Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-74d7c59bfc-nlwmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-02-07T21:09:51.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Challenging Online Misogyny

The Application of Corpus Linguistics in the MANTRaP Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 December 2025

Gavin Brookes
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Niall Curry
Affiliation:
Manchester Metropolitan University
Robbie Love
Affiliation:
Aston University
Get access

Summary

This chapter details the potential applications of corpus linguistic research in the study and mitigation of misogyny. The chapter begins by introducing the MANTRaP (Misogyny ANd The Red Pill) project and the work done in this project to examine language used across the online manosphere – a ‘loose online network’ of communities united by a shared anti-feminist ideology (Marwick and Caplan, 2018: 543). This chapter discusses findings from various studies conducted by project team members on corpora collected from online manosphere communities to examine, among other things, anti-feminist discourse and representations of gendered social actors. Following an overview of the academic work done by project team members, we then discuss practical applications and impacts of this research for the purposes of safeguarding children and young people from potential online harms. This discussion centres on various aspects of our work with a number of organisations involved in such safeguarding. In particular, our discussion centres on our contributions to the safeguarding efforts of these organisations through raising awareness with relevant stakeholders, producing and delivering safeguarding materials and training, and consultancy work for software companies providing safeguarding and monitoring solutions to schools. In the discussion, we also reflect on the formative work with non-academic stakeholders that leads to tangible impacts as well as the real-life implications of the applications emerging from this work. These include an increased public and academic focus on the communities researched and the language used in those communities and the use of research findings in safeguarding software designed for the online surveillance of children in schools.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Applications of Corpus Linguistics
Established and Emergent Contexts
, pp. 233 - 253
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2026

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aiston, J. (2021). What is the manosphere and why is it a concern? Internet Matters, 4 October. Retrieved 1 May 2025 from www.internetmatters.org/hub/news-blogs/what-is-the-manosphere-and-why-is-it-a-concern/.Google Scholar
Aiston, J. (2025). Male Separatism: Discourse, ideology, and argumentation. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiston, J., Krendel, A., Koller, V., & McGlashan, M. (n.d.). MANTRaP: Misogyny and The Red Pill. Retrieved 1 May 2025 from www.markmcglashan.com/projects/mantrap.Google Scholar
Amnesty International (2018) Toxic Twitter: Women’s experiences of violence and abuse on Twitter. Retrieved 24 March 2023 from www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2018/03/online-violence-against-women-chapter-3-2/.Google Scholar
Baele, S. J., Brace, L., & Coan, T. G. (2019). From ‘incel’ to ‘saint’: Analyzing the worldview behind the 2018 Toronto van attack. Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(8), 16671691. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1638256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baele, S. J., Brace, L., & Coan, T. G. (2021). From ‘incel’ to ‘saint’: Analyzing the violent worldview behind the 2018 Toronto attack. Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(8), 16671691. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1638256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, K. & Jurasz, O. (2021) Online misogyny as a hate crime: #TimesUp. In Zempi, I. & Smith, J. (eds.), Misogyny as Hate Crime. Routledge (pp. 7998). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003023722-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, A. (2016). It’s about ethics in games journalism? Gamergaters and geek masculinity. Social Media and Society, 2(4), 110. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116672484.Google Scholar
Breck Foundation (n.d.). Website. Retrieved 1 May 2025 from www.breckfoundation.org/.Google Scholar
Bogetić, K., Heritage, F., Koller, V., & McGlashan, M. (2023). ‘Landwhales, femoids and sub-humans: Dehumanising metaphors in incel discourse’. Metaphor and the Social World, 13(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.23005.bog/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, W. (2022). The monstrous-feminine in the incel imagination: Investigating the representation of women as ‘femoids’ on /r/Braincels. Feminist Media Studies, 22(2), 254270. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1804976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayter, D. & Rüdiger, S. (2022). The Language of Pick-Up Artists: Online Discourses of the Seduction Industry. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Education (2022) Keeping Children Safe in Education 2022. Retrieved 17 April 2023, www.gov.uk/government/publications/keeping-children-safe-in-education--2.Google Scholar
Ging, D. (2019). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638657. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1097184X17706401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ging, D. & Siapera, E. (2018). Special issue on online misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 515524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, M. (2013). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd ed. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hardaker, C. & McGlashan, M. (2016). ‘Real men don’t hate women’: Twitter rape threats and group identity. Journal of Pragmatics, 91(1), 8093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, F. & Koller, V. (2020). Incels, in-groups, and ideologies: The representation of gendered social actors in a sexuality-based online community. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 9(2), 152178. https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.19014.her.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermansson, P., Lawrence, D., Mulhall, J., & Murdoch, S. (2020). The International Alt-Right: Fascism for the 21st Century? Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope Not Hate (2023a). How to Tackle Andrew Tate’s Extreme Misogyny and It’s [sic] Impact on Young People. Retrieved 24 March 2023, https://hopenothate.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/andrew-tate-educational-resource-2023-02-v3.pdf.Google Scholar
Hope Not Hate (2023b). Who Is Andrew Tate?. Retrieved 24 March 2023, https://hopenothate.org.uk/andrew-tate/.Google Scholar
Human Restoration Project (2023). Combating the ‘Manosphere’ in the Classroom. YouTube, 27 May. Retrieved 1 May 2025 from www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4oxm7LWnEM.Google Scholar
Internet Matters (n.d.). Website. Retrieved 1 May 2025 from www.internetmatters.org/.Google Scholar
Jaki, S., De Smedt, T., Gwóźdź, M., Panchal, R., Rossa, A., & De Pauw, G. (2019). Online hatred of women in the incels.me forum: Linguistic analysis and automatic detection. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 7(2), 240268. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00026.jak.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C., Trott, V., & Wright, S. (2020). Sluts and soyboys: MGTOW and the production of misogynistic online harassment. New Media & Society, 22(10), 19031921. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444819887141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koller, V. & Ereaut, G. (2020). Culture change and rebranding in the charity sector: A linguistic consultancy approach. In Mullany, L. (Ed.), Professional Communication: Consultancy, Advocacy, Activism. Palgrave Macmillan (pp. 89–11).Google Scholar
Koller, V., McGlashan, M., Heritage, F., Krendel, A., & Aiston, J. (2019) MANTRaP: Misogyny online ANd The Red Pill. British Association of Applied Linguistics (BAAL) Special Interest Group on Language, Gender and Sexuality conference, Birmingham City University, 30 May.Google Scholar
Koulouris, T. (2018). Online misogyny and the alternative right: Debating the undebatable. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 750761. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krendel, A. (2020). The men and women, guys and girls of the ‘manosphere’: A corpus-assisted discourse approach. Discourse & Society, 31(6), 607630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520939690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krendel, A. (2021). From sexism to misogyny: Can online echo chambers stay quarantined? In Zempi, I. & Smith, J. (eds.), Misogyny as Hate Crime. Routledge (pp. 99118).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krendel, A. (2023). Self-help and masculinity: Speech acts in an online men’s group. Pragmatics and Society, 14(6), 844868. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21075.kre.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krendel, A., McGlashan, M., & Koller, V. (2022). The representation of gendered social actors across five manosphere communities on Reddit. Corpora, 17(2), 291321. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2022.0257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaViolette, J. & Hogan, B. (2019). Using platform signals for distinguishing discourses: The case of men’s rights and men’s liberation on Reddit. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on the Web and Social Media (pp. 323334). https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v13i01.3357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, D., Simhony-Philpott, L., & Stone, D. (2021). Antisemitism and misogyny: overlap and interplay. Hope Not Hate, 26 September. Retrieved 25 May 2023, https://hopenothate.org.uk/2021/09/26/antisemitism-misogyny-overlap-and-interplay/.Google Scholar
Lewis, R., Rowe, M., & Wiper, C. (2019). Online/offline continuities: Exploring misogyny and hate in online abuse of feminists. In Lumsden, K. & Harmer, E. (Eds.), Online Othering: Exploring Digital Violence and Discrimination on the Web. Springer International Publishing (pp. 121143). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12633-9_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, J. L. (2017). Antifeminism online: MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way). In Frömming, U. U., Köhn, S., Fox, S., & Terry, M. (Eds.), Digital Environments: Ethnographic Perspectives across Global Online and Offline Spaces. Transcript Verlag (pp. 7796).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lounela, E. & Murphy, S. (2024). Incel violence and victimhood: Negotiating inceldom in online discussions of the Plymouth shooting. Terrorism and Political Violence, 36(3), 344365. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2022.2157267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. (2021) Responding to the incel ideology. Safeguarding Network, March. Retrieved 24 March 2023, https://safeguarding.network/content/responding-to-the-incel-ideology/.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & White, P. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwick, A. E. & Caplan, R. (2018). Drinking male tears: Language, the manosphere, and networked harassment. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 543549. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlashan, M. & Krendel, A. (2024). Keywords of the manosphere. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 29(1), 87115. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22053.mcg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messner, M. A. (1998). The limits of ‘the male sex role’: An analysis of the men’s liberation and men’s rights movements discourse. Gender and Society, 12(3), 255276. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0891243298012003002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Grid for Learning (LGfL) (n.d.). Incels and the ‘manosphere’: Safeguarding CPD. Retrieved 1 May 2025 from https://lgfl.net/safeguarding/incels.Google Scholar
Powell, A. & Henry, N. (2017). Online misogyny, harassment and hate Crimes. In Powell, A. & Henry, N. (eds.), Sexual Violence in a Digital Age. Palgrave Macmillan (pp. 153193). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58047-4_6.Google Scholar
Regehr, K. (2020). In(cel)doctrination: How technologically facilitated misogyny moves violence off screens and on to streets. New Media & Society, 24(1), 138155. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444820959019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, M. & Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In Meyer, M. & Wodak, R. (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 3rd ed. SAGE Publications (pp. 2361).Google Scholar
Schmitz, R. M. & Kazyak, E. (2016). Masculinities in cyberspace: An analysis of portrayals of manhood in men’s rights activist websites. Social Sciences, 5(2), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci5020018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotto di Carlo, G. (2023). An analysis of self-other representations in the incelosphere: Between online misogyny and self-contempt. Discourse & Society, 34(1), 321. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221099380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. (2018). The woman who founded the ‘incel’ movement. BBC, 30 August. Retrieved 1 May 2025 from www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45284455.Google Scholar
The Mozilla Foundation (2021). YouTube Regrets: A Crowdsourced Investigation into YouTube’s Recommendation Algorithm. July. Retrieved 25 May 2023, https://assets.mofoprod.net/network/documents/Mozilla_YouTube_Regrets_Report.pdf.Google Scholar
UK Parliament (2023). Misogynist language online can escalate to offline violence against women and girls. Written evidence from Dr Jessica Aiston, Queen Mary University, Dr Veronika Koller, Lancaster University, Dr Alexandra Krendel, Lancaster University, Dr Mark McGlashan, Birmingham City University [EOV0019]. Women and Equalities Committee. Retrieved 1 May 2025 from https://committees.parliament.uk/work/7838/the-escalation-of-violence-against-women-and-girls/publications/written-evidence/?SearchTerm=mcglashan&DateFrom=&DateTo=&SessionId=.Google Scholar
UK Research and Innovation (2022). How Research England Supports Research Excellence. Retrieved 25 May 2023, www.ukri.org/about-us/research-england/research-excellence/ref-impact/.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, S. (2024). Online abuse of women: An interdisciplinary scoping review of the literature. Feminist Media Studies, 24(1), 5169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2181136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, T. (2020). ‘If i cannot have it, i will do everything i can to destroy it.’ the canonization of Elliot Rodger: ‘Incel’ masculinities, secular sainthood, and justifications of ideological violence. Social Identities, 26(5), 675689. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2020.1787132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organisation (WHO) (2024). Violence against women. 9 March. Retrieved 25 May 2023, www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women.Google Scholar
Wright, D. (2020). The discursive construction of resistance to sex in an online community. Discourse, Context & Media, 36, 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S., Trott, V., & Jones, C. (2020). ‘The pussy ain’t worth it, bro’: Assessing the discourse and structure of MGTOW. Information, Communication & Society, 23(6), 908925. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1751867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book complies with version 2.1 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved user experiences and achieves the intermediate (AA) level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×