Bibliography

1663. Renati Des Cartes Principiorum Philosophiae Pars I, et II, more geometrico demonstratae per Benedictum de Spinoza Amstelodamensem. Accesserunt ejusdem Cogitata Metaphysica. Amsterdam: Jan Rieuwertsz.Google Scholar

1664. Renatus Des Cartes Beginzelen der Wysbegeerte, I en II Deel, Na de Meetkonstige wijze door Benedictus de Spinoza Amsterdammer. Mitsgaders des zelfs overnatuurkundige Gedachten. Alies uit ‘t Latijn vertaalt door P. B. Amsterdam: Jan Rieuwertsz.Google Scholar

1677a. B.d.S. Opera posthuma, quorum series post praefationem exhibetur. Amsterdam: Jan Rieuwertsz.Google Scholar

1677b. De nagelate schriften van B.d.S. [Amsterdam: Jan Rieuwertsz].Google Scholar

1802–3. Benedicti de Spinoza opera quae supersunt omnia, 2 vols., ed. Paulus, H. E. G.. Jena: In Bibliofolio Academico Spinoza.Google Scholar

1882–83. Benedicti de Spinoza Opera quotquot reperta sunt, 2 vols., ed. van Vloten, J. and Land, J. P. N.. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar

1883. Ethic Demonstrated in Geometrical Order and Divided into Five Parts, trans. White, W. H.. London: Trübner and Co.Google Scholar

1883–84. The Chief Works of Benedict Spinoza, trans. Elwes, R. H. M.. London: G. Bell and Sons.Google Scholar

1907. Éthique, trans. de Boulainvilliers, H., ed. d’Istria, F. Colonna. Paris: A. Colin.Google Scholar

1925. Spinoza Opera, 4 vols., ed. Gebhardt, Carl. Heidelberg: Winter (reprinted 1972) [cited as G].Google Scholar

1954. Oeuvres Complètes, ed. and trans. Caillois, Roland, Francès, Madeleine, and Misrahi, Robert. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

1958. Political Works, ed. Wernham, A. G.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

1928. The Correspondence of Spinoza, ed. and trans. Wolf, A.. London: Allen & Unwin (reprinted 1966, London: Frank Cass).Google Scholar

1974. The Principles of Descartes’ Philosophy [with Cogitata Metaphysica], second ed., ed. and trans. Britan, Halbert Hains. La Salle: Open Court (first ed. 1905).Google Scholar

1977. Briefwisseling, ed. and trans. Akkerman, F., Hubbeling, H. G., and Westerbrink, A. G.. Amsterdam: Wereldbibliotheek.Google Scholar

1985. The Collected Works of Spinoza, Volume I, ed. and trans. Curley, Edwin M.. Princeton: Princeton University Press [cited as CW I].Google Scholar

1985 [attributed]. Spinoza’s Algebraic Calculation of the Rainbow; and, Calculation of Chances, ed. Petry, M. J.. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar

1986. Korte Verhandeling, van God, de Mensch, en deszelvs Welstand. Breve Trattato su Dio, l’Uomo, et il suo Bene, ed. and trans. Mignini, F.. L’Aquila: L. U. Japadre editore.Google Scholar

1987. Spinoza Opera, vol. 5: Supplementa, ed. Gebhardt, Carl. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar

1992. Traité de la réforme de l’entendement, ed. and trans. Rousset, Bernard. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

1994. A Spinoza Reader, ed. and trans. Curley, Edwin M.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

1995. Spinoza: The Letters, ed. and trans. Shirley, Samuel. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

2009. Œuvres, vol. 1: Premiers écrits, ed. and trans. Miginini, Filippo, Beyssade, Michelle, and Ganault, Joël. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar

2011. The Vatican Manuscript of Spinoza’s Ethica, ed. Spruit, L. and Totaro, P.. Brill: Leiden.Google Scholar

2015. Obras completas y biografías, ed. and trans. Domínguez, Atilano. Madrid: ViveLibroGoogle Scholar

2016. The Collected Works of Spinoza, Volume II, ed. and trans. Curley, Edwin M.. Princeton: Princeton University Press [cited as CW II].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2020a. Spinoza’s Ethics, trans. Eliot, George, ed. Carlisle, C.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

2020b. Œuvres, vol. 4: Ethica/Éthique, eds. Akkerman, Latin text Fokke and Steenbakkers, Piet, trans. Moreau, Pierre-François, intro. and notes Moreau, Pierre-François and Steenbakkers, Piet. (Paris : Presses Universitaires de France, 2020).Google Scholar

Akkerman, Fokke. 1977. Spinoza’s tekort aan woorden: Humanistische aspecten van zijn schrijverschap, Mededelingen vanwege Het Spinozahuis 36. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Akkerman, Fokke. 1980. Studies in the Posthumous Works of Spinoza. PhD thesis Groningen University. http://hdl.handle.net/11370/b7aaa2e2-3561-4892-afd7-fb9daca9562b.Google Scholar

1987. “La Latinité de Spinoza et l’authenticité du texte du Tractatus de intellectus emendatione,” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 71: 23–29.Google Scholar

Akkerman, Fokke, and Steenbakkers, Piet, eds. 2005. Spinoza to the Letter: Studies in Words, Texts and Books. Brill: Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albiac, Gabriel. 1987. La sinagoga vacía: Un estudio de las fuentes marranas del spinozismo. Madrid, Hiperión.Google Scholar

Aler, Jan, ed. 1965. Catalogus van de Bibliotheek der Vereniging het Spinozahuis te Rijnsburg. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, Henry E. 1987. Benedict de Spinoza: An Introduction, revised edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Alsted, Johann-Heinrich. 1649. Encyclopedia, 4 vols. Lyons (first edition Herborn, 1630).Google Scholar

Althusser, L. 1997. “The Only Materialist Tradition, Part I.” In The New Spinoza, ed. Montag, Warren and Stolze, Ted: 3–20. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Altmann, A. 1966. “Moses Mendelssohn on Leibniz and Spinoza.” In Studies in Rationalism, Judaism and Universalism, ed. Loewe, R.: 13–45. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.Google Scholar

Andala, R. 1712. “Dissertatio de unione mentis et corporis physica.” In Dissertationum philosophicarum pentas: 159–63. Franeker: Apud Franciscum Halman.Google Scholar

Andala, R. 1719. Cartesius verus spinozismi eversor, et physicae experimentalis architectus. Franequerae: ex officina W. Bleck.Google Scholar

Andrault, R. 2014. La Vie selon la raison: Physiologie et métaphysique chez Spinoza et Leibniz. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar

Andrault, R., and Lærke, M., eds. 2018. Steno and the Philosophers. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Andrault, R., Lærke, M., and Moreau, P.-F., eds. 2014. Spinoza/Leibniz, Rencontres, Controverses, Réceptions. Paris: Presses universitaires de Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar

Antistius, Lucius (Constans). 1991. Du droit des ecclésiastiques, ed. and trans. V. Butori. Caen: Université de Caen.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. 1964–66. Summa Theologiae, 60 vols. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. 1981. Summa Theologiae, trans. English Dominican Fathers. London: Burns, Oates, and Washburne (1912–36; New York: Benziger, 1947–48; New York: Christian Classics, 1981 [cited as ST].Google Scholar

Ariew, Roger. 1987. “Review of Jonathan Bennett’s A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47: 649–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ariew, Roger. 1990. “The Infinite in Spinoza’s Philosophy.” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, ed. Curley, E. and Moreau, P.-F.: 16–31. Leiden: Brill, 1990.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1963. Categories and De Interpretation, ed. and trans. Ackrill, J. L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols., ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Arlig, Andrew. 2015. “Medieval Mereology.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/mereology-medieval/.Google Scholar

Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre. 1662. La logique, ou l’art de penser. Paris.Google Scholar

Arnauld, Antoine, and Nicole, Pierre. 1996. Logic or the Art of Thinking, trans. Buroker, Jill Vance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aubert de Versé, N. 1685. L’Impie convaincu ou dissertation contre Spinosa. Amsterdam: Jean Crelle.Google Scholar

Aubrey, J. 1898. Brief Lives, 2 vols., ed. Clarke, A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Austin, Kenneth. 2007. From Judaism to Calvinism: the Life and Writings of Immanuel Tremellius. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Attal, J. 2010. La Non-excommunication de Jacques Lacan: Quand la psychanalyse a perdu Spinoza. Paris: l’Unebévue.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis. 1857–74. The Works of Francis Bacon, 15 vols., eds. Spedding, J., Ellis, R. L., and Heath, D. D.. London: Longmans and Co.Google Scholar

Banchetti-Robino, Marina Paola. 2012. “The Ontological Function of First-Order and Second-Order Corpuscles in the Chemical Philosophy of Robert Boyle: The Redintegration of Potassium Nitrate,” Foundations of Chemistry: Philosophical, Historical and Interdisciplinary Studies of Chemistry 14.3: 221–34.Google Scholar

Bartuschat, Wolfgang. 1992. Spinozas Theorie des Menschen. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar

Beiser, F. 1987. The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bell, D. 1984. Spinoza in Germany from 1670 to the Age of Goethe. London: Institute of Germanic Studies.Google Scholar

Bencini, D. 1720. Tractatio historico-polemica. Torino: In Regio Taurinensi Atheneo.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan. 1984. A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan. 1990. “Spinoza and Teleology: A Reply to Curley.” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, eds. Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François: 53–57 Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan. 1993. “Eight Questions about Spinoza.” In Spinoza on Knowledge and the Human Mind, ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan. 1996. “Spinoza’s Metaphysics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, first edition, ed. Garrett, Don: 61–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette, and Newman, William R., eds. 2007. The Artificial and the Natural: An Evolving Polarity. Dibner Institute Studies in the History of Science and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bentley, Jerry H. 1983. Humanists and Holy Writ, New Testament Scholarship in the Renaissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. 1982. Against the Current. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Berti, Silvia, ed. and trans. 1994. Trattato dei tre impostori: La vita e lo spirito del Signor Benedetto de Spinoza. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Beverland, Hadrianus. 1679. De peccato originali dissertatio. Leiden: Gaesbeeck.Google Scholar

Biasutti, Franco. 1979. La dottrina della scienza in Spinoza. Bologna: Pàtron Editore.Google Scholar

Bidney, David. 1940. The Psychology and Ethics of Spinoza: A Study in the History and Logic of Ideas. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Bienenstock, M. 2008. “Herder et Spinoza.” In Spinoza au XIX^e siècle, eds. Tosel, A., Moreau, P.-F., and Salem, J.: 47–61. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar

Billecoq, Alain. 2016. Spinoza ou l’ “athée vertueux.” Montreuil: Les Temps des Cerises.Google Scholar

Bloch, O. 1977. “Marx: Renouvier et l’histoire du matérialisme,” La Pensée 191: 3–42.Google Scholar

Bloksma, Nanne. 2018. Spinoza: A Miraculously Healthy Philosopher. Mededelingen vanwege het Spinozahuis, vol. 113. Rijnsburg: Uitgeverij Spinozahuis.Google Scholar

Bodian, Miriam. 1997. Hebrews of the Portuguese Nation: Conversos and Community in Early Modern Amsterdam. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Bolland, G. J. P. J. 1899. Spinoza: Rede tot inwijding van het herstelde Spinozahuis te Rijnsburg op den 24 Maart 1899 uitgesproken. Leiden: Adriani.Google Scholar

Bonke, Hans. 1987. “Portugezen op Vlooyenburg.” In Êxodo: Portugezen in Amsterdam 1600–1680, eds. Kistemaker, Renée and Levie, Tirtsah: 32–41. Amsterdam: Amsterdams Historisch Museum/De Bataafsche Leeuw.Google Scholar

Borrichius, Olaus. 1983 Itinerarium 1660–1665, 4 vols., ed. Schepelern, H. D.. Copenhagen: Reitzel/Brill.Google Scholar

Bos, E. P., and Krop, H. A., eds. 1993. Franco Burgersdijk (1590–1635). Studies in the History of Ideas in the Low Countries. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Bos, H. J. M. et al., eds. 1980. Studies on Christiaan Huygens: Invited Papers from the Symposium on the Life and Work of Christiaan Huygens, Amsterdam, 22–25 August 1979. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger B. V.Google Scholar

Bossers, Anton. 1986. “Nil volentibus arduum: Lodewijk Meyer en Adriaan Koerbagh.” In Opstellen over de Koninklijke Bibliotheek en andere studies: Bundel samengesteld door medewerkers van dr. C. Reedijk, ed. Tichelaar, P. A.: 374–83. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar

Bossuet, J.-B. 1681. Discours sur l’histoire universelle. Paris: Sebastien Mabre-Cramoisy.Google Scholar

Boucher, W. I. 2002. Spinoza in English: A Bibliography from the Seventeenth Century to the Present. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar

Bourel, D. 1988. “Spinoza et Mendelssohn en 1755,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 93.2: 208–14.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert. 1661. Tentamina quaedam physiologica, diversis temporibus et occasionibus conscripta: A Latin translation of Certain Physiological Essays, Written at Distant Times, and on Several Occasions. London.Google Scholar

Boyle, Robert. 1662. New experiments physico-mechanicall, second edition. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert. 1976. “Adequacy and the Individuation of Ideas in Spinoza’s Ethics,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 14: 147–62.Google Scholar

Brett, G. S. 1965. Brett’s History of Psychology, revised edition, ed. Peters, R. S.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Broad, C. D. 1930. Five Types of Ethical Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond. 1997. An Introduction to the New Testament. New York: Doubleday/Anchor.Google Scholar

Brunschvicg, Léon.1951. Spinoza et ses contemporains, fourth edition. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Bunge, Wiep van. 2005. From Stevin to Spinoza. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar

Bunge, Wiep van. 2009. “Spinoza Past and Present.” In Insiders and Outsiders in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, eds. Rogers, G. A. J., Sorell, T., and Kraye, J.: 223–37. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bunge, W. van, Krop, H., Leeuwenburgh, B., van Ruler, H., Schuurman, P., and Wielema, M., eds. 2003. Dictionary of Seventeenth and Eighteenth-Century Dutch Philosophers, 2 vols. Bristol: Thoemmes.Google Scholar

Bunge, W. van, Krop, H., Steenbakkers, P., and Van de Ven, J., eds. 2011. The Continuum Companion to Spinoza. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Burgersdijk, Frank. 1626. Institutionum logicarum libri duo. Accedit Adriani Heerboord Synopseos logicae Burgersdicianae explicatio: Unà cum ejusdem autoris Praxi lógica. London: Roger Daniels.Google Scholar

Caird, J. 1888. Spinoza. London: William Blackwood and Sons.Google Scholar

Calvetti, Carla Gallicet. 1972. Spinoza lettore del Machiavelli. Milan: Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuora.Google Scholar

Cantor, Georg. 1996. Foundations of a General Theory of the Manifolds: A Mathematico-Philosophical Investigation into the Theory of the Infinite. In From Kant to Hilbert, vol. II, ed. Ewald, William: 878–919. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Carlisle, Clare. 2015. “Spinoza on Eternal Life,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89: 69–96.Google Scholar

Carraud, Vincent. 2002. Causa sive Ratio: La Raison de la cause, de Suarez à Leibniz. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Carriero, John. 1995. “On the Relationship between Mode and Substance in Spinoza’s Metaphysics,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 33: 245–73.Google Scholar

Carriero, John. 2005 “Spinoza on Final Causality,” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 2: 105–47.Google Scholar

Carriero, John. 2018. “The Highest Good and Perfection in Spinoza.” In The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza, ed. Della Rocca, Michael: 240–71. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Casey, Maurice. 1998. Aramaic Sources of Mark’s Gospel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Casey, Maurice. 2010. Jesus of Nazareth: An Independent Historian’s Account of his Life and Teaching. New York: T&T Clark International.Google Scholar

Charles-Daubert, Françoise. 1998. Les libertins érudits au 17^e siècle. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Charles-Daubert, Françoise. 1999. Le “Traité des trois imposteurs” et “L’Esprit de Spinosa”: Philosophie clandestine entre 1678 et 1768. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar

Chaui, M. 2000. A Nervura do Real: Imanência e Liberdade em Espinosa. Rio de Janeiro: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar

Cherbury, , Edward Herbert of. 1624/1937. De Veritate, Prout Distinguitur a Revelatione, a Verisimili, a Possibili, Et a Falso. Bristol: J. W. Arrowsmith Ltd.Google Scholar

Citton, Y. 2006. L’Envers de la liberté: L’invention d’un imaginaire spinoziste dans la France des Lumières. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Clericuzio, Antonio.1990. “A Redefinition of Boyle’s Chemistry and Corpuscular Philosophy,” Annals of Science 47: 561–89.Google Scholar

Colerus, (Johannes Köhler). 1705. Korte, dog waaragtige levens-beschryving van Benedictus de Spinosa, uit autentique stukken en mondeling getuigenis van nog levende personen opgestelt. Amsterdam: Lindenberg. [1706 French translation: La Vie de B. de Spinosa, tirée des écrits de ce fameux philosophe, et du témoignage de plusieurs personnes dignes de foi, qui l’ont connu particuliérement. The Hague: Johnson. 1706 English translation (from the French): The Life of Benedict de Spinosa. London: Bragg.]Google Scholar

Condillac, E. B. de. 1798. Traité des systems, in Oeuvres complètes, vol. II. Paris: Houel.Google Scholar

Cotten, Jean-Pierre. “Spinoza et Victor Cousin.” In Spinoza au XIX^e siècle, eds. Tosel, A., Moreau, P.-F., and Salem, J.: 231–43. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar

Cousin, Victor. 1838. “Spinoza et la synagogue des juifs portugais.” In Fragments philosophiques, vol. 2: 163–66. Paris: Ladrange.Google Scholar

Crescas, Hasdai. 1990. Or ha-Shem [Hebrew: Light of the Lord], ed. Fisher, Shlomo. Jerusalem: Ramot.Google Scholar

Cristofolini, Paolo. 1995. “The Spinozistic Heresy: The Debate on the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, 1670–1677, and the Immediate Reception of Spinozism.” In Proceedings of the International Cortona Seminar: 25–35. Amsterdam: APA-Holland University Press.Google Scholar

Cropsey, Joseph, and Strauss, Leo, eds. 1981. History of Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 1969. Spinoza’s Metaphysics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 1973a. “Experience in Spinoza’s Theory of Knowledge.” In Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Grene, Marjorie: 25–59. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 1973b. “Spinoza’s Moral Philosophy.” In Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Grene, Marjorie: 354–76. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 1978. “Spinoza as an Expositor of Descartes.” In Speculum Spinozanum 1677–1977, ed. Hessing, Siegfried: 133–42. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 1988. Behind the Geometrical Method: A Reading of Spinoza’s Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 1990a. “Notes on a Neglected Masterpiece, II: The Theological-Political Treatise as a Prolegomenon to the Ethics.” In Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy, eds. Cover, J. A. and Kulstad, Mark: 109–59. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 1990b. “On Bennett’s Spinoza: The Issue of ‘Teleology’.” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, ed. Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François: 39–52. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 1991a. “A Good Man Is Hard to Find,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 65: 29–45.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 1991b. “The State of Nature and Its Law in Hobbes and Spinoza,” Philosophical Topics 19: 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 1991c. “On Bennett’s Interpretation of Spinoza’s Monism.” In God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics, ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu. Spinoza by 2000: The Jerusalem Conferences: 35–51. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 1992. “‘I durst not write so boldly’ or How to Read Hobbes’s Theological-Political Treatise.” In Hobbes e Spinoza: Scienza e politica, ed. Bostrenghi, D.: 497–62. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 1994a. “Spinoza on Truth,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72: 1–16.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 1994b. “Notes on a Neglected Masterpiece (I): Spinoza and the Science of Hermeneutics.” In Spinoza: The Enduring Questions, ed. Hunter, Graeme: 64–99. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 2002. “Maimonides, Spinoza, and the Book of Job.” In Jewish Themes in Spinoza’s Philosophy, eds. Ravven, Heidi and Goodman, Lenn: 147–86. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 2010. “Spinoza’s Exchange with Albert Burgh.” In Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, eds. Melamed, Y. Y. and Rosenthal, M. A.: 11–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 2014. “Spinoza’s Contribution to Biblical Scholarship.” In Baruch de Spinoza, Theologisch-politischer Traktat, ed. Höffe, Otfried: 109–126. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin M. 2015. “Resurrecting Leo Strauss.” In Reading Between the Lines: Leo Strauss and the History of Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Schroeder, Winfried: 129–70. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin, and Walski, Gregory. 1999. “Spinoza’s Necessitarianism Reconsidered.” In New Essays on the Rationalists, eds. Gennaro, R. J. and Huenemann, C.: 241–62. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Da Costa, Uriel. 1993. Examination of Pharisaic Traditions: Exame das tradições phariseas, facsimile of the unique copy in the Royal Library of Copenhagen, supplemented by da Silva, Semuel’s Treatise on the Immortality of the Soul: Tratado da immortalidade da alma, trans., notes, and intro. Salomon, H. P. and Sassoon, I. S. D.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Dagron, T. 2004. “Introduction.” In J. Toland, Lettres à Serena et autres textes, ed. Dagron, T.: 7–60. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar

Dagron, T. 2009. Toland and Leibniz: L’invention du néo-spinozisme. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Damasio, Antonio. 2003. Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar

D’Ancona, J. 1940. “Komst der Marranen in Noord-Nederland: De Portugese gemeenten te Amsterdam tot de vereniging (1639).” In Geschiedenis der Joden in Nederland, eds. Brugmans, H. and Frank, A.: 201–69. Amsterdam: Van Holkema & Warendorf.Google Scholar

Daudin, Henri. 1948. “Spinoza et la science expérimentale: Sa discussion de l’expérience de Boyle,” Revue d’Histoire des Sciences 2: 179–90.Google Scholar

De Dijn, Herman. 2011. “Ethics as Medicine for the Mind (5p1–20).” In Spinoza’s Ethics: A Collective Commentary, eds. Hampe, Michael, Renz, Ursula, and Schnepf, Robert: 265–80. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

De Vet, J. J. V. M. 2005. “Salomon Dierquens, auteur du Stelkonstige reeckening van den regenboog et du Reeckening van kanssen.” In Spinoza to the Letter: Studies in Words, Texts and Books, eds. Akkerman, Fokke and Steenbakkers, Piet: 169–88. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Delahunty, R. J. 1985. Spinoza: Arguments of the Philosophers. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Delbos, V. 1893. Le Problème moral dans la philosophie de Spinoza dans l’histoire du spinozisme. Paris: Ancienne Librairie Gemer Baillière.Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1967. Spinoza et le problème de l’expression. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1968. Différence et repetition. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1988. Spinoza: Practical Philosophy, trans. Hurley, R.. San Francisco: City Lights Books.Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1992. Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, trans. Joughin, Martin. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1995. Negotiations: 1972–1990, trans. Joughin, Martin.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 1991. “Causation and Spinoza’s Claim of Identity,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 8: 265–76.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 1996. Representation and the Mind-Body Problem in Spinoza. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 2002. “Spinoza’s Substance Monism.” In Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, eds. Biro, John and Koistinen, Olli: 11–37. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 2003a. “A Rationalist Manifesto: Spinoza and the Principle of Sufficient Reason,” Philosophical Topics 31: 75–93.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 2003b. “The Power of an Idea: Spinoza’s Critique of Pure Will,” Nous 37: 200–31.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 2004. “Egoism and the Imitation of Affects in Spinoza.” In Spinoza on Reason and the “Free Man,” eds. Yovel, Yirmiyahu and Segal, Gideon: 123–47. New York: Little Room Press.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 2007. “Spinoza and the Metaphysics of Scepticism,” Mind 116: 851–74.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 2008a. “Rationalism Run Amok: Representation and the Reality of Emotions in Spinoza.” In Interpreting Spinoza, ed. Huenemann, Charlie: 26–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 2008b. Spinoza. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 2010. “Getting His Hands Dirty: Spinoza’s Criticism of the Rebel.” In Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise, eds. Melamed, Yitzhak and Rosenthal, Michael: 168–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 2013. “The Taming of Philosophy.” In Philosophy and Its History: Methods and Aims in the Study of Early Modern Philosophy, eds. Lærke, M., Schliesser, E., and Smith, J. E. H.: 178–208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 2015. “Interpreting Spinoza: The Real Is the Rational,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53: 525–35.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 2016. “Review of Yitzhak Melamed’s Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought,” Philosophical Review 125.2: 292–97.Google Scholar

2021. “Perseverance, Power, and Eternity: Purely Positive Essence and Spinoza’s Naturalism,” Crisis and Critique 8: 307–25.Google Scholar

Den Uyl, Douglas. 1983. Power, State and Freedom. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar

Denzinger, Henry. 2007. Sources of Catholic Dogma, trans. Deferrari, Roy. Fitzwilliam: Loreto Publications.Google Scholar

Descartes, René. 1964–76. Oeuvres de Descartes, 12 vols., eds. Adam, Charles and Tannery, Paul. Paris: J. Vrin [cited as AT].Google Scholar

Descartes, René. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, 2 vols., eds. and trans. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, and Murdoch, Dugald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [cited as CSM].Google Scholar

Dibon, Paul. 1954. La philosophie néerlandaise au Siècle d’Or. Tome I: L’enseignement philosophique dans les universités à l’époque précartésienne (1575–1650). Publications de l’institut Français d’Amsterdam, Maison Descartes, no. 21. Paris: Elsevier Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Diderot, D. 1875–77. Œuvres completes, 20 vols., ed. Assézat, J. and Tourneux, M.. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar

Diderot, D., and le Rond D’Alembert, J., eds. 1751–72. Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, 17 vols. Paris: Briasson, David, Le Breton, Durand.Google Scholar

Donagan, Alan. 1980. “Spinoza’s Dualism.” In The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza, ed. Kennington, Richard: 89–102. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Donagan, Alan. 1989. Spinoza. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Doney, Willis. 1975. “Spinoza on Philosophical Skepticism.” In Spinoza: Essays in Interpretation, eds. Mandelbaum, Maurice and Freeman, Eugene: 139–57. LaSalle: Open Court.Google Scholar

Duchesneau, François. 1974. “Du modèle cartésien au modèle spinozist e de l’être vivant,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3: 539–62.Google Scholar

Duijkerius, J. 1691. Het leven van Philopater: Opgewiegt in Voetiaensche Talmeryen en groot gemaeckt in de Verborgentheden heden der Coccejanen. Groeningen: Van der Brug.Google Scholar

Duijkerius, J. 1697. Vervolg van’t leven van Philopater: Geredded uit de verborgentheeden der Coccejanen. Groeningen: Van der Brug.Google Scholar

1991. Het leven van Philopater en Vervolg van ’t leven van Philopater: Een spinozistische sleutelroman uit 1691/1697, ed. Maréchal, Gerardine. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Dungan, David Laird. 1999. A History of the Synoptic Problem. New York: Doubleday/Anchor.Google Scholar

Dunin-Borkowski, S. von. 1910. Der Junge de Spinoza: Leben und Werdegang im Lichte der Weltphilosophie. Münster: Aschendorf.Google Scholar

Dunin-Borkowski, S. von. 1910 and 1933–36. Spinoza, 4 vols. Münster: Aschendorf.Google Scholar

Dunin-Borkowski, S. von. 1933. “Die Physik Spinozas.” In Septimana Spinozana: Acta conventus oecumenici in memoriam Bendicti de Spinoza diei natalis trecentissimi Hagae Comitis habiti, curis Societatis Spinozanae edita: 85–101. The Hague: Societas Spinozana.Google Scholar

Dutka, Jacques. 1953. “Spinoza and the Theory of Probability,” Scripta Mathematica 19: 24–33.Google Scholar

Ehrman, Bart. 1993. The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture: The Effect of Early Christological Controversies on the Text of the New Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ekkart, Rudi. 1999. Spinoza in beeld: Het onbekende gezicht [Spinoza in Portrait: The Unknown Face]. Voorschoten: Vereniging Het Spinozahuis.Google Scholar

Ellsiepen, Christof. 2011. “The Three Types of Knowledge (2p38–47).” In Spinoza’s Ethics: A Collective Commentary, eds. Hampe, Michael, Renz, Ursula, and Schnepf, Robert: 129–44. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Eusebius of Caesarea, . 1926. Ecclesiastical History, trans. Lake, Kirsopp and Oulton, J. E. L.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Eustachius of St. Paul. 1609. Summa philosophica quadripartite. Paris: Carolus Chastellain.Google Scholar

Farkas, Jerneja, von Haehling, Stephan, Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar, Morley, John E., Anker, Stefan D., and Lainscak, Mitja. 2013. “Cachexia as a Major Public Health Problem: Frequent, Costly, and Deadly,” Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 4: 173–78.Google Scholar

Joseph A., Fitzmyer, ed. 1992. Romans, vol 33 of The Anchor Bible. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Joseph A., Fitzmyer, 1993. “The Consecutive Meaning of EΦ’ Ω in Romans 5:12,” New Testament Studies 39: 321–39.Google Scholar

Förster, E. 2012. “Goethe’s Spinozism.” In Spinoza and German Idealism, eds. Förster, E. and Melamed, Y.: 85–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Förster, E., and Melamed, Y.. 2012. “Introduction.” In Spinoza and German Idealism, eds. Förster, E. and Melamed, Y.: 1–6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Forster, M. 2012. “Herder and Spinoza.” In Spinoza and German Idealism, eds. Förster, E. and Melamed, Y.: 59–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Foucher de Careil, L. A. 1854. “Mémoire sur la Refutation inédite de Spinoza par Leibniz.” In Réfutation inédite de Spinoza, ed. Leibniz, G. W. and ed. and trans. Foucher de Careil, A.: I–CVI. Paris: Brière.Google Scholar

Frampton, T. L. 2006. Spinoza and the Rise of Historical Criticism of the Bible. New York: T&T Clark.Google Scholar

Francks, Richard. 1985. “Caricatures in the History of Philosophy: The Case of Spinoza.” In Philosophy, Its History and Historiography, ed. Holland, A. J.. Royal Institute of Philosophy Conferences, vol. 1983: 179–94. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Freedman, David Noel. 1987. “‘Who Is Like Thee among the Gods?’ The Religion of Early Israel.” In Ancient Israelite Religion, eds. Miller, Patrick D. Jr., Hanson, Paul D., and McBride, S. Dean: 315–35. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar

Freedman, David Noel. 1992. Anchor Bible Dictionary. New York: Doubleday [ABD]Google Scholar

Freedman, David Noel, and Geoghegan, Jeffrey. 2006. “Martin Noth: Retrospect and Prospect.” In The History of Israel’s Traditions, the Heritage of Martin Noth, eds. McKenzie, Steven and Graham, Patrick: 128–52. Sheffield: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Fréret, Nicholas. 1986. Lettre de Thrasybule à Leucippe, ed. Landucci, S.. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar

Freudenthal, Jacob. 1899. Die Lebensgeschichte Spinoza’s in Quellenschriften, Urkunden und nichtamtlichen Nachrichten. Leipzig: Von Veit.Google Scholar

Freudenthal, Jakob. 1904. Spinoza: Sein Leben und seine Lehre, Band I: Das Leben Spinozas. Stuttgart: Frommann.Google Scholar

Fuks, Leo. 1952. “Drie recente vondsten uit een Spinoza-bibliotheek,” Amstelodamum 39: 132–38.Google Scholar

Gabbey, Alan. 1973. “Review of W. L. Scott, The Conflict Between Atomism and Conservation Theory 1644–1860, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 4: 373–85.Google Scholar

Gabbey, Alan. 1980. “Force and Inertia in the Seventeenth Century: Descartes and Newton.” In Descartes: Philosophy Mathematics and Physics, ed. Gaukroger, Stephen: 230–320. Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Gabbey, Alan. 1992. “Newton’s Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy: A Treatise on ‘Mechanics’?” In An Investigation of Difficult Things: Essays on Newton and the History of the Exact Sciences in Honour of D. T. Whiteside, eds. Harman, P. M. and Shapiro, Alan E.: 305–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gabbey, Alan. 2007a. “Spinoza on the Natural and the Artificial.” In The Artificial and the Natural: An Evolving Polarity, eds. Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette and Newman, William R.. Dibner Institute Studies in the History of Science and Technology: 225–37. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gabbey, Alan. 2007b. “Spinoza scolastique et la méthodologie des sciences.” In Conceptions de la science: Hier, aujourd’hui, demain. Hommage à Marjorie Grene, sous la direction de Jean Gayon et Richard M. Burian, avec la collaboration de Marie-Claude Lorne, eds., Jean, Gayon and Burian, Richard M.: 242–58. Bruxelles: Editions Ousia.Google Scholar

Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Garber, Daniel. 2008. “Should Spinoza Have Published His Philosophy?” In Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays, ed. Huenemann, Charlie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garber, Daniel. 2015. “Superheroes in the History of Philosophy: Spinoza, Super-Rationalist,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53.3: 507–22.Google Scholar

Garber, Daniel, and Cohen, Lesley. 1982. “A Point of Order: Analysis, Synthesis and Descartes’s Principles,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 64: 136–47.Google Scholar

Garrett, Aaron V. 2003. Meaning in Spinoza’s Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 1979. “Spinoza’s ‘Ontological’ Argument,” Philosophical Review 88: 198–223.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 1990a. “‘A Free Man Always Acts Honestly, Not Deceptively’: Freedom and the Good in Spinoza’s Ethics.” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, eds. Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François: 221–38. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 1990b. “Ethics Ip5: Shared Attributes and the Basis of Spinoza’s Monism.” In Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy: Essays Presented to Jonathan Bennett, eds. Cover, J. A. and Kulstad, Mark: 69–107. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 1990c. “Truth, Method, and Correspondence in Spinoza and Leibniz,” Studia Spinozana 6: 13–43.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 1991. “Spinoza’s Necessitarianism.” In God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics, ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu. Spinoza by 2000: The Jerusalem Conferences: 191–218. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 1994. “Spinoza’s Theory of Metaphysical Individuation.” In Individuation in Early Modern Philosophy, eds. Barber, Kenneth F. and Gracia, Jorge J. E.: 73–101. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 1996. “Spinoza’s Ethical Theory.” In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, first edition, ed. Garrett, Don: 267–314. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 1998. “Teleology in Spinoza and Early Modern Rationalism.” In New Essays on the Rationalists, eds. Gennaro, Rocco and Huenmann, Charles: 310–35. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 2002. “Spinoza’s Conatus Argument.” In Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, eds. Koistinen, Olli and Biro, John: 127–58. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 2008. “Representation and Consciousness in Spinoza’s Naturalistic Theory of the Imagination.” In Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays, ed. Huenemann, Charles: 4–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 2009. “The Essence of the Body and the Part of the Mind That Is Eternal.” In A Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics, ed. Koistinen, Olli: 284–302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 2010. “‘Promising’ Ideas: Hobbes and Contract in Spinoza’s Political Philosophy.” In Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, eds. Melamed, Yitzhak and Rosenthal, Michael: 192–209. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 2017. “The Indiscernibility of Identicals and the Transitivity of Identity in Spinoza’s Logic of the Attributes.” In Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide, ed. Melamed, Yitzhak Y.: 12–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 2018. Nature and Necessity in Spinoza’s Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gawlick, Günter 1995. “Spinozismus.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 9, eds. Ritter, Joachim and Gründer, Karlfried: 1398–1401. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar

Jean, Gayon, and Burian, Richard M., eds. 2007. Conceptions de la science: Hier, aujourd’hui, demain. Hommage à Marjorie Grene, sous la direction de Jean Gayon et Richard M. Burian, avec la collaboration de Marie-Claude Lorne. Bruxelles: Editions Ousia, 2007.Google Scholar

Geach, Peter. 1971. “Spinoza and the Divine Attributes,” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement: 15–27.Google Scholar

Gebhardt, C. 1905. Abhandlung über die Verbesserung des Verstandes: Eine entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung. Heidelberg: Carl WinterGoogle Scholar

Gersonides, . 1560. Milhamot ha-Shem. Riva di Trento.Google Scholar

Gersonides, . 1984–99. The Wars of the Lord, 3 vols., ed. Feldman, Seymour. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society.Google Scholar

Giancotti Boscherini, E. 1971. Lexicon Spinozanum, 2 vols. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Gibert, P. 2010. L’Invention critique de la Bible XV^e-XVIII^e siècle. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Gillispie, Charles Couston, ed. 1970–80. Dictionary of Scientific Biography, 16 vols. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar

Goclenius, Rodolphus. 1613. Lexicon philosophicum, quo tanquam clave philosophiae fores aperiuntur, informatum opera &) studio Rodolphi Goclenii senioris, in Academia Mauritania, quae est Marchioburgi, Philosophiae Professons primarii. Frankfurt: Matthias Becker (reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms [in same volume: Goclenius’s Lexicon philosophicum Graecum, 1615]).Google Scholar

Goethe, J. W., and Jacobi, F. H.. 1846. Briefwechsel zwischen Goethe und F. H. Jacobi, ed. Jacobi, M.. Leipzig: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Goff, P., ed. 2012. Spinoza on Monism. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson, and Leonard, Henry S. 1940. “The Calculus of Individuals and Its Uses,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 5: 45–55.Google Scholar

Gootjes, Albert. 2016. “Sources inédites sur Spinoza: La correspondance entre Johannes Bouwmeester et Johannes Georgius Graevius,” Bulletin de Bibliographie Spinoziste 38, Archives de Philosophie 79: 817–19.Google Scholar

Gootjes, Albert. 2018. “The First Orchestrated Attack on Spinoza: Johannes Melchioris and the Cartesian Network in Utrecht,” Journal of the History of Ideas 79: 23–43.Google Scholar

Gootjes, Albert. 2020. “Spinoza between French Libertines and Dutch Cartesians: The 1673 Utrecht Visit,” Modern Intellectual History. 17: 591–617. doi.org/10.1017/S1479244318000471.Google Scholar

Gootjes, Albert. 2019. “The ‘Collegie der sçavanten’: A Seventeenth-Century Cartesian Scholarly Society in Utrecht.” In Enlightened Religion: From Confessional Churches to Polite Piety in the Dutch Republic, eds. Spaans, Joke and Touber, Jetze: 156–82. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Greenslade, S. L., ed. 1963. The Cambridge History of the Bible: The West from the Reformation to the Present Day, vol. 3 of The Cambridge History of the Bible. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grene, Marjorie, and Nails, Debra, eds. 1986. Spinoza and the Sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 91. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Grene, Marjorie, and Watson, Richard, eds. 1995. Malebranche’s First and Last Critics: Simon Foucher and Dortous de Mairan. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Grotius, H. 2001. De imperio summarum potestatum circa sacra, 2 vols, ed. and trans. van Dam, H.-J.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Grunwald, M. 1897. Spinoza in Deutschland. Berlin: S. Calvary.Google Scholar

Gueroult, Martial. 1968. Spinoza I: Dieu. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar

Gueroult, Martial. 1974. Spinoza II: L’âme. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar

Guggenheim, Heinrich, trans. with commentary. 2005. Seder Olam, the Rabbinic View of Biblical Chronology. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Gullan-Whur, Margaret. 1998. Within Reason: A Life of Spinoza. London: Cape.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian. 1975. Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hahn, Scott, and Wiker, Benjamin. 2013. Politicizing the Bible: The Roots of Historical Criticism and the Secularization of Scripture, 1300–1700. New York: Crossroads Publishing.Google Scholar

Hall, A. Rupert, and Hall, Marie Boas. 1964. “Philosophy and Natural Philosophy: Boyle and Spinoza.” In Mélanges Alexandre Koyré II: l’Aventure de l’Esprit: 241–56. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar

Hampshire, Stuart. 1994. “Truth and Correspondence in Spinoza.” In Spinoza and the Human Mind: Papers Presented at the Second Jerusalem Conference (Ethica II), ed. Yovel, Yirmiyahu: 1–10. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Hampshire, Stuart. 2005. Spinoza and Spinozism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hampton, Jean. 1986. Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harrisville, Roy, and Sundberg, Walter. 2002. The Bible in Modern Culture: Baruch Spinoza to Brevard Childs, second edition. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar

Harvey, Warren Zev. 2010. Rabbi Hasdai Crescas [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center.Google Scholar

Heereboord, Adriaan. 1659. Meletemata philosophica. Leiden: Fr. Moyard.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1955. Lectures on the History of Philosophy, trans. Haldane, E. S.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1969. The Science of Logic, trans. Miller, A. V.. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1990. Lectures on the History of Philosophy: The Lectures of 1825–1826. Vol. III: Medieval and Modern Philosophy, ed. Brown, R. F., trans. Brown, R. F. and Stewart, M.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1995. Lectures on the History of Philosophy, 3 vols., trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simson, Frances H.. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 2007. Lectures on the Proofs of the Existence of God, trans. Hodgson, Peter C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Herder, J. G. von. 1940. God: Some Conversations, trans. Burkhardt, F. H.. Indianapolis and New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Herder, J. G. von. 2002. Philosophical Writings, ed. and trans. Forster, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Herrnstein, Richard J., and Boring, Edwin G., eds. 1965. A Source Book in the History of Psychology. Source Books in the History of the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hessing, Siegfried, ed. 1977. Speculum Spinozanum 1677–1977. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. 1994. Leviathan, ed. Curley, Edwin. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Paul 2009. “Does Efficient Causation Presuppose Final Causation? Aquinas vs. Early Modern Mechanism.” In Metaphysics and the Good, ed. Jorgensen, Larry and Newlands, Samuel: 295–312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hoos, Anneliese. 2000. “Self-Preservation and Love in Spinoza’s Ethics.” Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Hubert, Christiane. 1994. Les premières refutations de Spinoza. Paris: Presses de l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar

Hübner, Karolina. 2018. “Spinoza’s Unorthodox Metaphysics of the Will.” In The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza, ed. Della Rocca, Michael: 343–69. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Huet, P.-D. 1679. Demonstratio evangelica. Paris: Stephanum Michallet.Google Scholar

Hume, David. 2007. A Treatise of Human Nature, eds. Norton, David F. and Norton, Mary J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press [originally published 1739–40].Google Scholar

Hunter, Graeme. 2005. Radical Protestantism in Spinoza’s Thought. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. 2001. Logical Investigations, trans. Findlay, J. N.. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Huygens, Christiaan. 1888–1950. Oeuvres complètes de Christiaan Huygens, publiées par la Société hollandaise des sciences, 22 vols., eds. de Haan, D. Bierans, Bosscha, J., Kortweg, D. J., and Vollgraff, J.. La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Ibn Ezra, . 1988. Ibn Ezra’s Commentary on the Pentateuch, 5 volumes, trans. and annot. Norman Strickman and Arthur Silver. New York: Menorah Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Ibn Gabbirol, Solomon. 2001. Selected Poems of Solomon Ibn Gabirol, trans. Cole, Peter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Irgas, Yosef. 1965. Shomer Emunim [Hebrew]. Jerusalem: The Loyal Guard].Google Scholar

Isaacson, Walter. 1992. Kissinger. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan I. 2001. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan I. 2006. Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man, 1670–1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan I. 2010. “The Early Dutch and German Reactions to the TTP: Foreshadowing the Enlightenment’s More General Spinoza Reception?” In Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, eds. Melamed, Yitzhak and Rosenthal, Michael: 72–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan I. 2011. Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution and Human Rights, 1750–1790. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jacobi, F. H. 1994. The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel Allwill, trans. di Giovanni, G.. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Jagersma, Rindert, and Dijkstra, Trude. 2013. “Uncovering Spinoza’s Printers by Means of Bibliographical Research,” Quærendo 43: 278–310.Google Scholar

James, Susan. 2012. Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion and Politics: The Theologico-Political Treatise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jarrett, Charles. 1991. “Spinoza’s Denial of Mind-Body Interaction and the Explanation of Human Action,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 29.4: 465–85.Google Scholar

Jensen, Lotte. 1997a. “Johannes Monnikhoff: Bewonderaar en bestrijder van Spinoza,” Geschiedenis van de Wijsbegeerte in Nederland 7: 5–31.Google Scholar

Jensen, Lotte, ed. 1997b. “Kritische voorrede door Johannes Monnikhoff,” Geschiedenis van de Wijsbegeerte in Nederland 7: 32–43.Google Scholar

Joachim, H. 1901. A Study of the Ethics of Spinoza: Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Joachim, H. 1940. Spinoza’s Tractatus de Intellectus Emendatione: A Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Jonas, Hans. 1973. “Spinoza and the Theory of the Organism.” In Spinoza: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Grene, Marjorie: 259–78. Garden City: Doubleday/Anchor Press.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Yosef. 1982. “The Social Functions of the Herem in the Portuguese Jewish Community of Amsterdam in the Seventeenth Century.” In Dutch Jewish History: Proceedings of the Symposium on the History of the Jews in the Netherlands, eds. Michman, Jozeph and Levie, Tirtsah: 111–55. Jerusalem: Institute for Research on Dutch Jewry.Google Scholar

Kaplan, Yosef. 2016. “On the Burial of Spinoza’s Grandfather and Grandmother,” Zutot: Perspectives on Jewish Culture 3: 6–39.Google Scholar

Keckermann, Bartholomew. 1614. Operum omnium quae extant tomus primus. Geneva: Pierre Aubert.Google Scholar

Kisner, Matthew J. 2011. Spinoza on Human Freedom: Reason, Autonomy and the Good Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kisner, Matthew J., and Youpa, Andrew, eds. 2014. Essays on Spinoza’s Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kisser, T. 2008. “Spinoza et Schelling.” In Spinoza au XIX^e siècle, eds. Tosel, A., Moreau, P.-F., and Salem, J.: 75–85. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar

Kissinger, Henry A. 1957. A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the Problems of Peace, 1812–1822. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Kissinger, Henry A. 1968. “The White Revolutionary: Reflections on Bismarck,” Daedalus 97: 888–924.Google Scholar

Klein, D. B. 1970. A History of Scientific Psychology: Its Origins and Philosophical Backgrounds. New York/London: Basic Books, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Klever, W. N. A. 1983. “Nieuwe argumenten tegen de toeschrijving van het auteurschap van de SRR en RK aan Spinoza,” Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 47: 493–502.Google Scholar

Klever, W. N. A. 1990. “Anti-falsificationism: Spinoza’s Theory of Experience and Experiments.” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, eds. Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François: 124–35. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Kline, G. L. 1952. Spinoza in Soviet Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan.Google Scholar

Koerbagh, Adriaan. 2011. A Light Shining in Dark Places, to Illuminate the Main Questions of Theology and Religion, ed. and trans. Wielema, Michiel, intro. Wiep van Bunge. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Kohlenberger, H. K. 1971. “Communes conceptiones.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 1, ed. Ritter, Joachim: 1024. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.Google Scholar

Koistinen, Olli. 1996. “Causality, Intensionality and Identity: Mind Body Interaction in Spinoza,” Ratio 9.1: 23–38.Google Scholar

Kolakowski, L. 1969. Chrétiens sans église: La conscience réligieuse et le lien confessionnel au 17^e siècle. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Kortholt, Christian 1680. De tribus impostoribus magnis liber. Kiloni: Literis et Sumptibus Joachimi Reumanni.Google Scholar

Krop, Henri. 2010. “Spinozas Bibliothek.” In Spinoza im Kontext: Voraussetzungen, Werk und Wirken eines radikalen Denkers, Katalog zur Ausstellung im Interdisziplinären Zentrum für die Erforschung der Europäischen Aufklärung, eds. van Heertum, Cis and Grunert, Frank: 47–58. Halle Saale: Mitteldeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar

Krop, Henri. 2014. “Experientia.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Spinoza, eds. van Bunge, Wiep, Krop, Henri, Steenbakkers, Piet, and van de Ven, Jeroen. Glossary: 213–16. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Kugel, James. 2007. How to Read the Bible: A Guide to Scripture, Then and Now. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Kulstad, Mark. 2002a. “Leibniz, Spinoza and Tschirnhaus: Metaphysics à Trois, 1675–76.” In Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, eds. Koistinen, Olli and Biro, John: 221–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kulstad, Mark. 2002b. “Exploring the Middle Ground: Was Leibniz’s Conception of God Ever Spinozistic?” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76: 671–90.Google Scholar

Kuyper, F. 1676. Arcana atheismi revelata, philosophice & paradoxè refutata, Examine tractatus theologico-politici. Roterodami: Isaacum Naeranum.Google Scholar

Lærke, M. 2006. “À la recherche d’un homme égal à Spinoza: G. W. Leibniz et la Demonstratio evangelica de Pierre-Daniel Huet,” XVII^e siècle 232: 388–410.Google Scholar

Lærke, M. 2008. Leibniz lecteur de Spinoza: La genèse d’une opposition complexe. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar

Lærke, M. 2010. “G. W. Leibniz’s Two Readings of the Tractatus.” In Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, eds. Melamed, Yitzhak and Rosenthal, Michael: 101–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lærke, M. 2012a. “Spinoza’s Monism? What Monism?” In Spinoza on Monism, ed. Goff, Philip: 244–61. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Lærke, M. 2012b. “Leibniz on Spinoza’s Political Philosophy.” In Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, vol. 6, eds. Garber, D. and Rutherford, D.: 105–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lærke, M. 2014. “Les études spinozistes aux États-unis: Spinoza et le Principe de Raison Suffisante. Représentations, concepts, idées,” Bulletin de bibliographie Spinoziste, no. XXXVI, in Archives de Philosophie 77: 721–26.Google Scholar

Lærke, M. 2015. Les Lumières de Leibniz: Controverses avec Huet, Bayle, Regis et More. Paris: Classiques Garnier.Google Scholar

Lærke, M. 2016a. Leibniz and Spinoza. Mededelingen vanwege het Spinozahuis 111. Voorschoten: Uitgeverij Spinozahuis.Google Scholar

Lærke, M. 2016b. “Mendelssohn, Wachter et les origines du Spinoza idéaliste.” In Les métaphysiques des Lumières, eds. Girard, P., Leduc, C., and Rioux-Beaulne, M.: 135–54. Paris: Classiques Garnier.Google Scholar

Lærke, M. 2016c. “La controverse entre Grotius, Hobbes et Spinoza sur le jus circa cacra: Textes, pretexts, contextes et circonstances,” Revue de synthèse 137: 399–425.Google Scholar

Lærke, M. 2018 “Leibniz’s Encounter with Spinoza’s Monism, October 1675 to February 1678.” In Oxford Handbook to Spinoza, ed. Della Rocca, Michael: 434–63. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lærke, M. 2020a. “French Historiographical Spinozism, 1893–2018: Delbos, Gueroult, Vernière, Moreau,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28.3: 653–72.Google Scholar

Lærke, M. 2020b. “Structural Analysis and Dianoematics: The History of (the History of) Philosophy According to Martial Gueroult,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 58.3: 581–607.Google Scholar

Lærke, M. 2021. Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lachterman, David R. 1978. “The Physics of Spinoza’s Ethics.” In Spinoza: New Perspectives, eds. Shahan, Robert W. and Biro, John: 77–111. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Lagrée, Jacqueline 2004. Spinoza et le débat religieux. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar

Lange, H. 2011. “Goethe and Spinoza: A Reconsideration,” Goethe Yearbook 18: 11–33.Google Scholar

La Peyrère, Isaac. 1655: A Theological System upon the Presupposition that Men were before Adam. London.Google Scholar

Laplanche, F. 1986. L’Écriture, le sacré et l’histoire: Érudits et politiques protestants devant la Bible en France au XVIIe siècle. Amsterdam et Maarsen: APA–Holland University Press.Google Scholar

LeBuffe, Michael. 2010. From Bondage to Freedom: Spinoza on Human Excellence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

LeBuffe, Michael. 2017. Spinoza on Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lecrivain, André. 1986. “Spinoza and Cartesian Mechanics.” In Spinoza and the Sciences, eds. Grene, Marjorie and Nails, Debra: 15–60. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1854. Réfutation inedite de Spinoza, ed. Foucher de Careil, L. A.. Paris: E. Brière.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1875–90. Die philosophischen Schriften von G. W. Leibniz, ed. Gerhardt, C. I.. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1923–(ongoing publication). Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, Akademie-Ausgabe. Darmstadt and other places: Reichl and other publishers [cited as AA].Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1976. Philosophical Papers and Letters, ed. and trans. Loemker, L. E.. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1989. Leibniz: Philosophical Essays, eds. and trans. Ariew, Roger and Garber, Daniel. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1992. De Summa Rerum: Metaphysical Papers, 1675–1676, trans. Parkinson, G. H. R.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Levine, Joseph. 1999. The Autonomy of History: Truth and Method from Erasmus to Gibbon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Levy, Lia. 2000. L’automate spirituel: La naissance de la subjectivité moderne d’après l’Éthique de Spinoza. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar

Lévy, L. 2017. “‘Causa Conscientiae’ in Spinoza’s Ethics.” In Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide, ed. Melamed, Yitzhak Y.: 187–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levy, T. 1987. Figures de l’infini: Les mathématiques au miroir des cultures. Paris: Éditions du seuil.Google Scholar

Lin, Martin. 2006. “Teleology and Human Action in Spinoza,” Philosophical Review 115: 317–54.Google Scholar

Lin, Martin. 2018. “The Principle of Sufficient Reason in Spinoza.” In The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza, ed. Della Rocca, Michael: 133–54. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lin, Martin. 2019. Being and Reason: An Essay on Spinoza’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lordon, F. 2006. L’Intérêt souverain: Essai d’anthropologie économique spinoziste. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Lucas, H.-C. 1982/83. “Hegel et l’édition de Spinoza par Paulus,” Cahiers Spinoza 4: 171–204.Google Scholar

[Lucas, Jean Maximilien]. 1927. The Oldest Biography of Spinoza, ed. and trans. Wolf, A.. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Luther, Martin. 1960. “Lectures on Deuteronomy.” In Luther’s Works, eds. Pelikan, Jaroslav et al. St. Louis: Concordia.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1994. Selected Political Writings, ed. & tr. by David Wootton, Hackett, 1994.Google Scholar

Malcolm, Noel. 2002. Aspects of Hobbes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

2003. “Leibniz, Oldenburg, and Spinoza, in the Light of Leibniz’s Letter to Oldenburg of 18/28 November 1676,” Studia Leibnitiana 35, 225–43.Google Scholar

Macherey, P. 1992. “Le Spinoza idéaliste de Hegel.” In Avec Spinoza: 187–97 Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Macherey, P. 2011. Hegel or Spinoza, trans. Ruddick, Susan M.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1975. The Discourses of Niccolo Machiavelli, ed. Crich, Bernard and trans. Walker, Leslie. London: Routledge and Paul.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1979. The Portable Machiavelli, ed. and trans. Bondanella, Peter and Musa, Mark. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1992. The Prince, second edition, ed. and trans. Adams, Robert. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Malcolm, Noel. 2003. “Leibniz, Oldenburg, and Spinoza, in the Light of Leibniz’s Letter to Oldenburg of 18/28 November 1676,” Studia Leibnitiana 35: 225–43.Google Scholar

Malebranche, Nicolas. 1979–92. Oeuvres, 2 vols., ed. Rodis-Lewis, G.. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Manning, Richard. 2012. “Spinoza’s Physical Theory.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (spring edition), ed. Zalta, Edwin. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spinoza-physics.Google Scholar

Mark, Thomas. 1972. Spinoza’s Theory of Truth. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Marshall, Colin. 2009. “The Mind and the Body as ‘One and the Same Thing’ in Spinoza,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27.5: 897–919.Google Scholar

Marshall, Eugene. 2008. “Adequacy and Innateness in Spinoza,” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 4: 51–88.Google Scholar

Marshall, Eugene. 2013. The Spiritual Automaton: Spinoza’s Science of the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Martineau, James. 1882. A Study of Spinoza. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Marx, K. 1977. “Le Traité Théologico-politique et la Correspondance de Spinoza: trois cahiers d’étude de l’année 1841,” Cahiers Spinoza 1: 29–158.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich. 1978. The Marx-Engels Reader, second edition, ed. Tucker, R. C.. New York and London: Norton.Google Scholar

Mason, Richard. 1987. The God of Spinoza. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Massing, Michael. 2018. Fatal Discord, Erasmus, Luther, and the Fight for the Western Mind. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre. 1969. Individu et communauté chez Spinoza. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre. 1977. “Le Traité Théologico-Politique vu par le jeune Marx,” Cahiers Spinoza 1: 159–212.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre. 1985. “Le ‘droit du plus fort’: Hobbes contre Spinoza,” Revue philosophique 110: 149–76.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre. 1990. “Le problème de l’évolution de Spinoza du Traité théologico-politique au Traité politique.” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, eds. Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François: 258–70. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre. 2011. Études sur Spinoza et les philosophies de l’âge classique. Lyon: ENS Éditions.Google Scholar

Matson, Wallace. 1977. “Death and Destruction in Spinoza’s Ethics,” Inquiry 20: 403–17.Google Scholar

Maull, Nancy. 1986. “Spinoza in the Century of Science.” In Spinoza and the Sciences, eds. Grene, Marjorie and Nails, Debra: 3–13. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

McKenna, Antony. 1990. “Spinoza et les ‘athées vertueux’ dans un manuscrit clandestin au XVIIIe siècle.” In Spinoza au XVIIIe siècle, ed. Bloch, Olivier: 85–92. Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck.Google Scholar

McKeon, Richard. 1928. The Philosophy of Spinoza: The Unity of His Thought. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar

McNiven Hine, E. 1979. A Critical Study of Condillac’s Traité des Systèmes. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

McShea, Robert. 1968. The Political Philosophy of Spinoza. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Meeks, Wayne, and Attridge, Harold, eds. 2006. The Harper-Collins Study Bible, revised edition. San Francisco: HarperOne [HCSB].Google Scholar

Meier, John. 1991. A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus, 2 volumes. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Meijer, Willem. 1902. “De woning van Despinoza op de Stille Veerkade,” Die Haghe: Bijdragen en Mededeelingen: 207–17.Google Scholar

Meijer, Willem. 1909. “Reinsburch,” Leidsch jaarboekje 6: 156–88.Google Scholar

Meinel, Christoph. 1988. “Early Seventeenth-Century Atomism: Theory, Epistemology and the Insufficiency of Experiment,” Isis 79: 68–103.Google Scholar

Meinsma, Koenraad Oege. 1896. Spinoza en zijn kring: Historisch-kritische studiën over Hollandsche vrijgeesten. The Hague: Nijhoff (reprinted 1980, intro. Zilverberg, S. B. J.. Utrecht: Hes).Google Scholar

Meinsma, Koenraad Oege. 1983. Spinoza et son cercle: Étude critique historique sur les hétérodoxes hollandaise, annot. and trans. Roosenburg, and Osier, J.-P.. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2004. “Salomon Maimon and the Rise of Spinozism in German Idealism,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42: 67–96.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2010a. “Acosmism or Weak Individuals? Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of the Finite,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2010): 77–92.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2010b. “Spinoza’s Anti-Humanism: An Outline.” In The Rationalists, eds. Fraenkel, Carlos, Perinetti, Dario, and Smith, Justin. Kluwer-New Synthese Historical Library. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2012a. “‘Christus secundum spiritum’: Spinoza, Jesus, and the Infinite Intellect.” In The Jewish Jesus, ed. Stahl, Neta: chapter 9. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2012b. “Spinoza’s Deification of Existence,” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 6: 75–104.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2012c. “‘Omnis determinatio est negatio’ – Determination, Negation and Self-Negation in Spinoza, Kant, and Hegel.” In Spinoza and German Idealism, eds. Förster, Eckart and Melamed, Yitzhak: 175–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2012d. “Why Spinoza Is Not an Eleatic Monist (Or Why Diversity Exists).” In Spinoza on Monism, ed. Goff, Philip: 206–22. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2012e. “Christus secundum spiritum: Spinoza, Jesus, and the Infinite Intellect.” In The Jewish Jesus, ed. Stahl, Neta: 140–51. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2013a. Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2013b. “Reply to Colin Marshall” (Symposium on Yitzhak Y. Melamed, Spinoza’s Metaphysics), Leibniz Review 23: 207–14.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2013c. “Charitable Interpretations and the Political Domestication of Spinoza, or, Benedict in the Land of the Secular Imagination.” In Philosophy and Its History, eds. Lærke, M., Schliesser, E., and Smith, J. E. H.: 258–77. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2014. “Hasdai Crescas and Spinoza on Actual Infinity and the Infinity of God’s Attributes.” In Spinoza and Jewish Philosophy, ed. Nadler, Steven: 204–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2015. “A Glimpse into Spinoza’s Metaphysical Laboratory: The Development of Spinoza’s Concepts of Substance and Attribute.” In The Young Spinoza, ed. Melamed, Yitzhak Y.: 272–86. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2016. “Eternity in Early Modern Philosophy.” In Eternity: A History, ed. Melamed, Yitzhak Y.: 129–67. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2017. “The Building Blocks of Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance, Attributes, and Modes.” In The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza, ed. Della, Michael: 84–113. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. 2019. “The First Draft of Spinoza’s Ethics?” In Spinoza in Twenty-First Century French and American Philosophy, eds. Ramond, Charles and Stetter, Hack: 93–112. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y. (forthcoming). “Spinoza’s Critique of Gersonides’ view on Divine Omniscience.” In Gersonides Through the Ages, eds. Freudenthal, Gad, Wirmer, David, and Eliot, Ofer.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak Y., and Lin, Martin. 2016. “Principle of Sufficient Reason.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/sufficient-reason/.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, M. 1971–. Gesammelte Schriften. Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt: Fromman Holzboog.Google Scholar

Menasseh ben Israel, . 1842. The Conciliator of R. Manasseh Ben Israel V2: A Reconcilement of the Apparent Contradictions in Holy Scripture, trans. E. H. Lindo. London: Duncan and Malcolm (reprinted in New York: Hermon Press, 1972).Google Scholar

Lærke, M.. Spinoza and the Freedom of Philosophizing. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2021.Google Scholar

Mertens, Frank. 2008. “Spinoza’s Amsterdamse vriendenkring: Studievriendschappen, zakenrelaties en familiebanden.” In Libertas philosophandi: Spinoza als gids voor een vrije wereld, ed. van Heertum, Cis: 69–81. Amsterdam: In de Pelikaan.Google Scholar

Mertens, Frank. 2011. “Johannes Koerbagh’s Lost Album Amicorum Seen through the Eyes of Pieter de la Ruë,” Lias 38: 59–127.Google Scholar

Mertens, Frank. 2017. “Van den Enden and Religion.” In The Dutch Legacy: Radical Thinkers of the 17th Century and the Enlightenment, eds. Lavaert, Sonja and Schröder, Winfried: 62–89. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Metlov, V. J. 2008. “Spinoza dans la philosophie Russe.” In Spinoza au XIX^e siècle, eds. Tosel, A., Moreau, P.-F., and Salem, J.: 377–86. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar

Metzger, Bruce, and Ehrman, Bart. 2005. The Text of the New Testament, Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration, fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Meyer, Arnold. 1896. Jesu Mutter-sprache: Das Galiläische Aramäisch in seiner Bedeutung für die Erklärung der Reden Jesu und der Evangelien überhaupt. Freiburg/Leipzig.Google Scholar

Meyer, H., ed. 1926. Verzeichniss der auserlesenen Büchersammlung des seeligen Herrn Moses Mendelssohn. Berlin: Soncino-Ges.Google Scholar

Miert, D. van. 2018. The Emancipation of Biblical Philology in the Dutch Republic, 1590–1670. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Miert, D. van, Nellen, H., Steenbakkers, P., and Touber, J., eds. 2017. Scriptural Authority & Biblical Criticism in the Dutch Golden Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mignini, Filippo. 1979. “Per la datazione e l’interpretazione del Tractatus de intellectus emendatione di B. Spinoza,” La Cultura 17: 87–160.Google Scholar

Mignini, Filippo. 1981. “Il sigillo di Spinoza,” La Cultura 19: 351–38.Google Scholar

Mignini, Filippo. 1987. “Données et problèmes de la chronologie spinozienne entre 1656 et 1665,” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 71: 9–21.Google Scholar

Mignini, Filippo. 1990. “In Order to Interpret Spinoza’s Theory of the Third Kind of Knowledge: Should Intuitive Science Be Considered per causam proximam Knowledge?” In Spinoza: Issues and Directions, eds. Curley, Edwin and Moreau, Pierre-François: 136–46. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Miller, David, ed. 1987. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Thought. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Jon, Miller. 2003. “Spinoza and the Concept of a Law of Nature,” The History of Philosophy Quarterly 20: 257–76.Google Scholar

Jon, Miller. 2005. “Spinoza’s Axiology.” In Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy, vol. 2, eds. Garber, Daniel and Nadler, Steven. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Montag, Warren. 1999. Bodies, Masses, Power: Spinoza and His Contemporaries. New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Montag, Warren, and Stolze, Tad, eds. 1997. The New Spinoza. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Moreau, Pierre-François. 1978. “Spinoza et Victor Cousin,” Archivio di filosofia 1: 327–31.Google Scholar

Moreau, Pierre-François. 1980. “Saisset, lecteur de Spinoza,” Recherches sur le xviie siècle 4: 85–97.Google Scholar

Moreau, Pierre-François. 1988. “Les enjeux de la publication en France des papiers de Leibniz sur Spinoza,” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 2: 215–22.Google Scholar

Moreau, Pierre-François. 1994. Spinoza: L’expérience et l’éternité. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Moreau, Pierre-François. 2007. “Spinoza est-il spinoziste?” In Qu’est-ce que les Lumières “radicales”? eds. Secrétan, C., Dagron, T., and Bove, L.: 289–97. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Moreau, Pierre-François. 2008. “Traduire Spinoza: l’exemple d’Émile Saisset.” In Spinoza au XIX^e siècle, eds. Tosel, A., Moreau, P.-F., and Salem, J.: 221–30. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar

Moreau, Pierre-François. 2014. “In naturalismo: Leibniz, Spinoza, et les spiritualistes français.” In Spinoza/Leibniz. Rencontres, controverses, receptions, eds. Andrault, R., Lærke, M., and Moreau, P.-F.: 325–44. Paris: Presses universitaires de Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar

Moreau, Pierre-François. 2018. “Le Bord du précipice. Dortous de Mairan entre Malebranche et Spinoza.” In Malebranche et Spinoza, eds. Carbone, R., Jaquet, Ch., and Moreau, P.-F.. Lyon: ENS Editions.Google Scholar

Moretti-Constanzi, T. 1946. Spinoza. Rome: Editrice Universitas.Google Scholar

Mori, Gianluca 1998. “Baruch de Spinoza: Athée vertueux, athée de système.” In Critique, savoir et érudition à la veille de Lumières: Le Dictionaire historique et critique de Pierre Bayle (1647–1706), ed. Bots, Hans: 341–58. Amsterdam: APA.Google Scholar

Mori, Gianluca 2014. “Pierre Bayle.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Spinoza, eds. van Bunge, Wiep, Krop, Henri, Steenbakkers, Piet, and van de Ven, Jeroen: 85–106. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Morrison, John 2013. “The Relation between Conception and Causation in Spinoza’s Metaphysics,” Philosopher’s Imprint 13.3: 1–17.Google Scholar

Morrison, John 2020. “Two Puzzles about Thought and Identity in Spinoza.” In Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide, ed. Melamed, Yitzhak Y.: 56–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mulier, Eco Haitsma. 1980. The Myth of Venice and Dutch Republican Thought in the Seventeenth Century. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar

Murray, J. Clark. 1896. “The Idealism of Spinoza,” Philosophical Review 5.5: 473–88.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven. 2001. Spinoza’s Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven. 2006. Spinoza’s Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven. 2010. “‘Whatever Is, Is in God’: Substance and Things in Spinoza’s Metaphysics.” In Interpreting Spinoza. Critical Essays, ed. Huenemann, Charlie: 53–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven. 2011. A Book Forged in Hell: Spinoza’s Scandalous Treatise and the Birth of a Secular Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven. 2018. Spinoza: A Life, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nahon, Gérard. 1979–80. “Amsterdam, métropole occidentale des Sefarades au XVII^e siècle,” Cahiers Spinoza 3: 15–50.Google Scholar

Nails, Debra. 1986. “Annotated Bibliography of Spinoza and the Sciences.” In Spinoza and the Sciences, eds. Grene, Marjorie and Nails, Debra: 305–14. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar

Negri, Antonio. 1991. The Savage Anomaly, trans. Hardt, Michael. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Negri, Antonio, and Hardt, M.. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Neu, Jerome. 1977. Emotion, Thought and Therapy. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Newlands, Samuel. 2010. “Another Kind of Spinozistic Monism,” Noûs 44: 469–502.Google Scholar

Newlands, Samuel. 2011a. “Hegel’s Idealist Reading of Spinoza,” Philosophy Compass 6.2: 100–108.Google Scholar

Newlands, Samuel. 2011b. “More Recent Idealist Readings of Spinoza,” Philosophy Compass 6.2: 109–19.Google Scholar

Newlands, Samuel. 2017. “Spinoza on Universals.” In The Problem of Universals in Modern Philosophy, eds. Di Bella, Stefano and Schmaltz, Tad; 62–86. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nicholas of Cusa, . 1991. The Catholic Concordance, ed. Sigmund, Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University of Press.Google Scholar

Noordegraaf, Leo, and Valk, Gerrit. 1996. De Gave Gods: De pest in Holland vanaf de late middeleeuwen. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar

Normore, Calvin G. 2010. “Accidents and Modes.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, vol. 2, ed. Pasnau, Robert: 674–85. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar

Norris, Christopher. 1991. Spinoza & the Origins of Modern Critical Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Offenberg, Adri. 1973. “Spinoza’s Library: The Story of a Reconstruction,” Quaerendo 3: 309–21.Google Scholar

Oldenburg, Henry. 1965–86. The Correspondence of Henry Oldenburg, 13 vols., eds. and trans. Hall, A. Rupert and Hall, Marie Boas. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press; London: Mansell, Taylor, and Francis.Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. 1965. “Inherence,” Phronesis 10: 97–105.Google Scholar

Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Parkinson, G. H. R. 1954. Spinoza’s Theory of Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Parkinson, G. H. R. 1993. “Spinoza and British Idealism: The Case of H. H. Joachim,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 1: 109–23.Google Scholar

Partington, J. R. 1951. General and Inorganic Chemistry for University Students, second edition. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

Pascal, Blaise. 1663. Traité de l’équilibre des liueurs et de la pesanteur de la masse de l’air. Paris: Desprez.Google Scholar

Pätzold, D. 2011. “Moses Mendelssohn on Spinoza.” In Moses Mendelssohn’s Metaphysics and Aesthetics, ed. Munk, R.: 107–30. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar