Belz, Herman, “The Constitution in the Gilded Age: The Beginnings of Constitutional Realism in American Scholarship,”American Journal of Legal History 13 (1969), 110–25
Curti, Merle, “The Great Mr. Locke: America’s Philosopher, 1783–1861,”Huntington Library Bulletin 11 (1937), 143
Paludan, Philip S., A Covenant with Death: The Constitution, Law, and Equality in the Civil War Era (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1975), 170–93
Hyman, Harold M., A More Perfect Union: The Impact of the Civil War and Reconstruction on the Constitution (New York: Knopf, 1973), 109
Pestritto, Ronald J., Woodrow Wilson and the Roots of Modern Liberalism (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005), 12
LaPiana, William P., “Jurisprudence of History and Truth,”Rutgers Law Journal 23 (1992), 554–56;
Grossman, Lewis A., “James Coolidge Carter and Mugwump Jurisprudence,”Law and History Review 20 (2002), 577–629;
Belz, , “The Constitution in the Gilded Age,” 116; Stephen A. Siegel, “Historism in Late Nineteenth Century Constitutional Thought,” Wisconsin Law Review (1990), 1439, 1463, 1541
Baumann, Fred, “Historicism and the Constitution,” in Confronting the Constitution, ed. Bloom, Allan (Washington: A.E.I. Press, 1990), 306
Pound, Roscoe lamented that the historical method ended up “in practice strangely like that of the eighteenth-century law-of-nature school against which it arose to protest” – “Law in Books and Law in Action,” American Law Review 44 (1910), 27
Jaffa, Harry V., “What Were the ‘Original Intentions’ of the Framers of the Constitution of the United States?”University of Puget Sound Law Review 10 (1987), 374
Pound, Roscoe, “Mechanical Jurisprudence,” Columbia Law Review 8 (1908), 605–23
Speziale, Marcia, “Langdell’s Concept of Law as Science: The Beginning of Anti-Formalism in American Legal Theory,”Vermont Law Review 5 (1980), 1–37;
Watson, Bradley C. S., Living Constitution, Dying Faith: Progressivism and the New Science of Jurisprudence (Wilmington, DE: I.S.I. Press, 2009), 163;
Schweber, Howard, “The ‘Science’ of Legal Science: The Model of the Natural Sciences in Nineteenth Century American Legal Education,” Law and History Review 17 (1999), 421–66
Bannister, Robert C., Sociology and Scientism: The American Quest for Objectivity, 1880–1940 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987), 8
Haack, Susan, Defending Science – Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism (Amherst, NY: Prometheus, 2003), 17
Grey, Thomas C., “Langdell’s Orthodoxy,”University of Pittsburgh Law Review 45 (1983), 39
Kelly, J. M., A Short History of Western Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), 290;
Hobbes, , A Dialogue Between a Philosopher and a Student of the Common Laws of England, ed. Cropsey, Joseph (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971)
Herget, James, American Jurisprudence, 1870–1970: A History (Houston: Rice University Press, 1990), 14;
“Anarchical Fallacies,” in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. Bowring, John, 11 vols. (Edinburgh: William Tait, 1843), II: 501
King, Peter J., Utilitarian Jurisprudence in America: The Influence of Bentham and Austin on American Legal Thought (New York: Garland, 1986), 21, 62, 103–09, 135;
Bentham, , “Pannomial Fragments,” in A Bentham Reader, ed. Mack, Mary Peter (New York: Pegasus, 1969), 243
Gabriel, Ralph Henry, The Course of American Democratic Thought, 3d ed. (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1986), 228;
Nelson, William E., The Roots of American Bureaucracy, 1830–1900 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982), 107;
Jones, Archer, “Social Darwinism and Classical Economics: An Untested Hypothesis,”North Dakota Quarterly 46 (1978), 19–31
Bannister, Robert C., “William Graham Sumner’s Social Darwinism: A Reconsideration,”History of Political Economy 5 (1973), 90, 108;
Sumner, William Graham, Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals (Boston: Ginn, 1906), 65
Nelson, , Roots of American Bureaucracy, 85; Olken, Samuel R., “Justice George Sutherland and Economic Liberty: Constitutional Conservatism and the Problem of Factions,”William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 6 (1997), 38
Reimann, Mathias, “A Career in Itself: The German Professoriate as a Model for American Legal Academia,” in The Reception of Continental Ideas in the Common Law World, 1820–1920, ed. Reimann, (Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 1993), 165–202
Bailey, Mark Warren, Guardians of the Moral Order: The Legal Philosophy of the Supreme Court, 1860–1910 (De Kalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2004)
Gamer, Robert E., “Justice Brewer and Substantive Due Process: A Conservative Court Revisited,” Vanderbilt Law Review 18 (1965), 632;
Duker, William F., “Mr. Justice Rufus Peckham: The Police Power and the Individual in a Changing World,” Brigham Young University Law Review 47 (1980), 49
Siegel, Stephen A., “Joel Bishop’s Orthodoxy,” Law and History Review 13 (1995), 243, 48;
May, Henry F., The Enlightenment in America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1976), 347
Hylton, , “David Josiah Brewer,” 55; Linda Przybyszewski, “Judical Conservatism and Protestant Faith: The Case of David J. Brewer,” Journal of American History 91 (2004), 471–96
Hylton, J. Gordon, “The Perils of Popularity: David Josiah Brewer and the Politics of Judicial Reputation,” Vanderbilt Law Review 62 (2009), 567–90;
Przybyszewski, Linda, The Republic According to John Marshall Harlan (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999)
Menand, Louis, The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2001), x, 4, 38, 61
Palmer, Ben W., “Hobbes, Holmes and Hitler,” American Bar Association Journal 31 (1945), 572.
Alschuler, Albert W., Law Without Values: The Life, Work, and Legacy of Justice Holmes (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 10, 27
The Autobiographical Notes of Charles Evans Hughes, ed. Danelski, David J. and Tulchin, Joseph S. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973), 175
Grey, Thomas C., “Holmes and Legal Pragmatism,” Stanford Law Review 41 (1989), 787–870
Book Notice, American Law Review 14 (1880), 234
Duxbury, Neil, Patterns of American Jurisprudence (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), 38, 44, 48
Holmes, Jr Oliver Wendell., “The Path of the Law,” Harvard Law Review 10 (1897), 464–65, 461
White, Edward, The American Judicial Tradition: Profiles of Leading American Judges, expanded ed. (New York: Oxford, 1988), 165
“Summary of Events,” American Law Review 7 (1873), 584
Holmes, , “Natural Law,” Harvard Law Review 32 (1918), 40.
Hull, N. E. H., Roscoe Pound and Karl Llewellyn: Searching for an American Jurisprudence (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997)
Wigdor, David, Roscoe Pound: Philosopher of Law (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1974), 24, 53–55, 62, 111;
Benedict, Michael Les, “Laissez-Faire and Liberty: A Re-Evaluation of the Meaning and Origins of Laissez-Faire Constitutionalism,” Law and History Review 3 (1985), 293–331
Bailey, Mark Warren, Guardians of the Moral Order
Wall, Joseph F., “Social Darwinism and Constitutional Law with Special Reference to Lochner v. New York,” Annals of Science 33 (1976), 465–76
Hovenkamp, Herbert, Enterprise and American Law, 1836–1937 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 100
Wyllie, Irvin G., “Social Darwinism and the Businessman,”Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 103 (1959), 629–35
West, John G., “Darwin’s Public Policy: Nineteenth Century Science and the Rise of the American Welfare State,” in The Progressive Revolution in Politics and Political Science, ed. Marini, John and Masugi, Ken (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005), 260
Tamanaha, Brian Z., Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010)
Osborne v. Bank of the United States, 22 U.S. 738 (1824), 866
American Law Review 23 (1889), 47, 700–718
Pound, Roscoe was still lamenting the endurance of natural-law ideas in American legal thought in 1909–10 – “Liberty of Contract,” Yale Law Journal 18 (1909), 464–68
“Law in Books and Law in Action,” American Law Review 44 (1910), 25
