{"id":44158,"date":"2021-08-25T14:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-08-25T13:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cupblog.bluefusesystems.com\/?p=44158"},"modified":"2021-09-03T16:39:13","modified_gmt":"2021-09-03T15:39:13","slug":"looking-for-womens-learning-in-medieval-england","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/blog\/2021\/08\/25\/looking-for-womens-learning-in-medieval-england\/","title":{"rendered":"Looking for Women\u2019s Learning in Medieval England"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

This blog accompanies Megan J. Hall’s History of Education Quarterly <\/em>article Women’s Education and Literacy in England, 1066-1540<\/a><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

In 1420, a notary public named Master Peter Church apprenticed two orphaned English sisters named Alice and Matilda Shaw. The seeming mundanity of this occurrence obscures an important consideration. If the Shaw sisters were to work for a notary, would they require literacy? Or were they literate when Church decided to employ them? Megan Hall\u2019s \u201cWomen\u2019s Education and Literacy in England, 1066-1540<\/a>\u201d draws on a range of primary and secondary sources to explore the ways women like Alice and Matilda Shaw learned, examining the transmission of knowledge in a variety of formal and informal contexts throughout the medieval period. Hall\u2019s article challenges historians to look for women\u2019s learning well before the early modern period in a variety of unexplored contexts, expands historical understanding of the intellectual lives of women in the medieval world, and elucidates the extent to which important avenues of education existed outside of formal or elite institutions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The study of women\u2019s medieval learning is a largely underdeveloped field. \u201cNot a single monograph has been written surveying the history of medieval English schooling for girls,\u201d Hall observes.[1]<\/a> However, English women learned in a variety of ways. Some women learned basic literacy at local elementary schools, and, by the sixteenth century, schools served as training grounds for female teachers.[2]<\/a> Girls \u201clearned from the same tools as boys\u201d in the earliest phases of their education, while both young men and young women received training in social and behavioral deportment.[3]<\/a> Hall notes how St. Margaret of Scotland was said to \u201coccupy herself with the study of the Holy Scriptures and delightfully exercise her mind,\u201d while saints and literary figures \u201cFelice, Morgan, Viviane, and St. Katherine of Alexandria\u201d all provided models of female education to readers and students alike.[4]<\/a> Nunneries doubled as another arena for women\u2019s literacy training, and Hall concludes that historical, institutional, and fictional examples indicate the prevalence of discourse and conversation surrounding female education in medieval England.[5]<\/a> Women like St. Margaret of Scotland and her daughter Matilda studied scripture, learned Latin, and developed their own wealth of knowledge in spiritual and intellectual pursuits.[6]<\/a> Hall concludes that access to a dynamic, literary, and intellectual education was not exclusively reserved for elite men in universities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Non-elite women, alongside the \u201crising bourgeoisie, the merchant and artisan classes, and in some cases the peasantry,\u201d experienced both a \u201cpractical and literary education.\u201d[7]<\/a> In households, women learned a variety of skills through predominantly oral instruction. Mothers were important literary and artistic facilitators of female education, as figures like St. Anne modelled moral and spiritual instruction.[8]<\/a> Fathers and sons often coupled female and male education in the household. In the romantic verse Floris and Blancheflour<\/em>, the king\u2019s son, Floris, insists on being educated in reading and writing Latin alongside his female childhood companion Blancheflour\u2014an account that proves neither \u201cwildly exaggerated\u201d nor altogether unlikely for many families.[9]<\/a> The language of thirteenth- and fourteenth-century treatises, literature, and poetry concerning female education emphasized \u201cappropriate behavior in religion, society, and marriage,\u201d asserting the growing \u201cbourgeois ethos\u201d in the late medieval period.[10]<\/a> Some families also turned to nunneries to educate their daughters as a means of spiritual, linguistic, and intellectual training.[11]<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Beyond the household, the school, and the nunnery, laboring women also learned in medieval England. The poor had a greater need than elite or cloistered women to secure some form of professional training: \u201cWhether it was brewing and selling, weaving, cloth-making, dyeing, baking, ironmongery, trade, shopkeeping, inkeeping, or innumerable other occupations, women began to acquire these skills in childhood,\u201d Hall concludes.[12]<\/a> Many girls were apprenticed or indentured in homes or workshops, and, in each pursuit, women received some instruction in the trade. Young girls may have received some initial literacy or basic professional training at home, while their apprenticeship taken on during pueritia<\/em> prepared them for the trade they might practice in adolescentia<\/em>.[13]<\/a> \u201cIt is particularly important,\u201d Hall observes, \u201cto note that the skills we perhaps most associate with education in the modern age, reading and writing, were taught to some girls in these [working class] groups, especially when such skills were needed to carry out a trade.\u201d[14]<\/a> Significantly, women in non-elite settings engaged in what Steven Justice calls \u201crecognition literacy,\u201d which enabled often enabled working women to navigate French and English in the process of record-keeping or inventory.[15]<\/a> Though laboring women probably received less training than apprentices, Hall notes that \u201c[laboring] women would have been learning and training from an early age to prepare for homekeeping, directing or helping in agricultural labor, and any other needs of their anticipated future.\u201d[16]<\/a> For non-elite women, learning was a critical endeavor, whether they were preparing to make a living, support a family, or simply support themselves. To Hall, this represents a critical conclusion: differing but extant levels of literacy among women in medieval England suggests that access to knowledge was neither entirely stifled nor exclusively confined to their fulfilment of gender norms. Instead, Hall concludes, women engaged in a complex and multifaceted intellectual life throughout medieval England.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Whether they were trained to manage households, preserve families\u2019 spirituality, embrace social and cultural norms, face the changing dynamics of a \u201cbourgeois\u201d sensibility, practice a trade, or perform manual labor, medieval women experienced education, and female learning was an important and determinative element of English society. Legal complaints, for example, reveal that people like William and Johanna Kaly petitioned for access to a female apprentice named Agnes Cook in 1376, despite her apprenticeship to a London cutler named Jusema.[17]<\/a> Agnes\u2019 education proved extremely valuable and competitive in the dynamic world of medieval England. Future studies of women\u2019s history, learning outside of academic institutions, and the experiences of laboring and contingent classes would benefit from adopting the approach Hall has taken in extrapolating instances like these to illustrate larger trends. In uncovering a vast array of contexts in which women acquired knowledge, became literate, and promoted intellectual advancement, Hall has successfully amplified the archivally silent world of women\u2019s education in medieval England.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read the full article<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Listen to Megan Hall discuss her History of Education Quarterly <\/em>article on the HEQ&A podcast<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n