Abizadeh, Arash. “Banishing the Particular: Rousseau on Rhetoric, Patrie, and the Passions.” Political Theory 29(4) (2001): 556–82.Google Scholar

Abizadeh, Arash. “The Passions of the Wise: Phronêsis, Rhetoric, and Aristotle’s Passionate Practical Deliberation.” Review of Metaphysics 56 (2002): 267–96.Google Scholar

Abizadeh, Arash. “On the Philosophy/Rhetoric Binaries: Or, Is Habermasian Discourse Motivationally Impotent?” Philosophy and Social Criticism 33(4) (2007): 445–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abramowitz, Alan and Webster, Steven. “All Politics Is National: The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. House and Senate Elections in the 21st Century.” stevenwwebster.com/research/all_politics_is_national.pdfGoogle Scholar

Achen, Christopher and Bartels, Larry. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Ahl, Frederick. “The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome.” American Journal of Philology 105(2) (1984): 174–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albrecht, Michael von. “M.T. Cicero, Sprache und Stil.” In Paulys Real-Encyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Neue Bearbeitung. Ed. Ziegler, Konrat. Supplementband 13. Munich: Alfred Druckmüller, 1973.Google Scholar

Allen, Danielle S. Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship since Brown v. Board of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Allen, Danielle S. Why Plato Wrote. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar

Arena, Valentina. “The Orator and His Audience: The Rhetorical Perspective in the Art of Deliberation.” In Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Ed. Steel, Catherine and van der Blom, Henriette. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Ed. Beiner, Ronald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. On Revolution. New York: Penguin, 1990.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. “Truth and Politics.” In Between Past and Future. New York: Penguin, 2006.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . The Politics and the Constitution of Athens. Trans. Stephen Everson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Rhetoric. In Aristotle. Vol. 22. Trans. J. H. Freese. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . Rhetoric. Trans. W. Rhys Roberts. London: Oxford University Press, 1931.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . The Politics and the Constitution of Athens. Trans. Stephen Everson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Armitage, David. “What’s the Big Idea? Intellectual History and the Longue Durée.” History of European Ideas 38(4) (2012): 493–507.Google Scholar

Arnold, Matthew. Essays in Criticism. 1st series. London: Macmillan, 1889.Google Scholar

Ashfield, Andrew and de Bolla, Peter, eds. The Sublime: A Reader in British Eighteenth-Century Aesthetic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atherton, Catherine. “Hand Over Fist: The Failure of Stoic Rhetoric.” The Classical Quarterly 38(2) (1988): 392–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Augustus, . Res gestae divi Augusti. In Valleius Paterculus and Res Gestae Divi Augusti. Trans. Frederick W. Shipley. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1924.Google Scholar

Bagehot, Walter. The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot. Vol. 1. Ed. St John-Stevas, Norman. London: Routledge, 1965.Google Scholar

Bagehot, Walter. The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot. Vol. 6. Ed. St John-Stevas., Norman London: Routledge, 1974.Google Scholar

Balot, Ryan K. “Free Speech, Courage, and Democratic Deliberation.” In Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Ed. Sluiter, Ineke and Rosen, Ralph M.. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar

Barber, Michael and Pope, Jeremy. “Does Party Trump Ideology? Disentangling Party and Ideology in America.” American Political Science Review 113(1) (2019): 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barthes, Roland. “The Old Rhetoric: An Aide-Mémoire.” In The Semiological Challenge. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Hill & Wang, 1988.Google Scholar

Bartsch, Shadi. “Praise and Doublespeak: Tacitus’ Dialogus.” In Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Tacitus. Ed. Ash, Rhiannon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Barwick, Karl. Das rednerische Bildungsideal Ciceros. Leipzig: Akademie Verlag, 1963.Google Scholar

Baumlin, James S. “Ciceronian Decorum and the Temporalities of Renaissance Rhetoric.” In Rhetoric and Kairos: Essays in History, Theory, and Praxis. Ed. Sipiora, Phillip and Baumlin, James S.. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Beiner, Ronald. Political Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Bejan, Teresa M. Mere Civility: Disagreement and the Limits of Toleration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bejan, Teresa M. “The Two Clashing Meanings of ‘Free Speech.’” The Atlantic. December 2, 2017.Google Scholar

Bell, Andrew J. E. “Cicero and the Spectacle of Power.” The Journal of Roman Studies 87 (1997): 1–22.Google Scholar

Bell, Catherine. Ritual: Perspectives and Dimension. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Bender, John and Wellbery, David E.. “Rhetoricality: On the Modernist Return of Rhetoric.” In The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice. Ed. Bender, John and Wellbery, David E.. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Berman, Sheri. “Against the Technocrats.” Dissent 65(1) (Winter 2018): 32–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bessette, Joseph M. The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Biden, Joe. “Inaugural Address.” January 20, 2021. www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/01/20/inaugural-address-by-president-joseph-r-biden-jr.Google Scholar

Bitzer, Lloyd F. “The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 1(1) (1968): 1–14.Google Scholar

Blair, Hugh. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Ed. Ferreira-Buckley, Linda and Halloran, S. Michael. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Blake, Aaron. “Everything That Was Said at the Second Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton Debate, Highlighted.” Washington Post. October 9, 2016. www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/09/everything-that-was-said-at-the-second-donald-trump-vs-hillary-clinton-debate-highlighted.Google Scholar

Boesche, Roger. The Strange Liberalism of Alexis de Tocqueville. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Bonald, Louis de. “Du style et de la littérature.” In Œuvres Complètes. Ed. Jacques-Paul Migne. Vol. 3. Paris: Ateliers Catholiques, 1859.Google Scholar

Booth, Wayne C. The Rhetoric of Rhetoric: The Quest for Effective Communication. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar

Bort, Ryan. “Decoding Trump’s Staged Inaugural Speechwriting Photo.” Newsweek. January 18, 2017. www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-inaugural-speech-tweet-544314.Google Scholar

Boswell, James. Private Papers of James Boswell from Malahide Castle. Ed. Scott, Geoffrey and Pottle, Frederick A.. Vol. 6. New York and London: Oxford University Press, 1928–37.Google Scholar

Bourke, Richard. Empire and Revolution: The Political Life of Edmund Burke. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Brogan, Hugh. Alexis de Tocqueville: A Biography. London: Profile, 2006.Google Scholar

Bromwich, David. The Intellectual Life of Edmund Burke: From the Sublime and Beautiful to American Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Brown, Peter. Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity: Towards a Christian Empire. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Browning, Reed. “The Origin of Burke’s Ideas Revisited.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 18 (1984): 57–71.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. “Cicero and Historiography.” In Miscellanea di Studi Classici in Onore di Eugenio Manni. Vol. 1. Rome: G. Bretschneider, 1979.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. “Libertas in the Republic.” In The Fall of the Roman Republic and Other Related Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Bullard, Paddy. Edmund Burke and the Art of Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs. In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 4. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. The Correspondence of Edmund Burke. Vol. 2. Ed. Sutherland, Lucy S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. “First Letter on a Regicide Peace.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 5. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. “Letter to a Noble Lord.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 5. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas Concerning the Sublime and Beautiful. In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 1. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. A Representation to His Majesty. In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 2. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. “Speech on American Taxation.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 2. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. “Speech on Conciliation with the Colonies.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 2. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. “Speech to the Electors of Bristol.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 2. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. “Speech in General Reply: Ninth Day.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 12. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. “Speech on Mr. Fox’s East India Bill.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 2. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. “Speech on the Nabob of Arcot’s Private Debts.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 3. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. “Speech in Opening the Impeachment: First Day.” In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 9. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. Reflections on the Revolution in France. In The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. Vol. 3. London: John C. Nimmo, 1887.Google Scholar

Butterfield, Herbert. The Whig Interpretation of History. New York: AMS Press, 1931.Google Scholar

Cahn, Steven M. Fate, Logic, and Time. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Canter, H. V. “The Impeachments of Verres and Hastings: Cicero and Burke.” Classical Journal 9(5) (1914): 199–211.Google Scholar

Carnall, Geoffrey. “Burke as Modern Cicero.” In The Impeachment of Warren Hastings. Ed. Carnall, Geoffrey and Nicholson, Colin. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Carrère, Emmanuel. The Kingdom. Trans. John Lambert. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2017.Google Scholar

Carroll, Ross. “Revisiting Burke’s Critique of Enthusiasm.” History of Political Thought 35(2) (2014): 317–44.Google Scholar

Carter, D. M. “Citizen Attribute, Negative Right: A Conceptual Difference between Ancient and Modern Ideas of Free Speech.” In Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Ed. Sluiter, Ineke and Rosen, Ralph M.. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar

Chambers, Simone. “Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?” Political Theory 37(3) (2009): 323–50.Google Scholar

Christian, Brian. “The A/B Test: Inside the Technology That’s Changing the Rules of Business.” Wired, April 25, 2012, www.wired.com/2012/04/ff-abtesting.Google Scholar

Chua, Amy. Political Tribes: Group Instinct and the Fate of Nations. New York: Penguin Random House, 2018.Google Scholar

Cicero, . Brutus. Trans. G. L. Hendrickson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1939.Google Scholar

Cicero, . Brutus and Orator. Trans. Robert A. Kaster. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Cicero, . De inventione. Trans. Charles Duke Yonge. London: Bohn, 1853.Google Scholar

Cicero, . De legibus. In On the Commonwealth and On the Laws. Ed. Zetzel, James E. G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Cicero, . De officiis. In Ethical Writings of Cicero. Trans. Andrew W. Peabody. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1887.Google Scholar

Cicero, . De re publica. In On the Commonwealth and On the Laws. Ed. Zetzel, James E. G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Cicero, . On Friendship [De amicitia]. In On Old Age, On Friendship, On Divination. Trans. W. A. Falconer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1923.Google Scholar

Cicero, . On the Ideal Orator [De oratore]. Trans. James M. May and Jakob Wisse. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Cicero, . The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero. Trans. Charles Duke Yonge. London: Bohn, 1856.Google Scholar

Clarke, M. L. Rhetoric at Rome: A Historical Survey. London: Routledge, 1953.Google Scholar

Clarke, Michelle T. “Doing Violence to the Roman Idea of Liberty?: Freedom as Bodily Integrity in Roman Political Thought.” History of Political Thought 35(2) (2014): 211–33.Google Scholar

Clive, John. Macaulay: The Shaping of the Historian. New York: Knopf, 1973.Google Scholar

Clive, John. Not by Fact Alone: Essays on the Writing and Reading of History. New York: Knopf, 1989.Google Scholar

Conley, Thomas M. Rhetoric in the European Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Connolly, Joy. The Life of Roman Republicanism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Connolly, Joy. The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Coppins, McKay. “Newt Gingrich Says You’re Welcome.” The Atlantic. November 2018. www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/11/newt-gingrich-says-youre-welcome/570832.Google Scholar

Corbeill, Anthony. “Rhetorical Education in Cicero’s Youth.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Ed. May, James M.. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar

Costelloe, Timothy M. The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Craig, Christopher P. “Cato’s Stoicism and the Understanding of Cicero’s Speech for Murena.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 116 (1986): 229–39.Google Scholar

Craig, Christopher P. “Cicero’s Strategy of Embarrassment in the Speech for Plancius.” American Journal of Philology 111(1) (1990): 75–81.Google Scholar

Craig, Christopher P. “A Survey of Recent Work on Cicero’s Rhetorica and Speeches.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Ed. May, James M.. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar

Culler, A. Dwight. The Victorian Mirror of History. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Dahlmann, Hellfried. “Caesars Schrift über die Analogie.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 84 (1935): 258–75.Google Scholar

Damasio, Antonio R. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam, 1994.Google Scholar

David, Jean-Michel “L’action oratoire de C. Gracchus: L’image d’un modele.” In Demokratia et Aristokratia: à propos de Caius Gracchus: mots grecs et réalités romaines. Ed. Nicolet, Claude. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 1983.Google Scholar

De Bruyn, Frans. “‘Expressive Uncertainty’: Edmund Burke’s Theory of the Sublime and Eighteenth Century Conceptions of Metaphor.” In The Science of Sensibility: Reading Burke’s Philosophical Enquiry. Ed. Vermeir, Koen and Deckard, Michael Funk. New York: Springer, 2012.Google Scholar

De Bruyn, Frans. The Literary Genres of Edmund Burke: The Political Uses of Literary Form. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996.Google Scholar

De Libero, Loretana. “Mit eiserner Hand ins Amt?” In Res Publica Reperta: Zur Verfassung und Gesellschaft der römischen Republik und des frühen Prinzipats. Ed. Spielvogel, Jörg. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2002.Google Scholar

Demosthenes, . On the Crown. Trans. John J. Keaney. In Demosthenes’ On the Crown. Ed. Murphy, James J.. New York: Random House, 1967.Google Scholar

Desmouliez, André. Cicéron et Son Goût: Essai sur Une Définition d’une Esthétique Romaine à la fin de la République. Brussels, 1976.Google Scholar

Dionysius of Halicarnassus. On the Style of Demosthenes. In The Critical Essays. Vol. 1. Trans. Stephen Usher. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Dlouhy, Jennifer A. “Obama Blasts Trump’s Virus Response as ‘Chaotic Disaster.’” Bloomberg. May 9, 2020. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-05-09/obama-blasts-trump-s-virus-response-as-chaotic-disaster.Google Scholar

Doran, Robert. The Theory of the Sublime from Longinus to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Douglas, Alan Edward. “The Intellectual Background of Cicero’s Rhetorica: A Study in Method.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 1(3) (1973): 95–138.Google Scholar

Douglas, Alan Edward. “M. Calidius and the Atticists.” Classical Quarterly 49 (1955): 241–7.Google Scholar

Dowe, William. Junius, Lord Chatham. New York: Miller, Orton, 1857.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John S. “Rhetoric in Democracy: A Systemic Appreciation.” Political Theory 38(3) (2010): 319–39.Google Scholar

Dugan, John. Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Edelman, Murray. Politics as Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Quiescence. New York: Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Eliot, Gilbert. The Life and Letters of Sir Gilbert Eliot. Vol. 1. London, 1874.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. Alexis de Tocqueville: The First Social Scientist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. “Deliberation and Constitution Making.” In Deliberative Democracy. Ed. Elster, Jon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. Securities against Misrule: Juries, Assemblies, Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Fantham, Elaine. The Roman World of Cicero’s De oratore. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Fantham, Elaine. “Theophrastus and the Theory of Style.” In Theophrastus of Eresus: On His Life and Work. Ed. Fortenbaugh, William Wall, Huby, Pamela M., and Long, Anthony A., vol. 2. New York: Routledge, 1985.Google Scholar

Farrell, Thomas B. “Knowledge, Consensus, and Rhetorical Theory.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 62 (1976): 1–14.Google Scholar

Farrell, Thomas B. Norms of Rhetorical Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Adam. An Essay on the History of Civil Society. Ed. Oz-Salzberger, Fania. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Finlayson, Alan. “‘What Is the Point of Parliamentary Debate?’ Deliberation, Oratory, Opposition and Spectacle in the British House of Commons.” Redescriptions 20(1) (2017): 11–31.Google Scholar

Fong, David. “Macaulay: The Essayist as Historian.” Dalhousie Review 51 (1971): 38–48.Google Scholar

Fontana, Benedetto, Nederman, Cary J., and Remer, Gary. Talking Democracy: Historical Perspectives on Rhetoric and Democracy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. “Discourse and Truth: The Problematization of Parrhesia.” foucault.info/system/files/pdf/DiscourseAndTruth_MichelFoucault_1983_0.pdf.Google Scholar

Fox, Charles James. “Mr. Fox’s East India Bill.” In Speeches of the Right Honourable Charles James Fox. 3rd ed. Vol. 2. London: Aylott, 1853.Google Scholar

Frank, Jason. “‘Delightful Horror’: Edmund Burke and the Aesthetics of Democratic Revolution.” In The Aesthetic Turn in Political Thought. Ed. Kompridis, Nikolas. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.Google Scholar

Furet, François. Interpreting the French Revolution. Trans. Elborg Forster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Furet, François and Mélonio, Françoise. “Introduction.” In Tocqueville, The Old Regime and the Revolution. Vol. 1. Trans. Alan S. Kahan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Furniss, Tom. Edmund Burke’s Aesthetic Ideology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “The Relevance of the Beautiful: Art as Play, Symbol, and Festival.” In The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

GannettJr., Robert T. Tocqueville Unveiled: The Historian and His Sources for the Old Regime and the Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Gaonkar, Dilip Parmeshwar. “Introduction: Contingency and Probability.” In A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism. Ed. Jost, Walter and Olmsted, Wendy. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar

Garcea, Alessandro. Caesar’s De Analogia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Garsten, Bryan. “The Rhetoric Revival in Political Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 14 (2011): 159–80.Google Scholar

Garsten, Bryan. Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelzer, Thomas. “Klassizismus, Attizismus und Asianismus.” In Le classicisme à Rome. Ed. Flashar, Hellmut. Vandoeuvres-Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 1979.Google Scholar

Gibbon, Edward. The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Vol. 1. London: Strahan and Cadell, 1776.Google Scholar

Gladstone, William Ewart. Gleanings of Past Years. Vol. 2. London: John Murray, 1879.Google Scholar

Gleason, Maud W. Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Goodman, Rob. “The Deliberative Sublime: Edmund Burke on Disruptive Speech and Imaginative Judgment.” American Political Science Review 112(2) (2018): 267–79.Google Scholar

Goodman, Rob. “‘The Low Principles of Jurisprudence’: Legal Indeterminacy in Edmund Burke’s Impeachment of Warren Hastings.” The Review of Politics 82(3) (2020): 459–83.Google Scholar

Goodman, Rob and Bagg, Samuel. “Preaching to the Choir? Rhetoric and Identity in a Polarized Age.” Journal of Politics (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Goldberg, Jonah. Suicide of the West: How the Rebirth of Tribalism, Populism, Nationalism, and Identity Politics Is Destroying American Democracy. New York: Crown Forum, 2018.Google Scholar

Gopen, George. The Sense of Structure. London: Longman, 2004.Google Scholar

Görler, Woldemar. “From Athens to Tusculum: Gleaning the Background of Cicero’s De oratore.” Rhetorica 6(3) (1988): 215–35.Google Scholar

Gormley, Steven. “Deliberation, Unjust Exclusion, and the Rhetorical Turn.” Contemporary Political Theory 18(2) (2019): 202–26.Google Scholar

Gorton, William A. “Manipulating Citizens: How Political Campaigns’ Use of Behavioral Social Science Harms Democracy.” New Political Science 36(1) (2016): 61–80.Google Scholar

Gotoff, Harold C. “Cicero’s Caesarian Orations.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Ed. May, James M.. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar

Gotoff, Harold C. Cicero’s Elegant Style: An Analysis of the Pro Archia. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Gowing, Alain M. “Tully’s Boat: Responses to Cicero in the Imperial Period.” In The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Ed. Steel, Catherine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Graf, Fritz. “Cicero, Plautus and Roman Laughter.” In A Cultural History of Humour. Ed. Bremmer, Jan and Roodenburg, Herman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Grant, W. Leonard. “Cicero on the Moral Character of the Orator.” Classical Journal 38 (1943): 472–8.Google Scholar

Green, Jeffrey Edward. The Eyes of the People: Democracy in an Age of Spectatorship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Greene, Lane. Talk on the Wild Side: The Untameable Nature of Language. London: Economist Books, 2018.Google Scholar

Gursky, Jacob and Woolley, Samuel. “The Trump 2020 App Is a Voter Surveillance Tool of Extraordinary Power.” MIT Technology Review. June 21, 2020. www.technologyreview.com/2020/06/21/1004228/trumps-data-hungry-invasive-app-is-a-voter-surveillance-tool-of-extraordinary-scope.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Enquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Thomas Burger and Frederick Lawrence. Oxford: Polity, 1989.Google Scholar

Hacker, Jacob S. The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Hall, Catherine. Macaulay and Son: Architects of Imperial Britain. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Hall, Cheryl. “‘Passions and Constraint’: The Marginalization of Passion in Liberal Political Theory.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 28(6) (2002): 727–48.Google Scholar

Hall, Jon. Cicero’s Use of Judicial Theater. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Hallam, Henry. The Constitutional History of England from the Accession of Henry VII. to the Death of George II. Vol. 3. Boston: Wells and Lilly, 1829.Google Scholar

Hamburger, Joseph. Macaulay and the Whig Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Hamburger, Tom. “Cruz Campaign Credits Psychological Data and Analytics for Its Rising Success.” Washington Post. December 13, 2015. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/cruz-campaign-credits-psychological-data-and-analytics-for-its-rising-success/2015/12/13/4cb0baf8-9dc5-11e5-bce4-708fe33e3288_story.html.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. The Federalist Papers. Ed. Kramnick, Isaac. New York: Penguin, 1987.Google Scholar

Hampsher-Monk, Iain. “Rhetoric and Opinion in the Politics of Edmund Burke.” History of Political Thought 9(3) (1988): 455–84.Google Scholar

Hariman, Robert. Political Style: The Artistry of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Stephen, Yudkin, Daniel, Juan-Torres, Míriam, and Dixon, Tim. “Hidden Tribes: A Study of America’s Polarized Landscape.” October 2018. static1.squarespace.com/static/5a70a7c3010027736a22740f/t/5bbcea6b7817f7bf7342b718/1539107467397/hidden_tribes_report-2.pdf.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor: Their Correspondence and Subsequent Marriage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Heath, Malcolm. “Longinus on Sublimity.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 45 (1999): 43–74.Google Scholar

Hendrickson, G. L. “The De Analogia of Julius Caesar; Its Occasion, Nature, and Date, with Additional Fragments.” Classical Philology 1 (1906): 97–120.Google Scholar

Hersh, Eitan D. Hacking the Electorate: How Campaigns Perceive Voters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Hindson, Paul and Gray, Tim. Burke’s Dramatic Theory of Politics. Aldershot: Avebury, 1988.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, Karl-Joachim. “Self-Serving Sermons: Oratory and the Self-Construction of the Roman Aristocrat.” In Praise and Blame in Roman Republican Rhetoric. Ed. Smith, Christopher and Covino, Ralph. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 2010.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. “Schmitt: The Debility of Liberalism.” In The Anatomy of Antiliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Howard, Philip N. New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Huddy, Leonie, Mason, Lilliana, and Aarøe, Lene. “Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity.” American Political Science Review 109(1) (2015): 1–17.Google Scholar

Huizinga, Johan. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Boston: Beacon, 1950.Google Scholar

Hume, David. “Of Eloquence.” In Essays Moral, Political, and Literary. Ed. Miller, Eugene F.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1985.Google Scholar

Hume, David. The History of England from the Invasion of Julius Caesar to the Revolution in 1688. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1983.Google Scholar

Hume, David. “That Politics May Be Reduced to a Science.” In Essays Moral, Political, and Literary. Ed. Miller, Eugene F.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1985.Google Scholar

IJsseling, Samuel. Rhetoric and Philosophy in Conflict. Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976.Google Scholar

Innes, D. C. “Longinus and Caecilius: Models of the Sublime.” Mnemosyne 55 (2002): 259–84.Google Scholar

Issenberg, Sasha. The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns. New York: Broadway Books, 2013.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto. “E Pluribus Pluribus, or Divided We Stand.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1) (2016): 219–24.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, Lelkes, Yphtach, Levendusky, Matthew, Malhotra, Neil, and Westwood, Sean J., “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science 22 (2019): 129–46.Google Scholar

Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gurav, and Lelkes, Yphtach. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3) (2012): 405–31.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. Politicians Don’t Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Jaume, Lucien. Tocqueville: The Aristocratic Sources of Liberty. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Jebb, Richard C. Macaulay. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1900.Google Scholar

Kagan, Donald. Thucydides: The Reinvention of History. New York: Penguin, 2010.Google Scholar

Kahan, Dan M., Braman, Donald, Gastil, John, Slovic, Paul, and Mertz, C. K.. “Culture and Identity-Protective Cognition: Explaining the White Male Effect in Risk Perception.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 4 (3) (2007): 465–505.Google Scholar

Kahn, Victoria. Machiavellian Rhetoric. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Kahn, Victoria. Rhetoric, Prudence, and Skepticism in the Renaissance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Trans. J. H. Bernard. New York: Hafner Press, 1951.Google Scholar

Kapust, Daniel. “Cicero on Decorum and the Morality of Rhetoric.” European Journal of Political Theory 10(1) (2011): 92–112.Google Scholar

Kapust, Daniel. Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Kapust, Daniel and Schwarze, Michelle A.. “The Rhetoric of Sincerity: Cicero and Smith on Propriety and Political Context.” American Political Science Review 110(1) (2016): 100–11.Google Scholar

Kaster, Robert A. Emotion, Restraint, and Community in Ancient Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Ellen. “Carl Schmitt and the Frankfurt School.” Telos 71 (1987): 37–66.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Ellen. “Introduction: Carl Schmitt’s Parlamentarismus in Its Historical Context.” In The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Ed. Schmitt, Carl, trans. Ellen Kennedy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Kennedy, George. The Art of Persuasion in Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Kennedy, George. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Kennedy, George. A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Kennedy, George. Quintilian. New York: Twayne, 1969.Google Scholar

Kimball, Bruce. Orators and Philosophers: A History of the Idea of Liberal Education. New York: Teachers College Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Klein, Ezra. Why We’re Polarized. New York: Avid Reader-Simon & Schuster, 2020.Google Scholar

Koziak, Barbara. Retrieving Political Emotion: Thumos, Aristotle and Gender. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Kramnick, Isaac. “The Left and Edmund Burke.” Political Theory 11(2) (1983): 189–214.Google Scholar

Kraus, Christina Shuttleworth. “Introduction.” In Livy, , Ab Urbe Condita, Book VI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Kraus, Christina Shuttleworth and Woodman, Anthony John. Latin Historians. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Krause, Sharon. Civil Passions: Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Kreiss, Daniel. “Micro-Targeting, the Quantified Persuasion.” Internet Policy Review 6(4) (2017). policyreview.info/articles/analysis/micro-targeting-quantified-persuasion.Google Scholar

Kreiss, Daniel. “Yes We Can (Profile You).” Stanford Law Review 64 (2012). www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/privacy-paradox-yes-we-can-profile-you.Google Scholar

Krostenko, Brian. Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Lambert, Elizabeth R. Edmund Burke of Beaconsfield. Cranbury: University of Delaware Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Landauer, Matthew. Dangerous Counsel: Accountability and Advice in Ancient Greece. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Landauer, Matthew. “Parrhesia and the Demos Tyrannos: Frank Speech, Flattery and Accountability in Democratic Athens.” History of Political Thought 33(2) (2012): 185–208.Google Scholar

Lanham, Richard A. The Electronic Word: Democracy, Technology, and the Arts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Lanham, Richard A. The Motives of Eloquence: Literary Rhetoric in the Renaissance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Larmore, Charles. The Morals of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Lausberg, Heinrich. Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Study. Trans. Matthew T. Bliss et al. Boston, 1998.Google Scholar

Leeman, Anton D. “Julius Caesar, the Orator of Paradox.” In The Orator in Action and Theory in Greece and Rome. Ed. Wooten, Cecil W.. Leiden: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar

Leeman, Anton D. and Pinkster, Harm. M.T. Cicero: De oratore libri III, Buch I, 1-165. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1981.Google Scholar

Leff, Michael. “The Habitation of Rhetoric.” In Contemporary Rhetorical Theory: A Reader. Ed. Lucaites, John L., Condit, Celeste M., and Caudill, Sally. New York: Guilford Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Lefort, Claude. “The Question of Democracy.” In Democracy and Political Theory. Trans. David Macey. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Leigh, Matthew. “Wounding and Popular Rhetoric at Rome.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 40 (1995): 195–215.Google Scholar

Lendon, J. E. “Historians without History: Against Roman Historiography.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians. Ed. Feldherr, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Lévesque de Pouilly, Louis-Jean. Theorie des sentiments agréables: òu après avoir indiqué les règles, que la nature suit dans la distribution du plaisir, on établit les principes de la théologie naturelle et ceux de la philosophie morale. Paris, 1748.Google Scholar

Levine, George. The Boundaries of Fiction: Carlyle, Macaulay, Newman. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Lewis, C. S. A Preface to Paradise Lost. London: Oxford University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. “Cicero and Milo.” The Journal of Roman Studies 64 (1974): 62–78.Google Scholar

Lock, F. P. Edmund Burke. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon, 1998.Google Scholar

Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. In The Works of John Locke. Vol. 2. Reprint ed. Aalen, Germany: Scientia Verlag, 1963.Google Scholar

London, Jennifer. “How to Do Things with Fables: Ibn al-Muqaffa’s Frank Speech in Stories from the Kalila wa Dimna.” History of Political Thought 29(2) (2008): 189–212.Google Scholar

Longinus, . On the Sublime. Trans. W. Rhys Roberts. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1907.Google Scholar

Luntz, Frank. “The 11 Words for 2011.” Huffington Post. January 3, 2011. www.huffingtonpost.com/frank-luntz/words-2011_b_829603.html.Google Scholar

Luttig, Matthew D. The Rise of Partisan Rigidity. PhD diss. conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/178943/Luttig_umn_0130E_16828.pdf.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “On the Athenian Orators.” In The Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Edinburgh Election, 1839.” In Speeches of Lord Macaulay: Corrected by Himself. London: Longman, 1863.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Francis Bacon,” in Critical and Historical Essays. Vol. 2. London: J. M. Dent, 1927.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “History.” In The Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Thomas Babington. The History of England from the Accession of James the Second. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Mill’s Essay on Government.” In The Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Mirabeau.” In The Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Parliamentary Reform (March 2, 1831).” In The Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Parliamentary Reform (December 16, 1831).” In The Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Parliamentary Reform (September 20, 1831).” In The Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “The People’s Charter (May 3, 1842).” In The Writings and Speeches of Lord Macaulay. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1889.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Thomas Babington. “Sir William Temple.” In Macaulay’s Essays and Lays of Ancient Rome. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1905.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, James. History of the Revolution in England in 1688: Comprising a View of the Reign of James II. from His Accession, to the Enterprise of the Prince of Orange. Philadelphia: Carey, Lea, and Blanchard, 1835.Google Scholar

Maguire, Matthew W. The Conversion of Imagination: From Pascal through Rousseau to Tocqueville. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.” Trans. Elly Stein and Jane Mansbridge. Political Theory 15(3) (1987): 338–68.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Mantel, Hilary. Wolf Hall. New York: Picador, 2009.Google Scholar

Marcus, George E., Neuman, W. Russell, and Mackuen, Michael, eds. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Markovits, Elizabeth. The Politics of Sincerity. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Marshall, David L. The Weimar Origins of Rhetorical Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Marx, F., ed. Incerti auctoris De ratione dicendi ad C. Herennium libri IV. Leipzig: Teubner, 1894.Google Scholar

Mason, Lilliana. “A Cross-Cutting Calm: How Social Sorting Drives Affective Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80(S1) (2016): 351–77.Google Scholar

Mason, Lilliana. “Ideologues without Issues: The Polarizing Consequences of Ideological Identities,” Public Opinion Quarterly 82(S1) (2018): 280–301.Google Scholar

Mason, Lilliana. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar

May, James M. “Cicero as Rhetorician.” In A Companion to Roman Rhetoric. Ed. Dominik, William J. and Hall, Jon. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar

McCormick, John P. Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

McCullagh, C. Behan. Justifying Historical Descriptions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

McDowell, R. B. and Webb, D. A.. Trinity College Dublin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Metcalf, Stephen. “Ezra Klein’s ‘Why We’re Polarized’ and the Drawbacks of Explainer Journalism.” New Yorker. March 11, 2020. www.newyorker.com/books/under-review/ezra-kleins-why-were-polarized-and-the-drawbacks-of-explainer-journalism.Google Scholar

Michel, Alain. Rhétorique et Philosophie chez Cicéron. Paris: University Press of France, 1960.Google Scholar

Milton, John. Paradise Lost. Reissue ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Harvey. Individual Choice and the Structures of History: Alexis de Tocqueville as Historian Reappraised. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Momigliano, Arnaldo. “Greek Historiography.” History and Theory 17 (1978): 1–28.Google Scholar

Monoson, Sara S. Plato’s Democratic Entanglements. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, Baron de. The Spirit of the Laws. Ed. Cohler, Anne M. et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Morley, John. Nineteenth Century Essays. Ed. Stansky, Peter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Morstein-Marx, Robert. Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Müller, Reimar. “Die Wertung der Bildungsdisziplinen bei Cicero. Bios praktikos und Bildung.” Klio 128 (1965): 77–173.Google Scholar

Narducci, Emanuele. Cicerone e l’eloquenza romana. Rome: Laterza, 1997.Google Scholar

Narducci, Emanuele. “Orator and the Definition of the Ideal Orator.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Ed. May, James M.. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar

Nichols, John and McChesney, Robert W.. Dollarocracy. New York: Nation Books, 2013.Google Scholar

Nicgorski, Walter. Cicero’s Skepticism and His Recovery of Political Philosophy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Nuzzi, Olivia. “Who Really Writes Trump’s Speeches? The White House Won’t Say.” New York. January 30, 2018. nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/who-really-writes-trumps-speeches-white-house-wont-say.html.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Daniel I. The Burke-Wollstonecraft Debate: Savagery, Civilization, and Democracy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

O’Neill, Daniel I. Edmund Burke and the Conservative Logic of Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2016.Google Scholar

O’Neill, John. “The Rhetoric of Deliberation: Some Problems in Kantian Theories of Deliberative Democracy.” Res Publica 8 (2002): 249–68.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, Michael. “Rationalism in Politics.” In Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. New York: Basic, 1962.Google Scholar

Obama, Barack. A Promised Land. New York: Crown-Random House, 2020.Google Scholar

Ober, Josiah. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Ong, Walter J. Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Packard, Vance. The Hidden Persuaders. New York: Pocket Books, 1957.Google Scholar

Packer, George. “A New Report Offers Insights into Tribalism in the Age of Trump.” New Yorker. October 13, 2018. www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/a-new-report-offers-insights-into-tribalism-in-the-age-of-trump.Google Scholar

Parry, Marc. “Is Political Science Too Pessimistic?” (interview with Jennifer Hochschild). Chronicle of Higher Education. September 19, 2016.Google Scholar

Peha, Jon. “Making Political Ads Personal.” Politico. September 11, 2012.Google Scholar

Perelman, Chaïm and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Pettit, Philip. “Resilience as the Explanandum of Social Theory.” In Political Contingency: Studying the Unexpected, the Accidental, and the Unforeseen. Ed. Shapiro, Ian and Bedi, Sonu. New York: NYU Press 2007.Google Scholar

Pezzini, Giuseppe. “Caesar the Linguist: The Debate about the Latin Language” In The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar. Ed. Luca Grillo and Christopher B. Krebs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Pilkington, Ed and Michel, Amanda. “Mitt Romney’s Campaign Closing Gap on Obama in Digital Election Race.” The Guardian. June 14, 2012, www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jun/14/romney-campaign-digital-data-obama.Google Scholar

Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Plato, . Phaedrus. In Plato in Twelve Volumes. Vol. 1. Trans. Harold N. Fowler. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914.Google Scholar

Plato, . Republic. In Plato in Twelve Volumes. Vol. 6. Trans. Paul Shorey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Plutarch, . “The Life of Demosthenes.” In Demosthenes’ On the Crown. Ed. Murphy, James J.. New York: Random House, 1967.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. “The Varieties of Whiggism from Exclusion to Reform.” In Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Polybius. Histories. Trans. W. R. Paton. Cambridge, MA, 1922–7.Google Scholar

Porter, James I. “Des sons qu’on ne peut entendre: Cicéron, les ‘kritikoi’ et la tradition du sublime dans la critique littéraire.” In Cicéron et Philodème: La Polémique en philosophie. Ed. Auvray-Assayas, Clara and Delattre, Daniel. Paris: Éditions rue d’Ulm, 2001.Google Scholar

Porter, James I. The Sublime in Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Potkay, Adam S. “Classical Eloquence and Polite Style in the Age of Hume.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 25(1) (1991): 31–56.Google Scholar

Potkay, Adam S. The Fate of Eloquence in the Age of Hume. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Press, Gerald Alan. The Development of the Idea of History in Antiquity. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Priestley, Joseph. A Course of Lectures on Oratory and Criticism. Ed. Bevilacqua, Vincent and Murphy, Richard. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Prior, James. Life of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. London: Bell & Sons, 1878.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense.” In Democracy’s Values. Ed. Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordón, Casiano. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Quintilian. Institutio oratoria [4 vols.]. Trans. H. E. Butler. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953–8.Google Scholar

Quintilian. The Orator’s Education [Institutio oratoria] [5 vols.]. Trans. Donald A. Russell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Rahe, Paul. Republics Ancient & Modern. Vol. 3. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Reid, Christopher. “Burke as Rhetorician and Orator.” In The Cambridge Companion to Edmund Burke. Ed. Dwan, David and Insole, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Remer, Gary. Ethics and the Orator: The Ciceronian Tradition of Political Morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Remer, Gary. “Political Oratory and Conversation: Cicero versus Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 27(1) (1999): 39–64.Google Scholar

Remer, Gary. “Two Modes of Deliberation: Oratory and Conversation in Ratifying the Constitution.” Journal of Political Philosophy 8(1) (2000): 68–90.Google Scholar

Rhetorica ad Herennium. Trans. Caplan, Harry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Richlin, Amy. “Gender and Rhetoric: Producing Manhood in the Schools.” In Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature. Ed. Dominik, William. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

Robin, Corey. The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Donald Trump. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Roisman, Joseph. “Speaker-Audience Interaction in Athens: A Power Struggle.” In Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Ed. Sluiter, Ineke and Rosen, Ralph M.. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar

Roller, Matthew B. “Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia.” Classical Philology 99 (1) (2004): 1–56.Google Scholar

Romilly, Samuel. Memoirs of the Life of Sir Samuel Romilly. Vol. 2. London: John Murray, 1840.Google Scholar

Rooney, Sally. “Even If You Beat Me.” The Dublin Review. Spring 2015. thedublinreview.com/article/even-if-you-beat-me.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Government of Poland. Trans. Willmoore Kendall. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1985.Google Scholar

Ryan, Cressida. “Burke’s Classical Heritage: Playing Games with Longinus.” In The Science of Sensibility: Reading Burke’s Philosophical Enquiry. Ed. Vermeir, Koen and Deckard, Michael Funk. New York: Springer, 2012.Google Scholar

Sachs, Jonathan. Romantic Antiquity: Rome in the British Imagination, 1789–1832. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Sainsbury, John. John Wilkes. Burlington: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar

Sasse, Ben. Them: Why We Hate Each Other – and How to Heal. New York: St. Martin’s, 2018.Google Scholar

Satkunanandan, Shalini. “Drawing Rein: Shame and Reverence in Plato’s Law-Bound Polity and Ours.” Political Theory 46(3) (2018): 331–56.Google Scholar

Saxonhouse, Arlene. Free Speech and Democracy in Ancient Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Scherer, Michael. “Inside the Secret World of the Data Crunchers Who Helped Obama Win.” Time. November 7, 2012. swampland.time.com/2012/11/07/inside-the-secret-world-of-quants-and-data-crunchers-who-helped-obama-win/.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, Alessandro. “Didaxis, Rhetoric, and the Law in Lucretius.” In Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean. Ed. Heyworth, S. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Trans. Ellen Kennedy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. Political Romanticism. Trans. Guy Oakes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. Roman Catholicism and Political Form. Trans. G. L. Ulmen. Westport: Greenwood, 1996.Google Scholar

Schütrumpf, Eckart. “Platonic Elements in the Structure of Cicero De Oratore Book 1.” Rhetorica 6(3) (1988): 237–58.Google Scholar

Scott, James C. Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Seligman, Adam B., Weller, Robert P., Puett, Michael, and Simon, Bennett. Ritual and Its Consequences: An Essay on the Limits of Sincerity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Selinger, William. Parliamentarism: From Burke to Weber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Serwer, Adam. “America’s Problem Isn’t Tribalism – It’s Racism.” The Atlantic. November 7, 2018. www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/11/racism-not-tribalism/575173.Google Scholar

Shaw, Tamsin. “Invisible Manipulators of Your Mind.” New York Review of Books. April 20, 2017. www.nybooks.com/articles/2017/04/20/kahneman-tversky-invisible-mind-manipulators.Google Scholar

Sheldon, Garrett Ward. The Political Philosophy of James Madison. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Patrick. “Political Declensions in Latin Grammar and Oratory, 55 BCE-CE 39.” In Roman Literature and Ideology: Ramus Essays for J.P. Sullivan. Bendigo: Aureal Publications, 1995.Google Scholar

Simon, Felix. “The Big Data Panic.” Medium. March 25, 2018. medium.com/viewpoints/cambridge-analytica-and-the-big-data-panic-5029f12e1bcb.Google Scholar

Siroker, Dan. “How Obama Raised $60 Million by Running a Simple Experiment.” Optimizely. November 29, 2010. blog.optimizely.com/2010/11/29/how-obama-raised-60-million-by-running-a-simple-experiment.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. Forensic Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles-Lettres. Ed. Bryce, E. J. C.. Indianapolis: LibertyClassics, 1985.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. The Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House, 2000.Google Scholar

Smith, John E. “Time and Qualitative Time.” In Rhetoric and Kairos: Essays in History, Theory, and Praxis. Ed. Sipiora, Phillip and Baumlin, James S.. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Smith, Jonathan Z. Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Solmsen, Friedrich. “The Aristotelian Tradition in Ancient Rhetoric.” The American Journal of Philology 62(2) (1941): 169–90.Google Scholar

Solmsen, Friedrich. “Aristotle and Cicero on the Orators’ Playing upon the Feelings.” Classical Philology 33(4) (1938): 390–404.Google Scholar

Solmsen, Friedrich. “Cicero’s First Speeches: A Rhetorical Analysis.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 69 (1938): 542–56.Google Scholar

Soni, Jimmy and Goodman, Rob. A Mind at Play: How Claude Shannon Invented the Information Age. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2017.Google Scholar

Steel, Catherine. Cicero, Rhetoric, and Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Steel, Catherine. “Cicero’s ‘Brutus’: The End of Oratory and the Beginning of History?” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 46 (2002–3): 195–211.Google Scholar

Steel, Catherine. “Tribunician Sacrosanctity and Oratorical Performance in the Late Republic.” In Form and Function in Roman Oratory. Ed. Berry, D. H. and Erskine, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Straumann, Benjamin. Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Andrew. “America Wasn’t Built for Humans.” New York. September 17, 2017. nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/09/can-democracy-survive-tribalism.html.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Andrew. “How Do We Cope with Trump?” New York. February 23, 2018. nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/02/andrew-sullivan-how-do-we-cope-with-trump.html.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Robert E. Macaulay: The Tragedy of Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Tacitus, . Dialogus de oratoribus. In Complete Works of Tacitus. Ed. Hadas, Moses, trans. Alfred John Church and William Jackson Brodribb. New York: Modern Library, 1942.Google Scholar

Tanasoca, Ana and Sass, Jensen. “Ritual Deliberation.” Journal of Political Philosophy 27(2) (2019): 139–65.Google Scholar

Tarnopolsky, Christina H. Prudes, Perverts, and Tyrants: Plato’s Gorgias and the Politics of Shame. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Thiers, Adolphe. The History of the French Revolution. Vol. 1. Trans. Frederick Shoberl. Philadelphia: 1844.Google Scholar

Stangl, Thomas, ed. Ciceronis Orationum Scholiastae. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1964.Google Scholar

Thompson, Mark. Enough Said: What’s Gone Wrong with the Language of Politics. New York: St. Martin’s, 2016.Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis de. The Ancien Régime and the French Revolution. Ed. Elster, Jon. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis de. Correspondance anglais. In Œuvres Complètes. Vol. 6. Paris: Michel Lévy, 1867.Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. Ed. Kramnick, Isaac. Trans. Gerald Bevan. New York: Penguin, 2003.Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis de. Études économiques, politiques. In Œuvres Complètes. Vol. 9. Paris: Michel Lévy, 1867.Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis de. Souvenirs. In Œuvres Complètes. Vol. 12. Paris: Michel Lévy, 1867.Google Scholar

Trenchard, John. “Of Eloquence, Considered Politically.” November 17, 1722. In John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon, Cato’s Letters. Vol. 2. Ed. Hamowy, Ronald. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1995.Google Scholar

Trevelyan, George Otto. The Life and Letters of Lord Macaulay. Vol. 1. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1876.Google Scholar

Trilling, Lionel. Sincerity and Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Van den Berg, Christopher S. The World of Tacitus’ Dialogus de Oratoribus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Van der Blom, Henriette. Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Vickers, Brian. In Defence of Rhetoric. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Vickers, Brian. “Repetition and Emphasis in Rhetoric: Theory and Practice.” In Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature 7: Repetition. Ed. Fischer, Andreas. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 1994.Google Scholar

Vivenza, Gloria. Adam Smith and the Classics: The Classical Heritage in Adam Smith’s Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Volk, Katharina. “The Genre of Cicero’s De consulatu suo.” In Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature. Ed. Papanghelis, Theodore D. et al. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar

Volk, Katharina and Zetzel, James E. G.. “Laurel, Tongue, and Glory (Cicero, De consulatu suo fr. 6 Soubiran).” Classical Quarterly 65(1) (2015): 204–23.Google Scholar

Waldron, Jeremy. Dignity, Rank, and Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Wallace, David Foster. “Up, Simba.” In Consider the Lobster and Other Essays. New York: Little, Brown and Co., 2006.Google Scholar

Wallace, Robert W. “The Power to Speak – and Not to Listen – in Ancient Athens.” In Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Ed. Sluiter, Ineke and Rosen, Ralph M.. Leiden: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. “Mutatio Morum: The Idea of a Cultural Revolution.” In The Roman Cultural Revolution. Ed. Habinek, Thomas and Schiesaro, Alessandro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Waterlow, Sarah. Passage and Possibility: A Study of Aristotle’s Modal Concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Weber, Ronald. “Singer and Seer: Macaulay on the Historian as Poet.” In Papers on Language and Literature 3 (Summer 1967): 210–19.Google Scholar

Weeden, Lisa. “Acting ‘As If’: Symbolic Politics and Social Control in Syria.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 40(3) (1998): 503–23.Google Scholar

White, Hayden. “The Historical Text as Literary Artifact.” In Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

White, Hayden. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in 19th-Century Europe. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Wille, Günter. Musica Romana: Die Bedeutung der Musik im Leben der Römer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 1967.Google Scholar

Winterbottom, Michael. “Quintilian and the Vir Bonus.” The Journal of Roman Studies 54 (1 and 2) (1964): 90–7.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. Clio’s Cosmetics: Three Studies in Greco-Roman Literature. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. Remembering the Roman People: Essays on Late-Republican Politics and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Wisse, Jakob. “The Bad Orator: Between Clumsy Delivery and Political Danger.” In Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Ed. Catherine Steel and Henriette van der Blom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Wisse, Jakob. “De Oratore: Rhetoric, Philosophy, and the Making of the Ideal Orator.” In Brill’s Companion to Cicero. Ed. May, James M.. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar

Wisse, Jakob. “Greeks, Romans, and the Rise of Atticism.” In Greek Literary Theory After Aristotle: A Collection of Papers in Honour of D.M. Schenkeveld. Ed. Abbenes, Jelle G. J., Slings, S. R., Schenkeveld, Dirk Marie, and Sluiter, Ineke. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Wolin, Sheldon. Politics and Vision. Expanded ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Wolin, Sheldon. Tocqueville between Two Worlds. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Wood, Neal. “The Aesthetic Dimension of Burke’s Political Thought.” Journal of British Studies 4(1) (1964): 41–64.Google Scholar

Wood, Neal. Cicero’s Social and Political Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. “History.” In Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. Vol. 1. Ed. Sloane, Thomas O.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. Rhetoric in Classical Historiography: Four Studies. London: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar

Wooten, Cecil W. “Cicero and Quintilian on the Style of Demosthenes.” Rhetorica 15(2) (1997): 177–92.Google Scholar

Wooten, Cecil W. Cicero’s Philippics and Their Demosthenic Model. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Wordsworth, William. The Fourteen-Book Prelude. Ed. Owen, W. J. B.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Yack, Bernard. “Rhetoric and Public Reasoning: An Aristotelian Understanding of Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 34(4) (2006): 417–38.Google Scholar

Yon, Albert. Cicéron: L’orateur. Paris, 1963.Google Scholar

Zaret, David. Origins of Democratic Culture: Printing, Petitions, and the Public Sphere in Early-Modern England. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Zerba, Michelle. “Love, Envy, and Pantomimic Morality in Cicero’s ‘De oratore.’” Classical Philology 97(4) (2002): 299–321.Google Scholar

Zetzel, James E. G. “Review of Christopher P. Craig, Form as Argument in Cicero’s Speeches.” Bryn Mawr Classical Review 4(6) (1993): 446–51.Google Scholar

Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs, 2019.Google Scholar

Zuckerberg, Donna. Not All Dead White Men: Classics and Misogyny in the Digital Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar