Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Cetin, Murat Seker, Fahri and Cavlak, Hakan 2015. Regional Economic Integration and the Global Financial System. p. 221.

    Wu, Hong Deng, Xiangzheng Zhan, Jinyan Wu, Feng and Li, Xing 2009. Developing a Multi-Sectoral Dynamic Applied General Equilibrium Model to Simulate the Emission Reduction of Nitrogen and Phosphorus at a Catchment Extent. p. 1.

    Li, Jennifer C. 2005. Is There a Trade-Off Between Trade Liberalization and Environmental Quality? A CGE Assessment on Thailand. The Journal of Environment & Development, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 252.

    Reinert, Kenneth A. and Roland-Holst, David W. 2001. Industrial Pollution Linkages in North America: A Linear Analysis. Economic Systems Research, Vol. 13, Issue. 2, p. 197.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1997
  • Online publication date: June 2012

16 - Trade and the Environment

Summary

Introduction

The environmental implications of international trade are becoming an important part of multilateral and domestic policy agendas. This is particularly the case for trade relations between developing and developed countries. To what extent developing countries should devote their resources to lowering domestic environmental costs for their own welfare and that of the world as a whole has frequently been debated. The debate stems from the widely held view that a tradeoff between economic growth and environmental quality exists. Many policymakers in developing countries argue that they have the right to pursue the same material aspirations by the same means as did the industrialized world during its developmental stages and are thus willing to spend smaller percentages of their productive resources for pollution abatement than developed countries.

If it is accepted that differing domestic practices yield different environmental effects, how might trade exert its own environmental influence? It is increasingly recognized that the import of goods and services entails an implicit transfer of environmental effects to the exporting country. Given the hierarchical nature of technology in the development process, one might infer that less developed countries would be net losers in the environmental transfer scheme which underlies trade. The data presented in this chapter indicate that trade between Indonesia and Japan has occasioned a large and sustained net transfer of effluents during the 1965–90 period. For example, the implied unit effluent content of Indonesian exports to Japan has been about six times that of its imports from Japan.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis
  • Online ISBN: 9781139174824
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174824
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×