References
Barry, Dave. 1985. ‘The rules’. In Dave Barry, Dave Barry’s greatest hits. New York: Crown.
Barthes, Roland. 1983. The fashion system. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.
Boas, Franz. 1928. Primitive art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bühler, K. 1934. Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.
Caillois, R. 1958. Le jeux et les hommes. Paris: Gallimard.
Chun-Leuh. 2007. Ve:jjakaw: kmae[Khmer grammar]. Phnom Penh: Pon Caun and Tiang Ciat.
Dahl, O. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ferguson, Charles and Michael Barlow. 1988. ‘Introduction’. In Michael Barlow and Charles Ferguson (eds.), Agreement in natural languages. Stanford: CSLI.
Gabelentz, G. Von der. 1891 [1969]. Die Sprachwissenschaft. Tübingen: Narr.
Gil, David. 2005. ‘From repetition to reduplication in Riau Indonesian’. In B. Hurch (ed.), Studies on reduplication. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 28.) Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, pp. 31–64.
Gil, David. 2009. ‘How much grammar does it take to sail a boat?’ In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil, and Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford University Press, pp. 19–33.
Gorgoniev, Yu. 1966. Grammatika Kxmerskogo jazyka. Moskva: Nauka.
Haiman, John. 1993. ‘Ritualization and the development of language’. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3–28.
Haiman, John. 1998a. Possible origins of infixation in Khmer. Studies in language 22(3): 597–617.
Haiman, John. 1998b. Talk is cheap. London: Oxford University Press.
Haiman, John. 2003. ‘Explaining infixation’. In John Moore and Maria Polisky (eds.), The nature of explanation in linguistic theory. Stanford: CSLI, pp. 105–120.
Haiman, John. 2010. The creation of new words. Linguistics 47: 549–72.
Haiman, John. 2011. Cambodian: Khmer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haiman, John. To appear. ‘Six motivations for repetition’. In Edith Moravcsik and Andrej Malcukov (eds.),Competing motivations. London: Oxford University Press.
Haiman, John and N. Ourn. 2003. Nouns, verbs, and syntactic backsliding in Khmer. Studies in Language 27(3): 505–528.
Haiman, John and N. Ourn. 2009. ‘Formulaic language in ritual (and everyday) speech’. In Roberta Corrigan et al.(eds.), Formulaic language, volume II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 567–587.
Heine, B. and T. Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
Heine, B. and T. Kuteva. 2005. Grammaticalization and language contact. Cambridge University Press.
Heine, B. and T. Kuteva. 2007. The genesis of grammar. London: Oxford University Press.
Henderson, E. 1952. The main features of Cambodian pronunciation. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 14: 149–174.
Huffman, Frank. 1970. Contemporary Cambodian. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Jacob, J. 1968. Introduction to Cambodian. London: Oxford University Press.
Jacob, J. 1976. ‘Affixation in Middle Khmer, with Old Khmer and modern Khmer comparisons’. In Philip N. Jenner, Laurence C. Thompson, and Stanley Starosta (eds.), Austroasiatic studies, Part I. (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications, No. 13.) Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 591–623.
Jakobson, R. 1959. ‘Boas’ view of grammatical meaning’. In Roman Jakobson, Selected writings, volume 2. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 489–496.
Jenner, P. 1969. Affixation in modern Khmer. Unpublished PhD. University of Hawai’i.
Jenner, P. 1974. ‘Observations on the Surin dialect of Khmer’. In N. D. Liem (ed.), Southeast Asian linguistic studies, volume I. Canberra: Australian National University, pp. 61–73.
Kuteva, Tania. 2010. ‘Are there languages without grammar?’ In Young-Se Kang, et al. (eds.), Universal Grammar and individual languages (SICOL-2010), E- publication for 2010 Seoul International Conference on Linguistics, 23–25 June, 2010, Korea University, Seoul: Hankookmunhwasa.
Lehmann, C. 1982. ‘Universal and typological aspects of agreement’. In H. Seiler and F. J. Stachowiak (eds.), Apprehension, volume II. Tübingen: G. Narr, pp. 201–267.
Lehmann, C. 1995. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Köln: Akup.
Levinson, S. 2000. Implicit meanings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lewitz, S. 1976. ‘The infix -b- in Khmer’. In Philip N. Jenner, Laurence C. Thompson, and Stanley Starosta (eds.), Austroasiatic studies, Part II. (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications, No. 13.) Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 741–760.
Malinowski, B. 1923. ‘The problem of meaning in primitive languages’. In C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards (eds.), The meaning of meaning. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 451–510.
Marchand, H. 1960. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Martini, F. 1942–5. Aperçu phonologique du cambodgien. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 42: 112–131.
Maspero, G. 1915. Grammaire de la langue Khmere. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.
Miller, S. 1973. Ends, means, and galumphing. American anthropologist 75(1): 87–98.
Morgenstern, C. 1964. ‘Das ästhetische Wiesel’. In Christian Morgenstern, Christian Morgenstern’s Galgenlieder. Translated by Max Knight. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 18–19.
Ourn, N. and J. Haiman. 2000. Symmetrical compounds in Khmer. Studies in language 24(3): 483–517.
Pou, S. 2004. ‘La dérivation en cambodgien modern’. In S. Pou (ed.), Selected papers on Khmerology. Phnom Penh: Reyum Publishing, pp. 22–41.
Prakorb, Phon-Ngam. 1992. The problem of aspirates in Central Khmer and Northern Khmer. Mon-Khmer studies 22: 251–256.
Rongier, J. 2005. Parlons Kony. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Ross, J. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sisovat, Porisat. 1972. Bo’ri’va: sap knong phiasa: kmae {Servant words in Khmer}. Phnom Penh: Privately printed.
Stanford, J. 2007. Sui adjective reduplication as poetic morphophonology. Journal of East Asian linguistics 16(2): 87–111.
Stolz, T. 2008. ‘Total reduplication vs. echo-word formation in language contact situations’. In P. Siemund and N. Kintana (eds.), Language contact and contact languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 107–132.
Tinbergen, N. 1952. ‘Derived’ activities; their causation, biological significance, origin, and emancipation during evolution. Quarterly review of biology 27: 1–32.
Wilson, E. 1975. Sociobiology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
