Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 27
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Ranta, Ronald and Nancheva, Nevena 2019. Unsettled: Brexit and European Union nationals' sense of belonging. Population, Space and Place, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. e2199.

    Savage, Lee 2019. The politics of social spending after the Great Recession: The return of partisan policy making. Governance, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 123.

    Denk, Thomas and Lehtinen, Sarah 2019. State-Formation and Democratization. p. 109.

    Ward, Tom 2018. Critical junctures and the Department of Finance: from DPS to DPER?. Irish Political Studies, Vol. 33, Issue. 1, p. 68.

    Aziabah, Maxwell A. 2018. The Politics of Educational Reform in Ghana. p. 83.

    Schmidtke, Henning 2018. Elite legitimation and delegitimation of international organizations in the media: Patterns and explanations. The Review of International Organizations,

    Anzinger, Heribert M. 2018. Zukunftsfragen des deutschen Steuerrechts III. Vol. 8, Issue. , p. 159.

    Varjonen, Sampo 2018. Institutional evolution and abrupt change: Reforming the administration of social assistance in Finland. International Journal of Social Welfare,

    Bremer, Björn 2018. The missing left? Economic crisis and the programmatic response of social democratic parties in Europe. Party Politics, Vol. 24, Issue. 1, p. 23.

    Sorensen, André 2018. Multiscalar governance and institutional change: critical junctures in European spatial planning. Planning Perspectives, Vol. 33, Issue. 4, p. 615.

    DAY, Stephen 2018. The Surprising Longevity of Kawasaki’s Representative Assembly for Foreign Residents: An Institutionalist Account. Social Science Japan Journal, Vol. 21, Issue. 1, p. 27.

    Aziabah, Maxwell A. 2018. The Politics of Educational Reform in Ghana. p. 53.

    Del Fabbro, Matteo 2018. The institutional history of Milan metropolitan area. Territory, Politics, Governance, Vol. 6, Issue. 3, p. 342.

    della Porta, Donatella 2018. Protests as critical junctures: some reflections towards a momentous approach to social movements. Social Movement Studies, p. 1.

    Cartwright, Madison 2018. Who cares about Reddit? Historical institutionalism and the fight against the Stop Online Piracy Act and the PROTECT Intellectual Property Act. Policy Studies, Vol. 39, Issue. 4, p. 383.

    Swenden, Wilfried 2018. Governing Diversity in South Asia: Explaining Divergent Pathways in India and Pakistan. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 48, Issue. 1, p. 102.

    Lampropoulou, Manto 2018. Policy responses to the Eurozone crisis: A comparative analysis of southern European administrations. Public Policy and Administration, p. 095207671880773.

    Simandan, Dragos 2018. Competition, contingency, and destabilization in urban assemblages and actor-networks. Urban Geography, Vol. 39, Issue. 5, p. 655.

    Kucharski, Jeffrey B. and Unesaki, Hironobu 2018. An institutional analysis of the Japanese energy transition. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Vol. 29, Issue. , p. 126.

    MacCarthaigh, Muiris 2017. Public Sector Reform in Ireland. p. 1.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: July 2015

6 - Critical junctures and institutional change

from Part III - Tools for temporal analysis
Summary

Critical juncture analysis is popular in comparative-historical analysis (CHA) since it provides tools for studying the political origins and reform of important institutional arrangements that exert a long-lasting influence on their social and political environment. This chapter clarifies a number of theoretical and conceptual issues, explores the strengths and weaknesses of the critical juncture approach, and proposes a methodological strategy for studying critical junctures in comparative perspective.

It is necessary to define the scope of the discussion by making two preliminary observations. First, the “dual” model of historical development intrinsic to critical juncture analysis – shorter phases of fluidity and change alternating with longer periods of stability and adaptation – has been applied to a wide range of outcomes and entities, from individual life histories to the development of groups and organizations and the evolution of entire societies (e.g., Swidler 1986, 280). In this chapter, I focus on the use of the concept of critical junctures in the context of the development of institutions, broadly defined as organizations, formal rules, public policies, political regimes, and political economies. These have generally been the object of critical juncture analysis in CHA in both political science and sociology.

Second, within CHA, the concept of critical juncture applies only to the analysis of path-dependent institutions and not to all forms of institutional development. The analysis of critical junctures is a part of path dependence arguments, according to which institutional arrangements put in place at a certain point in time become entrenched because of their ability to shape the incentives, worldviews, and resources of the actors and groups affected by the institution. In this analytical context, critical junctures are cast as moments in which uncertainty as to the future of an institutional arrangement allows for political agency and choice to play a decisive causal role in setting an institution on a certain path of development, a path that then persists over a long period of time.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis
  • Online ISBN: 9781316273104
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316273104
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2012. Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. London: Crown Business.
Arthur, Brian. 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bates, Robert H., Greif, Avner, Levi, Margaret, Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent, and Weingast, Barry R.. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey. Forthcoming. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bennett, Andrew, and Elman, Colin. 2006. “Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence.” Political Analysis 14 (3): 250–67.
Berins Collier, Ruth, and Collier, David. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Berlin, Isaiah. 1974. “Historical Inevitability.” In The Philosophy of History, edited by Gardiner, P., 161–86. London: Oxford University Press.
Berntzen, E., and Selle, P.. 1990. “Structure and Social Action in Stein Rokkan's Work.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 2 (2): 131–50.
Blyth, M. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blyth, M. 2003. “Structures Do Not Come with an Instruction Sheet: Interests, Ideas and Progress in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics 1 (4): 695–706.
Blyth, M. 2007. “When Liberalisms Change: Comparing the Politics of Inflations and Deflations.” In Neoliberalism: National and Regional Experiments with Global Ideas, edited by Roy, R., Denzau, A., and Willet, T., 71–96. London: Routledge.
Bulhof, J. 1999. “What If? Modality and History.” History and Theory 38 (2): 145–68.
Bunzl, M. 2004. “Counterfactual History: A User's Guide.” American Historical Review 109 (3): 845–58.
Büthe, T. 2002. “Taking Temporality Seriously: Modeling History and the Use of Narratives as Evidence.” American Political Science Review 96 (3): 481–93.
Capoccia, G. 2004. “Structuralism, Contingency and Regime Survival: Evidence from Interwar Europe.” Paper presented at the Conference of Europeanists, Chicago, March.
Capoccia, G. 2005. Defending Democracy: Reactions to Extremism in Interwar Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Capoccia, G. 2012. “Historical Institutionalism and the Politics of Institutional Change.” Manuscript, University of Oxford.
Capoccia, G. Forthcoming. “Critical Junctures.” In The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, edited by T. Falleti, O. Fioretos, and A. Sheingate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Capoccia, G., and Kelemen, R. D.. 2007. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Institutional Analysis.” World Politics 59 (3): 341–69.
Capoccia, G., and Ziblatt, D.. 2010. “The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (8/9): 931–68.
Carr, E. H. 1961. What Is History?New York: Random House.
Cortell, A., and Peterson, S.. 1999. “Altered States: Explaining Domestic Institutional Change.” British Journal of Political Science 29 (1): 177–203.
David, P. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 75 (2): 332–7.
David, P. 2000. “Path Dependence, Its Critics, and the Quest for ‘Historical Economics.’” In Evolution and Path Dependence in Economic Ideas: Past and Present, edited by Garrouste, P. and Ioannides, S., 15–40. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
Dion, M. L. 2010. Workers and Welfare: Comparative Institutional Change in Twentieth-Century Mexico. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Ermakoff, I. 2008. Ruling Oneself Out: A Theory of Collective Abdications. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Ertman, T. 2010. “The Great Reform Act of 1832 and British Democratization.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (8/9): 1000–22.
Falleti, T. G., and Lynch, J. F.. 2009. “Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (9): 1143–66.
Fearon, J. 1991. “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science.” World Politics 43 (2): 169–95.
Fioretos, O. 2011. “Historical Institutionalism in International Relations.” International Organization 65 (2): 367–99.
Goldstone, J. A. 1998. “Initial Conditions, General Laws, Path Dependence, and Explanation in Historical Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 104 (3): 829–45.
Gourevitch, P. 1992. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Greif, A. 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East-Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Häusermann, S. 2010. The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Modernization in Hard Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kalyvas, S. N. 1996. The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kalyvas, S. N. 1998. “From Pulpit to Party: Party Formation and the Christian Democratic Phenomenon.” Comparative Politics 31 (2): 293–312.
Kalyvas, S. N. 2003. “Unsecular Politics and Religious Mobilization.” In European Christian Democracy: Historical Legacies and Comparative Perspectives, edited by Kselman, T. A. and Buttigieg, J., 293–320. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
Katzenstein, P. 2003. “Same War, Different Views: Germany, Japan, and Counter-Terrorism.” International Organization 57 (4): 731–60.
Katznelson, I. 2003. “Periodization and Preferences: Reflections on Purposive Action in Comparative Historical Social Science.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D., 270–303. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kier, E., and Krebs, R.. 2010. “Introduction: War and Democracy in Comparative Perspective.” In In War's Wake: International Conflict and the Fate of Liberal Democracy, edited by Kier, E. and Krebs, R., 1–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kohli, Atul. 1997. “Can Democracies Accommodate Ethnic Nationalism? The Rise and Decline of Self-Determination Movements in India.” Journal of Asian Studies 56 (2): 325–44.
Krebs, R. 2010. “International Conflict and the Constitutional Balance: Executive Authority After War.” In In War's Wake: International Conflict and the Fate of Liberal Democracy, edited by Kier, E. and Krebs, R., 187–210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lebow, R. N. 2000a. “Contingency, Catalysts, and International System Change.” Political Science Quarterly 115 (4): 591–616.
Lebow, R. N. 2000b. “What's So Different about a Counterfactual?World Politics 52 (4): 550–85.
Lebow, R. N. 2010. Forbidden Fruit: Counterfactuals and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Levi, M. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Levi, M. 1997. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levitsky, S., and Murillo, M. V.. 2005. Argentine Democracy: The Politics of Institutional Weakness. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Levitsky, S., and Murillo, M. V. 2009. “Variations in Institutional Strength. Annual Review of Political Science 12 (1): 115–33.
Lieberman, E. 2003. Race and Regionalism in the Politics of Taxation in Brazil and South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lipset, S. M., and Rokkan, S.. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, edited by Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S., 1–64. New York: Free Press.
Luebbert, G. M. 1991. Fascism, Liberalism, and Social Democracy: Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lynch, J. 2006. Age in the Welfare State: The Origins of Social Spending on Pensioners, Workers, and Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mahoney, J. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–48.
Mahoney, J. 2001. Legacies of Liberalism: Path Dependence and Political Regimes in Central America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mahoney, J., and Goertz, G.. 2004. “The Possibility Principle: Choosing Negative Cases in Comparative Research.” American Political Science Review 98 (4): 653–69.
Mahoney, J., and Thelen, K.. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P.. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.
Morrison, B. 2011. “Channeling the Restless Spirit of Innovation: Elite Concessions and Institutional Change in the British Reform Act of 1832.” World Politics 63 (4): 678–710.
Nichols, C., and Myers, A.. 2010. “Exploiting the Opportunity for Reconstructive Leadership: Presidential Responses to Enervated Political Regimes.” American Politics Research 38 (5): 806–41.
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O'Donnell, G. A., and Schmitter, P. C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Page, S. 2006. “Path Dependence.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1 (1): 87–115.
Parsons, C. 2007. How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pierson, P. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–68.
Pierson, P. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
Putnam, R. D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Riker, W. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Sewell, W. H. 1992. “A Theory of Structure. Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology 98 (1): 1–29.
Shapiro, I., and Bedi, S.. 2006. Political Contingency: Studying the Unexpected, the Accidental, and the Unforeseen. New York: New York University Press.
Shermer, M. 1995. “Exorcising Laplace's Demon: Chaos and Antichaos, History and Metahistory.” History and Theory 34 (1): 59–83.
Skowronek, Stephen. 1993. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to George Bush. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Skowronek, Stephen 1995. Order and Change. Polity 28 (1): 91–6.
Skowronek, Stephen, and Glassman, Matthew. 2008. “Formative Acts.” In Formative Acts: American Politics in the Making, edited by Skowronek, Stephen and Glassman, Matthew, 1–9. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Slater, D., and Simmons, E.. 2010. “Informative Regress: Critical Antecedents in Comparative Politics.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (7): 886–917.
Soifer, H. 2012. “The Causal Logic of Critical Junctures.” Comparative Political Studies 45 (12): 1572–97.
Steensland, B. 2006. “Cultural Categories and the American Welfare State: The Case of Guaranteed Income Policy.” American Journal of Sociology 111 (5): 1273–1326.
Streeck, W., and Thelen, K.. 2005. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Streeck, W. and Thelen, K., 1–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swidler, A. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51 (2): 273–86.
Tetlock, P., and Belkin, A.. 1996. Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Thelen, K. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review Political Science 2:369–404.
Thelen, K. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trevor-Roper, H. 1988. “The Lost Moments of History” [Romanes lecture]. New York Review of Books, 35 (16), October 27.
Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Turner, H. A. 1999. “Human Agency and Impersonal Determinants in Historical Causation.” History and Theory 38 (3): 300–6.
Weyland, K. 2010. “The Diffusion of Regime Contention in European Democratization, 1830–1940.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (8/9): 1148–76.
Yashar, D. J. 1997. Demanding Democracy: Reform and Reaction in Costa Rica and Guatemala, 1870s–1950s. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.