Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Chapter
  • Get access
    Buy the print book
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    Log in Register Recommend to librarian
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    Crossref Citations
    Crossref logo
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.
    Alduncin, Alex Parker, David C. W. and Theriault, Sean M. 2017. Leaving on a Jet Plane: Polarization, Foreign Travel, and Comity in Congress. Congress & the Presidency, Vol. 44, Issue. 2, p. 179.
    ×
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: November 2015

14 - More a Symptom Than a Cause: Polarization and Partisan News Media in America

from PART IV - POLARIZATION IN THE MEDIA
Export citation
Summary

Many observers blame partisan news media for the high level of partisan polarization in U.S. government and the American electorate. In this chapter, we discuss the emergence of partisan news media in the United States and review disparate sources of evidence to assess its effect on political polarization. Taken together, we contend that the emergence of partisan news media is more a symptom of a polarized political system than a source.

• Political parties in the U.S. Congress polarized before the advent of partisan news media.

• The expansion of entertainment options on television and the Internet has limited the reach of both mainstream and partisan news.

• Although exposure to partisan news programs can polarize political attitudes, exposure to mainstream news can also polarize.

• News programs are polarizing, in part, because they communicate to the public the degree to which politicians are polarized along party lines. Consequently, if political elites were to become less partisan, the electorate would likely follow.

The debate over the Affordable Care Act in 2009 and 2010 offers a prime example of the polarized polity in the United States. It was cast in ideological terms, with supporters advancing access to medical care as a universal human right to be afforded by government and opponents decrying any government intrusion into the provision of medical care as creeping socialism. President Obama, attempting to craft the image of a “post-partisan” politician, met publicly with congressional Republicans multiple times and made a show of including some of their proposals. Whether these attempts were genuine is a matter of perspective, but their ineffectiveness is not. Not one Republican in either the House of Representatives or the Senate voted in support of the health care bill (Herszenhorn and Pear 2010).

Things were somewhat different in 1965, when 13 Republican senators and 70 Republican representatives joined their Democratic colleagues to support the creation of Medicare, providing health care for the elderly. Nearly half of the Republican caucus supported the bill (Social Security History 2014). What changed? The passage of Medicare was not a fait accompli ordained by overwhelming popularity or a lack of a credible opposition. The public was just as ambivalent about the proposed legislation in 1965 as it was in 2009, with opponents denouncing the plan as “socialized medicine” (Klein 2010). Moreover, the American Medical Association, which endorsed the Affordable Care Act, firmly opposed and openly lobbied against Medicare.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

American Gridlock
  • Online ISBN: 9781316287002
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316287002
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×
Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Achen, Christopher H. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Adams, Greg D. 1997. “Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 718–737.
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
American Political Science Association Committee on Political Parties. 1950. “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System.” American Political Science Review 44 (3) Part 2, Supplement: 1–100.
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2010. “The Benefits of Experimental Methods for the Study of Campaign Effects.” Political Communication 27 (2): 199–215.
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2008. “Can Partisan Cues Diminish Democratic Accountability?” Political Behavior 30 (2): 139–160.
Arceneaux, Kevin, and Johnson, Martin. 2014. “Understanding How Individual Differences and Political Context Shape Media Effects.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington DC.
Arceneaux, Kevin, and Johnson, Martin. 2013. Changing Minds or Changing Channels? Partisan News in an Age of Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Arceneaux, Kevin, Johnson, Martin, Lindstädt, René, and Wielen, Ryan J. Vander. 2015. “Democratic Representation and the Emergence of Partisan News Media: Investigating Dynamic Partisanship in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/ajps.12171.
Berelson, Bernard R. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bergan, Daniel E. 2012. “Partisan Stereotypes and Policy Attitudes.” Journal of Communication 62 (6): 1102–1120.
Bergan, Daniel E. 2009. “Does Grassroots Lobbying Work? A Field Experiment Measuring the Effects of an E-mail Lobbying Campaign on Legislative Behavior.” American Politics Research 37 (2): 327–352.
Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20 (3): 351–368.
Brock, David, Rabin-Havt, Ari, and Media Matters for America. 2012. The Fox Effect: How Roger Ailes Turned a Network into a Propaganda Machine. New York: Anchor Books.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E, Miller, Warren E, and Stokes, Donald E. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 74 (1): 78–91.
Clinton, Joshua D., and Enamorado, Ted. 2014. “The National News Media's Effect on Congress: How the Spread of Fox News Affected Elites in Congress.” Journal of Politics 76 (4): 928–943.
Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2009. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations before and after Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Converse, Philip E. 1964. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In Apter, David E., ed., Ideology and Discontent. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 206–261.
Davis, Nicholas T., and Dunaway, Johanna L.. N.d. “Competing Explanations for Partisan-Ideological Sorting: Media Fragmentation or Elite Polarization?” Unpublished MS, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
DellaVigna, Stefano, and Kaplan, Ethan. 2007. “The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (3): 1187–1234.
Druckman, James N., Peterson, Erik, and Slothuus, Rune. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review 107 (01): 57–79.
Edwards, George C. III, and Dan Wood, B.. 1999. “Who Influences Whom? The President, Congress, and the Media.” American Political Science Review 93 (2): 327–344.
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.
Gaines, Brian J., and Kuklinski, James H.. 2011. “Experimental Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Related to Self-Selection.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 724–736.
Garrett, R Kelly, Carnahan, Dustin, and Lynch, Emily K. 2013. “A Turn Toward Avoidance? Selective Exposure to Online Political Information, 2004-2008.” Political Behavior 35 (1): 113–134.
Groseclose, Tim, and Milyo, Jeffrey. 2005. “A Measure of Media Bias.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (4): 1191–1237.
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2005. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Herbst, Susan. 1998. Reading Public Opinion: How Political Actors View the Democratic Process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herszenhorn, David M., and Pear, Robert. 2010. “Final Votes in Congress Cap Battle on Health Bill.” New York Times, March 25, A1.
Hovland, Carl I., Janis, Irving L., and Kelley, Harold H.. 1953. Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Huckfeldt, Robert, and Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics and Social communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald R.. 2010. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion, Updated Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, S, Sood, G., and Lelkes, Y.. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 405–431.
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2000. Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Cappella, Joseph N.. 2008. Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Katz, Elihu, and Lazarsfeld, Paul Felix. 1955. Personal Influence, The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. New York: Free Press.
Key, Valdimer Orlando. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. New York: Vintage Books.
Key, Valdimer Orlando. 1961. Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.
Klein, Ezra. 2010. “Was Medicare Popular When It Passed?” Retrieved from http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/03/was_medicare_popular_when_it_p.html.
Ladd, Jonathan McDonald. 2012. Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Levendusky, Matthew. 2013. How Partisan Media Polarize America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levendusky, Matthew S. 2010. “Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters: A Benefit of Elite Polarization.” Political Behavior 32 (1): 111–131.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Jacoby, William G, Norpoth, Helmut, and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 2009. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Lord, C.G., Ross, L., and Lepper, M.R.. 1979. “Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (11): 2098–2109.
Lubinsky, Charles. 1996. “Reconsidering Retransmission Consent: An Examination of the Retransmission Consent Provision (47 U.S.C. 325(b)) of the 1992 Cable Act.” Federal Communications Law Journal 49 (1): 99–165.
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57 (1): 45–56.
Parsons, Patrick R. 2008. Blue Skies: A History of Cable Television. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Patterson, Thomas E. 2013. Informing the News: The Need for Knowledge-Based Journalism. New York: Vintage.
Poole, Keith. 2014. “The Polarization of Congressional Parties.” Retrieved from http://voteview.com/political_polarization.asp.
Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schickler, Eric, Pearson, Kathryn, and Feinstein, Brian D.. 2010. “Congressional Parties and Civil Rights Politics from 1933 to 1972.” Journal of Politics 72 (3): 672–689.
Siegel, David A. 2013. “Social Networks and the Mass Media.” American Political Science Review 107 (4): 786–805.
Slater, Michael D. 2007. “Reinforcing Spirals: The Mutual Influence of Media Selectivity and Media Effects and Their Impact on Individual Behavior and Social Identity.” Communication Theory 17 (3): 281–303.
Sobieraj, Sarah and Berry, Jeffrey M. 2011. “From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio, and Cable News.” Political Communication 28 (1): 19–41.
Social Security. 2014. “Legislative History.” Retrieved from http://www.ssa.gov/history/tally65.html.
Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2011. Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sunstein, Cass R. 2009. Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide. New York: Oxford University Press.
Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 755–769.
Thompson, Richard F. 2009. “Habituation: A History.” Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 92 (1): 127–134.
Yanovitzky, I. 2002. “Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions: A Closer Look Into the Media-Policy Connection.” Communication Research 29 (4): 422–451.
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cancel
Confirm
×