Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-gbqfq Total loading time: 0.595 Render date: 2022-05-29T13:02:56.782Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

10 - Genetics of Animal Domestication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Paul Gepts
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Thomas R. Famula
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Robert L. Bettinger
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Stephen B. Brush
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Ardeshir B. Damania
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Patrick E. McGuire
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Calvin O. Qualset
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Get access

Summary

Domestic animals show an amazing phenotypic diversity in form, color, behavior, and as regards their adaptation to various environments and production systems (Figure 10.1). Domestication took place 5,000 to 10,000 years ago for the major species of domestic animals and probably even earlier than that for the dog. It is now an exciting time for studying the evolutionary history of animal domestication thanks to the development of powerful tools for genetic analysis. We are now in a position where we can identify major genetic changes associated with domestication. This research is not only of interest for its own sake but it is also of general interest as a model for evolutionary biology and it will lead to new knowledge concerning gene function and genotype–phenotype relationships of interest for human medicine. Considerable progress has been made in the past 10 years as regards when and where animal domestications took place (Giuffra et al. 2000, Vilà et al. 2001, Savolainen et al. 2002, Bruford et al. 2003, Larson et al. 2005). However, the aim of this paper is to discuss how the genetic basis for phenotypic evolution in domestic animals can be revealed and how far we have come in this process and to give two examples where the alleles underlying phenotypic traits not present in the wild ancestor have been identified.

Most genetic diversity pre-dates domestication

A common misconception about domestic animals is that they are highly inbred. That is true if one considers certain breeds; in particular, the dog is subdivided into many small populations that are more or less inbred. However, across populations of domestic animals there is an extensive amount of genetic diversity at the DNA level. For instance, a pair of chicken chromosomes shows on average 5 sequence differences per 1,000 base pairs (International Chicken Polymorphism Map Consortium 2004). The corresponding figure for humans is only 1 difference per 1,000 base pairs. Other species of domestic animals show nucleotide sequence diversities in the same range as humans do.

Type
Chapter
Information
Biodiversity in Agriculture
Domestication, Evolution, and Sustainability
, pp. 260 - 274
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, LGeorges, M 2004 Domestic animal genomics: Deciphering the genetics of complex traitsNature Reviews Genetics 5 202CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersson, LHaley, CSEllegren, H 1994 Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for growth and fatness in pigsScience 263 1771CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bateson, W. 1902 Experiments with poultryReports to the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society 1 87Google Scholar
Berg, FStern, SAndersson, KAndersson, LMoller, M 2006 Refined localization of the FAT1 quantitative trait locus on pig chromosome 4 by marker-assisted backcrossingBMC Genetics 7 17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blount, JD. 2004 Carotenoids and life-history evolution in animalsArchives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 430 10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blount, JDMetcalfe, NBBirkhead, TRSurai, PF 2003 Carotenoid modulation of immune function and sexual attractiveness in zebra finchesScience 300 125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruford, MWBradley, DGLuikart, G 2003 DNA markers reveal the complexity of livestock domesticationNature Reviews Genetics 4 900CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlborg, ÖKerje, SSchütz, K 2003 A global search reveals epistatic interaction between QTLs for early growth in the chickenGenome Research 13 413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 1868 The Variation of Animals and Plants under DomesticationLondonJohn MurrayGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, JLarson, GGunnarsson, U 2008 Identification of the yellow skin gene reveals a hybrid origin of the domestic chickenPLoS Genetics 4 e1000010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fang, MAndersson, L 2006 Mitochondrial diversity in European and Chinese pigs is consistent with population expansions that occurred prior to domesticationProceedings of the Royal Society B 273 1803CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fang, MLarson, GSoares Ribeiro, HLi, NAndersson, L 2009 Contrasting mode of evolution at a coat color locus in wild and domestic pigsPLoS Genetics 5 e1000341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuffra, EKijas, JMHAmarger, V 2000 The origin of the domestic pig: independent domestication and subsequent introgressionGenetics 154 1785Google ScholarPubMed
Giuffra, ETörnsten, AMarklund, S 2002 A large duplication associated with Dominant White color in pigs originated by homologous recombination between LINE elements flanking Mammalian Genome 13 569CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunnarsson, UHellström, ARTixier-Boichard, M 2007 Mutations in cause plumage color variation in chicken and Japanese quailGenetics 175 867CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutt, FB. 1949 Genetics of the FowlNew York, NYMcGraw Hill Book CompanyGoogle Scholar
International Chicken Polymorphism Map Consortium 2004 A genetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 million single-nucleotide polymorphismsNature 432 717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeon, J-TCarlborg, ÖTörnsten, A 1999 A paternally expressed QTL affecting skeletal and cardiac muscle mass in pigs maps to the locusNature Genetics 21 157CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johansson, APielberg, GAndersson, LEdfors-Lilja, I 2005 Polymorphism at the porcine Dominant white/KIT locus influence coat colour and peripheral blood cell measuresAnimal Genetics 36 288CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johansson, M.Ellegren, H.Marklund, L. 1992 The gene for dominant white color in the pig is closely linked to and on chromosome 8Genomics 14 965CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keeling, LAndersson, LSchütz, KE 2004 Feather-pecking and victim pigmentationNature 431 645CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerje, SCarlborg, ÖJacobsson, L 2003 The two-fold difference in adult size between the red junglefowl and White Leghorn chickens is largely explained by a limited number of QTLsAnimal Genetics 34 264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerje, SLind, JSchütz, KJensen, PAndersson, L 2003 Melanocortin 1-receptor () mutations are associated with plumage colour in chickenAnimal Genetics 34 241CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerje, S.Sharma, P.Gunnarsson, U. 2004 The , and color variants in chicken are associated with insertion/deletion polymorphisms in the geneGenetics 168 1507CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kijas, JMHAndersson, L 2001 A phylogenetic study of the origin of the domestic pig estimated from the near complete mtDNA genomeJournal of Molecular Evolution 52 302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kijas, JMHMoller, MPlastow, GAndersson, L 2001 A frameshift mutation in and a high frequency of somatic reversions cause black spotting in pigsGenetics 158 779Google Scholar
Larson, GDobney, KAlbarella, U 2005 Worldwide phylogeography of wild boar reveals multiple centres of pig domesticationScience 307 1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marklund, SKijas, JRodriguez-Martinez, H 1998 Molecular basis for the dominant white phenotype in the domestic pigGenome Research 8 826CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pielberg, GOlsson, CSyvänen, A-CAndersson, L 2002 Unexpectedly high allelic diversity at the locus causing dominant white color in the domestic pigGenetics 160 305Google ScholarPubMed
Rosengren Pielberg, GGolovko, ASundström, E 2008 A cis-acting regulatory mutation causes premature hair greying and susceptibility to melanoma in the horseNature Genetics 40 1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, CJBrandstrom, HWright, D 2007 Quantitative trait loci for bone mineral density and bone strength in an intercross between domestic and wild type chickenJournal of Bone and Mineral Research 22 375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savolainen, PZhang, YPLuo, JLundeberg, JLeitner, T 2002 Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin of domestic dogsScience 298 1610CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schütz, KKerje, SJacobsson, L 2004 Major growth QTLs in fowl are related to fearful behavior – possible genetic links between fear responses and production traits in a red junglefowl x White Leghorn intercrossBehavior Genetics 34 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, EMAnderung, CBaubliene, J 2007 Tracing genetic change over time using nuclear SNPs in ancient and modern cattleAnimal Genetics 38 378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Laere, ASNguyen, MBraunschweig, M 2003 A regulatory mutation in causes a major QTL effect on muscle growth in the pigNature 425 832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilà, CLeonard, JAGotherstrom, A 2001 Widespread origins of domestic horse lineagesScience 291 474CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, DKerje, SBrändström, H 2008 The genetic architecture of a female sexual ornamentEvolution 62 86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, DKerje, SLundström, K 2006 Quantitative trait loci analysis of egg and meat production traits in a red junglefowl x White Leghorn crossAnimal Genetics 37 529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×