Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:50:07.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Immigrant Resentment: When the Work Ethic Backfires

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Deborah J. Schildkraut
Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Even though many nonwhite Americans, immigrant and native born alike, define the normative content of American identity the same as whites do (Chapter 3), think of themselves as American (Chapter 5), and differ minimally from whites in their sense of obligation, patriotism, and trust – with differences diminishing across each immigrant generation (Chapter 6), media coverage of immigration issues suggests that many white native-born Americans think otherwise. One is left with the impression that native-born whites believe that today's immigrants and their descendants reject American norms, a belief that generates a kind of resentment that I call “immigrant resentment.” The purpose of this chapter is to examine such resentment.

The constitutive norms that define the meaning of one's national identity provide stereotypes that help people derive expectations about the behavior of their fellow citizens. Negative feelings toward particular subgroups in society often stem from perceptions that members of such groups violate particular national norms, and thus threaten the meaning of one's own identity. For instance, the perception that African Americans violate cherished liberal American norms such as individualism or the work ethic has been shown to be relatively widespread and enduring, and it has proved to be a potent force driving preferences on race-targeted policies such as affirmative action (Kinder and Sanders 1996). This particular perception of norm violation has multiple terms in the literature, including symbolic racism, modern racism, and racial resentment (Henry and Sears 2002). The view that blacks threaten a central element of the national value system holds up as a powerful predictor of attitudes even when more tangible threats are included in models of opinion formation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Americanism in the Twenty-First Century
Public Opinion in the Age of Immigration
, pp. 160 - 194
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×