Part III - Typological Profiles of Linguistic Areas and Language Families

Abbi, Anvita. 2012. Dictionary of the Great Andamanese language: English – Great Andamanese – Hindi. Delhi: Ratna Sagar.Google Scholar

Abbi, Anvita. 2013. A grammar of the Great Andamanese language: An ethnolinguistic study. Leiden: Brill Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abramson, Arthur S. and L-Thongkum, Theraphan. 2009. A fuzzy boundary between tone languages and voice-register languages. In Fant, G., Fujisaki, H. and Shen, J. (eds.), Frontiers in phonetics and speech science, pp. 149–55. Bejing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar

Adelaar, Alexander and Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.. 2005. The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Alves, Mark J. 2001. What’s so Chinese about Vietnamese? In Thurgood, Graham W. (ed.), Papers from the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, pp. 221–42. Phoenix: Arizona State University.Google Scholar

Alves, Mark J. 2015. Morphological functions among Mon-Khmer languages: Beyond the basics. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 523–49.Google Scholar

Ansaldo, Umberto. 1999. Comparative constructions in Sinitic: Areal typology and patterns of grammaticalisation. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University.Google Scholar

Ansaldo, Umberto and Matthews, Stephen J.. 2001. Typical creoles and simple languages: The case of Sinitic. Linguistic Typology 5(2/3): 311–24.Google Scholar

Bauer, Robert S. 1996. Identifying the Tai substratum in Cantonese. In Pan-Asiatic linguistics: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Languages and Linguistics, Vol. V, pp. 1806–44. Bangkok: Mahidol University.Google Scholar

Bellwood, P. 1992. Southeast Asia before prehistory. In Tarling, (ed.), pp. 55–136.Google Scholar

Bisang, Walter. 1991. Verb serialization, grammaticalization and attractor positions in Chinese, Hmong, Vietnamese, Thai and Khmer. In Seiler, Hansjakob and Premper, Waldfried (eds.), Partizipation: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, pp. 509–62. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Blench, Roger. 2011. The role of agriculture in the evolution of mainland Southeast Asian language phyla. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 125–52.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert. 2013a. Southeast Asian islands and Oceania: Austronesian linguistic history. In Bellwood, Peter (ed.), The encyclopedia of global human migration, Vol. I: Prehistory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Blust, Robert. 2013b. The Austronesian languages, revised edn. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Bradley, David (ed.). 1995. Studies in Burmese languages. (Pacific Linguistics, A-83). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Bradley, David (ed.). 2007. Language endangerment in China and Mainland Southeast Asia. In Brenzinger, Matthias (ed.), Language diversity endangered, pp. 278–302. (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Brunelle, Marc and Kirby, James. 2015. Re-assessing tonal diversity and geographical convergence in Mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 82–110.Google Scholar

Burenhult, Niclas. 2005. A grammar of Jahai. (Pacific Linguistics, 566). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Butler, Becky. 2015. Approaching a phonological understanding of the sesquisyllable with phonetic evidence from Khmer and Bunong. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 443–99.Google Scholar

Capell, Arthur. 1979. Further typological studies in Southeast Asian languages. In Liem, Nguyen Dang (ed.), South-East Asian linguistic studies, Vol. III, pp. 1–42. (Pacific Linguistics, C-45). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Chappell, Hilary. 2001. Language contact and areal diffusion in Sinitic languages. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, pp. 328–57. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Marybeth. 1989. Hmong and areal South-East Asia. In Bradley, David (ed.), Southeast Asian Syntax, pp. 175–230. (Pacific Linguistics, A-77. Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics No. 11). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Clark, Marybeth and Prasithrathsint, Amara. 1985. Synchronic lexical derivation in Southeast Asian languages. In Ratanakul, Suriya and Premsrirat, Suwilai (eds.), Southeast Asian linguistic studies presented to André-G. Haudricourt, pp. 34–81. Bangkok: Mahidol University.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard (ed.). 1990. The major languages of East and South-East Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard (ed.). 2007. Areal typology of mainland Southeast Asia: What we learn from the WALS maps. In Kullavanijaya, Pranee (ed.), Trends in Thai linguistics, pp. 18–47. (Manusya Special Issue 13). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar

Cooke, Joseph R. 1968. Pronominal reference in Thai, Burmese and Vietnamese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, James S. 1966. Halang verb phrase. In Thomas, D. D. (ed.), Papers on four Vietnamese languages, pp. 28–34. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 2008. An exercise in ‘a posteriori’ language sampling. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61(3): 208–20.Google Scholar

de Sousa, Hilário. 2015. The Far Southern Sinitic languages as part of mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 356–439.Google Scholar

Diffloth, Gérard. 1976. Expressives in Semai. Austroasiatic Studies 1, Oceanic Linguistics, Honolulu, University of Hawaii Special Publication 13: 249–64.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. 2003. Linguistic epidemiology: Semantics and grammar of language contact in mainland Southeast Asia. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. 2005. Areal linguistics and mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 181–206.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. 2006. Languages as historical documents: The endangered archive in Laos. South East Asia Research 14(3): 471–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enfield, N. J. 2007. A grammar of Lao. (Mouton Grammar Library 38). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. (ed.). 2011a. Dynamics of human diversity: The case of mainland Southeast Asia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. 2011b. Linguistic diversity in mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 63–80.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. 2015. The utility of meaning: What words mean and why. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J and Comrie, Bernard. 2015. Mainland Southeast Asian languages: State of the art and new directions. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J and Comrie, Bernard (eds.). 2015. Languages of mainland Southeast Asia: The state of the art. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. and Diffloth, Gérard. 2009. Phonology and sketch grammar of Kri, a Vietic language of Laos. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 38(1): 3–69.Google Scholar

Gil, David. 2015. The Mekong-Mamberamo linguistic area. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 266–355.Google Scholar

Goddard, Cliff. 2005. The languages of East and Southeast Asia. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grinevald, Colette. 2000. A morphosyntactic typology of classifiers. In Senft, (ed.), pp. 50–92.Google Scholar

Haas, Mary Rosamond. 1969. Sibling terms as used by marriage partners. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 25(3): 228–35.Google Scholar

Hartmann, John. 1998. A linguistic geography and history of Tai Meuang-Fai (Ditch-Dike) techno-culture. Language and Linguistics 16(2): 67–101.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, Davd and Comrie, Bernard (eds.). 2005. The world atlas of language structures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Henderson, Eugénie J. A. 1952. The main features of Cambodian pronunciation. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 14: 149–74.Google Scholar

Henderson, Eugénie J. A. 1965. The topography of certain phonetic and morphological characteristics of South East Asian languages. Lingua 15: 400–34.Google Scholar

Henderson, Eugénie J. A. 1967. Grammar and tone in South East Asian languages. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Karl-Marx-Universität Leipzig 16(1/2): 171–8.Google Scholar

Huffman, Franklin E. 1970. Modern spoken Cambodian. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Southeast Asia Program.Google Scholar

Hyslop, G., Morey, S. and Post, M. W. (eds.). 2011. North East Indian linguistics, Vol. III. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hyslop, G., Morey, S. and Post, M. W. (eds.). 2012. North East Indian linguistics, Vol. IV. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hyslop, G., Morey, S. and Post, M. W. (eds.). 2013. North East Indian linguistics, Vol. V. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarkey, N. 2015. Serial verbs in White Hmong: Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Jenny, Mathias. 2015. The far west of Southeast Asia: ‘Give’ and ‘get’ in the language of Myanmar. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 155–208.Google Scholar

Jenny, M. and Sidwell, P. (eds.). 2015. The handbook of Austroasiatic languages. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenny, Mathias, Weber, Tobias and Weymuth, Rachel. 2015. The Austroasiatic languages: A typological overview. In Jenny, and Sidwell, (eds.), pp. 13–143. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Kölver, Ulrike. 1991. Local prepositions and serial verb constructions in Thai. In Seiler, Hansjakob and Premper, Waldfried (eds.), Partizipation: das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, pp. 485–508. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Kruspe, Nicole. 2004. A grammar of Semelai. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kwok, H. 1984. Sentence particles in Cantonese. Hong Kong: Center of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar

Long, Yaohong, and Zheng, Guoqiao. The Dong language in Guizhou Province, China. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar

Luong, H. V. 1988. Discursive practices and power structure: Person-referring forms and sociopolitical struggles in colonial Vietnam. American Ethnologist 15(2): 239–53.Google Scholar

Luong, H. V. 1990. Discursive practices and linguistic meanings: The Vietnamese system of person reference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A. 1973. Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. In Hyman, Larry M. (ed.), Southern California occasional papers in Linguistics, No. 1, pp. 72–95. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A. 1991. Areal and universal dimensions of grammatization in Lahu. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, pp. 383–453. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Matisoff, James A. 2001. Genetic versus Contact Relationship: Prosodic diffusability in Southeast Asian Languages. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, pp. 291–327. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, Stephen and Yip, Virginia. 1994. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Michaud, Jean (ed.). 2010. Editorial: Zomia and beyond. Special issue of Journal of Global History 5(2): 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morey, S. and Post, M. W. (eds.). 2008. North East Indian linguistics, Vol. I. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.Google Scholar

Morey, S. and Post, M. W. (eds.). 2010. North East Indian linguistics, Vol. II. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.Google Scholar

Pittayaporn, Pittayawat. 2015. Typologizing sesquisyllabicity: The role of structural analysis in the study of linguistic diversity in Mainland Southeast Asia. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 500–28.Google Scholar

Post, Mark W. 2011. Prosody and typological drift in Austroasiatic and Tibeto-Burman: Against ‘Indosphere’ and Sinosphere’. In Srichampa, S., Sidwell, P. and Gregerson, K. J. (eds.), Austroasiatic studies: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Austroasiatic Linguistics (ICAAL4), pp. 198–211. (Mon-Khmer Studies Special Issue 3). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Post, Mark W. 2015. Morphosyntactic reconstruction in an areal-historical context: A pre-historical relationship between North East India and Mainland Southeast Asia? In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 209–65.Google Scholar

Ratliff, Martha. 2015. Word-initial prenasalization in Southeast Asia: A historical perspective. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 31–50.Google Scholar

San Roque, Lila, Floyd, Simeon and Norcliffe, Elisabeth. Forthcoming. Egophoricity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Schendel, Willem. 2002. Geographies of knowing, geographies of ignorance: Jumping scale in Southeast Asia. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20(6): 647–68.Google Scholar

Scott, James C. 2009. The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google ScholarPubMed

Shorto, H. L. 1960. Word and syllable pattern in Palaung. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 23(3), 544–57.Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack and Shohet, Merav. 2013. The problem of peers in Vietnamese interaction. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19(3): 618–38.Google Scholar

Sidwell, Paul. 2013. Southeast Asian Mainland: Linguistic history. In Bellwood, Peter (ed.), The encyclopedia of global human migration, Vol. I: Prehistory, pp. 259–68. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sidwell, Paul. 2015. Local drift and areal convergence in the reconstructing of mainland Southeast Asian languages. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 51–81.Google Scholar

Sidwell, Paul and Blench, Roger. 2011. The Austroasiatic Urheimat: The southeastern riverine hypothesis. In Enfield, (ed.), pp. 315–43.Google Scholar

Simpson, Andrew (ed.). 2007. Language and national identity in Asia. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Srichampa, Sophana. 2008. Patterns of polite expressions in Vietnamese. The Mon-Khmer Studies Journal 38: 117–47.Google Scholar

Premsrirat, Suwilai. 1987. Khmu, a minority language of Thailand. (Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics, No. 10). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Premsrirat, Suwilai. 2007. Endangered languages of Thailand. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 186: 75–93.Google Scholar

Premsrirat, Suwilai. 2011. Pearic, a dying branch of Austroasiatic languages and its struggle for survival. In Srichampa, Sophana and Sidwell, Paul (eds.), Austroasiatic studies: Papers from the fourth International Conference on Austroasiatic Linguistics (ICAAL4), pp.138–153. (Mon-Khmer Studies Journal Special Issue No. 2). Dallas: SIL International; Salaya: Mahidol University; Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Tarling, N. 1993. The Cambridge history of Southeast Asia: From early times to c. 1800, Vol. II. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, David D. 1971. Chrau grammar, Vol. 7. (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Thurgood, Graham. 1998. Austronesian and Mon-Khmer Components in the Proto Chamic Vowel System. In Thomas, David (ed.), Further Chamic Studies, pp. 61–90. (Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics, No. 15). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Tufvesson, Sylvia 2011. Analogy-making in the Semai sensory world. The Senses & Society 6(1): 86–95.Google Scholar

Vittrant, Alice. 2015. Expressing motion: The contribution of Southeast Asian languages with reference to East Asian languages. In Enfield, and Comrie, (eds.), pp. 579–625.Google Scholar

Vittrant, Alice and Watkins, Justin (eds.). Forthcoming. Mainland South East Asia linguistic area: The languages. Boston and Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Watkins, Justin (ed.). 2005. Studies in Burmese linguistics. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Yip, Moira. 2002. Tone. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alpher, Barry. 1994. Yir-Yoront ideophones. In Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna and Ohala, John J. (eds.), Sound symbolism, pp. 161–77. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Capell, A. 1956. A new approach to Australian linguistics. Sydney: Oceania Publications.Google Scholar

Cleverley, John R. 1968. A preliminary study of the phonology and grammar of Djamindjung. MA thesis, University of New England, Armidale.Google Scholar

Crowley, Terry. 1978. The Middle Clarence dialects of Bandjalang. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

Dench, Alan C. 1994. The historical development of pronoun paradigms in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics 14: 155–91.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1981. Wargamay. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Blake, Barry J. (eds.), The handbook of Australian languages, Vol II, pp. 1–144. Canberra: Australian National University Press; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2001. The Australian linguistic area. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic relationship: Problems in comparative linguistics, pp. 64–104. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2002. Australian languages: Their nature and development. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2015. Edible gender, mother-in-law style, and other grammatical wonders. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Donaldson, Tamsin. 1980. Ngiyambaa: The language of the Wangaaybuwan. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eades, Diana K. 1979. Gumbaynggirr. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Blake, Barry J. (eds.), Handbook of Australian languages, Vol I, pp. 245–361. Canberra: Australian National University Press; Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas D. 1995. A grammar of Kayardild, with historical-comparative notes on Tangkic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas D. 1996. The syntax and semantics of body part incorporation in Mayali. In Chappell, Hilary and McGregor, William (eds.), The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body part nouns and the part-whole relation, pp. 65–109. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Ford, Lysbeth J. 2011. A description of the Emmi language of the Northern Territory of Australia. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Harvey, Mark. 1996. Body parts in Warray. In Chappell, Hilary and McGregor, William (eds.), The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body part nouns and the part-whole relation, pp. 111–53. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey. 1980. Basic materials in Warndarang: Grammar, texts and dictionary. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Hercus, Luise A. 1982. The Baagandji language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Hercus, Luise A. 1986. Victorian languages: A late survey. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Hercus, Luise A. 1994. A grammar of the Arabana-Wangkanguru language, Lake Eyre basin, South Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Hudson, Joyce. 1978. The core of Walmatjari grammar. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

Lee, Jennifer. 1987. Tiwi today: A study of language change in a contact situation. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Mathews, R. H. 1902. The Murawarri and other Australian languages. Queensland Geographical Journal 18: 52–68.Google Scholar

Merlan, Francesca. 1982. Mangarayi. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Merlan, Francesca 1983. Ngalakan grammar, texts and vocabulary. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Merlan, Francesca 1994. A grammar of Wardaman, a language of the Northern Territory of Australia. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Oates, Lynette F. 1988. The Muruwari language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Patz, Elisabeth. 1991. Djabugay. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Blake, Barry J. (eds.), The handbook of Australian languages, Vol. IV, pp. 245–347. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sharpe, Margaret. 1972. Alawa phonology and grammar. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

Smythe, W. E. 1978. Bandjalang grammar. Appendix to Crowley, Terry, The Middle Clarence dialects of Bandjalang, pp. 247–478. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar

Sutton, Peter. 1975. The Flinders Island language. Ms.Google Scholar

Thompson, David A. 1988. Lockhart River ‘Sand Beach’ language: An outline of Kuuku Ya’u and Umpila. Darwin: Summer Institute of Linguistics, Australian Aborigines Branch.Google Scholar

Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1981. The Djaru language of Kimberley, Western Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Walsh, Michael. 1996. Body parts in Murrinh-Patha: Incorporation, grammar and metaphor. In Chappell, Hilary and McGregor, William (eds.), The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body part nouns and the part-whole relation, pp. 327–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Adelaar, Willem F. H. 1977. Tarma Quechua: Grammar, texts, dictionary. Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar

Adelaar, Willem F. H. 1986. La relación quechua-aru. Perspectivas para la separación del léxico. Revista Andina 4(2): 379–426.Google Scholar

Adelaar, Willem F. H. 1987. Aymarismos en el quechua de Puno. INDIANA 11: 223–31.Google Scholar

Adelaar, Willem F. H. 1988. Categorías de aspecto en el quechua del Perú central (English text). Amerindia 13: 15–41.Google Scholar

Adelaar, Willem F. H. 1995. Raíces lingüísticas del quichua de Santiago del Estero. In Garay, Ana Fernández and Barros, José Pedro Viegas (eds.), Actas II Jornadas de Lingüística Aborigen (Buenos Aires, 14–18 November 1994), pp. 25–50. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Instituto de Lingüística.Google Scholar

Adelaar, Willem F. H. 2012. Modeling convergence: Towards a reconstruction of the history of Quechuan-Aymaran interaction. LINGUA 122(5): 461–9.Google Scholar

Adelaar, Willem F. H. 2013. A Quechuan Mirative? In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Storch, Anne (eds.), Perception and cognition in language and culture, pp. 95–109. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Adelaar, Willem F. H. and Muysken, Pieter C.. 2004. The languages of the Andes. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Alexander-Bakkerus, Astrid. 2005. Eighteenth-century Cholón. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics (LOT).Google Scholar

Beresford-Jones, David and Heggarty, Paul. 2012. Broadening our horizons: Towards an interdisciplinary prehistory of the Andes. In Heggarty, Paul and Beresford-Jones, David (eds.), Archaeology and language in the Andes: A cross-disciplinary exploration of prehistory, pp. 57–84. (Proceedings of the British Academy 173). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bills, Garland D., Troike, Rudolph C., and Vallejo, C. Bernardo. 1969. An introduction to spoken Bolivian Quechua. Special publication of the Institute of Latin American Studies, University of Texas at Austin. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Briggs, Lucy Th. 1993. El Idioma Aymara: variantes regionales y sociales. La Paz: Ediciones ILCA.Google Scholar

Bruil, Martine. 2008. Innovations in the Ecuadorian Converb Systems: Grammatical change in language contact situations. MPhil. and MA thesis, Faculty of Humanities, Leiden University.Google Scholar

Burger, Richard L. 2008. Chavín de Huántar and its sphere of influence. In Silverman, Helaine and Isbell, William (eds.), Handbook of South American archaeology, pp. 681–703. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burger, Richard L. 2012. Central Andean language expansion and the Chavín sphere of interaction. In Heggarty, Paul and Jones, David Beresford (eds.), Archaeology and language in the Andes: A cross-disciplinary exploration of prehistory, pp. 135–61. (Proceedings of the British Academy 173). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo M. 1976. Gramática Quechua Junín-Huanca. Lima: Ministerio de Educación e Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar

Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo M. 1987. Lingüística Quechua. Cuzco: Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos ‘Bartolomé de Las Casas’.Google Scholar

Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo M. 2000. Lingüística Aimara. Lima: Centro de Estudios Regionales Andinos ‘Bartolomé de Las Casas’.Google Scholar

Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo M. 2006. El Chipaya o la Lengua de los Hombres del Agua. Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar

Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo M. 2008. Quechumara: Estructuras paralelas del quechua y del aimara. La Paz: Universidad Mayor de San Simón, PROEIB Andes, and Plural Editores.Google Scholar

Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo M., Aguirre, Enrique Ballón. 2011. Chipaya: Léxico – Etnotaxonomía. Nijmegen: Center for Language Studies, Radboud University; Lima: Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar

Ciucci, Luca and Muysken, Pieter C.. 2011. Hernando de Alcocer y la Breve declaración del Arte y Bocabulario de lengua del Ynga conforme al estilo y su vso de la provincia de Quito: El más antiguo manuscrito de quichua del Ecuador INDIANA 28: 359–93.Google Scholar

Coler, Matt. 2014. A grammar of Muylaq’ Aymara. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emlen, Nicholas Q. Forthcoming. Perspectives on the Quechua-Aymara contact relationship and the lexicon and phonology of Pre-Proto-Aymara. International Journal of American Linguistics.Google Scholar

Faller, Martina. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Hardman, Martha J. 1966. Jaqaru: Outline of phonological and morphological structure. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar

Hardman, Martha J. 1972. Postulados lingüísticos del idioma aymara. In Escobar, Alberto (ed.), El reto del multilingüismo en el Perú, pp. 37–43. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar

Hardman, Martha J. 1978. Jaqi: The linguistic family. International Journal of American Linguistics 44(2): 146–53.Google Scholar

Hardman, Martha J. 2000. Jaqaru. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Hardman, Martha, Vásquez, Juana and de Dios Yapita, Juan. 1988. Aymara: Compendio de estructura fonológica y gramatical. La Paz: Instituto de Lengua y Cultura Aymara; Gainesville, FL: The Aymara Foundation.Google Scholar

Hastings, Rachel. 2002. The interpretation of Cuzco Quechua relative clauses. In Kim, Ji-Yung and Werle, Adam (eds.), Proceedings of SULA, pp. 53–62. (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 25). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar

Hintz, Daniel J. 2011. Crossing aspectual frontiers: Emergence, evolution, and interwoven semantic domains in South Conchucos Quechua discourse. (University of California Publications in Linguistics 146). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Hintz, Diane M. 2007. Past tense forms and their functions in South Conchucos Quechua: Time, evidentiality, discourse structure, and affect. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar

Hintz, Daniel J. and Hintz, Diane M.. Forthcoming. The evidential category of mutual knowledge in Quechua. To appear in LINGUA.Google Scholar

Mann, Charles C. 2005. 1491: New revelations of the Americas before Columbus. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Moseley, Michael. 2001. The Incas and their ancestors. Revised edn. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar

Muysken, Pieter C. 2012. Modelling the Quechua-Aymara relationship: Structural features, sociolinguistic scenarios and possible archaeological evidence. In Heggarty, Paul and Jones, David Beresford (eds.), Archaeology and language in the Andes: A cross-disciplinary exploration of prehistory, pp. 85–109. (Proceedings of the British Academy 173). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Orr, Carolyn J. and Longacre, Robert E.. 1968. Proto Quechumaran. Language 44: 28–55.Google Scholar

Parker, Gary J. 1973. Derivación verbal en el quechua de Ancash. (Documento de Trabajo no. 25). Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Centro de Investigación de Lingüística Aplicada.Google Scholar

Parker, Gary J. 1976. Gramática quechua Ancash-Huailas. Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar

Quesada Castillo, Félix. 1976. Gramática quechua Cajamarca-Cañaris. Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar

Soto Ruiz, Clodoaldo. 1979. Quechua: Manual de Enseñanza. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar

Torero Fernández de Córdova, Alfredo A. 1964. Los dialectos quechuas. Anales Científicos de la Universidad Agraria 2(4): 446–78. Lima: La Molina.Google Scholar

Torero Fernández de Córdova, Alfredo A. 1972. Lingüística e historia de la sociedad andina. In Escobar, Alberto (ed.), El reto del multilingüismo en el Perú, pp. 46–106. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar

Torero Fernández de Córdova, Alfredo A. 2002. Idiomas de los Andes: Lingüística e Historia. Lima: Editorial Horizonte.Google Scholar

Vries, Lourens. 2005. Towards a typology of tail-head linkage in Papuan languages. Studies in Language 29(2): 363–84.Google Scholar

Yapita Moya, Juan. 1991. Curso de Aymara Paceño. Institute of Amerindian Studies, University of St Andrews.Google Scholar

Baker, M. C. 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bergsland, K. 1989. Comparative aspects of Aleut syntax. Aikakauskirja Journal de la Societe Finno-ougrienne 82: 7–80.Google Scholar

Bergsland, K. 1997. Aleut grammar. Alaska Native Language Center, Research paper no. 10, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.Google Scholar

Boas, F. 1911. Handbook of American Indian languages. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar

Dorais, L.-J. 1990. Inuit Uqausiqatigiit, Inuit languages and dialects. Iqaluit: Arctic College, Nunatta Campus.Google Scholar

Fortescue, M. 1984. West Greenlandic. Beckenham: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Fortescue, M. 1991. Switch reference anomalies and ‘topic’ in West Greenlandic: A case of pragmatics over syntax. In Verschueren, J. (ed.), Levels of linguistic Adaptation: Selected papers of the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp, August 17–22, 1987, Vol. II, pp. 53–80. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Fortescue, M. 1992. Morphophonemic complexity and typological stability in a polysynthetic language family. International Journal of American Linguistics 58(2): 242–8.Google Scholar

Fortescue, M. 1994. The role of typology in the establishment of the genetic relationship between Eskimo and Aleut and beyond. In Miyaoka, O. (ed.), Languages of the North Pacific Rim, Vol. I, pp. 9–36. University of Hokkaido, Sapporo.Google Scholar

Fortescue, M. 1995. The historical source and typological position of ergativity in Eskimo languages. Etudes/Inuit/Studies 19(2): 61–75.Google Scholar

Fortescue, M. 2003. Evidentiality in West Greenlandic: A case of scattered coding. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, pp. 291–306. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Fortescue, M. 2016. The semantic domain of emotion in Eskimo and neighbouring languages: polysemy, shift, and cognitive motivation. In Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. and Juvanen, P. (eds.), Lexico-typological approaches to semantic shifts and motivation patterns in the lexicon, pp. 285–333. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. 1960. A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 26: 178–94.Google Scholar

Humboldt, W.. 1836. Uber die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaue. Berlin: Koniglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Jacobson, S. A. 1995. A practical grammar of the Central Alaskan Yup’ik Eskimo language. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.Google Scholar

Kleinschmidt, S. 1851. Grammatik der grönländischen Sprache. Berlin. Reprinted Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag Buchhandlung, 1968.Google Scholar

Krauss, M. E. 1976. Eskimo-Aleut. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Native languages of the Americas, pp. 175–281. New York and London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Krauss, M. E. 2007. Native languages of Alaska. In Miyaoka, O., Sakiyama, O. and Krauss, M. E. (eds.), The vanishing languages of the Pacific Rim, pp. 406–17. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leer, J. 1991. Evidence for a northern northwest coast language area: Promiscuous number marking and periphrastic possessive constructions in Hayda, Eyak and Aleut. International Journal of American Linguistics 57(2): 158–93.Google Scholar

Lynge, K. 1978. kalâtdlit oKalugtuait oKalualâvilo. Godthaab: Det groenlandske Forlag.Google Scholar

Mattissen, J. 2003. Dependent-head Synthesis in Nivkh. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Menovščikov, G. A. 1964. Jazyk sirenikskyx eskimosov. Moscow and Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar

Mithun, M. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60: 847–94.Google Scholar

Mithun, M. 2001. The languages of Native North America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mithun, M. 2009. Polysynthesis in the Arctic. In Mahieu, M.-A. and Tersis, N. (eds.), Variations on Polysynthesis, pp. 3–17. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Miyaoka, O. 2012. A grammar of Central Alaskan Yupik (CAY). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Nichols, J. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62: 56–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Reuse, W. J. 1994. Siberian Yupik Eskimo. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Sadock, J. 1980. Noun incorporation in Greenlandic: A case of syntactic word formation. Language 56(2): 300–19.Google Scholar

Sapir, E. 1911. The problem of noun incorporation in American languages. American Anthropologist 13: 250–82. Reprinted in The Collected Works of Edward Sapir, ed. Bright, W., Vol. V, pp. 27–59. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1990.Google Scholar

Trask, R. L. 1979. On the origins of ergativity. In Plank, F. (ed.), Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations, pp. 385–404. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Woodbury, A. 2002. The word in Cup’ik. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 79–99. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Alderete, John and Blenkiron, Amber. 2014. Tahltan grammar synopsis. Ms. Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar

Attla, Catherine. 1983. Sitsiy yugh noholnik ts’in’: As my grandfather told it. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center and Yukon Koyukon School District.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Melissa. 1990. Incorporation in Koyukon Athapaskan. International Journal of American Linguistics 56: 179–95.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Melissa. 1993. The semantics of time: Aspectual categorization in Koyukon Athabaskan. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Axelrod, Melissa. 2000. The semantics of classification in Koyukon Athabaskan. In Fernald, Theodore B. and Platero, Paul R. (eds.), The Athabaskan languages: Perspectives on a North American language family. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Déline First Nation. 2005. Bek’éots’erazhá ni̜dė Yahní̜i̜ Só̜bak’ə́ gogho̜ Sahtúot’ine gogodi [If only we had known. The history of Port Radium as told by the Sahtúot’ine]. Déline, Northwest Territories: Déline First Nation.Google Scholar

Cook, Eung-Do. 1984. A Sarcee grammar. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

Cook, Eung-Do. 2013. A Tsilhqút’ín grammar. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2012. Basic linguistic theory, Vol. III. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013a. Prefixing vs. suffixing in inflectional morphology. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/26 [Accessed on 02.04.15].Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013b. Order of subject, object and verb. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/81 [Accessed on 02.04.15].Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013c. Order of relative clause and noun. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/90 [Accessed on 02.04.2015].Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. 2013d. Position of polar question particles. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/92 [Accessed on 02.04.15].Google Scholar

Faltz, Leonard. 2000. A semantic basis for Navajo syntactic typology. In Fernald, Theodore B. and Platero, Paul R. (eds.), The Athabaskan languages: Perspectives on a Native American language family, pp. 28–50. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Frank, Ellen, Kari, James and Tuttle, Siri. 2006. Lower Tanana Athabaskan language lessons. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar

Goddard, Pliny Earle. 1905. The Bear River dialect of Athapascan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Golla, Victor. 1970. Hupa grammar. PhD dissertation, University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar

Gunlogson, Christine. 2001. Third person object prefixes in Babine-Witsuwit’en. International Journal of American Linguistics 67: 365–95.Google Scholar

Hajek, John. 2013. Vowel nasalization. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.) The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/10 [Accessed on 22.12.14].Google Scholar

Hargus, Sharon. 2002. Negation in Kwadacha (Fort Ware Sekani). Paper presented at the Athabascan Languages Conference, Fairbanks, Alaska.Google Scholar

Hargus, Sharon. 2007. Witsuwit’en grammar: phonetics, phonology, morphology. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar

Hargus, Sharon. 2010. Vowel quality and duration in Xinag, Yukon Deg. In Tuttle, Siri and Spence, Justin (eds.), Proceedings of the 2009 Dene (Athabaskan) Languages Conference, pp. 33–73. (Alaska Native Language Center Working Papers 2009). Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar

Holden, Josh. 2013. Bénasní – I remember: Dene Su̜ɬiné oral histories with morphological analysis. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Holton, Gary. 2000. The phonology and morphology of the Tanacross Athabaskan language. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar

Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 39–76.Google Scholar

Jelinek, Eloise and Willie, MaryAnn. 1996. ‘Psych’ verbs in Navajo. In Jelinek, Eloise, Midgette, Sally, Rice, Keren and Saxon, Leslie (eds.), Athabaskan language studies: Essays in honor of Robert W. Young, pp. 15–34. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar

Jetté, Jules and Jones, Eliza. 2000. Koyukon Athabaskan dictionary. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar

Jung, Dagmar. 2000. Word order in Apache narratives. In Fernald, Theodore B. and Platero, Paul R. (eds.), The Athabaskan languages: Perspectives on a Native American language family, pp. 92–100. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kari, James. 1979. Athabaskan verb theme categories: Ahtna. (Alaska Native Language Center Research Papers number 2). Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar

Kari, James. 1990. Ahtna Athabaskan dictionary. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar

Kari, James. 2007. Dena’ina topical dictionary. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar

Kibrik, Andrej. 2005. Inflection vs. derivation and the template for Athabaskan verb morphology. In Gessner, Suzanne (ed.), Proceedings of the 2005 Athabaskan Languages Conference, pp. 67–94. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar

Krauss, Michael. 1973. Na-Dene. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Linguistics in North America. The Hague: Mouton. 903–78.Google Scholar

Krauss, Michael. 2005. Athabaskan tone. In Hargus, Sharon and Rice, Keren (eds.), Athabaskan prosody, pp. 55–136. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Krauss, Michael and Golla, Victor. 1981. Northern Athapaskan languages. In Helm, June (ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. VI: Subarctic, pp. 67–85. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar

Leer, Jeff. 2000. The negative/irrealis category in Athabaskan-Eyak-Tlingit. In Fernald, Theodore and Platero, Paul (eds.), The Athabaskan languages: Perspectives on a Native American language family, pp. 101–38. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leer, Jeff. 2005. How stress shapes the stem-suffix complex in Athabaskan. In Hargus, Sharon and Rice, Keren (eds.), Athabaskan prosody, pp. 277–318. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Fang-Kuei, Li. 1930. Mattole: An Athabaskan language. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Fang-Kuei, Li. 1946. Chipewyan. In Hoijer, Harry (ed.), Linguistic structures of native America, pp. 398–423. New York: Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology.Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 2013a. Consonant inventories. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/1 [Accessed on 22.12.14].Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 2013b. Uvular consonants. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/6 [Accessed on 22.12.14].Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 2013c. Glottalized Consonants. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/7, Accessed on 2014–12–22.)Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 2013d. Lateral consonants. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/8 [Accessed on 22.12.14].Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 2013e. Absence of common consonants. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/18 [Accessed on 22.12.14].Google Scholar

Maddieson, Ian. 2013f. Presence of uncommon consonants. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at: http://wals.info/chapter/19 [Accessed on 22.12.14].Google Scholar

Manker, Jonathan. 2012. An acoustic study of stem prominence in Hän Athabascan. Masters thesis, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar

Miller, Julia Colleen. 2013. The phonetics of tone in two dialects of Dane-zaa (Athabaskan). PhD dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 2003. Why prefixes? Acta Linguistica Hungarica 50: 155–85.Google Scholar

Moore, Patrick. 2002. Point of view in Kaska historical narratives. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar

Perkins, Ellavina. 1978. The role of word order and scope in the interpretation of Navajo sentences. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar

Perkins, Ellavina. 1982. The extraposition of relative clauses in Navajo. International Journal of American Linguistics 48(3): 277–85.Google Scholar

Petitot, Emile. 1876. Dictionnaire de la langue dènè-dindjié. Paris: Ernst Leroux.Google Scholar

Platero, Paul. 1974. The Navajo relative clause. International Journal of American Linguistics 40: 365–424.Google Scholar

de Reuse, Willem J. and Goode, Phillip. 2006. A practical grammar of the San Carlos Apache language. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar

Rice, Keren. 1989. A grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Rice, Keren. 2000. Morpheme order and semantic scope: Word formation in the Athapaskan verb. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rice, Keren. 2008. On incorporation in Athapaskan languages: Aspects of language change. In Eythórsson, Thórhallur (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory, pp. 375–409. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Rice, Keren. 2011. Principles of affix ordering. An overview. Word Structure 4(2) 169–200.Google Scholar

Rice, Keren and Hargus, Sharon. 2005. Introduction. In Hargus, Sharon and Rice, Keren (eds.), Athabaskan prosody, pp. 1–45. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Rice, Keren and Saxon, Leslie. 2005. Comparative Athapaskan syntax: Arguments and projections. In Cinque, Guglielmo and Kayne, Richard S. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, pp. 698–774. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rice, Sally. 2009. Athapaskan eating and drinking verbs and constructions. In Newman, J. (ed.), The linguistics of eating and drinking, pp. 109–52. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Rushforth, Scott and Tatti, Fibbie. 1980. Bear Lake Athapaskan classificatory verbs: The ‘controlled’–‘uncontrolled’ distinction. Paper presented at the Symposium on Athapaskan Comparative Linguistics and Language Planning, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar

Saxon, Leslie. 1986. The syntax of pronouns in Dogrib (Athapaskan): Some theoretical consequences. PhD dissertation, University of California San Diego.Google Scholar

Saxon, Leslie. 1989. Lexical versus syntactic projection: The configurationality of Slave. In Cook, Eung-Do and Rice, Keren (eds.), Athapaskan linguistics: Current perspectives on a language family, pp. 379–406. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Saxon, Leslie and Siemens, Mary. 1996. Tɬi̜cho̜ Yatiiì Eni̜tɬ’è [A Dogrib dictionary]. Rae-Edzo, NWT: Dogrib Divisional Board of Education.Google Scholar

Saxon, Leslie and Wilhelm, Andrea. 2016. The “possessed noun suffix” and possession in two Nothern Dene (Athabaskan) languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 82(1): 35–70.Google Scholar

Schauber, Ellen. 1975. The syntax and semantics of questions in Navajo. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Smith, Carlota. 1997. The parameter of aspect, 2nd edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Speas, Margaret. 1990. Phrase structure in natural language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Speas, Margaret. 1996. Null objects in functional projections. In Rooryck, Johan and Zaring, Laurie (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon, pp. 187–211. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Speas, Margaret. 2000. Person and point of view in Navajo direct discourse complements. In Carnie, Andrew, Jelinek, Eloise and Willie, Mary Ann (eds.), Papers in honor of Ken Hale, pp. 19–38. (Working Papers in Endangered and Less Familiar Languages 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar

Speas, Margaret and Yazzie, Evangeline Parsons. 1996. Quantifiers and the position of noun phrases in Navajo. In Jelinek, Eloise, Midgette, Sally, Rice, Keren and Saxon, Leslie (eds.), Athabaskan language studies: Essays in honor of Robert W. Young, pp. 35–80. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, Chad. 2000. Iconicity and word order in Koyukon Athabaskan. In Fernald, Theodore B. and Platero, Paul R. (eds.), The Athabaskan languages: Perspectives on a Native American language family, pp. 228–51. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tuttle, Siri. 2010. Syllabic obstruents in Ahtna Athabaskan. In Wohlgemuth, Jan, Cysouw, Michael and Gensler, Orin (eds.), Rara and rarissima: Documenting the fringes of linguistic diversity, pp. 235–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Tuttle, Siri, Lovick, Olga and Núñez-Ortiz, Isabel. 2011. The vowels of Upper Tanana Athabascan. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41: 283–312. Published online. doi:10.1017/S002510031100034X.Google Scholar

Van Gelderen, Elly. 2008. Negative cycles. Linguistic Typology 12: 195–243Google Scholar

Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1932. The structure of the Athabascan languages. Ms. Whorf Collection, Sterling Library, Yale University.Google Scholar

Willie, MaryAnn. 1989. Why there is nothing missing in Navajo relative clauses. In Cook, Eung-Do and Rice, Keren (eds.), Athapaskan linguistics: Current perspectives on a language family, pp. 360–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Willie, MaryAnn. 1991. Pronouns and obviation in Navajo. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar

Willie, MaryAnn and Jelinek, Eloise. 2000. Navajo as a discourse configurational language. In Fernald, Theordore B. and Platero, Paul R. (eds.), The Athabaskan languages: Perspectives on a Native American language family, pp. 252–87. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Young, Robert W. and Morgan, William Sr. 1987. The Navajo language: A grammar and colloquial dictionary, 2nd edn. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar

Blankenship, Barbara. 1996. Classificatory verbs in Cherokee. In Munro, Pamela (ed.), Cherokee papers from UCLA, pp. 61–74. (UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 16). Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 2015. A grammar of the Seneca language. (University of California Publications in Linguistics). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cook, William 1979. A grammar of North Carolina Cherokee. PhD dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar

Flemming, Edward. 1996. Laryngeal metathesis and vowel deletion in Cherokee. In Munro, Pamela (ed.),Cherokee papers from UCLA, pp. 23–44. (UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 16). Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar

Haas, Mary. 1948. Classificatory verbs in Muskogee. International Journal of American Linguistics 14: 242–5.Google Scholar

King, Duane. 1975. A grammar and dictionary of the Cherokee language. PhD dissertation, University of Georgia.Google Scholar

Lindsay, Geoffrey and Scancarelli, Janine. 1985. Where have all the adjectives come from? The case of Cherokee. In Niepokuj, Mary, Van Clay, Mary, Nikiforidou, Vassiliki and Feder, Deborah (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 16–18, 1985, pp. 207–15. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1991. Active/Agentive case marking and its motivations. Language 67: 510–46.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 1996. Multiple reflections of inalienability in Mohawk. In Chappell, Hilary and McGregor, William (eds.), The grammar of inalienability: Typological perspectives on body part terms and the part-whole relation, pp. 633–49. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 2000. Noun and verb in Iroquoian languages: Multicategorisation from multiple criteria. In Vogel, Petra M. and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), An anthology of word classes, pp. 379–420. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 2001. The difference a category makes in the expression of possession and inalienability. In Herslund, Michael, Sørensen, Finn and Baron, Irène (eds.), Dimensions of possession, pp. 285–310. (Typological Studies in Language 47). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 2013. Prosody and independence: Free and bound person marking. In Bakker, Dik and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), Language across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, pp. 291–312. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Montgomery-Anderson, Brad. 2008. A reference grammar of Oklahoma Cherokee. PhD dissertation, University of Kansas.Google Scholar

Munro, Pamela. 1996. The Cherokee laryngeal alternation rule. In Munro, Pamela (ed.), Cherokee papers from UCLA, pp. 45–60. (UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15). Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar

Reyburn, William. 1952. Cherokee verb morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Scancarelli, Janine. 1987. Grammatical relations and verb agreement in Cherokee. PhD dissertation in linguistics, UCLA.Google Scholar

Uchihara, Hiroto. 2013. Tone and accent in Oklahoma Cherokee. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1999. The Arawak language family. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), The Amazonian languages, pp. 65–106. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. The languages of the Amazon. (Oxford Linguistics). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2013. Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Possession and ownership, pp. 1–64. (Explorations in Linguistic Typology). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, Ronald J. 1985. Cuentos folklóricos de los Asheninca, Vol. I. (Comunidades y Culturas Peruanas 18). Yarinacocha: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Anderson, Ronald J. 1986. Cuentos folklóricos de los Asheninca, Vol. II. (Comunidades y Culturas Peruanas 18). Yarinacocha: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Anderson, Ronald J. 2002. Historias de cambio de los ashéninka. (Comunidades y Culturas Peruanas 29). Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Anderson, Ronald J. 2005. Diferencias regionales reconocidas por los ‘campa’. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Lingüísticos 10: 111–22.Google Scholar

Base de Datos de Pueblos Indígenas u Originarios. 2013. Available online at: bdpi.cultura.gob.pe/lista-de-pueblos-indigenas [Accessed 13 December 2014].Google Scholar

Bodley, John H. 2003. The Power of scale: A global history approach. New York and London: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle. 2012. Classification of the indigenous languages of South America. In Campbell, Lyle and Grondona, Verónica (eds.), The Indigenous languages of South America: A comprehensive guide, pp. 59–166. (The World of Linguistics 2). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Cochachi Vásquez, David, Domingo Prado, Cirílo, Romero, Rosa María Paulino and Cochachi Vásquez, Jhon Edgard (eds.). 2009. Opempe. Oshintsinka noñane. El poder de mi lengua. Satipo: AMABISEC y Andesbooks Editorial.Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael. 2007. Content interrogatives in Pichis Asheninka: Corpus study and typological comparison. International Journal of Linguistics 73: 133–63.Google Scholar

Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1986. Comparative survey of morphology and syntax in Brazilian Arawakan. In Derbyshire, Desmond and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. I, pp. 469–566. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Dirks, Sylvester. 1953. Campa (Arawak) phonemes. International Journal of American Linguistics 19(4): 302–4.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2012. Basic linguistic theory: Further grammatical topics, Vol. III. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.. 1999. Introduction. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), The Amazonian languages, pp. 1–21. (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew. 2007. Word order. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. I: Clause structure, pp. 61–131. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fabián, Fernández, Clotilde, Liliana. 2011. Conectores discursivos en asháninka. BA thesis, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.Google Scholar

Salazar, García, Victoria, Gabriela. 1997. Generalidades de la morfologia y fonologia del ashéninca del Ucayali. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Etnolingüísticos 9: 1–101.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. On S, A, P, T and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Discovery 15(3): 535–67.Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2015. Ditransitive constructions. The Annual Review of Linguistics 1: 19–41.Google Scholar

Heise, María, Payne, David, Payne, Judith and Vilchez, Elsa. 2000. Diccionario escolar ashaninka/asheninka. Lima: Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar

Heitzman, Allene. 1975. Correspondencias entre ciertos grupos de fonemas en varios dialectos campa. In Lingüística e indigenismo moderno de América: Trabajos presentados al XXXIX Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, Vol. V, pp. 165–79. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar

Kindberg, Lee D. 1961. Independent and dependent sentence types in Campa (Arawak). In Elson, Benjamin F. and Comas, Juan (eds.), A William Cameron Townsend en el vigésimoquinto aniversario del Instituto Lingüístico de Verano, pp. 519–53. Mexico: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Kindberg, Lee D. 1980. Diccionario asháninca. (Documento de Trabajo 19). Yarinacocha: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Kindberg, Willard. 1961. Campa (Arawak) morphology. In Elson, Benjamin F. and Comas, Juan (eds.), A William Cameron Townsend en el vigésimoquinto aniversario del Instituto Lingüístico de Verano, pp. 519–53. Mexico: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Aimee. 2012. Reconstruction of Proto-Kampa verbal morphology. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, California, 11–12 February.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Aimee. 2013. Inflectional verbal morphology in Matsiguenga. MA thesis, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Michael, Lev. 2007. Mood and negation in Nanti (Kampa, Arawak). Ms.Google Scholar

Michael, Lev. 2008. Nanti evidential practice: Language, knowledge and social action in an Amazonian society. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Michael, Lev. 2011. La reconstrucción y la clasificación interna de la rama Kampa de la familia Arawak. Paper presented at the Congreso de Idiomas Indígenas de Latinoamerica V, University of Texas, Austin, October 7.Google Scholar

Michael, Lev. 2012. Possession in Nanti. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 149–66. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Michael, Lev. 2014. The Nanti reality status system: Implications for the typological validity of the realis/irrealis contrast. Linguistic Typology 18(2): 251–88.Google Scholar

Michael, Lev, Chang, Will and Stark, Tammy. 2014. Exploring phonological areality in the circum-Andean region using a Naive Bayes Classifier. Language Dynamics and Change 4(1): 27–86.Google Scholar

Mihas, Elena. 2010. Essentials of Ashéninka Perené grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar

Mihas, Elena. 2015. A grammar of Alto Perené (Arawak). Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar

O’Hagan, Zachary and Michael, Lev. 2015. On exuberant noun categorization in Matsigenka (Arawak): Gender, animacy, and a multiple classifier system. Talk given at the Gender and Classifiers: Areal and Genealogical Perspectives Workshop, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, 27 January 2015. Available online at: http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~zjohagan/presentations.Google Scholar

Payne, David. 1981. The phonology and morphology of Axininca Campa. (SIL Publications in Linguistics 66). Dallas, TX: SIL International; University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar

Payne, David. 1991. A classification of Maipuran (Arawakan) languages based on shared lexical retentions. In Derbyshire, Desmond and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. III, pp. 355–499. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Payne, David. 2002. Causatives in Asheninka: The case for associative source. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation, pp. 485–505. (Typological Studies in Language 48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Payne, David and Payne, Judith. 2005. The pragmatics of split intransitivity in Asheninka. Revista Latinoamericana de Estidios Ethnolingüísticos 10: 37–56.Google Scholar

Payne, Judith. 1982. Directionals as time referentials in Asheninca. Anthropological Linguistics 24: 325–37.Google Scholar

Payne, Judith. 1989. Lecciones para el aprendizaje del idioma ashéninca. (Serie Lingüística Peruana 28). Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educación y Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Payne, Judith. 1990. Asheninka stress patterns. In Payne, Doris L. (ed.), Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages, pp. 185–209. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Pike, Kenneth and Kindberg, Willard. 1956. A problem in multiple stresses. Word 12: 415–28.Google Scholar

Piratsi. Animales. 1998. Libro de lectura y escritura 6 ashéninca pajonalino, con la traducción castellano. Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Reed, Judith and Payne, David. 1986. Ashéninca (Campa) pronominals. In Wiesemann, Ursula (ed.), Pronominal systems, pp. 323–31. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Romani Miranda, Maggie M. 2004. Toponimia en el Gran Pajonal con especial atención a los topónimos de afiliación Ashaninka. BA thesis, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.Google Scholar

Santos-Granero, Fernando and Barclay, Frederica. 1998. Selva central: History, economy, and land use in Peruvian Amazonia, trans. King, Elizabeth. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Shaler, Dattie. 1971. Idenitification of clause types and participant roles in Pajonal Campa. Ms.Google Scholar

Shaver, Harold. 1996. Diccionario Nomatsiguenga-Castellano, Castellano-Nomatsiguenga. Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Glenn, Shepard Jr.. 1997. Noun classification and ethnozoological classification in Machigenga. The Journal of Amazonian Languages 1(1): 30–59.Google Scholar

Snell, Betty A. 2011. Diccionario matsigenka-castellano. Con índice castellano, notas enciclopédicas, y apuntes gramaticales. (Serie Lingüística Peruana 56). Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Snell, Betty A. and Fonseca, Gustavo Solís. 2005. Tata onkantakera niagantsipage anianeegiku: Diccionario escolar Machiguenga. Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Solís Fonseca, Gustavo. 1973. Fonología machiguenga (arawak). (Documento de Trabajo 24). MA thesis, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.Google Scholar

Solís Fonseca, Gustavo 2003. Lenguas en la Amazonia Peruana. Lima: Visual Service S.R.L.Google Scholar

Spring, Cari. 1990. Implications of Axininca Campa for prosodic morphology and reduplication. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar

Swift, Kenneth. 1988. Morfología del caquinte (Arawak Preandino). (Serie Lingüística Peruana 25). Lima: Instituto Lingüístico del Verano.Google Scholar

Van Gijn, Rik. 2014. The Andean foothills and adjacent Amazonian fringe. In O’Connor, Loretta and Muysken, Pieter (eds.), The Native languages of South America: Origins, development, typology, pp. 102–25. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van Gijn, Rik, Haude, Katharina and Muysken, Pieter. 2011. Subordination in South America: An overview. In Van Gijn, Rik, Haude, Katharina and Muysken, Pieter (eds.), Subordination in Native South American languages, pp. 1–24. (Typological Studies in Language 97). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Weber, David (ed.). 1987. Juan del Oso. (Serie Lingüística Peruana 26). Yarinacocha: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar

Wise, Mary Ruth. 1971. Identification of participants in discourse: A study of aspects of form and meaning in Nomatsiguenga. (Summer Institute of Linguistics Publications in Linguistics and Related Fields 28). Norman: Summer Institute of Linguistics of the University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar

Wise, Mary Ruth. 1986. Grammatical characteristics of Preandine Arawakan languages of Peru. In Derbyshire, Desmond and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. I, pp. 567–642. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Wise, Mary Ruth. 1990. Valence-changing affixes in Maipuran Arawakan languages. In Payne, Doris L. (ed.), Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages, pp. 89–116. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Wise, Mary Ruth. 2002. Applicative suffixes in Peruvian Amazonian languages. In Crevels, Mily, van de Kerke, Simon, Meira, Sérgio and van der Voort, Hein (eds.), Current studies on South American Indian languages: Selected papers from the 50th International Congress of Americanists in Warsaw and the Spinoza workshop on Amerindian languages in Leiden, 2000, pp. 329–44. (Indigenous Languages of Latin America 3). Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and Amerindian studies.Google Scholar

Adams, B. A. 1983. A Tagmemic analysis of the Wolaitta language. PhD thesis, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar

Ahland, Michael Bryan. 2012. A grammar of Northern Mao (MÀWÉS AAS’È). PhD thesis, University of Oregon.Google Scholar

Yilma, Aklilu. 1994. A sketch of the Nayi grammar. SLLE linguistic reports 16: 1–20.Google Scholar

Yilma, Aklilu 2003. Comparative phonology of the Maji languages. Journal of Ethiopian Studies 36(2): 59–88.Google Scholar

Allan, Edward J. 1976b. Dizi. In Bender, M. L. (ed.), The non-Semitic languages of Ethiopia, pp. 377–92. (Monograph No. 5, Occasional Papers Series, Committee on Ethiopian Studies 1). East Lansing: African Studies Center, Michigan State University.Google Scholar

Amha, Azeb. 1995. Case in Basketo. African Languages and Cultures 28(1): 1–17.Google Scholar

Amha, Azeb 1996. Tone-accent and prosodic domains in Wolaitta. Studies in African Linguistics 25(2):111–38.Google Scholar

Amha, Azeb 2001a. The Maale language. CNWS Publications, Vol. 99. Leiden University. CNWS.Google Scholar

Amha, Azeb 2001b. Ideophones and compound verbs in Wolaitta. In Killian-Hatz, Christa and Voeltz, F. K. E. (eds.), Ideophones, pp. 49–62. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamin.Google Scholar

Amha, Azeb 2006. Gender and animacy in Maale in comparative perspective. In Uhlig, S. (ed.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ethiopian Studies, pp. 704–14. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Amha, Azeb 2007a. Are -a- and -o- in the indicative verb paradigms of Zargulla nominalizers? In Azeb, Ahma, Graziano, Savá and Mous, Maarten (eds.), Omotic and Cushitic languages studies: Papers from the Fourth Cushitic-Omotic Conference, Leiden, 10–12 April 2003, pp. 1–22. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar

Amha, Azeb 2007b. Questioning forms in Zargulla. In Voigt, Rainer (ed.), ‘From Beyond the Mediterranean’: Akten des 7. internationalen Semitohamitistenkongresses, Berlin 13–15, September 2004, pp. 197–210. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.Google Scholar

Amha, Azeb 2007c. Non-verbal predication in Wolaitta. In Crass, Joachim and Meyer, Ronny (eds.), Deictics, copula and focus in the Ethiopian Convergence Area, pp. 99–117. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar

Amha, Azeb 2009a. Participant marking and valence in Wolaitta. In Dimmendaal, Gerrit (ed.), Coding participant marking: Construction types in twelve African languages, pp. 355–84. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Amha, Azeb 2009. The morpho-syntax of negation in Zargulla. In Wetzels, Leo (ed.), The linguistics of endangered languages: Contributions to morphology and morpho-syntax, pp. 199–220. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar

Amha, Azeb 2010. Compound verbs and ideophones in Wolaitta revisited. In Amberber, Mengistu, Baker, Brett and Harvey, Mark (eds.), Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure, pp. 259–90. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Amha, Azeb 2012. Omotic. In Frajzyngier, Zygmunt and Shay, Erin (eds.), The Afroasiatic languages, pp. 423–504. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ahland, Michael Bryan 2013. Demonstratives and directionals in Wolaitta. Paper presented at the LCRC weekly meeting. The Cairns Institute, JCU Cairns, Australia.Google Scholar

Amha, Azeb Forthcoming. Male drums and female drums: Gender and inanimate nouns in Oyda. Gender, culture and cognition. Special issue of the International Journal of Language and Culture (ed. Alvanoudi, Angeliki).Google Scholar

Amha, Azeb and Dimmendaal, Gerrit J.. 2006a. Verbal compounding in Wolaitta. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, pp. 319–37. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Amha, Azeb and Dimmendaal, Gerrit J.. 2006b. Converbs in an African perspective. In Ameka, F. K., Dench, Alan and Evans, Nicholas (eds.), Catching languages: Issues in grammar writing, pp. 393–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Beachy, Marvin Dean. 2005. An overview of central Dizin phonology and morphology. MA thesis, University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar

Bender, M. Lionel. 1991. Comparative Aroid (South Omotic) syntax and morphosyntax. Afrika und Übersee 74: 87–110.Google Scholar

Bender, M. L. 2000. Comparative morphology of the Omotic languages. (Lincom Studies in African Linguistics 19). Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Bender, M. L. 2003. Omotic lexicon and phonology. Southern Illinois University: SIU Printing/Duplicating.Google Scholar

Mendisu, Biniyam S.. 2008. Koorete verb Morphology. PhD thesis, Oslo University.Google Scholar

Breeze, Mary J. 1986. Personal pronouns in Gimira. In Wiesemann, Ursula (ed.), Pronominal systems, pp. 47–69. (Continuum 5). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Breeze, Mary J. 1990. A sketch of the phonology and grammar of Gimira (Benchnon). In Hayward, R. J. (ed.), Omotic studies, pp. 1–67. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Goshu, Debela and Demeke, Girma A.. 2005. A grammatical sketch and some socio-linguistic aspects of a dying language, Anfillo. Ethiopian Languages Research Centre Working Papers 1(1): 53–86.Google Scholar

Dimmendaal, Gerrit. 2007. Africa’s verb-final languages. In Heine, Bernd and Nurse, Derek (eds.), A linguistic geography of Africa, pp. 271–307. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 1982. Where have all the adjectives gone? And other essays in semantics and syntax. Berlin and New York: Mouton.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2003. Demonstratives: A cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language 27(1): 61–112Google Scholar

Dixon, R. M. W. 2004. Adjective classes in typological perspective. In Dixon, R. M. W. and Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), Adjective classes, pp. 1–49. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fleming, Harold. 1976. Omotic overview. In Bender, M. L. (ed.), The non-Semitic languages of Ethiopia, pp. 298–323. (Monograph No. 5, Occasional Papers Series, Committee on Ethiopian Studies 1). East Lansing: African Studies Center, Michigan State University.Google Scholar

Guadie, Gebre B.. 2013. Shinasha noun morphology. PhD thesis, Oslo University.Google Scholar

Hayward, R. J. 1982. Notes of the Koyra language. Afrika und Übersee 65(2): 211–68.Google Scholar

Hayward, R. J. 1987. Terminal vowels in Ometo nominals. In Jungraithmayr, H. and Müller, W. W. (eds.), Proceedings of the fourth International Hamito-Semitic Congress, Marburg, September 20–22, 1983, pp. 215–31. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins,Google Scholar

Hayward, R. J. 1988. Remarks on Omotic sibilants. In Bechhaus-Gerst, M. and Serzisko, F. (eds.), Cushitic and Omotic: Papers from the International Symposium on Cushitic and Omotic Languages, Cologne, January 6–9, 1986, pp. 263–99. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar

Hayward, R. J. 1990a. Notes on the Zayse Language. In Hayward, R. J. (ed.), Omotic language studies, pp. 210–355. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar

Hayward, R. J. 1990b. Notes on the Aari language. In Hayward, R. J. (ed.), Omotic language studies, pp. 425–93. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar

Hayward, R. J. 1995. The Challenge of Omotic (an inaugural lecture). School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar

Hayward, R. J. 2003. Omotic. The ‘empty quarter’ of Afroasiatic Linguistics. In Lecarme, Jacqueline (ed.), Research in Afroasiatic grammar II: Selected papers from the fifth Conference on Afroasiatic Languages, Paris, 2000, pp. 241–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hellenthal, Anne-Christie. 2010. Sheko grammar. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar

Hirut, Woldemariam. 2001. Demonstratives in Dawuro. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere. (Special issue on North-East Africa linguistic and literary studies) 65: 157–67.Google Scholar

Hirut, Woldemariam 2003. The grammar of Haro with comparative notes on the Ometo linguistic group. PhD thesis, Addis Ababa University.Google Scholar

Hirut, Woldemariam 2005. Historical notes on numerals in Ometo: The obsolete quinary system. Journal of Ethiopian Studies 38(1/2): 131–50.Google Scholar

Woldemariam, Hirut. 2007. Deictics in Gamo. In Crass, Joachim and Meyer, Ronny (eds.), Deictics, copula and focus in the Ethiopian Convergence Area, pp. 129–38. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar

Hompó, Éva. 1990. Grammatical relations in Gamo: A pilot sketch. In Hayward, R. J. (ed.), Omotic language studies, pp. 356–405. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar

Hudson, Grover. 2005. 75 Ethiopian languages: 19 Cushitic, 20 Nilosaharan, 23 Omotic, 12 Semitic and 1 unclassified. Unpublished paper. Available online at: www.msu.edu/~hudson/Ethlgs.pdf.Google Scholar

König, Christa. 2006. Marked nominative in Africa. Studies in Language 30(4): 655–732.Google Scholar

Lydall, Jean. 1976. Hamar. In Bender, M. L. (ed.), The non-Semitic languages of Ethiopia, pp. 393–438. (Monograph No. 5, Occasional Papers Series, Committee on Ethiopian Studies 1). East Lansing: African Studies Center, Michigan State University.Google Scholar

Tesfu, Mahder. 2001. The morphology of Malo. MA thesis, Addis Ababa University.Google Scholar

Yigezu, Moges. 2007. The vowel system of Kara from a historical-comparative perspective. In Voigt, Rainer (ed.), ‘From beyond the mediterranean’. Akten des 7. Internationalen Semitohamitistenkongresses, pp. 245–51. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar

Seyoum, Mulugeta. 2008. A grammar of Dime. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar

Rapold, Christian J. 2006. Towards a Grammar of Benchnon. PhD thesis, Leiden University.Google Scholar

Rottland, Franz. 1990. A sketch of Shinasha morphology. In Hayward, R. J. (ed.), Omotic Language Studies, pp. 185–209. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar

Ado, Taddese. 2001. Tone in Kafinoono. MA thesis, Trondheim University.Google Scholar

Theil, Rolf. 2007. Kafa phonology. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 28(2): 193–216.Google Scholar

Theil, Rolf. 2013: Koorete tonology. In Simeone-Senelle, M.-C. and Vanhove, Martine (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Cushitic and Omotic Languages, Paris, April 16–18, 2008, pp. 167–74. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Google Scholar

Unseth, Peter. 1990. Linguistic bibliography of the non-Semitic languages of Ethiopia. East Lansing: African Studies Center, Michigan State University.Google Scholar

Wedekind, K. 1983. A six-tone language in Ethiopia: Tonal analysis of Benchnon (Gimira). Journal of Ethiopian Studies 16: 129–56.Google Scholar

Wedekind, K. 1985. Why Bench (Ethiopia) has five level tones today. In Pieper, Ursula and Stickel, Gerhard (eds.), Studia linguistica diachronica et synchronica, pp. 881–901. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Wedekind, K. 1990. Gimo-Jan or Ben-Yem-Om: Beng-Yemsa Phonemes, Tones and Words, In Hayward, R. J. (ed.), Omotic language studies, pp. 68–184. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar

Zaborski, Andrzej. 1983. Basic numeral in Omotic languages. In Segert, S. and Bodrogligeti, A. J. E. (eds.), Ethiopian studies, pp. 123–42. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Zaugg-Coretti, Silvia. 2013. Yemsa verb morphology. PhD thesis, University of Zurich.Google Scholar

Appleyard, David L. 2004. Some thoughts on the origin of the Amharic object marker -[ə]n. In Böll, V., Nosnitsin, D., Rave, T., Smidt, W. and Sokolinskaia, E. (eds.), Studia Aethiopica: In honour of Siegbert Uhlig on the occasion of his 65th birthday, pp. 291–301. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Cohen, Marcel. 1912. Le parler arabe des juifs d’Algers. Paris: H. Champion.Google Scholar

Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A. 2014a. Notes on the history of reciprocal NP-strategies in Semitic languages in a typological perspective. Diachronica 31: 337–78.Google Scholar

Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A. 2014b. From non-argument-dative to an argument-dative: The character and origin of the qṭīl lī construction in Syriac and Jewish Babylonian Aramaic. Folia Orientalia 51: 59–101.Google Scholar

Caubet, Dominique. 1993. L’arabe marocain, 2 vols. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar

Cook, John A. 2006. The finite verbal forms in Biblical Hebrew do express aspect. Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society 30: 21–35.Google Scholar

Cowell, Mark W. 1964. A reference grammar of Syrian Arabic. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Deutscher, Guy. 2000. Stability against the odds? The survival of verb final order in Akkadian. In Sornicola, Rosanna, Poppe, Erich and Shisha-Halevy, Ariel (eds.), Stability, change and variation in word-order patterns over time, pp. 55–69. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Erwin, Wallace M. 1963. A short reference grammar of Iraqi Arabic. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Fassberg, Steven E. 1999. The Lengthened Imperative קָטְלָה in Biblical Hebrew. Hebrew Studies 40: 7–13.Google Scholar

Fassberg, Steven E. 2010. The Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialect of Challa. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Gensler, Orin D. 2011. Morphological typology of Semitic. In Weninger, Stefan (ed.), in collaboration with Khan, Geoffrey, Streck, Michael P. and Watson, Janet C. E., The Semitic languages: An international handbook, pp. 279–302. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hasselbach, Rebecca. 2013. Case in Semitic: Roles, relations, and reconstruction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hetzron, Robert. 1967. Agaw numerals and incongruence in Semitic. Journal of Semitic Studies 12: 169–97.Google Scholar

Hoberman, Robert D. and Aronoff, Mark. 2003. The verbal morphology of Maltese: From Semitic to Romance. In Shimron, Joseph (ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based, morphology, pp. 61–78. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Huehnergard, John. 2003. Akkadian ḫ and West Semitic ḥ. In Kogan, Leonid (ed.), Orientalia: Papers of the Oriental Institute 3, pp. 102–19. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities.Google Scholar

Huehnergard, John. 2004. Afro-Asiatic. In Woodard, Roger (ed.), Cambridge encyclopedia of the world’s ancient languages, pp.138–59. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huehnergard, John. 2006. On the etymology of the Hebrew Relative šɛ-. In Fassberg, Steven E. and Hurvitz, Avi (eds.), Biblical Hebrew in Its Northwest Semitic setting: Typological and historical perspectives, pp.103–25. Jerusalem: Magnes.Google Scholar

Jastrow, Otto. 1990. Der arabische Dialekt der Juden von ‘Aqra und Arbīl. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Joosten, Jan. 1998. The functions of the Semitic D stem: Biblical Hebrew materials for a comparative-historical approach. Orientalia 67: 202–30.Google Scholar

Joosten, Jan. 2002. Do the finite verbal forms in Biblical Hebrew express aspect? Journal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society 29: 49–70.Google Scholar

Kapeliuk, Olga. 2011. Creating adverbs in Amharic. In Busetto, Luca, Sottile, Roberto, Tonelli, Livia and Tosco, Mauro (eds.), He bitaney lagge: Studies on language and African linguistics in honour of Marcello Lamberti, pp. 81–90. Milan: Qu.A.S.A.R.Google Scholar

Khan, Geoffrey. 1999. A grammar of the Neo-Aramaic dialect of the Jews of Arbel. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Khan, Geoffrey. 2002. The Neo-Aramaic dialect of Qaraqosh. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Khan, Geoffrey. 2008. The expression of definiteness in North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic dialects. In Gzella, Holger and Folmer, Margaretha L. (eds.), Aramaic in its historical linguistic setting, pp. 209–26. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Khan, Geoffrey. 2015. Ergativity in Neo-Aramaic. In Coon, Jessica, Massam, Diane and Travis, Lisa (eds.), Oxford handbook of ergativity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kogan, Leonid. 2011. Proto-Semitic phonetics and phonology. In Weninger, Stefan (ed.), in collaboration with Khan, Geoffrey, Streck, Michael P. and Watson, Janet C. E., The Semitic languages: An international handbook, pp. 54–151. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Leslau, Wolf. 1945. The influence of Cushitic on the Semitic languages of Ethiopia: A problem of substratum. Word 1: 59–82.Google Scholar

Leslau, Wolf. 1995. Reference grammar of Amharic. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Leslau, Wolf. 1999. Zway Ethiopic documents: Grammar and dictionary. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Lonnet, Antoine. 1998. Le Socotri: une métamorphose contrariée. In Medlaoui, Mohamed El, Gafaiti, Said and Saa, Fouad (eds.), Actes du 1^er congrès Chamito-Sémitique de Fès, pp. 69–85. Fes: Faculté des Lettres et des Sciences Humaines Saïs-Fès.Google Scholar

Melles, Mulugeta Girmay. 2001. Tigrinya grammar and reader. Springfield, VA: Dunwoody.Google Scholar

Meyer, Ronny. 2005. Das Zay: Deskriptive Grammatik einer Ostguragesprache (Äthiosemitisch). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar

Meyer, Ronny. 2006. Wolane: Descriptive grammar of an East Gurage language (Ethiosemitic). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar

Muraoka, Takamitsu and Porten, Bezalel. 2003. A grammar of Egyptian Aramaic, 2nd edn. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Nöldeke, Theodor. [1904] 2001. Compendious Syriac grammar, 2nd edn, trans. Crichton, James A.. London: Williams and Norgate. Reprinted Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar