-island-locations\/559D04D9787F20C0633505B89A62898D\/core-reader\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>study<\/strong><\/a> published in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/journals\/environmental-conservation\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Environmental Conservation<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cChildren on Andros showed a preference for feral cats, dogs and pigs, which are invasive species that can be more damaging in an island environment,\u201d Shapiro says. \u201cThat\u2019s a concern for future wildlife-conservation efforts.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>However, island children chose a wider variety of wildlife species as their favorites \u2013 including birds, lizards, fish and insects \u2013 than their continental counterparts from North Carolina, who strongly preferred mammals, including deer, bears, rabbits, wolves and squirrels.<\/p>\n<p>Island children may have a greater preference for species like rock iguanas, conchs and flamingos (the national bird of the Bahamas) not only for reasons of familiarity and national pride but also because they\u2019re surrounded by fewer big furry species, known as \u201ccharismatic megafauna\u201d to wildlife biologists.<\/p>\n<p>About a third of the children from Andros who were surveyed take part in Discovery Club, a Bahamian environmental education program. Discovery Club participants showed a greater concern for native species with declining populations than nonmembers.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Discovery Club curriculum deals specifically with declining species but it doesn\u2019t focus heavily on invasive species,\u201d says co-author Kathryn Stevenson, an NC State assistant professor and former public school science teacher who studies environmental literacy. \u201cDiscovery Club offers an ongoing way to build awareness of wildlife issues. Based on the findings, a recommendation would be to add a specific module on invasive species to help children learn about the impact on native wildlife.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Wildlife biologists need to understand the human factors that drive conservation decisions, says co-author Nils Peterson, an associate professor in NC State\u2019s College of Natural Resources who studies the intersections of human and natural systems.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFaced with a constant loss of species and limited resources, conservation biologists are always in triage mode, identifying the species most at risk and targeting our efforts to save them,\u201d Peterson says. \u201cThe better understanding the public has, the more likely we are to base our priorities on sound science.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The article <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/journals\/environmental-conservation\/article\/wildlife-species-preferences-differ-among-children-in-continental-and-island-locations\/559D04D9787F20C0633505B89A62898D\/core-reader\" target=\"_blank\">&#8216;Wildlife species preferences differ among children in continental and island locations&#8217;<\/a> which is part of an <em>Environmental Conservation<\/em> themed edition about human and island environments, is based on undergraduate research done in a conservation biology study-abroad course. Brian Langerhans, an NC State faculty member in biological sciences, and Kristin Frew, a former graduate student, contributed to the study. <strong>The article has been made freely available until 26th March 2017<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><em>Authors<\/em>: Hannah G. Shapiro, M. Nils Peterson, Kathryn T. Stevenson, Kristin N. Frew and R. Brian Langerhans, North Carolina State University<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Click <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.journals.cambridge.org\/tag\/ec-perspectives\/\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a> to discover more blog posts about <em>Environmental Conservation<\/em> content.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Growing up on an island or mainland location can shape the way children think about wildlife, including which species they prefer, according to North Carolina State University research, published in Environmental Conservation. Comparison surveys of children living in the Bahamas and in North Carolina reveal significant differences and potential challenges for wildlife-conservation efforts on islands.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":588,"featured_media":18696,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2248,1],"tags":[1285,496,64,1112,672],"coauthors":[],"class_list":["post-18661","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-earth-environmental-science","category-news","tag-children","tag-environmental","tag-environmental-conservation","tag-wildlife","tag-wildlife-conservation"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18661","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/588"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18661"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18661\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/18696"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18661"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18661"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18661"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=18661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}