{"id":20732,"date":"2017-09-14T23:10:45","date_gmt":"2017-09-14T22:10:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.journals.cambridge.org\/?p=20732"},"modified":"2017-09-19T15:34:04","modified_gmt":"2017-09-19T14:34:04","slug":"paul-e-nahme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/2017\/09\/14\/paul-e-nahme\/","title":{"rendered":"Wissen und Lomdus: Idealism, Modernity, and History in some Nineteenth-Century Rabbinic and Philosophical responses to the Wissenschaft des Judentums"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"bsf_rt_marker\"><\/div><p style=\"text-align: left;\">This a<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-20825 size-thumbnail alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.journals.cambridge.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Nahme_headshot-220x220.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"220\" height=\"220\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Nahme_headshot-220x220.jpg 220w, https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Nahme_headshot-420x420.jpg 420w, https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Nahme_headshot-32x32.jpg 32w, https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Nahme_headshot-50x50.jpg 50w, https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Nahme_headshot-64x64.jpg 64w, https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Nahme_headshot-96x96.jpg 96w, https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/Nahme_headshot-128x128.jpg 128w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 220px) 100vw, 220px\" \/>rticle examines the parallel strategies taken by Hermann Cohen (1842\u20131918) and contemporaries in the Eastern European Lithuanian Talmudic academies to develop modernizing interpretations of Jewish text, tradition, and law. By emphasizing the conceptualism of both philosophical and rabbinic modes of interpretation, I suggest that a common thread of \u201cidealism\u201d can be found in both contexts. By tracing idealism as a reaction to the Wissenschaft des Judentums\u2019s historicization of Judaism, I suggest that Jewish thought in the later nineteenth century, both Western and Eastern European, share a common strategy of not foregoing but rather idealizing historical consciousness in the interpretation of Jewish law and practice.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/journals\/harvard-theological-review\/article\/wissen-und-lomdus-idealism-modernity-and-history-in-some-nineteenthcentury-rabbinic-and-philosophical-responses-to-the-wissenschaft-des-judentums\/29680ABCBF17CCDEF9AB5A2916875A35\"><strong>Enjoy free access to this article until October 30, 2017.\u00a0<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This article examines the parallel strategies taken by Hermann Cohen (1842\u20131918) and contemporaries in the Eastern European Lithuanian Talmudic academies to develop modernizing interpretations of Jewish text, tradition, and law. By emphasizing the conceptualism of both philosophical and rabbinic modes of interpretation, I suggest that a common thread of \u201cidealism\u201d can be found in both [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":381,"featured_media":20832,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":true,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,6,1,2265,372],"tags":[577,3378,3372,55,3373,2276,3375,3379,308,3377,83,3370,3371,80,3374,3376],"coauthors":[3369],"class_list":["post-20732","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-history","category-humanities","category-news","category-philosophy","category-religious-studies-humanities","tag-cambridge-university-press","tag-eastern-european-lithuanian-talmudic","tag-havard-theological-review","tag-history-2","tag-htr","tag-humanities","tag-idealism","tag-jewish","tag-journals","tag-judaism","tag-law-2","tag-modernity","tag-nineteenth-century-rabbinic","tag-philosophy","tag-wissen-und-lomdu","tag-wissenschaft-des-judentums"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20732","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/381"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20732"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20732\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20832"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20732"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20732"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20732"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=20732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}