The Cambridge International Handbook of Lean Production Diverging Theories and New Industries around the World
Book contents
- The Cambridge International Handbook of Lean Production
- The Cambridge International Handbook of Lean Production
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures and Sidebars
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- 1 Lean Production as the Dominant Division of Labor
- Part I Theories of Lean Production
- 2 Lean Production from the View of Management Theory
- 3 Lean Production – Perspectives from its Primary Caretaker, Industrial Engineering
- 4 The Industrial Relations Perspective on Lean Systems, Workers, and Unions
- 5 Contested Views of Lean Production from the Social Sciences Perspective
- 6 The Lean Labor Process
- Part II Lean Production across Industries
- Part III Lean Production Around the World
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
5 - Contested Views of Lean Production from the Social Sciences Perspective
from Part I - Theories of Lean Production
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2021
Book contents
- The Cambridge International Handbook of Lean Production
- The Cambridge International Handbook of Lean Production
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures and Sidebars
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- 1 Lean Production as the Dominant Division of Labor
- Part I Theories of Lean Production
- 2 Lean Production from the View of Management Theory
- 3 Lean Production – Perspectives from its Primary Caretaker, Industrial Engineering
- 4 The Industrial Relations Perspective on Lean Systems, Workers, and Unions
- 5 Contested Views of Lean Production from the Social Sciences Perspective
- 6 The Lean Labor Process
- Part II Lean Production across Industries
- Part III Lean Production Around the World
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
The social sciences perspective on lean production is much less unified than the previous two areas of management and industrial engineering. Some studies of the impact of lean production on the workforce cover positive aspects such as teamwork, job rotation, job enrichment, and job satisfaction. Other studies examine the negative aspects such as work intensification, long and unannounced overtime, and the extensive use of temporary workers. Yet another group studies the diffusion of lean production, and there are alternative models like socio-technical theory and diversified quality production. As a result, this chapter focuses on six approaches to lean: (1) sociological studies of lean production; (2) socio-technical theory as a social psychological approach to lean and teamwork; (3) the diffusion of lean production; (4) critical social science and flexible accumulation; (5) the productive models approach; and (6) diversified quality production. The social sciences are more divided about the benefits and costs of lean production, so we start with the three positive views and follow with the three critical approaches.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge International Handbook of Lean ProductionDiverging Theories and New Industries around the World, pp. 124 - 149Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Abegglen, James 2006. 21st Century Japanese Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Paul. 2012. “The Sociological Ambivalence of Bureaucracy: From Weber via Gouldner to Marx.” Organization Science. 23(1): 244–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aglietta, Michel. 1978. “Phases of US Capital Expansion.” New Left Review. 110: 17–28.Google Scholar
Albritton, Robert. 1995/2001. “Regulation Theory: A Critique,” pp. 416–442 in Jessop, Bob (ed.) The Parisian Regulation School, Volume 1. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Anttila, Timo, Oinas, Tomi Sakan, and Armi, Mustosmäki. 2018. “Towards Formalisation: The Organisation of Work in the Public and Private Sectors in Nordic Countries.” Acta Sociologica. 62(3): 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelbaum, Eileen and Batt, Rosemary. 2014. Private Equity at Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, Steven. 1997. “Socio-technical Systems Theory: An Intervention Strategy for Organizational Development.” Management Decision. 35(6): 452–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austrom, Douglas and Ordowich, Carolyn. 2018. “Calvin Pava: Sociotechnical Design for the Digital Coal Mines,” pp. 2–31 in Szabla, David, Pasmore, William, Barnes, Mary, and Gipson, Asha (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Avgar, Ariel and Kuruvilla, Sarosh. 2015. “Dual Alignment of Industrial Relations Activity: From Strategic Choice to Mutual Gains.” Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations. 21: 1–39.Google Scholar
Baccaro, Lucio, Doellgast, Virginia, Edwards, Tony, and Whitford, Josh. 2018. “Diversified Quality Production 2.0: On Arndt Sorge and Wolfgang Streeck, ‘Diversified Quality Production Re-visited: Its Contribution to German Socioeconomic Performance Over Time’.”Socio-Economic Review. 16(3): 614–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamber, Greg, Stanton, Pauline, Bartram, Timothy, and Ballardie, Ruth. 2014. “Human Resource Management, Lean Processes and Outcomes for Employees.” International Journal of Human Resource Management. 25(21): 2881–2891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Gordon and Sommerville, Ian. 2011. “Socio-technical Systems: From Design Methods to Systems Engineering.” Interacting with Computers. 23: 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Daniel. 1976. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Axel van den and Janoski, Thomas. 2005. “Conflict Theories in Political Sociology,” pp. 72–95 in Janoski, Thomas, Alford, Robert, Hicks, Alexander, and Schwartz, Mildred (eds.) The Handbook of Political Sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Besser, Terry. 1993. “The Commitment of Japanese and US Workers.” American Sociological Review. 58(6): 873–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanpain, Roger (ed.). 2008. Globalization and Employment Relations in the Auto Industry. Alphen aan den Rijn,The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Blanpain, Roger, Bisom-Rapp, Susan, Corbett, William, Josephs, Hilary, and Michael, Zimmer (eds.). 2007. The Global Workplace. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, , Robert, E., Charron, Ulrich Jürgens, and Tolliday, Steve (eds.). 1998. Between Imitation and Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, Robert and Drache, Daniel (eds.). 1996. States Against Markets. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Boyer, Robert and Freyssenet, Michel. 2000. “A New Approach of Productive Models. The World that Changed the Machine.” Industrielle Beziehungen. 7(4): 385–413.Google Scholar
Boyer, Robert and Freyssenet, Michel 2002 [2000 in French]. The Productive Models. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boyer, Robert and Freyssenet, Michel 2016. “Special Session: 15 Years of Productive Models,” Plenary Session. GERPISA Conference: The New Frontiers of the World Automotive Industry. Puebla, Mexico, June 4.Google Scholar
Brenner, Robert and Glick, Mark. 2001. “The Regulation Approach: Theory and History,” pp. 341–415 in Jessop, Bob (ed.) The Parisian Regulation School, Volume 1. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Budd, John W. and Bhave, Devasheesh. 2008. “Values, Ideologies, and Frames of Reference in Employment Relations,” pp. 92–113 in Blyton, Paul, Bacon, Nicolas, Fiorito, Jack, and Heery, Edmund (eds.) Sage Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carayon, Pascale. 2009. “Human Factors of Complex Sociotechnical Systems.” Applied Ergonomics. 37(4): 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carayon, Pascale, Hancock, Peter, Leveson, Nancy, Nov, Ian, Sznelwar, Laerte, and Geert, van Hootegem. 2015. “Advancing a Sociotechnical Systems Approach to Workplace Safety.” Ergonomics. 58(4): 548–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carvajal, Raul. 1983. “Systemic-Netfields: The Systems Paradigm Crisis. Part I.” Human Relations. 36(3): 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvajal, Raul 1985. “Systemic-Netfields: The Emergence of New Frames, Part II.” Human Relations. 38(9): 857–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Simon. 1990. “The Crisis of Fordism or the Crisis of Social Democracy?” Telos. 83: 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Robert E. 1971. Japanese Blue Collar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Robert E. 1979. Work, Mobility and Participation. Berkeley, CA; University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Robert E. 1989. Strategies for Learning. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Robert, Kalleberg, Arne, and Lincoln, James. 1993. “Assessing Commitment in the United States and Japan: A Comment on Besser.” American Sociological Review. 58(6): 882–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danford, Andy. 1998. “Teamworking and Labour Regulation in the Autocomponents Industry.” Work, Employment and Society. 12(3): 409–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defeo, Joseph and Juran, Joseph. 2016. Juran’s Quality Handbook, 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Delbridge, Rick. 1998. Life on the Line in Contemporary Manufacturing. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deming, W. Edwards. 1994. The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Doellgast, Virginia. 2010. “Collective Voice under Decentralized Bargaining: A Comparative Study of Work Reorganization in US and German Call Centres.” British Journal of Industrial Relations. 48(2): 375–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dore, Ronald. 1973. British Factory, Japanese Factory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dore, Ronald 1987. Taking Japan Seriously. Stanford, CA: Atholone and Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Durand, Jean-Pierre, Stewart, Paul, and Castillo, Juan José (eds.). 1999. Teamwork in the Automobile Industry. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgell, Stephen and Granter, Edward. 2020. The Sociology of Work, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Edwards, Paul, Ram, Monder, Sengupta, Sukanya, and Tsai, Chin-ju. 2006. “The Structuring of Working Relationships in Small Firms.” Organization, 13(5): 701–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Paul, Sengupta, Sukanya, and Tsai, Chin-ju. 2009. “Managing Low-skill Workers: A Study of Small UK Food Manufacturing Firms.” Human Resource Management Journal. 19(1): 40–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emery, Fred. 1997. “The Next Thirty Years: Concepts, Methods and Anticipations.” Human Relations. 50(8): 885–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freund, William and Epstein, Eugene. 1984. People and Productivity. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.Google Scholar
Freyssenet, Michel. 2003. Globalization or Regionalization of the European Car Industry. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freyssenet, Michel(ed.). 2009. The Second Automobile Revolution. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartman, David. 1998. “Postmodernism; or, the Cultural Logic of Post-Fordism.” Sociological Quarterly. 39(1): 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geary, John and Trif, Aurora. 2011. “Workplace Partnership and the Balance of Advantage.” British Journal of Industrial Relations. 49(s1): s44–s69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gereffi, Gary, Humphrey, John, and Sturgeon, Timothy. 2005. “The Governance of Global Value Chains.” Review of International Political Economy. 12(1): 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Kenyon B. de. 1973. Sociotechnical Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hauptmeier, Marco. 2012. “Institutions Are What Actors Make of Them—The Changing Construction of Firm-level Employment Relations in Spain.” British Journal of Industrial Relations. 50(4): 737–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyer, Nancy Lea, A. Brown, Karen, and Zimmerman, Sharon. 1998. “A Socio‐Technical Systems Approach to Cell Design: Case Study and Analysis.” Journal of Operations Management. 17(2): 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, Frederic. 1991. Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Janoski, Thomas. 1990. The Political Economy of Unemployment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Janoski, Thomas 1994. “Direct State Intervention in the Labor Market: The Explanation of Active Labor Market Policy from 1950 to 1988 in Social Democratic Conservative and Liberal Regimes,” pp. 31–53 in Janoski, Thomas and Hicks, Alexander (eds.) The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janoski, Thomas and Lepadatu, Darina. 2014. Dominant Divisions of Labor: Models of Production that Have Transformed the World of Work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, Bob 2001. “Introduction,” pp. xxv–xxxvi in Jessop, Bob (ed.) The Regulation School and the Crisis of Capitalism, Volume 1 of The Parisian Regulation School. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Jessop, Robert and Sum, Ngai-Ling. 2006. Beyond the Regulation Approach. London: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juran, Joseph and Gryna, Frank (eds.). 2011. Juran’s Quality Control Handbook, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Juravich, Tom. 1985. Chaos on the Shop Floor. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich. 2004. “An Elusive Model: Diversified Quality Production and the Transformation of the German Automobile Industry.” Competition and Change. 8(4): 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich and Krzywdzinski, Michael. 2016. New Worlds of Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochan, Thomas, Adler, Paul, McKersie, Robert, Eaton, Adrienne, Segal, Phyllis, and Gerhart, Paul. 2008. “The Potential and Precariousness for Partnership.” Industrial Relations. 47(1): 36–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochan, Thomas, Lansbury, Russell, and MacDuffie, John Paul (eds.). 1997. After Lean Production. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krafcik, John F. 1988. “Triumph of the Lean Production System.” Sloan Management Review. 30(1): 41–52.Google Scholar
Krzywdzinski, Michael. 2011. “Exporting the German Work Model to Central and Eastern Europe,” pp. 99–116 in Contrepois, Sylvie, Delteil, Violaine, Dieuaide, Patrick, and Jefferys, Steve (eds.) Globalizing Employment Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepadatu, Darina and Janoski, Thomas. 2011. Diversity at Kaizen Motors: Gender, Race, Age and Insecurity in a Top Japanese Transplant. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Lepadatu, Darina and Janoski, Thomas 2018. “Just in Time Workforce: Temporary Workers as a Structural Aspect of Lean Production in the US Auto Industry.” International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management. 18 (2): 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepadatu, Darina and Janoski, Thomas 2020. Framing and Managing Lean Organizations in the New Economy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey and Meier, David. 2005. The Toyota Way Fieldbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey and Convis, Gary. 2012. The Toyota Way to Lean Leadership. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey and Franz, James. 2012. The Toyota Way to Continuous Improvement. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey and Hoseus, Michael 2010. “Human Resource Development in Toyota Culture.” International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management. 10(1): 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, James, Guillot, Didier, and Sargent, Matthew. 2017. “Business Groups, Networks, and Embeddedness: Innovation and Implementation Alliances in Japanese Electronics, 1985-1998.” Industrial and Corporate Change. 26(2017): 357–378.Google Scholar
Lincoln, James and Kalleberg, Arne. 1985. “Work Organization and Workforce Commitment: A Study of Plants and Employees in the US and Japan.” American Sociological Review. 50: 738–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, James and Kalleberg, Arne 1990. Culture, Control and Commitment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lincoln, James and Kalleberg, Arne 1996. “Commitment, Quits and Work Organization in Japanese and US Plants.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 50(1): 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, James and Shimotani, Masahiro. 2010. “Business Networks in Postwar Japan: Whither the Keiretsu?” pp. 127–156 in Colpan, Asli, Hikino, Takashi, and Lincoln, James (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lipietz, Alain. 1987. “Rebel Sons: The Regulation School,” pp. 3–12 in Jessop, Bob (ed.) The Regulation School and the Crisis of Capitalism, Volume 1 of The Parisian Regulation School. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Lipietz, Alain 1997. “The Post-Fordist World: Labour Relations, International Hierarchy and Global Ecology.” Review of International Political Economy. 4(1): 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehri, Darius. 2005. Notes from Toyota-land. Ithaca, NY: ILR and Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohr, Bernard and Pierre, van Amelsvoort. 2016. Co-Creating Humane and Innovative Organizations. Portland, ME: Global STS-D Network.Google Scholar
Morgan, James and Liker, Jeffrey. 2006. The Toyota Product Development System. New York: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
Netland, Torbjørn and Powell, Daryl (eds.). 2017. The Routledge Companion to Lean Management. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pasmore, William A. 1995. “Social Science Transformed: The Socio-Technical Perspective.” Human Relations. 48(1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasmore, William A. 2001. “Action Research in the Workplace,” pp. 38–46 in Reason, Peter and Bradbury, Hilary (eds.) Handbook of Action Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pava, Calvin 1986. “New Strategies for Systems Change.” Human Relations. 39(7): 615–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perruci, Robert. 1994. Japanese Auto Transplants in the Heartland. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Piore, Michael and Sabel, Charles. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pulignano, Valeria and Signoretti, Andrea. 2016. “Union Strategies, National Institutions and the Use of Temporary Labour in Italian and US Plants.” British Journal of Industrial Relations. 54(3): 574–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyzdek, Thomas and Keller, Paul. 2012. The Handbook for Quality Management, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pyzdek, Thomas and Keller, Paul 2014. The Six Sigma Handbook, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Riisgaard, Lone and Hammer, Nikolaus. 2011. “Prospects for Labour in Global Value Chains.” British Journal of Industrial Relations. 49(1): 168–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Pamela and Rainbird, Helen. 2013. “International Supply Chains and the Labour Process.” Competition and Change. 17(1): 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, William K. and Teague, Paul. 2014. “Successful but Unappealing: Fifteen Years of Workplace Partnership in Ireland: Partnership, Collaboration and Mutual Gains.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 25(6): 781–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlen, Thomas. 1974. For Harmony and Strength. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rother, Mike. 2010. Toyota Kata: Managing People for Improvement, Adaptiveness and Superior Results. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Shah, Rachna and Ward, Peter. 2007. “Defining and Developing Measures of Lean Production.” Journal of Operations Management. 25(4): 785–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signoretti, Andrea. 2016. “Analysis of Italian Medium-sized Enterprises’ Collective Bargaining from an International Perspective: Evidence from the Manufacturing Sector.” Economic and Industrial Democracy. 37(4): 716–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signoretti, Andrea. 2019a. “Explaining Variation in the Social Performance of Lean Production: A Comparative Case Study of the Role played by Workplace Unions’ Framing of the System and Institutions.” Industrial Relations Journal. 50(2): 126–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signoretti, Andrea. 2019b. “Overcoming the Barriers to the Implementation of more Efficient Productive Strategies in Small Enterprises.” Employee Relations. 42(1): 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitter, Ulbo de, Hertog, Friso den, and Dankbaar, Ben. 1997. “From Complex Organizations with Simple Jobs to Simple Organizations with Complex Jobs.” Human Relations. 50(5): 497–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorge, Arndt and Streeck, Wolfgang. 1988. “Industrial Relations and Technical Change: The Case for an Extended Perspective,” pp. 19–44 in Hyman, Richard and Streeck, Wolfgang (eds.) New Technology and Industrial Relations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sorge, Arndt and Streeck, Wolfgang 2018. “Diversified Quality Production Revisited: Its Contribution to German Socio-Economic Performance over Time.” Socio-Economic Review. 16(3): 587–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanton, Pauline, Gough, Richard, Ballardie, Ruth, Bartram, Timothy, Bamber, Greg, and Sohal, Amrik. 2014. “Implementing Lean Management/Six Sigma in Hospitals: Beyond Empowerment or Work Intensification?” The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 25(21): 2926–2940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Paul, Mrozowicki, Adam, Danford, Andy, and Murphy, Ken. 2016. “Lean as Ideology and Practice: A Comparative Study of the Impact of Lean Production on the Working Life in Automotive Manufacturing in the United Kingdom and Poland.” Competition and Change. 20(3): 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, David and Macy, Michael. 2001. “In Search of Excellence: Fads, Success Stories, and Adaptive Emulation.” American Journal of Sociology. 107(1): 147–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunder, Vijaya and Mahalingam, Sanjay. 2018. “An Empirical Investigation of Implementing Lean Six Sigma in Higher Education Institutions.” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management. 35(10): 2157–2180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, Gerald. 1976. Autonomy at Work: A Sociotechnical Analysis of Participative Management. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Taylor, James and Felten, David. 1992. Performance by Design: Socio-technical Systems in North America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Trist, Eric. 1981. The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems: A Conceptual Framework and an Action Research Program. Toronto, CA: Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre, Occasional Paper No. 2.Google Scholar
Trist, Eric and Bamforth, Ken. 1951. “Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of Coal Getting.” Human Relations. 4(1): 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valerye, Antoine, Lorenz, Edward, Cartron, Damien, Csizmadia, Peter, Gollac, Michel, Illéssy, Miklós, and Csaba, Makó. 2009. Working Conditions in the European Union: Work Organisation. Luxembourg: EU Publication Office.Google Scholar
Vallas, Steven. 1999. “Rethinking Post-Fordism: The Meaning of Workplace Flexibility.” Sociological Theory. 17(1): 68–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallas, Steven 2003. “Why Teamwork Fails: Obstacles to Workplace Change in Four Manufacturing Plants.” American Sociological Review. 68(2): 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallas, Steven 2006a. “Empowerment Redux: Structure, Agency and the Remaking of Managerial Authority.” American Journal of Sociology. 111(6): 1677–1717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallas, Steven 2006b. “Theorizing Teamwork under Contemporary Capitalism.” Research in the Sociology of Work. 16: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallas, Steven, Finlay, William, and Wharton, Amy. 2009. The Sociology of Work. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Vidal, Matt. 2007. “Manufacturing Empowerment? ‘Employee Involvement’ in the Labour Process after Fordism.” Socio-Economic Review. 5(2): 197–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, Matt 2011. “Reworking Post-Fordism.” Sociological Compass. 5(4): 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vidal, Matt and Tigges, Leann. 2007. “Lean Production, Worker Empowerment and Job Satisfaction.” Critical Sociology. 33(1–2): 247–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Guy. 2015. “Come Back Sociotechnical Systems Theory, All is Forgiven … .” Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems. 32(1–2): 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Guy, Stanton, Neville, Salmon, Paul, and Jenkins, David. 2010. “A Review of Sociotechnical Systems Theory: A Classic Concept for New Command and Control Paradigms.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 9(6): 479–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisbord, Marvin. 2012. Productive Workplaces: Organizing and Managing for Dignity, Meaning and Community, 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Woollard, Frank G. 1954/2009. The Principles of Mass and Flow Production, 55th Anniversary Special Reprint Edition. London: CLBM, LLC.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.