Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-797576ffbb-cx6qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-12-02T09:57:09.950Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

2b - Models of developmental neuropsychology: adult and geriatric

from Section I - Theory and models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

Jacobus Donders
Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital
Scott J. Hunter
University of Chicago
Get access


Neuropsychologists often assess cognitive function to distinguish normal aging from pathological conditions. For elders, interpretation hinges on accurate conceptualization of cognitive performances associated with normal neurological aging versus deficits indicative of central nervous system injury or illness, such as those found in neurodegenerative dementias. Early research indicated that aging in the absence of disease is not associated with standard focal deficits that are typical of an injured central nervous system [1, 2]. Rather, age-related declines were characterized as a more diffuse, gradual loss of efficiency and flexibility. Cross-sectional observations provided an important foundation for estimating abilities across various age groups, and these normative studies have traditionally informed models of normal aging.

More recently, neuropsychologists and neuroscientists have expanded our understanding of the longitudinal course of neurological function in older adults by including intraindividual observations of anatomical and functional changes over time. And yet, the relationship between aging and cognitive function is actually quite complex and difficult to characterize for several reasons. For instance, there are considerable methodological challenges to conducting well-controlled longitudinal studies that span beyond 5–7 years, such that aging models typically rely on relative snapshots of neurodevelopment when considered within the context of a 70–80-year lifespan. Also, influences on how humans age continue to evolve in a manner that probably parallels societal and technological progress. It appears that environmental, nutritional, and technological factors that can influence aging are changing with increasing speed.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Reitan, R. Psychologic changes associated with aging and with cerebral damage. Mayo Clin Proc 1967;42:653–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Kaszniak, AW, Newman, MC. Toward a neuropsychology of cognitive aging. In Qualls, SH, Abeles, N, eds. Psychology and the Aging Revolution: How we adapt to longer Life. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2000: 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattan, SIS. Increased molecular damage and heterogeneity as the basis of aging. Biol Chem 2008;389:267–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franceschi, C, Bonafe, M.Centenarians as a model for healthy aging. Biochem Soc Trans 2003;31:457–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, KA. A behavioral medicine perspective on aging and health. In Qualls, SH, Abeles, N, eds. Psychology and the Aging Revolution: How we adapt to longer life. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2000: 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeuw, FE, Groot, JC, Achten, E, et al. Prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly people: a population based magnetic resonance imaging study. The Rotterdam Scan Study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;70:9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, JW, Kahn, RL. Successful Aging. New York: Pantheon; 1998.Google ScholarPubMed
Berkman, LF, Seeman, TE, Albert, M, et al. High, usual and impaired functioning in community-dwelling older men and women: findings from the MacArthur Foundation Research network on successful aging. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;10:1129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultsch, DF, Hertzog, C, Small, BJ, et al. Use it or lose it: engaged lifestyle as a buffer of cognitive decline in aging?Psychol Aging 1999;14:245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, JD, Huang, MH, Albert, M, et al. Interleukin-6 and risk of cognitive decline: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Neurology 2002;59:371–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kado, DM, Karlamangla, AS, Huang, MH, et al. Homocysteine versus the vitamins folate, B6, and B12 as predictors of cognitive function and decline in older high-functioning adults: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Am J Med 2005;118:161–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Social Security Administration. Actuarial Publications: Period Life Table, 2004. (Accessed June 4, 2008).
Coffey, C, Wilkinson, W, Parashos, I, et al. Quantitative cerebral anatomy of the aging human brain: a cross-sectional study using magnetic resonance imaging. Neurology 1992;42:527–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jack, C, Petersen, R, O'Brien, P, et al. MR-based hippocampal volumetry in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1992;42:183–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouras, C, Hof, PR, Giannakopoulos, P, et al. Regional distribution of neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques in the cerebral cortex of elderly patients: a quantitative evaluation of a one-year autopsy population from a geriatric hospital. Cereb Cortex 1994;4:138–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chételat, G, Fouquet, M, Kalpouzos, G, et al. Three-dimensional surface mapping of hippocampal atrophy progression from MCI to AD and over normal aging as assessed using voxel-based morphometry. Neuropsychologia 2008;46:1721–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowell, PE, Turetsky, BI, Gur, RC, et al. Sex differences in aging of the human frontal and temporal lobes. J Neurosci 1994;14:4748–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raz, N, Gunning-Dixon, F, Head, D, et al. Aging, sexual dimorphism, and hemispheric asymmetry of the cerebral cortex: replicability of regional differences in volume. Neurobiol Aging 2004;25:377–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witelson, SF, Beresh, H, Kigar, DL. Intelligence and brain size in 100 postmortem brains: sex, lateralization, and age factors. Brain 2006;129:386–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shan, ZY, Liu, JZ, Sahgal, V, et al. Selective atrophy of left hemisphere and frontal lobe of the brain in old men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005;60:165–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holland, CM, Smith, EE, Csapo, I, et al. Spatial distribution of white matter hyperintensities in Alzheimer's disease, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and healthy aging. Stroke 2008;39:1127–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stadlbauer, A, Salomonowitz, E, Strunk, G, et al. Age-related degradation in the central nervous system: assessment with Diffusion-Tensor Imaging and Quantitative Fiber Tracking. Radiology 2008;247:179–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guttmann, CRG, Jolesz, FA, Kikinis, R, et al. White matter changes with normal aging. Neurology 1998;50:972–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jernigan, TL, Achibald, SL, Fennema-Notestine, C, et al. Effects of age on tissues and regions of the cerebrum and cerebellum. Neurobiol Aging 2001;22:581–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hickie, I, Naismith, S, Ward, PB, et al. Reduced hippocampal volumes and memory loss in patients with early- and late-onset depression. Br J Psychiatry 2005;186:197–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Resnick, SM, Pham, DL, Kraut, MA et al. Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies of older adults: A shrinking brain. J Neurosci 2003;23:3295–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, E, Reeves, AJ, Graziano, MSA, et al. Neurogenesis in the neocortex of adult primates. Science 1999;286:548–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, NS, Wang, S, Jiang, L, et al. In vitro neurogenesis by progenitor cells isolated from the adult human hippocampus. Nat Med 2000;6:271–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jin, K, Peel, AL, Mao, XO, et al. Increased hippocampal neurogenesis in Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:343–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D. WAIS-III Administration and scoring manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 1997.Google Scholar
Horn, JL, Cattell, RB. Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1963;26:107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, D, Reynolds, CA, McArdle, JJ, et al. Latent growth curve analyses of accelerating decline in cognitive abilities in late adulthood. Dev Psychol 2003;39:535–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McArdle, JJ, Ferrer-Caja, E, Hamagami, F, et al. Comparative structural analyses of the growth and decline of multiple intellectual abilities over the life span. Dev Psychol 2002;38:115–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cherry, BJ, Hellige, JB, McDowd, JM. Age differences and similarities in patterns of cerebral asymmetry. Psychol Aging 1995;10:191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittenberg, W, Seidenberg, M, O'Leary, DS, et al. Changes in cerebral functioning associated with normal aging. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1989;11:918–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindenberger, U, Baltes, PB. Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: a strong connection. Psychol Aging 1994;9:339–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salthouse, TA, Nesselroade, JR, Berish, . Short-term variability in cognitive performance and the calibration of longitudinal change. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2006;61:P144–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salthouse, TA. The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol Rev 1996;103:403–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, DC, Lautenschlager, G, Hadden, T, et al. Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychol Aging 2002;17:299–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schretlen, D, Pearlson, GD, Anthony, JC, et al. Elucidating the contributions of processing speed, executive ability, and frontal lobe volume to normal age-related differences in fluid intelligence. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2000;6:52–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasher, L, Lustig, C, Zacks, RT. Inhibitory mechanisms and the control of attention. In Conway, A, Jarrold, C, Kane, M, Miyake, A, Towse, J, eds. Variation in Working Memory. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007: 227–49.Google Scholar
Healy, MK, Campbell, KL, Hasher, L. Cognitive aging and increased distractibility: costs and potential benefits. Prog Brain Res 2008;169:353–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, EA, Dannefer, D. Aged heterogeneity: fact or fiction? The fate of diversity in gerontological research. Gerontologist 1992;32:17–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hultsch, DF, MacDonald, SWS. Intraindividual variability in performance as a theoretical window into cognitive aging. In Dixon, RA, Backman, L, Nilsson, L-G, eds. New Frontiers in Cognitive Aging. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004: 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, SB, Odell, KH. Age-related intraindividual performance variability with practice. Int J Aging Hum Dev 2007;65:97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, S, Myerson, J, Hale, S. Are there age differences in intraindividual variability in working memory performance? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2006;61B:P18–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hultsch, DF, MacDonald, SWS, Hunter, MA, et al. Intraindividual variability in cognitive performance in older adults: comparison of adults with mild dementia, adults with arthritis, and healthy adults. Neuropsychology 2000;14:588–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hultsch, DF, MacDonald, SWS, Dixon, RA. Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2002;57:P101–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allaire, JC, Marsiske, M. Intraindividual variability may not always indicate vulnerability in elders' cognitive performance. Psychol Aging 2005;20:390–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, SC, Aggen, SH, Nesselroade, JR, et al. Short-term fluctuations in elderly people's sensorimotor functioning predict text and spatial memory performance: the MacArthur Successful Aging Studies. Gerontology 2001;47:100–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, E, MacDonald, SWS, Hunter, M, et al. Intraindividual variability in three groups of older adults: cross-domain links to physical status and self-perceived affect and beliefs. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2002;8:893–906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, CL, Strauss, E, Hultsch, DF, et al. Intraindividual variability as a marker of neurological dysfunction: a comparison of Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2006;28:67–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats