Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Abell, Jackie Locke, Abigail Condor, Susan Gibson, Stephen and Stevenson, Clifford 2006. Trying similarity, doing difference: the role of interviewer self-disclosure in interview talk with young people. Qualitative Research, Vol. 6, Issue. 2, p. 221.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2004
  • Online publication date: September 2009

12 - Perspectives and frameworks in interviewers' queries

Summary

It is futile to search for truly neutral questions. They don't exist. Every question carries presuppositions, so every question establishes a perspective. So for each question we must ask: Is the perspective taken really the one from which we want the respondent to answer? If the answer is yes – if we can justify the perspective – then we can also justify the question.

(Clark and Schober 1992: 30)

One use of in-depth interviews is to determine the respondents' attitudes, beliefs, and/or opinions on controversial issues. Race is one such controversial issue. When an interviewer asks questions about racial issues (or controversial issues more generally), a fundamental organization comes into play: (1) asking about a racial issue reflects and implicates a position or perspective with respect to the controversy; and (2) an interviewer can construct a query that aligns to a greater or lesser extent with a position or perspective, or he or she may work to avoid aligning with a particular position or perspective.

When an interviewer asks about a particular racial matter, the interviewee might presume that the interviewer endorses the perspective implicated by the query. Likewise, when an interviewee responds to a query about a particular racial matter, the interviewer might presume that the interviewee endorses a perspective implicated by the response. The possibility of the interactants' making inferences about each other's perspective presents certain problems for both the interviewer and interviewee in terms of how to formulate and interpret queries and responses.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Analyzing Race Talk
  • Online ISBN: 9780511489792
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489792
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×