Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-888d5979f-zxcqg Total loading time: 0.748 Render date: 2021-10-25T11:50:44.884Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

6 - Developmental Dyslexia in Finnish

from Part I - Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2019

Ludo Verhoeven
Affiliation:
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Charles Perfetti
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Kenneth Pugh
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Written Finnish and the Finnish literacy culture provide an exceptional context for an interesting separation of the various processes associated with reading acquisition. The orthography of Finnish is relatively optimally wired to give young learners an easy time acquiring basic decoding skills. Finnish orthography has full transparency in both reading and writing. After learning the limited set of sounds connected consistently with specific graphemes, learners usually learn to decode accurately, even those with learning difficulties in reading.

The high status of literacy in Finland, which dates from the early stages of its writing system, has led to additional benefits. The written language of Finnish was established in the mid-sixteenth century. The first book published in Finnish was an ABC-book, a primer for reading and a catechism. As early as the seventeenth century, literacy started to become more common with the influence of the church.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aro, M. (2017). Learning to read Finnish. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 416436). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brem, S., Bach, S., & Kucian, K. et al. (2010). Brain sensitivity to print emerges when children learn letter–speech sound correspondences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 79397944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guttorm, T., Leppänen, P., Hämäläinen, J., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Newborn event-related potentials predict poorer pre-reading skills in children with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 391401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heikkilä, R., Aro, M., Närhi, V., Westerholm, J., & Ahonen, T. (2013). Does training in syllable recognition improve reading speed? A computer-based trial with poor readers from second and third grade. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 398414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holopainen, L., Ahonen, T., & Lyytinen, H. (2001). Predicting delay in reading achievement in a highly transparent language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 3(4), 401413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huemer, S., Aro, M., Landerl, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2010). Repeated reading of syllables among Finnish-speaking children with poor reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14, 317340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketonen, R. (2010). Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research, 0075–4625, 404. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Kirjavainen, T., Pulkkinen, J., & Jahnukainen, M. (2013). Erityisopetuksen muutostrendit perusopetuksessa 2000-luvulla [The trends of change in special education after year 2000]. Valtiontalouden tarkastusvirasto [National Audit Office of Finland]. https://docplayer.fi/10162284-Erityisopetuksen-muutostrendit-perusopetuksessa-2000-luvulla.html. Accessed January 25, 2015.
Kujala, T., Karma, K., & Ceponiene, R. et al. (2001). Plastic neural changes and reading improvement caused by audiovisual training in reading-impaired children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 1050910514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leppänen, P. H. T., Hämäläinen, J. A., & Salminen, H. et al. (2010). Brain event-related potentials reveal atypical processing of sound frequency and the subsequent association with later literacy skills in children with familial dyslexia. Cortex, 46, 13621376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyytinen, H., Erskine, J., Hämäläinen, J., Torppa, M., & Ronimus, M. (2015). Dyslexia – Early identification and prevention: Highlights from the Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Dyslexia. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 2, 330338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyytinen, H., Erskine, J., Kujala, J., Ojanen, E., & Richardson, U. (2009). In search of a science-based application: A learning tool for reading acquisition. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 668675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malin, A., Sulkunen, S., & Laine, K. (2013). PIAAC 2012. Kansainvälisen aikuistutkimuksen ensituloksia [PIAAC 2012. The survey of adult skills]. Helsinki: Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriön julkaisuja, 19.Google Scholar
Official Statistics of Finland. (2014). Special education. Share of students having received special support diminished [e-publication]. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. www.tilastokeskus.fi/til/erop/2013/erop_2013_2014–06-12_tie_001_en.html. Accessed January 25, 2015.
Oksanen, A.-M. (2012). Auditiivisen ja kielellisen harjoittelun vaikutus kolmannella luokalla olevien heikkojen lukijoiden lukutaitoon. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research, 443. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Poskiparta, E., Niemi, P., & Vauras, M. (1999). Who benefits from training in linguistic awareness in the first grade, and what components show training effects? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 437446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, U., Leppänen, P. H. T., Leiwo, M., & Lyytinen, H. (2003). Speech perception of infants with high familial risk for dyslexia differ at the age of 6 months. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23, 385397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, U., & Lyytinen, H. (2014). The GraphoGame method: The theoretical and methodological background of the technology-enhanced learning environment for learning to read. Human Technology, 10, 3960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saine, N. L., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Ahonen, T., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (2011). Computer-assisted remedial reading intervention for school beginners at-risk for reading disability. Child Development, 82, 10131028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×