We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Barnes, J. (1995) The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols. Princeton. [English transl.; the translations of the works of the Organon are all included in vol. 1]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, ed. by Minio-Paluello, L.. Oxford1949. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristote. Catégories, ed. and transl. by Bodéüs, R.. Paris2001. [Edition and French transl.]Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. (1963) Aristotle. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, ed. by Minio-Paluello, L.. Oxford1949. [Edition]Google Scholar
Aristoteles, De interpretatione, ed. by Weidemann, H.. Berlin and Boston2014. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. (1963) Aristotle. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford. [English transl. with notes]Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. (2014) Aristoteles: Peri Hermeneias. 3rd ed.Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Analitica Priora et Posteriora, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford1964. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W.D. (1949) Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Oxford. [Edition with comm.]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1969) Aristotele. Gli Analitici Primi. Naples. [Italian transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1989) Aristotle. Prior Analytics. Indianapolis. [English transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Ebert, T. and Nortmann, U. (2007) Aristoteles. Analytica Priora, Buch I. Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malink, M. and Strobach, N. (2015) Aristoteles. Analytica Priora, Buch II. Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Striker, G. (2009) Aristotle’s Prior Analytics: Book 1. Oxford. [English transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Crubellier, M. (2014) Aristote. Premiers Analytiques. Paris. [French transl. with notes]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Analitica Priora et Posteriora, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford1964. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ross, W.D. (1949) Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Oxford. [Edition with comm.]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1975) L’argomentazione dimostrativa in Aristotele. Padua. [Italian comm. on the first book]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (2007) Aristotele. Gli Analitici secondi. Rome and Bari. [Italian transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993) Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. 2nd ed. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Detel, W. (1993) Aristoteles. Analytica Posteriora. Berlin. [German transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford1958. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristote. Topiques I–IV, texte établi et traduit par J. Brunschwig. Paris1967. [Edition with notes]Google Scholar
Aristote. Topiques V–VIII, texte établi et traduit par J. Brunschwig. Paris2007. [Edition with notes]Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1997) Aristotle. Topics Books I and VIII. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford1958. [Edition]Google Scholar
Aristote. Les Réfutations Sophistiques, ed. by Hecquet, M. Paris, 2019. [Edition, French transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. (1995) Aristote. Les refutations sophistiques. Paris and Laval. [French transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2007) Aristotele. Le Confutazioni sofistiche. Rome and Bari. [Italian transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Hasper, P.S. (2013) ‘Aristotle’s Sophistical Refutations: A Translation’, History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis15: 13–54. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W.W., Huby, P.M., Sharples, R.W. and Gutas, D. (1992) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. 2 vols. Leiden and Boston. [Text, English transl. and comm.] (=FHS&G)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, K. (1972) Die Megariker. Kommentierte Sammlung der Testimonien. Amsterdam. [Edition and German comm.]Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (ed.) (1983–90) Socratis et socraticorum reliquiae. 4 vols. Naples. [Text and Italian comm.] (=SSR)Google Scholar
Muller, R. (1985) Les Mégariques. Fragments et témoignages. Paris. [French transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta, ed. by Von Arnim., J. 4 vols. Stuttgart1903–24. [Edition] (=SVF)Google Scholar
Baldassarri, M. (1984–7) La logica stoica. Testimonianze e frammenti. 8 vols. Como. [Texts with Italian transl.]Google Scholar
Hülser, K. (1987–8) Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker. 4 vols. Stuttgart. [Texts with German transl. and notes] (=FDS)Google Scholar
Long, A.A. and Sedley, D.N. (eds.) (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge. [Selection of texts with English transl. and comm.] (=L&S)Google Scholar
De Lacy, P.H. and De Lacy, E.A. (1985) On Methods of Inference (De signis). Naples. [Edition, English transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Institutio Logica, ed. by Kalbfleisch, K.. Leipzig1896. [Edition]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. and Morison, B. (forthcoming) Galen: Introduction to Logic. 2 vols. Oxford. [Edition, English transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Galeni libellus de captionibus quae per dictionem fiunt, ed. by Gabler, K.. Rostock1903. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1981) De Captionibus, in Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle’s Sophistici Elenchi. 3 vols. Leiden: vol. 2: pp. 1–26. [Edition]Google Scholar
Edlow, R.B. (1977) Galen on Language and Ambiguity. Leiden. [Intr., text and transl.]Google Scholar
Schiaparelli, A. (2002) Galeno e le fallacie linguistiche. Il De captionibus in dictione. Venice. [Text with Italian transl. and notes]Google Scholar
Peri Hermeneias, in Apuleius, De Philosophia libri, ed. by Moreschini, C.. Stuttgart and Leipzig1991. [Edition]Google Scholar
Londey, D. and Johanson, C. (1987) The Logic of Apuleius. Leiden and New York. [Intr., text, and comm.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critical editions in the series Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca(=CAG).Google Scholar
ACA indicates the English translations, with notes, in the series Ancient Commentators on Aristotle directed by R. Sorabji and M. Griffin and published by Duckworth and Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Commentary on the First Book of Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin1883 (CAG II.1). [Edition]Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Bobzien, S., Flannery, K. and Ierodiakonou, K. (1991) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.1–7. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. with Gould, J. (1999) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.8–13. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. with Gould, J. (1999) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.14–22. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (2006) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.23–31. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (2006) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.32–46. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on the Eight Books of Aristotle’s Topics, ed. by Wallies, M. Berlin1891 (CAG II.2). [Edition]Google Scholar
Van Ophuijsen, J.M. (2000) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 1. [ACA]Google Scholar
Castelli, L. (2020) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 2. [ACA]Google Scholar
Castelli, L. (2021) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 3. [ACA]Google Scholar
Isagoge and Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Busse, M. Berlin1887 (CAG IV.1). [Edition]Google Scholar
Commentaire aux Catégories d’Aristote, ed. by Bodéüs, R. Paris2008. [Edition with a French transl.]Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1992) Porphyry. On Aristotle Categories. [ACA]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2003) Porphyry. Introduction. Oxford. [English transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s De interpretatione, ed. by Busse, A.. Berlin1897 (CAG IV.5).Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s First Book of the Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin1899 (CAG IV.6).Google Scholar
Matthews, G. and Cohen, M. (1991) Ammonius. On Aristotle Categories. [ACA]Google Scholar
Blank, D. (1996) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 1–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
Blank, D. and Kretzmann, N. (1998) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. With Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Busse, A.. Berlin1898 (CAG XIII.1).Google Scholar
Sirkel, R., Tweedale, M. and Harris, J. (2015) Philoponus. On Aristotle Categories 1–5. [ACA]Google Scholar
Share, M. (2019) Philoponus. On Aristotle Categories 6–15. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin1905 (CAG XIII.2).Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin1909 (CAG XIII.3).Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (2008) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.1–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (2012) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.9–18. [ACA]Google Scholar
Goldin, O. and Martijn, M. (2012) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.19–34. [ACA]Google Scholar
Goldin, O. (2009) Philoponus(?). On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 2. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Kalbfleisch, C, Berlin1907 (CAG VIII).Google Scholar
Chase, M. (2003) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 1–4. [ACA]Google Scholar
de Haas, F. and Fleet, B. (2001) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 5–6. [ACA]Google Scholar
Fleet, B. (2002) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 7–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. (2000) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 9–15. [ACA]Google Scholar
Manlii Severini Boetii opera omnia (Patrologia Latina 64), ed. by Migne, J.-P.. Paris1847.Google Scholar
Anicii Manlii Severini Boetii commentarii in librum Aristotelis ΠEPI EPMHNEIAS, ed. by Meiser, C. 2 vols. Leipzig1877–80. [Edition of Boethius’ two commentaries on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione]Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2010) Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 1–3. [ACA. Partial translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2011) Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 4–6. [ACA. Partial translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Blank, D. and Kretzmann, N. (1998) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. With Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. [ACA. Partial Translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Boethius. De hypotheticis syllogismis, ed. by Obertello, L. Brescia1969. [Edition and Italian transl.]Google Scholar
Stump, E. (1978) Boethius. De topicis differentiis. Ithaca, NY and London. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Stump, E. (1988) Boethius. In Ciceronis Topica, Ithaca, NY and London. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Magee, J. (1998) Boethius. De divisione. Leiden and Boston. [Edition and English transl.]Google Scholar
Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2008) Boethius. De syllogismo categorico. Gothenburg. [Edition]Google Scholar
Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2008) Boethius. Introductio ad syllogismos categoricos. Gothenburg. [Edition]Google Scholar
Procli Diadochi In primum Euclidis Elementorum Librum Commentaria, ed. by Friedlein, G. Leipzig1873. [Edition]Google Scholar
Morrow, G. (1992) Proclus. A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Princeton 1992. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1995) The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols. Princeton. [English transl.; the translations of the works of the Organon are all included in vol. 1]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, ed. by Minio-Paluello, L.. Oxford1949. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristote. Catégories, ed. and transl. by Bodéüs, R.. Paris2001. [Edition and French transl.]Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. (1963) Aristotle. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, ed. by Minio-Paluello, L.. Oxford1949. [Edition]Google Scholar
Aristoteles, De interpretatione, ed. by Weidemann, H.. Berlin and Boston2014. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. (1963) Aristotle. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford. [English transl. with notes]Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. (2014) Aristoteles: Peri Hermeneias. 3rd ed.Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Analitica Priora et Posteriora, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford1964. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W.D. (1949) Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Oxford. [Edition with comm.]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1969) Aristotele. Gli Analitici Primi. Naples. [Italian transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1989) Aristotle. Prior Analytics. Indianapolis. [English transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Ebert, T. and Nortmann, U. (2007) Aristoteles. Analytica Priora, Buch I. Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malink, M. and Strobach, N. (2015) Aristoteles. Analytica Priora, Buch II. Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Striker, G. (2009) Aristotle’s Prior Analytics: Book 1. Oxford. [English transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Crubellier, M. (2014) Aristote. Premiers Analytiques. Paris. [French transl. with notes]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Analitica Priora et Posteriora, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford1964. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ross, W.D. (1949) Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Oxford. [Edition with comm.]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1975) L’argomentazione dimostrativa in Aristotele. Padua. [Italian comm. on the first book]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (2007) Aristotele. Gli Analitici secondi. Rome and Bari. [Italian transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993) Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. 2nd ed. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Detel, W. (1993) Aristoteles. Analytica Posteriora. Berlin. [German transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford1958. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristote. Topiques I–IV, texte établi et traduit par J. Brunschwig. Paris1967. [Edition with notes]Google Scholar
Aristote. Topiques V–VIII, texte établi et traduit par J. Brunschwig. Paris2007. [Edition with notes]Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1997) Aristotle. Topics Books I and VIII. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford1958. [Edition]Google Scholar
Aristote. Les Réfutations Sophistiques, ed. by Hecquet, M. Paris, 2019. [Edition, French transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. (1995) Aristote. Les refutations sophistiques. Paris and Laval. [French transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2007) Aristotele. Le Confutazioni sofistiche. Rome and Bari. [Italian transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Hasper, P.S. (2013) ‘Aristotle’s Sophistical Refutations: A Translation’, History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis15: 13–54. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1995) The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols. Princeton. [English transl.; the translations of the works of the Organon are all included in vol. 1]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, ed. by Minio-Paluello, L.. Oxford1949. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristote. Catégories, ed. and transl. by Bodéüs, R.. Paris2001. [Edition and French transl.]Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. (1963) Aristotle. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione, ed. by Minio-Paluello, L.. Oxford1949. [Edition]Google Scholar
Aristoteles, De interpretatione, ed. by Weidemann, H.. Berlin and Boston2014. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. (1963) Aristotle. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford. [English transl. with notes]Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. (2014) Aristoteles: Peri Hermeneias. 3rd ed.Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Analitica Priora et Posteriora, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford1964. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W.D. (1949) Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Oxford. [Edition with comm.]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1969) Aristotele. Gli Analitici Primi. Naples. [Italian transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1989) Aristotle. Prior Analytics. Indianapolis. [English transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Ebert, T. and Nortmann, U. (2007) Aristoteles. Analytica Priora, Buch I. Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malink, M. and Strobach, N. (2015) Aristoteles. Analytica Priora, Buch II. Berlin. [German transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Striker, G. (2009) Aristotle’s Prior Analytics: Book 1. Oxford. [English transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Crubellier, M. (2014) Aristote. Premiers Analytiques. Paris. [French transl. with notes]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Analitica Priora et Posteriora, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford1964. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ross, W.D. (1949) Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Oxford. [Edition with comm.]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1975) L’argomentazione dimostrativa in Aristotele. Padua. [Italian comm. on the first book]Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (2007) Aristotele. Gli Analitici secondi. Rome and Bari. [Italian transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993) Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. 2nd ed. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Detel, W. (1993) Aristoteles. Analytica Posteriora. Berlin. [German transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford1958. [Edition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristote. Topiques I–IV, texte établi et traduit par J. Brunschwig. Paris1967. [Edition with notes]Google Scholar
Aristote. Topiques V–VIII, texte établi et traduit par J. Brunschwig. Paris2007. [Edition with notes]Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1997) Aristotle. Topics Books I and VIII. Oxford. [English transl. with comm.]Google Scholar
Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi, ed. by Ross, W.D.. Oxford1958. [Edition]Google Scholar
Aristote. Les Réfutations Sophistiques, ed. by Hecquet, M. Paris, 2019. [Edition, French transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. (1995) Aristote. Les refutations sophistiques. Paris and Laval. [French transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2007) Aristotele. Le Confutazioni sofistiche. Rome and Bari. [Italian transl. with intr. and comm.]Google Scholar
Hasper, P.S. (2013) ‘Aristotle’s Sophistical Refutations: A Translation’, History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis15: 13–54. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W.W., Huby, P.M., Sharples, R.W. and Gutas, D. (1992) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. 2 vols. Leiden and Boston. [Text, English transl. and comm.] (=FHS&G)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, K. (1972) Die Megariker. Kommentierte Sammlung der Testimonien. Amsterdam. [Edition and German comm.]Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G. (ed.) (1983–90) Socratis et socraticorum reliquiae. 4 vols. Naples. [Text and Italian comm.] (=SSR)Google Scholar
Muller, R. (1985) Les Mégariques. Fragments et témoignages. Paris. [French transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta, ed. by Von Arnim., J. 4 vols. Stuttgart1903–24. [Edition] (=SVF)Google Scholar
Baldassarri, M. (1984–7) La logica stoica. Testimonianze e frammenti. 8 vols. Como. [Texts with Italian transl.]Google Scholar
Hülser, K. (1987–8) Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker. 4 vols. Stuttgart. [Texts with German transl. and notes] (=FDS)Google Scholar
Long, A.A. and Sedley, D.N. (eds.) (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge. [Selection of texts with English transl. and comm.] (=L&S)Google Scholar
De Lacy, P.H. and De Lacy, E.A. (1985) On Methods of Inference (De signis). Naples. [Edition, English transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Institutio Logica, ed. by Kalbfleisch, K.. Leipzig1896. [Edition]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. and Morison, B. (forthcoming) Galen: Introduction to Logic. 2 vols. Oxford. [Edition, English transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Galeni libellus de captionibus quae per dictionem fiunt, ed. by Gabler, K.. Rostock1903. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1981) De Captionibus, in Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle’s Sophistici Elenchi. 3 vols. Leiden: vol. 2: pp. 1–26. [Edition]Google Scholar
Edlow, R.B. (1977) Galen on Language and Ambiguity. Leiden. [Intr., text and transl.]Google Scholar
Schiaparelli, A. (2002) Galeno e le fallacie linguistiche. Il De captionibus in dictione. Venice. [Text with Italian transl. and notes]Google Scholar
Institutio Logica, ed. by Kalbfleisch, K.. Leipzig1896. [Edition]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. and Morison, B. (forthcoming) Galen: Introduction to Logic. 2 vols. Oxford. [Edition, English transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Galeni libellus de captionibus quae per dictionem fiunt, ed. by Gabler, K.. Rostock1903. [Edition]Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1981) De Captionibus, in Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle’s Sophistici Elenchi. 3 vols. Leiden: vol. 2: pp. 1–26. [Edition]Google Scholar
Edlow, R.B. (1977) Galen on Language and Ambiguity. Leiden. [Intr., text and transl.]Google Scholar
Schiaparelli, A. (2002) Galeno e le fallacie linguistiche. Il De captionibus in dictione. Venice. [Text with Italian transl. and notes]Google Scholar
Peri Hermeneias, in Apuleius, De Philosophia libri, ed. by Moreschini, C.. Stuttgart and Leipzig1991. [Edition]Google Scholar
Londey, D. and Johanson, C. (1987) The Logic of Apuleius. Leiden and New York. [Intr., text, and comm.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critical editions in the series Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca(=CAG).Google Scholar
ACA indicates the English translations, with notes, in the series Ancient Commentators on Aristotle directed by R. Sorabji and M. Griffin and published by Duckworth and Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Commentary on the First Book of Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin1883 (CAG II.1). [Edition]Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Bobzien, S., Flannery, K. and Ierodiakonou, K. (1991) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.1–7. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. with Gould, J. (1999) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.8–13. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. with Gould, J. (1999) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.14–22. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (2006) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.23–31. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (2006) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.32–46. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on the Eight Books of Aristotle’s Topics, ed. by Wallies, M. Berlin1891 (CAG II.2). [Edition]Google Scholar
Van Ophuijsen, J.M. (2000) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 1. [ACA]Google Scholar
Castelli, L. (2020) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 2. [ACA]Google Scholar
Castelli, L. (2021) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 3. [ACA]Google Scholar
Isagoge and Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Busse, M. Berlin1887 (CAG IV.1). [Edition]Google Scholar
Commentaire aux Catégories d’Aristote, ed. by Bodéüs, R. Paris2008. [Edition with a French transl.]Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1992) Porphyry. On Aristotle Categories. [ACA]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2003) Porphyry. Introduction. Oxford. [English transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s De interpretatione, ed. by Busse, A.. Berlin1897 (CAG IV.5).Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s First Book of the Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin1899 (CAG IV.6).Google Scholar
Matthews, G. and Cohen, M. (1991) Ammonius. On Aristotle Categories. [ACA]Google Scholar
Blank, D. (1996) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 1–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
Blank, D. and Kretzmann, N. (1998) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. With Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Busse, A.. Berlin1898 (CAG XIII.1).Google Scholar
Sirkel, R., Tweedale, M. and Harris, J. (2015) Philoponus. On Aristotle Categories 1–5. [ACA]Google Scholar
Share, M. (2019) Philoponus. On Aristotle Categories 6–15. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin1905 (CAG XIII.2).Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin1909 (CAG XIII.3).Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (2008) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.1–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (2012) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.9–18. [ACA]Google Scholar
Goldin, O. and Martijn, M. (2012) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.19–34. [ACA]Google Scholar
Goldin, O. (2009) Philoponus(?). On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 2. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Kalbfleisch, C, Berlin1907 (CAG VIII).Google Scholar
Chase, M. (2003) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 1–4. [ACA]Google Scholar
de Haas, F. and Fleet, B. (2001) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 5–6. [ACA]Google Scholar
Fleet, B. (2002) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 7–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. (2000) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 9–15. [ACA]Google Scholar
Manlii Severini Boetii opera omnia (Patrologia Latina 64), ed. by Migne, J.-P.. Paris1847.Google Scholar
Anicii Manlii Severini Boetii commentarii in librum Aristotelis ΠEPI EPMHNEIAS, ed. by Meiser, C. 2 vols. Leipzig1877–80. [Edition of Boethius’ two commentaries on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione]Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2010) Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 1–3. [ACA. Partial translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2011) Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 4–6. [ACA. Partial translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Blank, D. and Kretzmann, N. (1998) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. With Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. [ACA. Partial Translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Boethius. De hypotheticis syllogismis, ed. by Obertello, L. Brescia1969. [Edition and Italian transl.]Google Scholar
Stump, E. (1978) Boethius. De topicis differentiis. Ithaca, NY and London. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Stump, E. (1988) Boethius. In Ciceronis Topica, Ithaca, NY and London. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Magee, J. (1998) Boethius. De divisione. Leiden and Boston. [Edition and English transl.]Google Scholar
Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2008) Boethius. De syllogismo categorico. Gothenburg. [Edition]Google Scholar
Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2008) Boethius. Introductio ad syllogismos categoricos. Gothenburg. [Edition]Google Scholar
Procli Diadochi In primum Euclidis Elementorum Librum Commentaria, ed. by Friedlein, G. Leipzig1873. [Edition]Google Scholar
Morrow, G. (1992) Proclus. A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Princeton 1992. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Commentary on the First Book of Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin1883 (CAG II.1). [Edition]Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Bobzien, S., Flannery, K. and Ierodiakonou, K. (1991) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.1–7. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. with Gould, J. (1999) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.8–13. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. with Gould, J. (1999) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.14–22. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (2006) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.23–31. [ACA]Google Scholar
Mueller, I. (2006) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.32–46. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on the Eight Books of Aristotle’s Topics, ed. by Wallies, M. Berlin1891 (CAG II.2). [Edition]Google Scholar
Van Ophuijsen, J.M. (2000) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 1. [ACA]Google Scholar
Castelli, L. (2020) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 2. [ACA]Google Scholar
Castelli, L. (2021) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Aristotle Topics 3. [ACA]Google Scholar
Isagoge and Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Busse, M. Berlin1887 (CAG IV.1). [Edition]Google Scholar
Commentaire aux Catégories d’Aristote, ed. by Bodéüs, R. Paris2008. [Edition with a French transl.]Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1992) Porphyry. On Aristotle Categories. [ACA]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2003) Porphyry. Introduction. Oxford. [English transl. and comm.]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s De interpretatione, ed. by Busse, A.. Berlin1897 (CAG IV.5).Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s First Book of the Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin1899 (CAG IV.6).Google Scholar
Matthews, G. and Cohen, M. (1991) Ammonius. On Aristotle Categories. [ACA]Google Scholar
Blank, D. (1996) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 1–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
Blank, D. and Kretzmann, N. (1998) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. With Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Busse, A.. Berlin1898 (CAG XIII.1).Google Scholar
Sirkel, R., Tweedale, M. and Harris, J. (2015) Philoponus. On Aristotle Categories 1–5. [ACA]Google Scholar
Share, M. (2019) Philoponus. On Aristotle Categories 6–15. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Prior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin1905 (CAG XIII.2).Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, ed. by Wallies, M.. Berlin1909 (CAG XIII.3).Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (2008) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.1–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (2012) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.9–18. [ACA]Google Scholar
Goldin, O. and Martijn, M. (2012) Philoponus. On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 1.19–34. [ACA]Google Scholar
Goldin, O. (2009) Philoponus(?). On Aristotle Posterior Analytics 2. [ACA]Google Scholar
Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories, ed. by Kalbfleisch, C, Berlin1907 (CAG VIII).Google Scholar
Chase, M. (2003) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 1–4. [ACA]Google Scholar
de Haas, F. and Fleet, B. (2001) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 5–6. [ACA]Google Scholar
Fleet, B. (2002) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 7–8. [ACA]Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. (2000) Simplicius. On Aristotle Categories 9–15. [ACA]Google Scholar
Manlii Severini Boetii opera omnia (Patrologia Latina 64), ed. by Migne, J.-P.. Paris1847.Google Scholar
Anicii Manlii Severini Boetii commentarii in librum Aristotelis ΠEPI EPMHNEIAS, ed. by Meiser, C. 2 vols. Leipzig1877–80. [Edition of Boethius’ two commentaries on Aristotle’s De Interpretatione]Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2010) Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 1–3. [ACA. Partial translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2011) Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 4–6. [ACA. Partial translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Blank, D. and Kretzmann, N. (1998) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. With Boethius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9. [ACA. Partial Translation of the second commentary]Google Scholar
Boethius. De hypotheticis syllogismis, ed. by Obertello, L. Brescia1969. [Edition and Italian transl.]Google Scholar
Stump, E. (1978) Boethius. De topicis differentiis. Ithaca, NY and London. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Stump, E. (1988) Boethius. In Ciceronis Topica, Ithaca, NY and London. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Magee, J. (1998) Boethius. De divisione. Leiden and Boston. [Edition and English transl.]Google Scholar
Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2008) Boethius. De syllogismo categorico. Gothenburg. [Edition]Google Scholar
Thomsen Thörnqvist, C. (2008) Boethius. Introductio ad syllogismos categoricos. Gothenburg. [Edition]Google Scholar
Procli Diadochi In primum Euclidis Elementorum Librum Commentaria, ed. by Friedlein, G. Leipzig1873. [Edition]Google Scholar
Morrow, G. (1992) Proclus. A Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements. Princeton 1992. [English transl.]Google Scholar
Abbo of Fleury, (1997) De syllogismis hypotheticis, ed. by Schupp, F.. Leiden, New York and Cologne.Google Scholar
Abelard, P. (1970) Dialectica, ed. by de Rijk, L.M.. 2nd ed.Assen.Google Scholar
Abelard, P. (2010) Glossae super peri hermeneias, ed. by Jacobi, K. and Strub, C.. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Acerbi, F. (2003) ‘On the Shoulders of Hipparchus: A Reappraisal of Ancient Greek Combinatorics’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences57: 465–502.Google Scholar
Acerbi, F. (2013) ‘Aristotle and Euclid’s Postulates’, Classical Quarterly63: 680–5.Google Scholar
Acerbi, F. (2021) The Logical Syntax of Greek Mathematics. Berlin.Google Scholar
Achard, G. (1989) Rhétorique À Herennius. Paris.Google Scholar
Ackrill, J.L. (1963) Aristotle. Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford.Google Scholar
Adamson, P. (ed.) (2013) Interpreting Avicenna. Critical Essays. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ademollo, F. (2010) ‘The Principle of Bivalence in De Interpretatione 4’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy38: 97–113.Google Scholar
Ademollo, F. (2015) ‘Names, Verbs and Sentences in Ancient Greek Philosophy’, in Cameron, M and Stainton, R.J. (eds.) Linguistic Content: New Essays on the History of Philosophy of Language. Oxford: 33–54.Google Scholar
Aho, T. and Yrjönsuuri, M. (2009) ‘Late Medieval Logic’, in Haaparanta2009: 11–77.Google Scholar
al-Khūnajī, Afḍal al-Dīn (2010) Kashf al-asrār ʻan ghawāmiḍ al-afkār, ed. by el, K.-Rouyaheb, . Tehran and Berlin.Google Scholar
Alberti, A. (ed.) (1990) Logica, mente e persona. Studi sulla filosofia antica. Florence.Google Scholar
Alessandrelli, M. (2013) Il problema del λεκτόν nello stoicismo antico. Origine e statuto di una nozione controversa. Florence.Google Scholar
Algra, K.A., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (1995) ‘The Development of Aristotle’s Logic: Part of an Account in Outline’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy11: 177–205.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2001) Inferences from Signs: Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence. Oxford.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2007) ‘Rhetoric and Logic’, in Worthington, I. (ed.) A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. Malden, Oxford and Victoria: 350–64.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2011) ‘Syllogism, Demonstration, and Definition in Aristotle’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy40: 63–90.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2014) ‘Aristotle on the Value of “Probability”, Persuasiveness, and Verisimilitude in Rhetorical Argument’, in Wohl, V (ed.) Probabilities, Hypotheticals, and Counterfactuals in Ancient Greek Thought. Cambridge: 47–64.Google Scholar
Allen, J. (2019) ‘Megara and Dialectic’, in Bénatouïl and Ierodiakonou 2019: 17–46.Google Scholar
Alston, W.P. (1996) A Realist Conception of Truth. Ithaca, NY and London.Google Scholar
Anderson, A.R. and Belnap, N.D.Jr. (1975) Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. 1. New Haven.Google Scholar
Angioni, L. (2012) ‘Os, seis requisites das premissa daa demonstracão cientifica em Aristóteles (Segundos Aneliticos I 2)’, Manuscrito35: 7–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angioni, L. and Zuppolini, B. (2019) ‘Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstration and Its Logical and Metaphysical Entanglements’, Manuscrito42: i–ix.Google Scholar
Annas, J. and Barnes, J. (2000) Sextus Empiricus. Outlines of Scepticism, transl. 2nd ed.Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ariew, R. (2011) Descartes among the Scholastics. Leiden.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E.J. (1974) Language and Logic in the Post-Medieval Period. Dordrecht and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E.J. (1978) ‘Multiple Quantification and the Use of Special Quantifiers in Early Sixteenth Century Logic’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic19: 599–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, E.J. (1985) ‘Editor’s Introduction’ to Sanderson, R., Logicae artis compendium. Bologna: ix–lv.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E.J. (2008) ‘Developments in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries’, in Gabbay, D and Woods, J. (eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic. Vol. 2: Mediaeval and Renaissance Logic. Amsterdam: 609–43.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E.J. (2010) ‘Terminist Logic’, in Pasnau, R and van Dyke, C. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: vol. I: 146–58.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E.J. (2015) ‘Logic Teaching at the University of Oxford from the Sixteenth to the Early Eighteenth Century’, Noctua II1–2: 24–62.Google Scholar
Ashworth, E.J. (2016) ‘The Post-Medieval Period’, in Dutilh Novaes and Read 2016: 166–94.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1984) Epicurus’ Scientific Method. Ithaca, NY and New York.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (1996) ‘Epicurean Semiotics’, in Manetti, G (ed.) Knowledge Through Signs. Bologna: 155–86.Google Scholar
Atherton, C. (1988) ‘Hand Over Fist: The Failure of Stoic Rhetoric’, Classical Quarterly38: 392–427.Google Scholar
Atherton, C. (1993) The Stoics on Ambiguity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Auroux, S. (1993) La logique des idées. Montréal and Paris.Google Scholar
Ausland, H.W. (2012) ‘Socratic Induction in Plato and Aristotle’, in Fink 2012: 224–50.Google Scholar
Avicenna, (1973) The Propositional Logic of Avicenna, transl. with note and intr. by Shehaby, N.. Dordrecht and Boston.Google Scholar
Avicenna, (1984) Remarks and Admonitions. Part One: Logic, transl. by Inati, S.. Toronto.Google Scholar
Ayer, A.J. (1940) The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge. New York.Google Scholar
Bailey, D.T.J. (2006) ‘Plato and Aristotle on the Unhypothetical’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy30: 101–26.Google Scholar
Bailey, D.T.J. (2008) ‘Excavating Dissoi Logoi 4’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy35: 249–64.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1969) ‘Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstration’, Phronesis14: 123–52. [Repr. in Barnes 2014a: ch. 7.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1970) ‘Property in Aristotle’s Topics’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie52: 136–55. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 9.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1975) Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, transl. and comm. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1976) ‘Menaechmus and Circular Proof’, Classical Quarterly27: 278–92. [Repr. in Barnes 2014a: ch. 9.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1980) ‘Proof Destroyed’, in Schofield, Burnyeat and Barnes 1980: 161–81. [Repr. in Barnes 2014a: ch. 14.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1981) ‘Proof and the Syllogism’, in Berti 1981: 17–59. [Repr. in Barnes 2014a: ch. 6.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1982) ‘Medicine, Experience and Logic’, in Barnes, Brunschwig, Burnyeat and Schofield 1982: 24–68. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 20.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1983) ‘Terms and Sentences: Theophrastus on Hypothetical Syllogisms’, Proceedings of the British Academy69: 279–326. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 15.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1985), ‘Theophrastus and Hypothetical Syllogistic’, in Wiesener, W. (ed.) Aristoteles Werk und Wirkung. Berlin: 557–76. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 14.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1988) ‘Epicurean Signs’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, s.v.: 91–134. [Repr. in Barnes 2014a: ch. 13.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1990) ‘Logical Form and Logical Matter’, in Alberti, A. (ed.) Logica, mente e persona. Florence: 7–119. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 3]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993a) Aristotle. Posterior Analytics. 2nd ed.Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993b) ‘Meaning, Saying and Thinking’, in Döring and Ebert 1993: 47–61. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 21.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993c) ‘A Big, Big D?’, Classical Review63: 304–6.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1993d) ‘“A Third Sort of Syllogism”: Galen and the Logic of Relations’, in Sharples, R. W. (ed.) Modern Thinkers and Ancient Thinkers. London: 172–94.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1996a) ‘Grammar on Aristotle’s Terms’, in Frede, M. and Striker, G. (eds.) Rationality in Greek Thought. Oxford: 175–302. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 4.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1996b) ‘The Catalogue of Chrysippus’ Logical Works’, in Algra, K. A., van der Horst, P. W. and Runia, D. T. (eds.) Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy. Leiden, New York and Cologne: 169–84.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997a) Logic and the Imperial Stoa. Leiden, New York and Cologne.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997b) ‘Logic in Academica I and the Lucullus’, in Inwood, B. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.) Assent and Argument: Studies in Cicero’s Academic Books. Leiden, New York and Cologne: 140–60. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 2.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997c) ‘Proof and the Syllogistic Figures’, in Günther, H.-C and Rengakos, A. (eds.) Beiträge zur antike Philosophie: Festschrift für Wolfgang Kullmann. Stuttgart: 153–66.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1997d) ‘Roman Aristotle’, in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. (eds.) Philosophia Togata II. Oxford: 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (1999) ‘Aristotle and Stoic Logic’, in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.) Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: 23–53. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 13.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (2005a) ‘Les catégories et les Catégories’, in Bruun, O. and Corti, L. (eds.) Les Catégories et leur histoire. Paris: 11–80. [Repr. in English in Barnes 2012a: ch. 6.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2005b) ‘What Is a Disjunction?’, in Frede, D. and Inwood, B. (eds.) Language and Learning. Cambridge: 274–98. [Repr. in Barnes 2012a: ch. 19.]Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2007) Truth, Etc.: Six Lectures on Ancient Logic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2010) ‘Review of Charles H. Kahn, Essays on Being (2009)’, Mind119: 811–14.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2012a) Logical Matters. Essays in Ancient Philosophy II, ed. by Bonelli, M.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2012b) ‘Syllogistic and the Classification of Predicates’, in Barnes 2012a: 266‒83.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2014a) Proof, Knowledge, and Scepticism. Essays in Ancient Philosophy III, ed. by Bonelli, M., Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2014b) ‘Boethus and Finished Syllogisms’, in Lee, M. (ed.) Strategies of Argument: Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology, and Logic. Oxford: 175–98.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (ed.) (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised English Translation. 2 vols. Princeton.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (ed.) (1995) The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Bobzien, S., Flannery, K. and Ierodiakonou, K. (1991) Alexander of Aphrodisias On Aristotle Prior Analytics I.1–7, transl. London.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Bobzien, S. and Mignucci, M. (1999) ‘Logic’, in Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld and Schofield 1999: 77–176.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M.F. and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1982) Science and Speculation: Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Basso, P. (1999) Filosofia e geometria: Lambert interprete di Euclide. Florence.Google Scholar
Beaney, M. (1996) Frege: Making Sense. London.Google Scholar
Becker, A. (1933) Die Aristotelische Theorie der Möglichkeitsschlüsse. Berlin.Google Scholar
Becker, O. (1956) ‘Über den Κυριεύων λόγος des Diodoros Kronos’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie NS29: 289–304Google Scholar
Becker, O. (1960) ‘Zur Rekonstruktion des Kyrieuon Logos des Diodoros Kronos. Mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Arbeiten von A.N. Prior’, in Derbolav, J. and Nicolin, F. (eds.) Erkenntnis und Verantwortung. Festschrift für Theodor Litt. Düsseldorf: 250–63.Google Scholar
Beere, J. (2019) ‘Faking Wisdom: The Expertise of Sophistic in Plato’s Sophist’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy57: 153–89.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. (2007) ‘Vertus dialectiques et défi sceptique: les stoïciens et les académiciens’, Cahiers Philosophiques de Strasbourg22: 79–108.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.) (2019) Dialectic After Plato and Aristotle. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Beneke, F. (1842) System der Logik als Kunstlehre des Denkens I–I. Berlin.Google Scholar
Benson, H. H. (1989) ‘A Note on Eristic and the Socratic Elenchus’, Journal of the History of Philosophy27: 591–9.Google Scholar
Benson, H. H. (2010) ‘Plato’s Philosophical Method in the Republic: The Divided Line (510b–511d)’, in McPherran, M.L. (ed.) Plato’s Republic: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: 188–208.Google Scholar
Benson, H. H. (2015) Clitophon’s Challenge: Dialectic in Plato’s Meno, Phaedo, and Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar
Berti, E. (ed.) (1981) Aristotle on Science: The ‘Posterior Analytics’. Padua.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (ed.) (2005) Sextus Empiricus. Against the Logicians, transl. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Beziau, J.-Y. (2012) ‘A History of Truth-Values’, in Gabbay, D.M., Pelletier, F.J. and Woods, J. (eds.) Logic: A History of Its Central Concepts. Volume 11 of Gabbay and Woods 2004–14: 235–307.Google Scholar
Bïard, J. (ed.) (2015) Raison et demonstration. Les commentaires médiévaux sur les Seconds analytiques. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Bïard, J. and Mariani Zini, F. (eds.) (2009) Les lieux de l’argumentation: histoire du syllogisme topique d’Aristote à Leibniz. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Bïard, J. and Rosier-Catach, I. (eds.) (2003) La tradition médiévale des catégories (XIIe–XVe siècles). Louvain-la Neuve, Leuven and Paris.Google Scholar
Black, D. (1990) Logic and Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Poetics in Medieval Arabic Philosophy. Leiden, New York, Copenhagen and Cologne.Google Scholar
Blair, J.A. (2012) ‘Informal Logic and Logic’, in Blair, J.A (ed.) Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair. Dordrecht: 119–34.Google Scholar
Blank, D. and Kretzmann, N. (eds.) (1998) Ammonius. On Aristotle On Interpretation 9, with Boethius, On Aristotle On Interpretation 9, transl. London.Google Scholar
Bloch, D. (2012) John of Salisbury on Aristotelian Science. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Blum, P.R. (2012) Studies on Early Modern Aristotelianism. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1986) Die stoische Modallogik. Würzburg.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1993) ‘Chrysippus’ Modal Logic and Its Relation to Philo and Diodorus’, in Döring and Ebert 1993: 63–84.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1996) ‘Stoic Syllogistic’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy14: 133–92.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1997) ‘The Stoics on Hypotheses and Hypothetical Arguments’, Phronesis42: 299–312.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1998) Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1999a) ‘Stoic Logic’, in Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld and Schofield 1999: 92–157.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1999b) ‘Logic: The Megarics’, in Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld and Schofield 1999: 83–92.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2000) ‘Wholly Hypothetical Syllogisms’, Phronesis45: 87–137.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2002a) ‘The Development of Modus Ponens in Antiquity: From Aristotle to 2nd Century AD’, Phronesis47: 359–94.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2002b) ‘Pre-Stoic Hypothetical Syllogistic in Galen’sInstitutio Logica’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies s.v. 77: 57–72.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2002c) ‘Chrysippus and the Epistemic Theory of Vagueness’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society102: 217–38.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2002d) ‘A Greek Parallel to Boethius’ De Hypotheticis Syllogismis’, Mnemosyne55: 285–300.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2003) ‘Logic’, in Inwood 2003: 85–123.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2004) ‘Peripatetic Hypothetical Syllogistic in Galen – Propositional Logic off the Rails?’, Rhizai2: 57–102.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2005) ‘The Stoics on Fallacies of Equivocation’, in Frede, D and Inwood, B. (eds.) Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge: 239–73.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2011) ‘The Combinatorics of Stoic Conjunction: Hipparchus Refuted, Chrysippus Vindicated’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy40: 157–88.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2013) ‘How to Give Someone Horns’, History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis15: 159–84.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2019) ‘Stoic Sequent Logic and Proof Theory’, History and Philosophy of Logic40: 234–65.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2020a) ‘Ancient Logic’, in Zalta, E.N. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2020b) ‘Demonstration and the Indemonstrability of the Stoic Indemonstrables’, Phronesis65: 355–78.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (2021) ‘Frege Plagiarized the Stoics’, in Leigh, F (ed.) Themes in Plato, Aristotle, and Hellenistic Philosophy. London: 149–206.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. and Shogry, S. (2020) ‘Stoic Logic and Multiple Generality’, Philosophers’ Imprint20.Google Scholar
Bocheński, I.M. (1947) La logique de Théophraste. Fribourg.Google Scholar
Bocheński, I.M. (1951) Ancient Formal Logic. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bocheński, I.M. (1956) Formale Logik. Freiburg and Munich.Google Scholar
Boethius (1969) De hypotheticis syllogismis, ed. by Obertello, L.. Brescia.Google Scholar
Boger, G. (2004) ‘Aristotle’s Underlying Logic’, in Gabbay and Woods 2004: 101–46.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. (1990) ‘The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic’, in Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.) Biologie, logique, et métaphysique chez Aristote. Paris: 185–236.Google Scholar
Bolzano, B. (1929) Wissenschaftslehre. 4 vols. 2nd ed.Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bolzano, B. (2014) Theory of Science, transl. by George, R. and Rusnock, P.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bonevac, D. (2012) ‘A History of Quantification’, in Gabbay, D.M, Pelletier, F.J and Woods, J. (eds.) Logic: A History of Its Central Concepts, vol. 11 of Gabbay and Woods 2004–14: 63–126.Google Scholar
Bonevac, D. and Dever, J. (2012) ‘A History of the Connectives’, in Gabbay, D.M., Pelletier, F.J. and Woods, J. (eds.) Logic: A History of Its Central Concepts, vol. 11 of Gabbay and Woods 2004–14: 175–233.Google Scholar
Bonjour, L. (1985) The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bonomi, A. and Zucchi, A. (2001) Tempo e linguaggio. Introduzione alla semantica del tempo e dell’aspetto verbale. Milano.Google Scholar
Boole, G. (1847) The Mathematical Analysis of Logic: Being an Essay Towards a Calculus of Deductive Reasoning. Cambridge and London.Google Scholar
Boole, G. (1854) An Investigation of the Laws of Thought, On Which Are Founded the Mathematical Theories of Logic and Probabilities. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boolos, G. (1994) ‘1879?’, in Hale, B. and Clark, P. (eds.) Reading Putnam. Oxford: 31–48.Google Scholar
Botting, D. (2013) ‘What Is a Sophistical Refutation?’, Argumentation26: 213–23.Google Scholar
Bowen, A. and Todd, R. (2004) Cleomedes’ Lectures on Astronomy: A Translation of The Heavens. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bowen, A.C. (1983) ‘Menaechmus versus the Platonists: Two Theories of Science in the Early Academy’, Ancient Philosophy3: 13–29.Google Scholar
Bown, A. (2016a) ‘Epicurus on Truth and Falsehood’, Phronesis51: 463–503.Google Scholar
Bown, A. (2016b) ‘Epicurus on Bivalence and the Excluded Middle’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie98: 239–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys-Stones, G.R. (2018) Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to AD 250: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Braakhuis, H.A.G. and Kneepkens, C.H. (eds.) (2003) Aristotle’s Peri Hermeneias in the Latin Middle Ages. Essays on the Commentary Tradition. Groningen and Haren.Google Scholar
Brandis, C. (1835) ‘Über die Reihenfolge der Bücher des Aristotelischen Organons und ihre Griechischen Ausleger, nebst Beiträgen zur Geschichte des Textes jener Bücher des Aristoteles und ihrer Ausgaben’, in Historisch-Philologische Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (Jahr 1833). Berlin.Google Scholar
Brandwood, L. (1990) The Chronology of Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breger, H. (2008) ‘The Art of Mathematical Rationality’, in Dascal, M. (ed.) Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist?Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York and London: 141–52.Google Scholar
Brenner, H. (2000), ‘Eine vollständige Formalisierung der aristotelischen Notwendigkeitssyllogistik’, in Öffenberger, N and Skarica, M. (eds.) Beiträge zum Satz vom Widerspruch und zur Aristotelischen Prädikationstheorie. Hildesheim: 333–56.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1924–5) Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt I–II, ed. by Kraus, O. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. (1956) Die Lehre vom richtigen Urteil, ed. by Mayer-Hillebrand, F.. Bern.Google Scholar
Broadie, A. (1985) The Circle of John Mair: Logic and Logicians in Pre-Reformation Scotland. Oxford.Google Scholar
Broadie, A. (1993) Introduction to Medieval Logic. 2nd ed.Oxford.Google Scholar
Brock, S. (1993) ‘The Syriac Commentary Tradition’, in Burnett 1993: 3–15.Google Scholar
Bronowski, A. (2019) The Stoics on Lekta: All There Is to Say. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bronstein, D. (2012) ‘The Origin and Aim of Posterior Analytics II.19’, Phronesis57: 29–62.Google Scholar
Bronstein, D. (2016) Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brown, L. (1994) ‘The Verb to Be in Greek Philosophy: Some Remarks’, in Everson, S. (ed.) Language. Cambridge: 211–36.Google Scholar
Brown, L. (2008) ‘The Sophist on Statements, Predication, and Falsehood’, in Fine, G. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Plato. Oxford: 437–62.Google Scholar
Brown, L. (2010) ‘Definition and Division in the Sophist’, in Charles, D. (ed.) Ancient Theories of Definition. Oxford: 151–71.Google Scholar
Brown, L. (2018) ‘Rethinking Agreement in Plato’, in Brink, D.O., Sauvé Meyer, S. and Shields, C. (eds.) Virtue, Happiness, Knowledge: Themes from the Work of Gail Fine and Terence Irwin. Oxford: 18–32.Google Scholar
Brundell, B. (1987) Pierre Gassendi. From Aristotelianism to a New Natural Philosophy. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Brungs, A., Kapriev, G. and Mudroch, V. (eds.) (2019) Die Philosophie des MittelaltersI:Byzanz. Judentum. Basel.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1967) Aristote. Topiques I–IV, ed. and transl. Paris.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1969) ‘La proposition particulière et les preuves de non-concluance chez Aristote’, Cahiers pour l’Analyse10: 3–26.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1980) ‘Proof Defined’, in Schofield, Burnyeat and Barnes 1980: 125–60.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1986) ‘Sur le système des “prédicables” dans les Topiques d’Aristote’, in Energeia. Etudes aristotéliciennes offertes à Mgr Antonio Jannone, Paris: 145–57.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1989) ‘L’Organon, Tradition Grecque’, in Goulet, R. (ed.) Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques. Paris: 482–502.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1994) ‘Remarks on the Classification of Simple Propositions in Hellenistic Logics’, in Brunschwig, J, Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: 57–71.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (2007) Aristote. Topiques V–VIII, ed. and transl. Paris.Google Scholar
Bruun, O. and Corti, L. (eds.) (2005) Les Catégories et leur histoire. Paris.Google Scholar
Bruyère, N. (1984) Méthode et dialectique dans l’oeuvre de Pierre de La Ramée. Paris.Google Scholar
Bueno, A.A. (1988) ‘Aristotle, the Fallacy of Accident, and the Nature of Predication: A Historical Inquiry’, Journal of the History of Philosophy26: 5–24.Google Scholar
Buickerood, J.G. (1985) ‘The Natural History of the Understanding: Locke and the Rise of Facultative Logic in the Eighteenth Century’, History and Philosophy of Logic6: 157–90.Google Scholar
Buridan, J. (1976) Tractatus de consequentiis, ed. by Hubien, H.. Louvain and Paris.Google Scholar
Burleigh, W. (1955) De puritate artis logicae. Tractatus longior. With a revised edition of the Tractatus Brevior, ed. by Boehner, P. St Bonaventure, Louvain and Paderborn.Google Scholar
Burnett, C. (ed.) (1993) Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts. The Syriac, Arabic and Medieval Latin Traditions. London.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (1981) ‘Aristotle on Understanding Knowledge’, in Berti 1981: 97–139. [Repr. in Burnyeat 2012: vol. 2, ch. 6.]Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (1982a) ‘Gods and Heaps’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. (eds.) Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: 315–38. [Repr. in Burnyeat 2012: vol. 1, ch. 5.]Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (1982b) ‘The Origins of Non-deductive Inference’, in Barnes, Brunschwig, Burnyeat and Schofield 1982: 193–238. [Repr. in Burnyeat 2012: vol. 1, ch. 6.]Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (1987) ‘Platonism and Mathematics: A Prelude to Discussion’, in Graeser, A. (ed.) Mathematics and Metaphysics in Aristotle. Bern: 213–40. [Repr. in Burnyeat 2012: vol. 2, ch. 7.]Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (1994) ‘Enthymeme: Aristotle on the Logic of Persuasion’, in Furley, D.J. and Nehamas, A. (eds.) Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Philosophical Essays. Princeton: 3–55. [Repr. in Burnyeat 2012: vol. 1, ch. 7.]Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (1996) ‘Enthymeme: Aristotle on the Rationality of Rhetoric’, in Rorty, A.O. (ed.) Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: 88–115.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (1998) ‘Dissoi Logoi’, in Craig, E. (ed.) The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: vol. 3, 106–7. [Repr. in Burnyeat 2012: vol. 1, ch. 13.]Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (2002) ‘Plato on How Not to Speak of What Is Not: Euthydemus 283a–288a’, in Canto-Sperber and Pellegrin 2002: 40–66.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (2011) ‘Episteme’, in Morison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.) Episteme, etc. Oxford: 3–29.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. (2012) Explorations in Ancient and Modern Philosophy. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bury, R.G. (ed.) (1935) Sextus Empiricus. Against the Logicians. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bydén, B. and Ierodiakonou, K. (2012), ‘Greek Philosophy’, in Marenbon 2012: 29–57.Google Scholar
Calzolari, V. (2009) ‘David et la tradition arménienne’, in Calzolari and Barnes 2009 : 15–36.Google Scholar
Calzolari, V. and Barnes, J. (eds.) (2009) L’oeuvre de David l’Invincible et la transmission de la pensée grecque dans la tradition arménienne et syriaque. Commentaria in Aristotelem Armeniaca – Davidis opera 1, Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Cameron, M. and Marenbon, J. (eds.) (2010) Aristotelian Logic East and West, 500–1500: On Interpretation and Prior Analytics in two traditions = Vivarium 48, 1–2.Google Scholar
Canto-Sperber, M. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.) (2002) Le style de la pensée. Paris.Google Scholar
Caplan, H. (1954) [Cicero]. Rhetorica Ad Herennium. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Capozzi, M. (1990) ‘Editor’s Introduction’ to Segner, J.A, Specimen logicae universaliter demonstratae. Bologna: xi–clxxii.Google Scholar
Capozzi, M. (2002) Kant e la logica, vol. 1. Naples. [Reprint 2013.]Google Scholar
Capozzi, M. (2006) ‘Kant on Heuristics as a Desirable Addition to Logic’, in Cellucci, C. and Pecere, P. (eds.) Demonstrative and Non-Demonstrative Reasoning in Mathematics and Natural Science. Cassino: 123–81.Google Scholar
Capozzi, M. (2011) ‘The Cognitive Importance of Sight and Hearing in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Logic’, in Cellucci, C., Grosholz, E. and Ippoliti, E. (eds.) Logic and Knowledge. Newcastle upon Tyne: 3–25.Google Scholar
Capozzi, M. (2020) ‘Wahrscheinlichkeit and Scheinbarkeit. A Key Issue in Kant’s Logic and Philosophy’, in Schlüter, G. (ed.) Kants Philosophie in Übersetzungen = Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte, Sonderheft 15: 513–33.Google Scholar
Capozzi, M. and Roncaglia, G. (2009) ‘Logic and Philosophy of Logic from Humanism to Kant’, in Haaparanta2009: 78–158.Google Scholar
Casari, E. (1958) ‘Sulla disgiunzione nella logica megarico-stoica’, in Gruppo Italiano di Storia delle Scienze (eds.) Actes du VIIIe Congrès International d’Histoire des Sciences. Vinci and Paris: vol. 3, 1217–24.Google Scholar
Cassan, E. (2012) ‘The Status of Bacon in Gassendi’s Syntagma Philosophicum’, History of Logic Society and Politics6: 80–9.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2009) ‘Sunartēsis crisippea e tesi di Aristotele’, in Alessandrelli, M. and Nasti De Vincentis, M (eds.) La logica nel pensiero antico. Naples: 105–63.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2010a) Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument from Democritus to Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2010b) ‘How Dialectical Was Stoic Dialectic?’, in Nightingale, A. and Sedley, D. (eds.) Ancient Models of Mind: Studies in Human and Divine Rationality. Cambridge: 153–79.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2013) ‘Aristotle on Begging the Question: Between Dialectic, Logic and Epistemology’, History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis15: 90–121.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2016) ‘Aristotle on the Non-Cause Fallacy’, History and Philosophy of Logic37: 9–32.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, L. (2019) ‘Dialectic in the Hellenistic Academy’, in Bénatouïl and Ierodiakonou 2019: 168–217.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (1985) ‘La negazione stoica’, in Cavini, W., Donnini Macciò, M.C., Funghi, M.S. and Manetti, D. (eds.) Studi su papiri greci di logica e medicina. Florence: 47–126.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (1989) ‘Modalità dialettiche nei Topici di Aristotele’, in Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Storia della Logica su Le teorie delle modalità. Bologna: 15–46.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (1991) ‘Semantica fondamentale. Note sul § 44 di Essere e Tempo’, in Usberti, G. (ed.) Problemi Fondazionali nella teoria del significato. Florence: 35–48.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (1993) ‘Chrysippus on Speaking Truly and the Liar’, in Döring and Ebert 1993: 85–109.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (1996) ‘“Essere ed essere vero”. Sull’uso assoluto di ΥΠΑΡΧΩ nella logica stoica’, in Funghi, M.S. (ed.) ΟΔΟΙ ΔΙΖΗΣΙΟΣ: Le vie della ricerca. Studies in honor of Francesco Adorno. Florence: 141–5.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (1998) ‘Arguing from a Definition: Aristotle on Truth and the Excluded Middle’, in Avgelis, N and Peonidis, F. (eds.) Aristotle on Logic, Language, and Science. Thessaloniki: 3–15.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (2007) ‘Principia Contradictionis: Sui principi aristotelici della contraddizione (§§ 1–3)’, Antiquorum Philosophia1: 123–69.Google Scholar
Cavini, W. (2011) ‘Vero e falso nelle Categorie di Aristotele’, in Bonelli, M. and Masi, F.G. (eds.) Studi sulle Categorie di Aristotele. Amsterdam: 371–406.Google Scholar
Chance, T.A. (1992) Plato’s Euthydemus: Analysis of What Is and Is Not Philosophy. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Charles, D. (ed.) (2010) Definition in Greek Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Charles, D. and Peramatzis, M. (2016) ‘Aristotle on Truth-Bearers’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy50: 101–41.Google Scholar
Cherniss, H. (1944) Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy, vol. 1. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Chiba, K. (2010) ‘Aristotle on Essence and Defining-Phrase in His Dialectic’, in Charles 2010: 203–51.Google Scholar
Chiron, P. (2007) ‘The Rhetoric to Alexander’, in Worthington, I. (ed.) A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. Malden, Oxford and Victoria: 90–106.Google Scholar
Chisholm, R. (1989) Theory of Knowledge. 3rd ed.Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. (1999) Between Geography and History: Hellenistic Constructions of the Roman World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cogan, M. (1984) ‘Rodolphus Agricola and the Semantic Revolutions of the History of Invention’, Rhetorica. A Journal of the History of Rhetoric2: 163–94.Google Scholar
Cohen, S.M. (1971) ‘Socrates on the Definition of Piety: Euthyphro 10A–11B’, Journal of the History of Philosophy9: 1–13.Google Scholar
Consigny, S.P. (2001) Gorgias. Sophist and Artist. Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (1987) ‘Hypothetical Necessity and Natural Teleology’, in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J.G. (eds.) Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: 243–74.Google Scholar
Cope, E.M. (1867) An Introduction to Aristotle’s Rhetoric. London and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, B.P. and Schmitt, C.B. (1992) A History of Western Philosophy: 3 Renaissance Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Corcoran, J. (1972) ‘Completeness of an Ancient Logic’, Journal of Symbolic Logic37: 696–702.Google Scholar
Corcoran, J. (1974a) ‘Aristotle’s Natural Deduction System’, in Corcoran, J. (ed.) Ancient Logic and Its Modern Interpretations. Dordrecht and Boston: 85–131.Google Scholar
Corcoran, J. (1974b) ‘Remarks on Stoic Deduction’, in Corcoran, J. (ed.) Ancient Logic and Its Modern Interpretations. Dordrecht and Boston: 169–81.Google Scholar
Corcoran, J. (2009) ‘Aristotle’s Demonstrative Logic’, History and Philosophy of Logic30: 1–20.Google Scholar
Corey, D.D. (2015) The Sophists in Plato’s Dialogues. Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Cornford, F.M. (1935) Plato’s Cosmology: The Timaeus of Plato. London.Google Scholar
Crager, A. (2015) ‘Meta-Logic in Aristotle’s Epistemology’. Doctoral thesis, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Craig, M. (2013) ‘Humanism and the Assessment of Averroes in the Renaissance’, in Akasoy, A. and Giglioni, G. (eds.) Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe. Dordrecht: 65–80.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (1994) ‘Indefinite Propositions and Anaphora in Stoic Logic’, Phronesis39: 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2004) Aristotle on Truth. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2010) ‘The Stoics on Definitions’, in Charles 2010: 359–423.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2011a) Plato’s Account of Falsehood: A Study of the Sophist. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2011b) ‘Aristotle on Syllogisms from a Hypothesis’, in Longo, A. (ed.) Argument from Hypothesis in Ancient Philosophy. Napoli: 95–184.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2012) ‘Aristotle’s Logic’, in Shields, C. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle. Oxford and New York: 113–49.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2015) ‘Truth in Metaphysics Ε 4’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy48: 167–225.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2019) ‘Dialectic in the Early Peripatos’, in Bénatouïl and Ierodiakonou 2019: 47–81.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (2021) ‘The Sophist’s Appearance in Plato’s Sophist’, in Delcomminette, S. and Lachance, G. (eds.) L’éristique: Définitions, Caractérisations et Historicité. Bruxelles: 217–66.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. (forthcoming) ‘Stoic Logic’, in Klein, J and Powers, N (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Crivelli, P. and Charles, D. (2011) ‘ΠΡΟΤΑΣΙΣ in Aristotle’s Prior Analytics’, Phronesis56: 193–203.Google Scholar
Crubellier, M. (2014) Aristote. Premiers Analytiques, transl. Paris.Google Scholar
Dancy, R.M. (1975) Sense and Contradiction: A Study in Aristotle. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Daston, L. (1988) Classical Probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, H. (2007) Locke, Language, and Early-Modern Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lacy, P. and De Lacy, E. (1978) Philodemus. On Methods of Inference, transl. and comm. 2nd ed.Naples.Google Scholar
De Morgan, A. (1926) Formal Logic, ed. by Taylor, A.E. London.Google Scholar
De Morgan, A. (1966) ‘On the Syllogism: IV and on the Logic of Relations’, in De Morgan, A., On the Syllogism and Other Logical Writings, ed. by Heath, P.. New Haven: 208–42.Google Scholar
de Pater, W.A. (1965) Les Topiques d’Aristote et la Dialectique Platonicienne. Fribourg.Google Scholar
De Quincey, T. (1893) Essays on Style, Rhetoric and Language, ed. by Scott, F.N. Boston: 145–6.Google Scholar
De Romilly, J. (1992) The Great Sophists in Periclean Athens. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delcomminette, S. (2018) Aristote et la nécessité. Paris.Google Scholar
Denyer, N. (1981) ‘Time and Modality in Diodorus Cronus’, Theoria47: 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denyer, N. (1991) Language, Thought and Falsehood in Ancient Greek Philosophy. London.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1964–76) Ouvres de Descartes, ed. by Adam, C. and Tannery, P.. Paris.Google Scholar
Detel, W. (1997) ‘Why All Animals Have a Stomach: Demonstration and Axiomatization in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals’, in Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.) Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse. Stuttgart: 63–84.Google Scholar
Devereux, D.T. (1992) ‘Inherence and Primary Substance in Aristotle’s Categories’, Ancient Philosophy12: 113–31.Google Scholar
Di Lascio, E.V. (2004) ‘Third Men: The Logic of the Sophisms at Arist. SE 22, 178b36–170a10’, Topoi23: 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Lascio, E.V. (2013) ‘The Theoretical Rationale Behind Aristotle’s Classification of Linguistic Fallacies in the Sophistical Refutations’, History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis15: 55–89.Google Scholar
Diels, H. and Kranz, W. (1964) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. 6th ed.Berlin.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1993) Alcinous. The Handbook of Platonism, transl. and comm. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. and Gergel, T. (2003) The Greek Sophists. London.Google Scholar
Dod, B.G. (1982) ‘Aristoteles latinus’, in Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A. and Pinborg, J. (eds.) The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: 45–79.Google Scholar
Döring, K. (1972) Die Megariker. Kommentierte Sammlung der Testimonien. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Döring, K. (1989) ‘Gab es eine Dialektische Schule?’, Phronesis34: 293–310.Google Scholar
Döring, K. and Ebert, Th. (eds.) (1993) Dialektiker und Stoiker: Zur Logik der Stoa und ihrer Vorläfer. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Dorion, L.-A. (1995) Aristote. Les réfutations sophistiques, transl. and comm. Paris.Google Scholar
Doyle, J.P. (2007) ‘Hispanic Scholastic Philosophy’, in Hankins, J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy. Cambridge: 250–69.Google Scholar
Drechsler, M. (2005) Interpretationen der Beweismethoden in der Syllogistik des Aristoteles. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1978) ‘Truth’, in Dummett, M., Truth and Other Enigmas. London: 1–24.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1981) Frege: Philosophy of Language. 2nd ed.London.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1993) ‘What Is a Theory of Meaning? (II)’, in Dummett, M., The Seas of Language. Oxford: 34–93.Google Scholar
Duncombe, M. (2014) ‘Irreflexivity and Aristotle’s Syllogism’, Philosophical Quarterly64: 434–52.Google Scholar
Durand, M. (2018) ‘Language and Reality: Stoic Semantics Reconstructed’. Doctoral thesis, Toronto.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, C. (2011) ‘The Different Ways in Which Logic Is (Said to Be) Formal’, History and Philosophy of Logic32: 303–32.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, C. and Read, S. (eds.) (2016) The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Logic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1981) Commentators and Commentaries on Aristotle’s Sophistici Elenchi. A Study of Post-Aristotelian Ancient and Medieval Writings on Fallacies. 3 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1990) ‘Philoponus, “Alexander” and the Origins of Medieval Logic’, in Sorabji, R. (ed.) Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence. London: 445–61. [Repr. in Ebbesen 2008a: 157–70.]Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1993) ‘Medieval Latin Glosses and Commentaries on Aristotelian Logical Texts of the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries’, in Burnett 1993: 129–73.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1996) ‘Greek and Latin Medieval Logic’, Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen Âge grec et latin 66 : 67–95. [Repr. in Ebbesen 2008a: 137–56.]Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (2008a) Greek-Latin Philosophical Interaction. Collected Essays of Sten Ebbesen, vol. I. Aldershot and Vermont.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (2008b) ‘Fragments of “Alexander’s” Commentaries on Analytica Posteriora and Sophistici Elenchi’, in Ebbesen 2008a: 187–201.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (2009) ‘The Aristotelian Commentator’, in Marenbon, J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Boethius. Cambridge: 34–55.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (2010) ‘The Prior Analytics in the Latin West: 12th–13th Centuries’, in Cameron and Marenbon 2010: 96–133.Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (2015) ‘The Posterior Analytics 1100–1400 in East and West’, in Bïard 2015: 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Th. (1987) ‘The Origin of the Stoic Theory of Signs in Sextus Empiricus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy5: 83–126.Google Scholar
Ebert, Th. (1991) Dialektiker und frühe Stoiker bei Sextus Empiricus: Untersuchungen zur Entstehung der Aussagenlogik. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Ebert, Th. (1993) ‘Dialecticians and Stoics on Classifying Propositions’, in Döring and Ebert 1993: 111–27.Google Scholar
Ebert, Th. (1995) ‘Was ist ein vollkommener Syllogismus des Aristoteles?’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie77: 221–47.Google Scholar
Ebert, Th. (2015) ‘What Is a Perfect Syllogism in Aristotle’s Syllogistic?’, Ancient Philosophy35: 351–74.Google Scholar
Ebert, Th. and Nortmann, U. (2007) Aristoteles: Analytica Priora, Buch I, transl. and comm. Berlin.Google Scholar
Ebrey, D. (2015) ‘Why Are There No Conditionals in Aristotle’s Logic?’, Journal of the History of Philosophy53: 185–205.Google Scholar
Edlow, R.B. (1977) Galen on Language and Ambiguity: An English Translation of Galen’s De Captionibus (On Fallacies). Leiden.Google Scholar
Egli, U. (1967) ‘Zur stoischen Dialektik’. Doctoral thesis, Bern.Google Scholar
Egli, U. (1979) ‘The Stoic Concept of Anaphora’, in Bäuerle, R., Egli, U. and von Stechow, A. (eds.) Semantics from Different Points of View. Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: 266–83.Google Scholar
Egli, U. (1986) ‘Stoic Syntax and Semantics’, Historiographia Linguistica13: 281–306.Google Scholar
Einarson, B. (1936) ‘On Certain Mathematical Terms in Aristotle’s Logic’, The American Journal of Philology57: 33–54 (Part I); 151–72 (Part II).Google Scholar
El-Rouyaheb, K. (2010) Relational Syllogisms and the History of Arabic Logic, 900–1900. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
El-Rouyaheb, K. (2011) ‘Logic in the Arabic and Islamic World’, in Lagerlund, H. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London and New York: I, 686–92.Google Scholar
El-Rouyaheb, K. (2016) ‘Arabic Logic after Avicenna’, in Dutilh-Novaes and Read 2016: 45–93.Google Scholar
El-Rouyaheb, K. (2019) The Development of Arabic Logic (1200–1800). Basel.Google Scholar
Endress, G. (1977) The Works of Yahyâ ibn cAdî. An Analytical Inventory. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1979) ‘More on Aristotelian Epagoge’, Phronesis24: 301–19.Google Scholar
Engel, P. (1988) ‘Plenitude and Contingency: Modal Concepts in Nineteenth Century French Philosophy’, in Knuuttila 1988: 179–237.Google Scholar
Englebretsen, G. (1996) Something to Reckon With: The Logic of Terms. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Erdmann, J.E. (1923) Logische Elementarlehre, ed. by Becher, E.. Berlin and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Erismann, Ch. (2017) ‘Logic in Byzantium’, in Kaldellis, A. and Siniossoglou, N. (eds.) The Cambridge Intellectual History of Byzantium. Cambridge: 362–80.Google Scholar
Eucken, C. (1983) Isokrates: Seine Positionen in der Auseinandersetzung mit den Zeitgenössischen Philosophen. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar
Everson, S. (ed.) (1990) Epistemology. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Everson, S. (1990a) ‘Epicurus on the Truth of the Senses’, in Everson 1990: 161–83.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (1998) ‘Endoxa e consenso: per la distinzione dei due concetti in Aristotele’, Annali dell’Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Storici15: 15–48.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2004) ‘Aristotle on a Puzzle about Logical Consequence: Necessity of Being vs. Necessity of Saying’, Topoi23: 101–12.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2007) Aristotele. Le Confutazioni sofistiche, transl. and comm. Rome and Bari.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2008a) ‘Aristotele e paralogismi dell’identità’, Rivista di Storia della Filosofia63: 205–26.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2008b) Review of Barnes 2007, Rhizai5: 345–53.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2013) ‘The “False Validating Premiss” in Aristotle’s Doctrine of Fallacies: An Interpretation of Sophistical Refutations 8’, History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis15: 238–66.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2016) ‘Aristotle on the Demarcation of Dialectical and Sophistical Arguments’, Antiquorum Philosophia10: 25–46.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (2021) ‘Protagoras’ Attack on Wrestling and the Other Arts: The Cradle of Antilogic and Eristic’, in Delcomminette, S. and Lachance, G. (eds.) L’éristique: Définitions, Caractérisations et Historicité. Bruxelles: 47–80.Google Scholar
Fait, P. (forthcoming) ‘Misplaced Trust and Blind Reasoning: Aristotle on the Fallacy of Equivocation’.Google Scholar
Feingold, M. (2001) ‘English Ramism: A Reinterpretation’, in Feingold, M., Freedman, J.S. and Rother, W. (eds.) The Influence of Petrus Ramus. Basel: 127–76.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, M. (1989) ‘Plato and Aristotle on Negative Predication and Semantic Fragmentation’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie71: 257–82.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, M. (1991) The Origins of Aristotelian Science. New Haven.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, M. (2013) Formal Causes: Definition, Explanation, and Primacy in Socratic and Aristotelian Thought. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, G. (1990) ‘Knowledge and Belief in Republic V–VII’, in Everson 1990: 85–115.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (2014) The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fine, K. (2011) ‘Aristotle’s Megarian Manoeuvres’, Mind120: 993–1034.Google Scholar
Fink, J.L. (ed.) (2012) The Development of Dialectic from Plato to Aristotle. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Finocchiaro, M.A. (2013) Meta-argumentation: An Approach to Logic and Argumentation Theory. London.Google Scholar
Flannery, K. (1995) Ways into the Logic of Alexander of Aphrodisias. Leiden and New York.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W.W. and Mirhady, D.C. (eds.) (1994) Peripatetic Rhetoric After Aristotle. New Brunswick and London.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W.W., Huby, P.M., Sharples, R.W. and Gutas, D. (1992) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence. 2 vols. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. (2015) The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability before Pascal. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Frede, D. (2012) ‘The Endoxon Mystique: What Endoxa Are and What They Are Not’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy43: 185–215.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1967) Prädikation und Existenzaussage: Platons Gebrauch von ‘… ist …’ und ‘… ist nicht …’ im Sophistes. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1974a) Die stoische Logik. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1974b) ‘Stoic vs. Aristotelian Syllogistic’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophy56: 1–32. [Repr. in Frede 1987a: 99–124.]Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1987a) Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1987b) ‘Individuals in Aristotle’, in Frede 1987a: 49–71.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1994a) ‘The Stoic Notion of a Lekton’, in Everson, S (ed.) Language. Cambridge: 109–28.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1994b) ‘The Stoic Notion of a Grammatical Case’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies39: 13–24.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1999) ‘Stoic Epistemology’, in Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld and Schofield 1999: 295–322.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1919) ‘Negation’, in Geach, P.T. and Black, M. (eds.) (1960) Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: 117–35.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1964) Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze, ed. by Angelelli, I., Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1967) Begriffsschrift, a Formula Language Modeled Upon That of Arithmetic, for Pure Thought, in van Heijenoort 1967: 1–82.Google Scholar