Book contents
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Food Webs: Complexity and Stability
- 1 Food Webs versus Interaction Networks: Principles, Pitfalls, and Perspectives
- 2 What Kind of Interaction-Type Diversity Matters for Community Stability?
- 3 Symmetry, Asymmetry, and Beyond: The Crucial Role of Interaction Strength in the Complexity–Stability Debate
- 4 Ecologically Effective Population Sizes and Functional Extinction of Species in Ecosystems
- 5 Merging Antagonistic and Mutualistic Bipartite Webs: A First Step to Integrate Interaction Diversity into Network Approaches
- 6 Toward Multiplex Ecological Networks: Accounting for Multiple Interaction Types to Understand Community Structure and Dynamics
- 7 Unpacking Resilience in Food Webs: An Emergent Property or a Sum of the Parts?
- Part II Food Webs: From Traits to Ecosystem Functioning
- Part III Food Webs and Environmental Sustainability
- Index
- References
2 - What Kind of Interaction-Type Diversity Matters for Community Stability?
from Part I - Food Webs: Complexity and Stability
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2017
Book contents
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Adaptive Food Webs
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Food Webs: Complexity and Stability
- 1 Food Webs versus Interaction Networks: Principles, Pitfalls, and Perspectives
- 2 What Kind of Interaction-Type Diversity Matters for Community Stability?
- 3 Symmetry, Asymmetry, and Beyond: The Crucial Role of Interaction Strength in the Complexity–Stability Debate
- 4 Ecologically Effective Population Sizes and Functional Extinction of Species in Ecosystems
- 5 Merging Antagonistic and Mutualistic Bipartite Webs: A First Step to Integrate Interaction Diversity into Network Approaches
- 6 Toward Multiplex Ecological Networks: Accounting for Multiple Interaction Types to Understand Community Structure and Dynamics
- 7 Unpacking Resilience in Food Webs: An Emergent Property or a Sum of the Parts?
- Part II Food Webs: From Traits to Ecosystem Functioning
- Part III Food Webs and Environmental Sustainability
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Adaptive Food WebsStability and Transitions of Real and Model Ecosystems, pp. 19 - 30Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Allesina, S. and Tang, S. (2012). Stability criteria for complex ecosystems. Nature, 483, 205–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bascompte, J. and Jordano, P. (2013). Mutualistic Networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Burkholder, P. R. (1952). Cooperation and conflict among primitive organisms. American Scientist, 40, 601–631.Google Scholar
Chen, X. and Cohen, J. E. (2001). Transient dynamics and food-web complexity in the Lotka–Volterra cascade model. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 268, 869–877.Google Scholar
de Ruiter, P. C., Wolters, V., and Moore, J. C. (2005). Dynamic Food Webs: Multispecies Assemblages, Ecosystem Development, and Environmental Change. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Emmerson, M. and Raffaelli, D. (2004). Body size, patterns of interaction strength and the stability of a real food web. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73, 399–409.Google Scholar
Gause, G. F. (1932). Experimental studies on the struggle for existence. Journal of Experimental Biology, 9, 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgelin, E. and Loeuille, N. (2014). Dynamics of coupled mutualistic and antagonistic interactions, and their implications for ecosystem management. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 346, 67–74.Google Scholar
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S. III, Ewel, J. J., et al. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monograph, 75, 3–35.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. (1959). Homage to Santa Rosalia, or Why are there so many kinds of animals? American Naturalist, 93, 145–159.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. C., Graham, J. H., and Smith, F. A. (1997). Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism–parasitism continuum. New Phytologist, 135, 575–585.Google Scholar
Kéfi, S., Berlow, E., Wieters, E., Navarrete, S., et al. (2012). More than a meal… Integrating non-feeding interactions into food webs. Ecology Letters, 15, 291–300.Google Scholar
Kondoh, M. (2003). Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food-web complexity and stability. Science, 299, 1388–1391.Google Scholar
Kondoh, M. (2008). Building trophic modules into a persistent food web. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 16631–16635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawlor, L. R. (1978). A comment on randomly constructed model ecosystems. American Naturalist, 112, 445–447.Google Scholar
Mélian, C. J., Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., and Křivan, V. (2009). Diversity in a complex ecological network with two interaction types. Oikos, 118, 122–130.Google Scholar
Mougi, A. and Kondoh, M. (2012). Diversity of interaction types and ecological community stability. Science, 337, 349–351.Google Scholar
Mougi, A. and Kondoh, M. (2014a). Adaptation in a hybrid world with multiple interaction types: A new mechanism for species coexistence. Ecological Research, 29, 113–119.Google Scholar
Mougi, A. and Kondoh, M. (2014b). Stability of competition–antagonism–mutualism hybrid community and the role of community network structure. Journal of Theoretical Ecology, 360, 54–58.Google Scholar
Mougi, A. and Kondoh, M. (2014c). Instability of a hybrid module of antagonistic and mutualistic interactions. Population Ecology, 56, 257–263.Google Scholar
Neutel, A.-M., Heesterbeek, J. A. P., and de Ruiter, P. C. (2002). Stability in real food webs: Weak links in long loops. Science, 296, 1120–1123.Google Scholar
Ohgushi, T. (2005). Indirect interaction webs: Herbivore-induced effects through trait change in plants. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 36, 81–105.Google Scholar
Ohgushi, T., Craig, T. P., and Price, P. W. (2007). Ecological Communities: Plant Mediation in Indirect Interaction Webs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ohgushi, T., Schmitz, O., and Holt, R. D. (2013). Trait-Mediated Indirect Interactions: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pocock, M. J. O., Evans, D. M., and Memmott, J. (2012). The robustness and restoration of a network of ecological networks. Science, 335, 973–977.Google Scholar
Ramos-Jiliberto, R., Valdovinos, F. S., Moisset de Espanés, P., and Flores, J. D. (2012). Topological plasticity increases robustness of mutualistic networks. Journal of Animal Ecology, 81, 896–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rúa, M. A. and Umbanhowar, J. (2015). Resource availability determines stability for mutualist–pathogen–host interactions. Theoretical Ecology, 8, 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, D., Jones, C. G., Thébault, E., et al. (2014). Integrating ecosystem engineering and food webs. Oikos, 123, 513–524.Google Scholar
Stouffer, D. B. and Bascompte, J. (2011). Compartmentalization increases food-web persistence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 3648–3652.Google Scholar
Suweis, S., Grilli, J., and Martian, A. (2014). Disentangling the effect of hybrid interactions and of the constant effort hypothesis on ecological community stability. Oikos, 123, 525–532.Google Scholar
Thébault, E. and Fontaine, C. (2010). Stability of ecological communities and the architecture of mutualistic and trophic networks. Science, 329, 853–856.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. N. (2005). The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Toju, H., Guimarães, P. R., Olesen, J. M., and Thompson, J. N. (2014). Assembly of complex plant–fungus networks. Nature Communications, 5, 5273.Google Scholar
Werner, E. E. and Peacor, S. D. (2003). A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology, 84, 1083–1100.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by