Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-96cn4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-30T22:15:35.650Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

5 - From Victim Precipitation to Perpetrator Predation

Toward a New Paradigm for Understanding Workplace Aggression

from Part II - The Social Context of Workplace Aggression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2017

Nathan A. Bowling
Wright State University, Ohio
M. Sandy Hershcovis
University of Calgary
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Amir, M. (1967). Victim precipitated forcible rape. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 58, 493502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K. (2000). Structural and individual determinants of workplace victimization: The effects of hierarchical status and conflict management style. Journal of Management, 26(2), 171193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., & Bradfield, M. (2000). Perceived victimization in the workplace: The role of situational factors and victim characteristics. Organization Science, 11(5), 525537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., & Byron, K. (2002). Dominating interpersonal behavior and perceived victimization in groups: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship. Journal of Management, 28(1), 6987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., & Lamertz, K. (2004). A relational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimization in dyadic relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 10231034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berdahl, J. L. (2007). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 425437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, R. J., & Searles, P. (1985). Victim-offender interaction in rape: Victimological, situational, and feminist perspectives. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 915.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 18, 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohner, G., Siebler, F., & Schmelcher, J. (2006). Social norms and the likelihood of raping: Perceived rape myth acceptance of others affects men’s rape proclivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 286297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brekke, N., & Borgida, E. (1988). Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social-cognitive analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(3), 372386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. L., & Messman-Moore, T. L. (2010). Personal and perceived peer attitudes supporting sexual aggression as predictors of male college students’ willingness to intervene against sexual aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 503517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R., Fehler Cabral, G., Pierce, S. J., Sharma, D. B., Bybee, D., Shaw, J., Horsford, S., & Feeney, H. (2015). The Detroit Sexual Assault Kit (SAK) Action Research Project (ARP), Final Report. Available at
Chan, M. E., & McAllister, D. J. (2014). Abusive supervision through the lens of employee state paranoia. Academy of Management Review, 39(1), 4466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Strategies for qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 249291). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Coates, L., & Wade, A. (2004). Telling it like it isn’t: Obscuring perpetrator responsibility for violent crime. Discourse & Society, 15(5), 499526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 5575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortina, L. M. & Berdahl, J. L. (2008). Sexual harassment in organizations: A decade of research in review. In Barling, J. & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 469496). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Cortina, L. M., Kabat-Farr, D., Leskinen, E. A., Huerta, M., & Magley, V. J. (2013). Selective incivility as modern discrimination in organizations evidence and impact. Journal of Management, 39(6), 15791605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, G. (2000). Beliefs about the causes of four types of rape. Sex Roles, 42(9–10), 807823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall’Ara, E., & Maass, A. (1999). Studying sexual harassment in the laboratory: Are egalitarian women at higher risk? Sex Roles, 41(9–10), 681704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, P. G. & Monteith, M. J. (1999). Automaticity and control in stereotyping. In Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 339360). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Eigenberg, H., & Garland, T. (2003). Victim blaming. In Moriarty, L. J. (Ed.), Controversies in victimology (pp. 1524). Newark, NJ: Routledge.Google Scholar
Escamilla v. SMS Holdings Corp., 2011, WL 5025254 (D. Minn. Oct. 21, 2011).
Fischer, G. J. (1996). Deceptive, verbally coercive college males: Attitudinal predictors and lies told. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 25, 527533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, C. W., & Franklin, A. P. (1976). Victimology revisited: A critique and suggestions for future direction. Criminology, 14(1), 125136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2010). “I used to think the law would protect me”: Illinois’s failure to test rape kits. New York: Human Rights Watch.
IACP. (2005). Sexual assault incident reports: Investigative strategies. Alexandria, VA: International Association of Chiefs of Police.
Jones, M. (2002). Social psychology of prejudice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarPubMed
Kabat-Farr, D., & Cortina, L. M. (2012). Selective incivility: Gender, race, and the discriminatory workplace. In Fox, S. & Lituchy, T. (Eds.), Gender and the dysfunctional workplace (pp. 107119). Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Kim, E. & Glomb, T. M. (2014). Victimization of high performers: The roles of envy and work group identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 619634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koss, M. P. (1985). The hidden rape victim: Personality, attitudinal, and situational characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9(2), 193212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koss, M. P., & Dinero, T. E. (1989). Predictors of sexual aggression among a national sample of male college students. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 529, 133147.Google Scholar
Kutash, I. L. (1978). Treating the victim of aggression. In Kutash, I. L., Kutash, S. B., Schlesinger, L. B., & Kutash, S. B. (Eds.), Violence: Perspectives on murder and aggression (pp. 446461). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kutash, I. L. (1984). Aggression victimology: Treatment of the victim. Current Issues in Psychoanalytic Practice, 1(2), 4764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeGrand, C. E. (1973). Rape and rape laws: Sexism in society and law. California Law Review, 61, 919941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loh, C., Gidycz, C. A., Lobo, T. R., & Luthra, R. (2005). A prospective analysis of sexual assault perpetration: Risk factors related to perpetrator characteristics. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 13251348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lonsway, K. A., Cortina, L. M. & Magley, V. J. (2008). Sexual harassment mythology: Definition, conceptualization, and measurement. Sex Roles, 58(9), 599615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsway, K. A. & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths in review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(2), 133164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth scale, 33(1), 27–68.
Malamuth, N. M. (1981). Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 37(4), 138157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maass, A., Cadinu, M., Guarnieri, G., & Grasselli, A. (2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 853–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meloy, M. L., & Miller, S. L. (2011). The victimization of women: Law, policies, and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milam, A. C., Spitzmueller, C., & Penney, L. M. (2009). Investigating individual differences among targets of workplace incivility. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(1), 5869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, 523 U.S. 75 (1998)
Samnani, A. K. (2013). Embracing new directions in workplace bullying research: A paradigmatic approach. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(1), 2636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samnani, A. K. & Singh, P. (2015). Workplace bullying: Considering the interaction between individual and work environment. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2653-x.CrossRef
Scott, K. L., Restubog, S. L., & Zagenczyk, T. J. (2013). A social exchange-based model of the antecedents of workplace exclusion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 3748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scully, D., & Marolla, J. (1984). Convicted rapists’ vocabulary of motive: Excuses and justifications. Social Problems, 31(5), 530544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, J. W., & Spohn, C. C. (1997). The effect of evidence factors and victim characteristics on prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault cases. Justice Quarterly, 14(3), 501524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockdale, M. S. (2005). The sexual harassment of men: Articulating the approach-rejection theory of sexual harassment. In Gruber, J. E. & Morgan, P. (Eds.), In the company of men: Re-discovering the links between sexual harassment and male domination (pp. 117142). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Henle, C. A., & Lambert, L. S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 101123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tepper, B. J., Moss, S. E., & Duffy, M. K. (2011). Predictors of abusive supervision: Supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 279294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetreault, P. A. (1989). Rape myth acceptance: A case for providing educational expert testimony in rape jury trials. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 7(2), 243257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M. P., Koss, M. P., Kingree, J. B., & Rice, J. (2011). A prospective mediational model of sexual aggression among college men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 27162734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, K., Hoyt, D. R., & Whitbeck, L. B. (1998). Coercive sexual strategies. Violence and Victims, 13(1), 4761.Google ScholarPubMed
The Weiner Report (2002). DNA justice: Cases solved at last. New York: Author.
Timmer, D. A., & Norman, W. H. (1984). Ideology of victim precipitation. Criminal Justice Review, 9, 6368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, B. L. (2000). Correlates of pre-college males’ sexual aggression: Attitudes, beliefs and behavior. Women & Criminal Justice, 11, 2547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Hentig, H. (1940). Remarks on the interaction of perpetrator and victim. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 31, 303.Google Scholar
Von Hentig, H. (1948). The criminal & his victim: Studies in the sociobiology of crime. Oxford: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Weis, K., & Borges, S. S. (1973). Victimology and rape: The case of the legitimate victim. Issues in Criminology, 71115.Google Scholar
Wiederspahn, A. (2013, September 12). Military catches flak for poster that warns of sexual assaults. MSNBC. Available at
Wisan, G. (1979). The treatment of rape in criminology textbooks. Victimology, 4(1), 8699.Google Scholar
Wolfgang, M. F. (1957). Victim precipitated criminal homicide. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 48, 1, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats