Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-768dbb666b-x9ds4 Total loading time: 1.044 Render date: 2023-02-04T09:13:40.750Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Book contents

25 - Evidence for sexual dimorphism in chimpanzee vocalizations: a comparison of male and female call production and acoustic parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2019

Christophe Boesch
Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
Roman Wittig
Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
Catherine Crockford
Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
Linda Vigilant
Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
Tobias Deschner
Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Germany
Fabian Leendertz
Robert Koch-Institut, Germany
Get access


In humans, differences in voice quality influence sexual attraction and perceived dominance, but little is known about such mechanisms in Pan. Here, we investigated the degree of sexual dimorphism in chimpanzee vocalizations. We expected the sexes to differ in mean fundamental (F0) and peak frequencies (pF) according to the source filter theory, which predicts that differences in body size affect vocal characteristics. Using data from nine chimpanzees of the South Group, we analysed call rates and measured F0, pF and durations from pant–hoots and food calls. We also tested for sex differences in bout duration and the number of food grunts per bout. Males and females had equal rates of call production for all signals except pant–hoots and buttress-drumming, with males producing these significantly more often. Additionally, contrary to predictions based on body size, female food grunts were lower in dominant frequency bands and peak frequencies while males produced longer food-call bouts with a greater number of tonal grunts. Further analyses should address whether these sex differences in acoustic parameters could play a role in female choice and male competition in chimpanzees.

The Chimpanzees of the Taï Forest
40 Years of Research
, pp. 410 - 421
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Adams, D. C. & Anthony, C. D. (1996). Using randomization techniques to analyse behavioural data. Animal Behaviour, 51, 733738.
Arcadi, A. C. (1996). Phrase structure of wild chimpanzee pant hoots: Patterns of production and interpopulation variability. American Journal of Primatology, 39, 159178.
Barelli, C., Mundry, R., Heistermann, M. & Hammerschmidt, K. (2013). Cues to androgens and quality in male gibbon songs. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e82748.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1).
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H. B., Singmann, H., et al. (2016). lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models using ‘Eigen’ and S4 (Version 1.1–12).
Benítez, M. E., Le Roux, A., Fischer, J., Beehner, J. C. & Bergman, T. J. (2016). Acoustic and temporal variation in gelada (Theropithecus gelada) loud calls advertise male quality. International Journal of Primatology, 37, 568585.–9922–0
Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341345.
Briefer, E. F. (2012). Vocal expression of emotions in mammals: Mechanisms of production and evidence. Journal of Zoology, 288, 120.–7998.2012.00920.x
Clark, A. P. (1993). Rank differences in the production of vocalizations by wild chimpanzees as a function of social context. American Journal of Primatology, 31, 159179.
Clutton-Brock, T. (2007). Sexual selection in males and females. Science, 318(5858), 18821885.
Clutton-Brock, T. (2016). Reproductive competition among males. In Mammal Societies (pp. 427466). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Crockford, C. & Boesch, C. (2003). Context-specific calls in wild chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus: Analysis of barks. Animal Behaviour, 66, 115125.
Davies, N. B. & Halliday, T. R. (1978). Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo. Nature, 274(5672), 683685.
Dobson, A. J. & Barnett, A. (2008). An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
East, M. L. & Hofer, H. (1991). Loud calling in a female-dominated mammalian society: II. Behavioural contexts and functions of whooping of spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta. Animal Behaviour, 42, 651669.–3472(05)80247–7
Ey, E., Pfefferle, D. & Fischer, J. (2007). Do age- and sex-related variations reliably reflect body size in non-human primate vocalizations? A review. Primates, 48, 253267.–0033–y
Fedurek, P., Slocombe, K. E., Enigk, D. K., Thompson, M. E., Wrangham, R. W. & Muller, M. N. (2016). The relationship between testosterone and long-distance calling in wild male chimpanzees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 70, 659672.–2087–1
Fischer, J., Kitchen, D. M., Seyfarth, R. M. & Cheney, D. L. (2004). Baboon loud calls advertise male quality: Acoustic features and their relation to rank, age, and exhaustion. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 56, 140148.–0739–4
Fitch, W. T. (1997). Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 12131222.
Fitch, W. T. & Hauser, M. D. (2003). Unpacking ‘honesty’: Vertebrate vocal production and the evolution of acoustic signals. In Simmons, A. M., Fay, R. R. & Popper, A. N. (eds.), Acoustic Communication (pp. 65137). New York: Springer.
Forstmeier, W. & Schielzeth, H. (2011). Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: Overestimated effect sizes and the winner’s curse. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 4755.–1038–5
Gil, D. & Gahr, M. (2002). The honesty of bird song: Multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 133141.–5347(02)02410–2
Grawunder, S., Crockford, C., Clay, Z., Kalan, A. K., Stevens, J. M., Stoessel, A., et al. (2018). Higher fundamental frequency in bonobos is explained by larynx morphology. Current Biology, 28, R1188R1189.
Hill, K., Boesch, C., Goodall, J., Pusey, A. E., Williams, J. & Wrangham, R. W. (2001). Mortality rates among wild chimpanzees. Journal of Human Evolution, 40, 437450.
Jungers, W. L. & Susman, R. L. (1984). Body size and skeletal allometry in African apes. In Susman, R. L. (ed.), The Pygmy Chimpanzee: Evolutionary Biology and Behavior (pp. 131177). New York: Plenum Press.
Kalan, A. K. & Boesch, C. (2015). Audience effects in chimpanzee food calls and their potential for recruiting others. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 69, 17011712.–1982–1
Kalan, A. K., Mundry, R. & Boesch, C. (2015). Wild chimpanzees modify food call structure with respect to tree size for a particular fruit species. Animal Behaviour, 101, 19.
Kitchen, D. M., Seyfarth, R. M., Fischer, J. & Cheney, D. L. (2003). Loud calls as indicators of dominance in male baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 53, 374384.–0588–1
Kojima, S., Izumi, A. & Ceugniet, M. (2003). Identification of vocalizers by pant hoots, pant grunts and screams in a chimpanzee. Primates, 44, 225230.–0014–8
Marler, P. & Hobbett, L. (1975). Individuality in a long-range vocalization of wild chimpanzees. Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie, 38, 97109.–0310.1975.tb01994.x
McClelland, B. E., Wilczynski, W. & Ryan, M. J. (1996). Correlations between call characteristics and morphology in male cricket frogs (Acris crepitans). Journal of Experimental Biology, 199, 19071919.
McComb, K. E. (1991). Female choice for high roaring rates in red deer, Cervus elaphus. Animal Behaviour, 41, 7988.–3472(05)80504–4
Mitani, J. C. (1985). Sexual selection and adult male orangutan long calls. Animal Behaviour, 33, 272283.–X
Muller, M. N. & Mitani, J. C. (2005). Conflict and cooperation in wild chimpanzees. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 35, 275331.
Neumann, C., Assahad, G., Hammerschmidt, K., Perwitasari-Farajallah, D. & Engelhardt, A. (2010). Loud calls in male crested macaques, Macaca nigra: A signal of dominance in a tolerant species. Animal Behaviour, 79, 187193.
Pfefferle, D., West, P. M., Grinnell, J., Packer, C. & Fischer, J. (2007). Do acoustic features of lion, Panthera leo, roars reflect sex and male condition? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 39473953.
Pitcher, B. J., Briefer, E. F., Vannoni, E. & McElligott, A. G. (2014). Fallow bucks attend to vocal cues of motivation and fatigue. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 392401.
Potter, D. M. & Griffiths, D. J. (2006). Omnibus permutation tests of the overall null hypothesis in datasets with many covariates. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 16, 327341.
Puts, D. A., Gaulin, S. J. C. & Verdolini, K. (2006). Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 283296.
Puts, D. A., Hill, A. K., Bailey, D. H., Walker, R. S., Rendall, D., Wheatley, J. R., et al. (2016). Sexual selection on male vocal fundamental frequency in humans and other anthropoids. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 283(1829).
R Core Team. (2016). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Reby, D. & McComb, K. (2003). Anatomical constraints generate honesty: Acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags. Animal Behaviour, 65, 519530.
Reno, P. L., Meindl, R. S., McCollum, M. A. & Lovejoy, C. O. (2003). Sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis was similar to that of modern humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 94049409. of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.1133180100
Searcy, W. A. & Andersson, M. (1986). Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17, 507533.
Vannoni, E. & McElligott, A. G. (2008). Low frequency groans indicate larger and more dominant fallow deer (Dama dama) males. PLoS ONE, 3(9), e3113.
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats