Adler, E. Scott, and Wilkerson, John. 1989–1998. Congressional Bills Project: 1989–1998, NSF 00880066 and 00880061. Online at http://www.congressionalbills.org/index.html.Google Scholar

Ainsworth, Scott, and Flathman, Marcus. 1995. “Unanimous Consent Agreements as Leadership Tools.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20: 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alchian, Armen A., and Demsetz, Harold. 1972. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review 62(5): 777–795.Google Scholar

Aldrich, John, and Rohde, David W.. 1998. “Measuring Conditional Party Government.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 23–25.

Aldrich, John, and Rohde, David W. 2000. “The Republican Revolution and the House Appropriations Committee.” Journal of Politics 62: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, John, and Rohde, David W. 2001. “The Logic of Conditional Party Government: Revisiting the Electoral Connection.” In Dodd, Lawrence and Oppenheimer, Bruce, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 7th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 269–292.Google Scholar

Aldrich, John, and Rohde, David W. 2005. “Congressional Committees in a Continuing Partisan Era.” In Dodd, Lawrence and Oppenheimer, Bruce, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 8th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 249–270.Google Scholar

Alexander, Alva Stanwood. 1916. History and Procedure of the House of Representatives. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil: Interests, Identities, and Institutions in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amorim Neto, Octavio, Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2003. “Agenda Power in Brazil's Câmara dos Deputados, 1989 to 1998.” World Politics 55: 550–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, Edmund L. 2006a. “Estate Tax Showdown Is Splitting the G.O.P.” New York Times, June 7.Google Scholar

Andrews, Edmund L 2006b. “G.O.P. Fails in Attempt to Repeal Estate Tax.” New York Times, June 9.Google Scholar

Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Bach, Stanley. 1989. “Points of Order and Appeals in the Senate.” CRS Report for Congress, Order Code 89–69 RCO.Google Scholar

Bach, Stanley. 1991. “The Senate's Compliance with Its Legislative Rules: The Appeal of Order.” Congress and the Presidency 18: 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bargen, Andrew. 2003. “Senators, Status Quos, and Agenda Setting: A Spatial Story of Policy Making in the U.S. Senate, 1953–1996.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 27–31.

Bargen, Andrew. 2004. “Party Power in the U.S. Senate: Shaping the Ideological Content of the Legislative Agenda.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September 2–5.

Bawn, Kathy, and Koger, Gregory. 2008. “Effort, Intensity, and Position Taking: Reconsidering Obstruction in the Pre-Cloture Senate.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 20: 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beeman, Richard R. 1968. “Unlimited Debate in the Senate: The First Phase.” Political Science Quarterly 83(3): 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Lauren. 2002. “Senatorial Discourtesy: The Senate's Use of Delay to Shape the Federal Judiciary.”Political Research Quarterly 55: 589–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beth, Richard. 1995. “What We Don't Know about Filibusters.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Portland, OR, March 20–23.

Beth, Richard S. 2002. “Motions to Proceed to Consider in the Senate: Who Offers Them?” Congressional Research Service Report No. RS21255, Washington, DC.

Beth, Richard S. 2003. “How Unanimous Consent Agreements Regulate Senate Floor Action.” Congressional Research Service Report No. RS20594, Washington, DC

Beth, Richard S., and Bach, Stanley. 2003. “Filibusters and Cloture in the Senate.” Congressional Research Service Report No. RL30360, Washington, DC.

Beth, Richard S., Heitshusen, Valerie, Bill Henniff, Jr., and Rybicki, Elizabeth. 2009. “Leadership Tools for Managing the U.S. Senate.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, September 3–6.

Binder, Sarah. 1996. “The Partisan Basis of Procedural Choice: Allocating Parliamentary Rights in the House, 1789–1991.”American Political Science Review 90: 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah A. 1997. Minority Rights, Majority Rule: Partisanship and the Development of Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah A 1999. “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock.” American Political Science Review 93: 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah A 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Binder, Sarah A 2008. “Taking the Measure of Congress: Response to Chiou and Rothenberg.” Political Analysis 16: 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah A., and Maltzman, Forrest. 2002. “Senatorial Delay in Confirming Federal Judges, 1947–1998.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 190–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah, and Smith, Steven S.. 1997. Politics or Principle: Filibustering in the U.S. Senate. Washington DC: Brookings Institute Press.Google Scholar

Black, Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committee and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bradbury, Erin M., Davidson, Ryan A., and Evans, C. Lawrence. 2008. “The Senate Whip System: An Exploration.” In Monroe, Nathan, Roberts, Jason, and Rohde, David, eds., Why Not Parties? Party Effects in the United States Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 73–99.Google Scholar

Brady, David W., Brody, Richard, and Epstein, David. 1989. “Heterogeneous Parties and Political Organization: The US Senate: 1880–1920.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 14: 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, David W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2002. “Party, Process, and Political Change: New Perspectives on the History of Congress.” In Brady, David W. and McCubbins, Mathew D., eds., Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Brady, David W., and Volden, Craig. 2006. Revolving Gridlock: Politics and Policy from Carter to George W. Bush, 2d ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Bullock, Charles E. III, and Brady, David W.. 1983. “Party, Constituency, and Roll-Call Voting in the US Senate.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 8: 29–43.Google Scholar

Burdette, Franklin L. 1940. Filibustering in the Senate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, Charles M. 2000. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Andrea C. 2001. “Party Government in the United States Senate.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.

Campbell, Andrea C 2004. “Fighting Fire with Fire: Strategic Amending in the 105th Senate.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, April 15–18.

Campbell, Andrea C., Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2002. “Agenda Power in the U.S. Senate, 1877 to 1986.” In Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D., eds., Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 146–165.Google Scholar

Carr, Thomas P. 2005. “Preparation for Senate Committee Markup.” CRS Report for Congress, Order Code 95–243 GOV.Google Scholar

Chiou, Fang-Yi, and Rothenberg, Lawrence S.. 2003. “When Pivotal Politics Meets Partisan Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 47: 503–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiou, Fang-Yi, and Rothenberg, Lawrence S. 2006. “Preferences, Parties, and Legislative Productivity.” American Politics Research 34: 705–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiou, Fang-Yi, and Rothenberg, Lawrence S. 2008a. “Comparing Legislators and Legislatures: The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock Reconsidered.” Political Analysis 16: 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiou, Fang-Yi, and Rothenberg, Lawrence S. 2008b. “The Search for Comparability: Response to Binder.” Political Analysis 16: 226–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clausen, Aage R., and Cheney, Richard B.. 1970. “A Comparative Analysis of Senate House Voting on Economic and Welfare Policy: 1953–1964.” American Political Science Review 64: 138–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coase, Ronald H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica, New Series 4(16): 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, Joseph, and Brady, David W.. 1981. “Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn.” American Political Science Review 75: 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W 1994. “Bonding, Structure, and the Stability of Political Parties: Party Government in the House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19: 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W 2000. “The Institutional Determinants of Economic Policy Outcomes.” In Haggard, Stephen and McCubbins, Mathew D., eds., Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–63.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W 2002. “Agenda Power in the U.S. House of Representatives.” In Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D., eds., Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 107–145.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W., Kousser, Thad, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. “What Polarizes Parties? Preference and Agenda Control in American State Legislatures.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC., September 1–4.

,CQ Weekly. 2006. “Senate Vote 170: Central America Trade Liberalization.” CQ Weekly (January 9): 112.Google Scholar

,CQ Weekly 2007. “Filling the Appropriations Bill's Amendment Tree.” CQ Weekly (February 12): 488.Google Scholar

Crespin, Michael H., and Finocchiaro, Charles. 2008. “Distributive and Partisan Politics in the U.S. Senate: An Exploration of Earmarks, 1996–2005.” In Monroe, Nathan, Roberts, Jason, and Rohde, David, eds., Why Not Parties? Party Effects in the United States SenateChicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 229–252.Google Scholar

Davidson, Roger H. 1985. “Senate Leaders: Janitors for an Untidy Chamber?” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds., Congress Reconsidered, 3d ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 225–252.Google Scholar

Davidson, Roger H 1989a. “The Senate: If Everyone Leads, Who Follows?” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds., Congress Reconsidered, 4th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 275–306.Google Scholar

Davidson, Roger H 2001. “Senate Floor Deliberation: A Preliminary Inquiry.” In Rae, Nicol C. and Campbell, Colton C., eds., The Contentious Senate. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 21–42.Google Scholar

Davidson, Roger H., Oleszek, Walter J., and Lee, Frances E.. 2008. Congress and Its Members, 11th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Demsetz, Harold. 1968. “The Cost of Transacting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 82: 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartog, Christopher F. 2004. “Limited Party Government and the Majority Party Revolution in the Nineteenth-Century House.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.

Hartog, Chris, and Monroe, Nathan W.. 2008a. “The Value of Majority Status: The Effect of Jeffords's Switch on Asset Prices of Republican and Democratic Firms.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 33: 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartog, Chris, and Monroe, Nathan W. 2008b. “Agenda Influence and Tabling Motions in the U.S. Senate.” In Monroe, Nathan W., Roberts, Jason R., and Rohde, David W., eds., Why Not Parties? Party Effects in the United States Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 142–158.Google Scholar

Hartog, Chris, and Monroe, Nathan W. 2009. “Partisan Support for Chairs' Rulings in the House and Senate.” Paper presented at the Bicameralism Conference, Vanderbilt University, October 23–24.

Dewar, Helen. 2004a. “For Specter, a Showdown over Judiciary Chairmanship; GOP Senator Battles Conservatives Angered by His Comments,” Washington Post, November 15.Google Scholar

Dewar, Helen. 2004b. “Specter Panel Backs Specter; GOP Senators Elicit Pledge Not to Block Antiabortion Judges.” Washington Post, November 19.Google Scholar

Dion, Douglas. 1997. Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew: Minority Rights and Procedural Change in Legislative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Eisele, Albert. 2004. “Turmoil in New Senate,” The Hill, November 10.Google Scholar

Endersby, James W., and McCurdy, Karen M.. 1996. “Committee Assignments in the U.S. Senate.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 21: 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, C. Lawrence. 1991. Leadership in Committee: A Comparative Analysis of Leadership Behavior in the U.S. Senate. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, C. Lawrence 1999. “Legislative Structure: Rules, Precedents, and Jurisdictions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24: 605–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, C. Lawrence 2001. “Committees, Leaders, and Message Politics.” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds., Congress Reconsidered, 6th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 217–244.Google Scholar

Evans, C. Lawrence, and Lipinski, Daniel. 2005. “Obstruction and Leadership in the U.S. Senate.” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds., Congress Reconsidered, 8th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 227–248.Google Scholar

Evans, C. Lawrence, and Oleszek, Walter J.. 1997. Congress under Fire. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Evans, C. Lawrence, and Oleszek, Walter J. 2001. “Message Politics and Senate Procedure.” In Campbell, Colton and Rae, Nicol, eds., The Contentious Senate. Landham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Faler, Brian. 2009. “Alan Frumin May Rise From Obscurity to Craft Senate Health Bill.” Bloomberg.com., August 12.

Fenno, Richard F., Jr. 1966. The Power of the Purse: Appropriations Politics in Congress. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Figueiredo, Argelina C., and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. “Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 32: 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fink, Evelyn C., and Humes, Brian D.. 1996. “Party Conflict and Rules Changes in the United States House of Representatives, 1st–104th Congresses.” Revised version of paper presented at the 1996 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 29–September 1.

Follett, Mary Parker. 1896. The Speaker of the House of Representatives. New York: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar

Frisch, Scott, and Kelly, Sean. 2004. “Democratic Leaders and Democratic Committee Requests and Assignments in the U.S. Senate.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago., September 2–5.

Frumin, Alan S., and Riddick, Floyd M.. 1992. Riddick's Senate Procedure: Precedents and Practices. U.S. Senate Document 101–28.

Gailmard, Sean, and Jenkins, Jeffrey A.. 2007. “Negative Agenda Control in the Senate and House: Fingerprints of Majority Party Power.” Journal of Politics 69: 689–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gailmard, Sean, and Jenkins, Jeffrey A.. 2008a. “Examining Minority Party Power in the Senate and House.” In Monroe, Nathan, Roberts, Jason, and Rohde, David, eds., Why Not Parties? Party Effects in the United States Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 181–197.Google Scholar

Gailmard, Sean, and Jenkins, Jeffrey A.. 2008b “Coalition Size in the Senate and House of Representives.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 2–5.

Galloway, George B. 1976. History of the House of Representatives, 2d ed. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar

Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith. 1990. “Organization of Informative Committees by a Rational Legislature.” American Journal of Political Science 34: 531–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gold, Martin B. 2004. Senate Procedure and Practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Gold, Martin B 2008. Senate Procedure and Practice, 2d ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Goodman, Craig. 2006. “Partisan Agenda Control in the United States Senate: The Strategic Use of Motions to Table.” Unpublished manuscript, Texas Tech University.

Groseclose, Tim, and James M. Snyder, Jr. 1996. “Buying Supermajorities.” American Political Science Review 90: 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hager, George. 1998. “GOP Tax Cut May Die in Senate; Hill Leaders Say $80 Billion Package Needs a Trim to Survive; Little Optimism for Tax Cut Measure.” Washington Post, October 1.

Heitshusen, Valerie. 2006. “Points of Order, Rulings, and Appeals in the Senate.” CRS Report for Congress, Order Code 98–306 GOV.Google Scholar

Hershey, Marjorie R. 2007. Party Politics in America, 12th ed. White Plains, NY: Pearson Longman Press.Google Scholar

Hosansky, David. 1997. “Education: Expansion of ‘Education IRAs’ Approved by Ways and Means.” CQ Weekly Online (October 11): 2478, http:// library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/WR19971011–40SCHOOLTAX001 (accessed September 9, 2009).Google Scholar

Hosansky, David. 1998a. “Taxes: GOP Seeks Pre-Election Vote on a Tax Cut Package Despite Long Odds.” CQ Weekly Online (September 12): 2401, http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/WR19980912–36TAXES001 (accessed June 17, 2009).Google Scholar

Hosansky, David. 1998b. “Taxes: Tax Bill's Chances Fade as Senate Democrats Savor an Opportunity to Unite.” CQ Weekly Online (September 26): 2579–2580. http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/WR19980926–38TAXES001 (accessed June 17, 2009).Google Scholar

Huitt, Ralph K. 1961. “Democratic Party Leadership in the Senate.” American Political Science Review 55(2): 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hulse, Carl. 2009. “Battle Brewing over Reconciliation, Which Is Anything but That.” New York Times online ed., March 29.

Jenkins, Jeffrey A., and Nokken, Timothy. 2008. “Partisanship, the Electoral Connection, and Lame-Duke Sessions of Congress, 1877–2006.” Journal of Politics 70: 450–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Charles O. 1968. “Joseph G. Cannon and Howard W. Smith: An Essay on the Limits of Leadership in the House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 30: 617–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keith, Robert. 1977. “The Use of Unanimous Consent in the Senate.” In U.S. Senate, Committee and Senate Procedures, 94th Cong., 2nd Sess. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Keith, Robert. 2008a. “Introduction to the Federal Budget Process.” CRS Report for Congress, Order Code 98–721 GOV.Google Scholar

Keith, Robert. 2008b. “The Budget Reconciliation Process: The Senate's Byrd Rule.” CRS Report for Congress, Order Code RL30862.Google Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1988. “ Presidential Influence on Congressional Appropriations Decisions.” American Journal of Political Science 65: 131–143.Google Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kim, Henry A. 2005. “Partisan Deadlocks and Agenda-Setting in American State Legislatures.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 9–11.

King, Aaron S., Orlando, Frank J., and Rohde, David W.. 2010. “Beyond Motions to Table: Exploring the Procedural Toolkit of the Majority Party in the United States Senate.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 22–25.

King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchhoff, Sue. 1998. “Education: Senate Agrees on Debate Terms for Savings Accounts Bill.” CQ Weekly Online (March 28): 824. http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/WR19980328–13EDUCATION001 (accessed June 17, 2009).Google Scholar

Kloha, Philip. 2006. “Majority Party Reliability: The Vital Role of Party in the Structure and Composition of Legislative Committees.” Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University.

Koger, Gregory. 2003. “The Majoritarian Senate: ‘Nuclear Options’ in Historical Perspective.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 27–31.

Koger, Gregory. 2004. “Pivots for Sale: Transaction Costs, Endogenous Rules, and Pivotal Politics.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September 2.

Koger, Gregory. 2006. “Cloture Reform and Party Government in the Senate, 1918 to 1925.” Journal of Politics 68: 708–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koger, Gregory. 2007. “Filibuster Reform in the Senate.” In Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew, eds., Process, Party, and Policymaking: Further New Perspectives on the History of Congress. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 205–225.Google Scholar

Koger, Gregory. 2008. “Filibustering and Majority Rule in the Senate: The Contest over Judicial Nominations, 2003–2005.” In Monroe, Nathan, Roberts, Jason, and Rohde, David, eds., Why Not Parties? Party Effects in the United States Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 159–177.Google Scholar

Koger, Gregory. 2010. Filibustering: A Political History of Obstruction in the House and Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koger, Gregory, and Fowler, James. 2006. “Parties and Agenda Setting in the Senate, 1973–1998.” Paper presented at the Conference on Party Effects in the U.S. Senate, University of Minnesota, September 29–30.

Krauss, Clifford. 1992. “Senate Passes Bill to Force States to Make Voter Registration Easier.” New York Times, May 21.Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1986. “Unanimous Consent Agreements: Going Along in the Senate.” Journal of Politics 48(3): 541–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1993. “Where's the Party?” British Journal of Political Science 23: 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krutz, Glen S. 2005. “Issues and Institutions: ‘Winnowing’ in the U.S. Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Frances E. 2000. “Senate Representation and Coalition Building in Distributive Politics.” American Political Science Review 94: 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Frances E 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehnen, Robert G. 1967. “Behavior on the Senate Floor: An Analysis of Debate in the U.S. Senate.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 11: 505–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American Political Science Review 65(3): 682–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linz, Juan J. 1994. “Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?” In Linz, Juan J. and Valenzuela, Arturo, eds., The Failure of Presidential DemocracyBaltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 3–89.Google Scholar

Madonna, Anthony. 2008. “Institutions and Coalition Formation: Revisiting the Effects of Rule XXII on Winning Coalition Sizes in the U.S. Senate.” Unpublished paper, University of Georgia.

Madonna, Anthony. 2009. “The Presiding Officer and Parliamentarian: Moving Towards a Non-Partisan Interpretation of Rules and Precedent in the U.S. Senate.” Unpublished paper, University of Georgia.

Magar, Eric. 2001. “Bully Pulpits: Posturing, Bargaining, and Polarization in the Legislative Process of the Americas.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.

Mainwaring, Scott, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, Bryan W., Prins, Brandon C., and Rohde, David W.. 1999. “Fighting Fire with Water: Partisan Procedural Strategies and the Senate Appropriations Committee.” Congress and the Presidency 26: 114–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matthews, Donald R. 1960. US Senators and Their World. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

McConachie, Lauros G. 1974 [1898]. Congressional Committees. New York: B. Franklin [reprint].Google Scholar

McKelvey, Richard. 1976. “Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control.” Journal of Economic Theory 12: 472–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monroe, Nathan W., and Robinson, Gregory. 2008. “Do Restrictive Rules Produce Non-Median Outcomes? Evidence from the 101st–106th Congresses.” Journal of Politics 70: 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, Michael K., and Thomas, Sue. 1991. “Explaining Legislative Success in the U.S. Senate: The Role of the Majority and Minority Parties.” Western Political Quarterly 44: 959–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, Shailagh, and Babington, Charles. 2005. “GOP Agenda Shifts as Political Trials Grow; Katrina Puts Estate Tax Repeal on Ice.” Washington Post, September 6.Google Scholar

Murray, Shailagh, and Babington, Charles 2006. “Now Playing in Senate: A GOP Double Bill.” Washington Post, September 6.Google Scholar

Nather, David, and Dongen, Rachel. 2006a. “A Well-Courted Group of Senators.” CQ Weekly Online (August 7): 2177. http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/weeklyreport109–000002355223 (accessed June 26, 2009).Google Scholar

Nather, David, and Dongen, Rachel 2006b. “Frist Loses Estate Tax Showdown.” CQ Weekly Online (August 7):2176–2178. http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/weeklyreport109–000002355217 (accessed June 26, 2009).Google Scholar

Newmyer, Tory. 2008. “Elections Spur Upheaval on Hill; Dingell–Waxman Brouhaha Awaits.” Roll Call, November 6.Google Scholar

North, Douglass C. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Norton, Stephen J. 2005. “CAFTA Squeaks Through in House Vote.” CQ Weekly (August 1, 2005): 2111–2113.Google Scholar

Oleszek, Walter J. 2001a. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, 5th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Oleszek, Walter J 2001b. “Senate Amendment Process: General Conditions and Principles.” CRS Report for Congress, Order Code 98–707 GOV.Google Scholar

Oleszek, Walter J 2004. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, 6th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Oleszek, Walter J 2007. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, 7th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Oleszek, Walter J 2011. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, 8th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 1985. “Changing Time Constraints on Congress: Historical Perspectives on the Use of Cloture.” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds., Congress Reconsidered, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 393–413.Google Scholar

Oppenheimer, Bruce I., and Hetherington, Mark J.. 2008. “Catch 22: Cloture, Energy Policy, and the Limits of Conditional Party Government.” In Monroe, Nathan, Roberts, Jason, and Rohde, David, eds., Why Not Parties? Party Effects in the United States Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 198–228.Google Scholar

Ornstein, Norman J., Peabody, Robert L., and Rohde, David W.. 1993. “The U.S. Senate in an Era of Change.” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds., Congress Reconsidered, 5th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 13–40.Google Scholar

Palmer, Betsy, and Bach, Stanley. 2003. “The Amending Process in the Senate.” CRS Report for Congress, Order Code 98–853 GOV.Google Scholar

Patterson, Samuel C. 1989. “Party Leadership in the U. S. Senate.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 14(3): 393–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, Kathryn. 2008. “Party Loyalty and Discipline in the Individualistic Senate.” In Monroe, Nathan, Roberts, Jason, and Rohde, David, eds., Why Not Parties? Party Effects in the United States Senate. University of Chicago Press, pp. 100–120.Google ScholarPubMed

Peters, Ronald M., Jr. 1990. The American Speakership: The Office in Historical Perspective, 2d ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Pierce, Emily. 2008. “Byrd, Lieberman Await Their Fate.” Roll Call, October 21.Google Scholar

Pierce, Emily. 2010. “Reid Has Killed Most Filibusters; Leader on Pace to Set Record.” Roll Call, April 12.Google Scholar

Plott, Charles R., and Levine, Michael E., 1977. “Agenda Influence and Its Implications.” Virginia Law Review 63: 561–604.Google Scholar

Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Preston, Mark. 2004. “Frist Gains Committee Appointment Power.” Roll Call, November 18.Google Scholar

Preston, Mark. 2005. “Parliamentarian Takes Quiet Role in Senate Tiff.” Roll Call, May 12.Google Scholar

Rae, Nicol C., and Campbell, Colton C.. 2001. “Party Politics and Ideology in the Contemporary Senate.” In Rae, Nicol C. and Campbell, Colton C., eds., The Contentious Senate. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Rawls, W. Lee. 2009. In Praise of Deadlock: How Partisan Struggle Makes Better Laws. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Riker, William. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Ripley, Randall B. 1969. Power in the Senate. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, Jason M., and Bell, Lauren Cohen. 2008. “Scoring the Senate: Scorecards, Parties, and Roll-Call Votes.” In Monroe, Nathan W., Roberts, Jason M., and Rohde, David W., eds., Why Not Parties? Party Effects in the United States Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 52–72.Google ScholarPubMed

Robinson, William A. 1930. Thomas B. Reed: Parliamentarian. New York: Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar

Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohde, David W 1992. “Electoral Forces, Political Agendas, and Partisanship in the House and Senate.” In Davidson, Roger H., ed., The Postreform Congress. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 27–47.Google Scholar

Rohde, David W., and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 2007. “Advising and Consenting in the 60-Vote Senate: Strategic Appointments to the Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 69: 664–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenbaum, Davis E. 2005. “True to Ritual, House Votes for Full Repeal of Estate Tax.” New York Times, April 14.Google Scholar

Rubin, Alissa J. 1994. “Finance Chairman's Bill Outline Becomes Bipartisan Flash Point.” CQ Weekly Online (June 11): 1525.Google Scholar

Rubinstein, Ariel. 1982. “Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model.” Econometrica 50: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rundquist, Paul S. 2003. “Senate Rule XIV Procedures for Placing Measures Directly on the Senate Calendar.” Congressional Research Service Report No. 98–389. Washington, DC.

Sartori, Anne E. 2003. “An Estimator for Some Binary Outcome Selection Models Without Exclusion Restrictions.” Political Analysis 11: 111–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni. 1994. “Neither Presidentialism nor Parliamentarism.” In Linz, Juan J. and Valenzuela, Arturo, eds., The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 106–118.Google Scholar

Saturno, James V. 2003. “How Measures Are Brought to the Senate Floor: A Brief Introduction.” CRS Report for Congress, Order Code RS20668.Google Scholar

Saturno, James V 2008. “Points of Order in the Congressional Budget Process.” CRS Report for Congress, Order Code 97–865.Google Scholar

Schatz, Joseph J. 2005. “Estate Tax Battle Awaits Senate's Return.” CQ Weekly Online (August 8): 2189. http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/weeklyreport109–000001814757 (accessed June 26, 2009).Google Scholar

Schickler, Eric. 2000. “Institutional Change in the House of Representatives, 1867–1998: A Test of Partisan and Ideological Power Balance Models.” American Political Science Review 94: 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the US Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Schickler, Eric, and Rich, Andrew. 1997. “Controlling the Floor: Politics as Procedural Coalitions in the House.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 1340–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiller, Wendy J. 1995. “The Art of Manipulation: The Use of Senate Parliamentary Procedure to Change Policy Outcomes.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, August 31–September 3.

Schiller, Wendy J 2000. “Trent Lott's New Regime: Filling the Amendment Tree to Centralize Power in the U.S. Senate.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, August 31–September 3.

Schiller, Wendy J 2001. “Majority and Minority Rights in the Senate and the Role of Party Leaders in Internal Governance.” Paper presented at the 2001 Meeting of the American Political Science Association San Francisco, August 30– September 2.

Schneider, Judy. 2003. “Committee Assignment Process in the U.S. Senate: Democratic and Republican Party Procedures.” CRS Report for Congress, Order Code RL30743.Google Scholar

Schneider, Judy. 2005. “House and Senate Rules of Procedure: A Comparison.” CRS Report for Congress, Order Code RL 30945.Google Scholar

Schofield, Norman. 1978. “Instability of Simple Dynamic Games.” Review of Economic Studies 45: 575–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1979. “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 27–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A., Houweling, Robert P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Hanson, Peter C.. 2009. “The Senate Electoral Cycle and Bicameral Appropriations Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 53: 343–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1984. “Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes with Implications for Agenda Control.” American Journal of Political Science 28: 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81: 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Carey, John M.. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 1989. The Transformation of the U.S. Senate. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 1997. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 2001a. “The New World of US Senators.” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds., Congress Reconsidered, 7th ed., Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 2001b. “The Senate Leadership Dilemma: Passing Bills and Pursuing Partisan Advantage in a Nonmajoritarian Chamber.” In Rae, Nicol C. and Campbell, Colton C., eds., The Contentious Senate. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 65–90.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 2002. “The ‘60-Vote Senate’: Strategies, Process and Outcomes.” In Oppenheimer, Bruce I., ed, U.S. Senate Exceptionalism. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 241–260.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 2005. “The New World of U.S. Senators.” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I. eds., Congress Reconsidered, 8th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 2007. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress, 3d ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Sloan, Steven, and Schatz, Joseph J.. 2010. “GOP Ends Blockade; Financial Bill Moves.” CQ Weekly Online (May 3, 2010): 1092–1093. http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/weeklyreport111–000003653775 (accessed October 10, 2010).Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S. 1989. Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S 2005. “Parties and Leadership in the Senate.” In Quirk, Paul J. and Binder, Sarah A., eds., American Institutions of Democracy: The Legislative Branch. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 255–278.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S 2007. Party Influence in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Steven S., and Lawrence, Eric. 1997. “Party Control of Committees in the Republican Congress.” In Dodd, Lawrence and Oppenheimer, Bruce, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 6th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 163–192.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S., and Flathman, Marcus. 1989. “Managing the Senate Floor: Complex Unanimous Consent Agreements since the 1950s.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 14: 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Steven S., Roberts, Jason M., and Wielen, Ryan Vander. 2006. The American Congress, 4th ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stepan, Alfred, and Skach, Cindy. 1994. “Presidentialism and Parliamentarism Compared.” In Linz, Juan J. and Valenzuela, Arturo, eds., The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 119–136.Google Scholar

Stolberg, Sheryl Gay, Andrews, Edmund L., Hulse, Carl, and Kirkpatrick, David D.. 2005. “As August Recess Looms, Congress Finds High Gear.” New York Times, July 27.Google Scholar

Strahan, Randall. 2002. “Leadership and Institutional Change in the Nineteenth-Century House.” In Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D., eds., Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 237–269.Google Scholar

Swift, Elain K. 1996. The Making of an American Senate: Reconstitutive Change in Congress, 1787–1841. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tiefer, Charles. 1989. Congressional Practice and Procedure: A Reference, Research, and Legislative Guide. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2001. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.0. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, June 1, http://gking.harvard.edu.Google Scholar

Trochim, William M. K., and Donnelly, James P.. 2007. The Research Methods Knowledge Base, 3d ed. Mason, OH: Atomic Dog Publishing.Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George. 1995. “Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism.” British Journal of Political Science 25: 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tsebelis, George, and Money, Jeannette. 1997. Bicameralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dongen, Rachel. 2006a. “Frist Lets Estate Tax Revision Simmer as He Looks for Support.” CQ Weekly Online (July 10): 1876, http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/weeklyreport109–000002321883 (accessed June 26, 2009).Google Scholar

Dongen, Rachel. 2006b. “House Backs Compromise Estate Tax Cut.” CQ Weekly Online (June 26): 1788, http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/weeklyreport109–000002312127 (accessed June 26, 2009).Google Scholar

Dongen, Rachel, and Daphne, Retter. 2006. “Negotiators Look at Kyl Plan to Bolster Estate Tax Overhaul.” CQ Weekly Online (June 19): 1704, http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/weeklyreport109–000002305997 (accessed June 26, 2009).Google Scholar

Houweling, Robert P. 2003. “Legislators' Personal Policy Preferences and Partisan Legislative Organization.” Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.

Walker, Jack L. 1977. “Setting the Agenda in the U.S. Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection.” British Journal of Political Science 7: 423–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wawro, Gregory J., and Schickler, Eric. 2004. “Where's the Pivot? Obstruction and Lawmaking in the Pre-cloture Senate.” American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 758–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wawro, Gregory J 2006. Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Weingast, Barry R. 1992. “Fighting Fire with Fire: Amending Activity and Institutional Change in the Postreform Congress.” In Davidson, Roger, ed., The Postreform Congress. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 142–168.Google Scholar

Weingast, Barry R., and Marshall, William. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress.” Journal of Political Economy 96: 132–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weisman, Jonathan. 2005. “GOP Agenda in Congress May Be at Risk; Katrina's Costs, High Fuel Prices Working against More Tax Cuts.” Washington Post, September 4.Google Scholar

Wilkerson, John. 1999. “Killer Amendments in Congress.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Wines, Michael. 1993a. “Senators Approve a Bill That Eases Voter Registration.” New York Times, March 18.Google Scholar

Wines, Michael. 1993b. “Accord Reached on Easing Voter Registration” New York Times, April 29.Google Scholar

Yakee, Susan Webb. 2003. “Punctuating the Congressional Agenda: Strategic Scheduling by House and Senate Leaders.” Political Research Quarterly 56: 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar