Skip to main content
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Aldy, Joseph E. Pizer, William A. and Akimoto, Keigo 2017. Comparing emissions mitigation efforts across countries. Climate Policy, Vol. 17, Issue. 4, p. 501.

    Verbruggen, Aviel 2011. Preparing the design of robust climate policy architectures. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Vol. 11, Issue. 4, p. 275.

    DAI, XINYUAN 2010. Global regime and national change. Climate Policy, Vol. 10, Issue. 6, p. 622.

    Paterson, Matthew 2009. Post-Hegemonic Climate Politics?. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 140.

  • Print publication year: 2007
  • Online publication date: June 2012

7 - Practical global climate policy



A meaningful discussion of international climate policy agreement needs to begin by asking the question, what is the goal of the international agreement? What defines success? One way to answer this question is to view the problem through the eyes of a stylized grouping of experts and stakeholders engaged in the issue: economists, environmental advocates, and technologists. Economists would likely describe the goal as maximizing welfare; that is, setting a global policy that balances expected costs and benefits of mitigation. Environmental advocates, and indeed the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), describe a goal of preventing dangerous interference with the climate system. Like the Clean Air Act in the United States, it suggests first consulting the science to establish a safe standard, then following up with a cost-effective (i.e., least-cost strategy) to achieve it. Alternatively, the goal might be described by technologists as the need to develop and deploy climate friendly technology at a global level, without a heavy emphasis on near-term emission reductions.

Such stylized views typically lead to straw-man conclusions about the design of an agreement – agreements that are easily knocked down by practical critiques. Yet considering these straw men can help point us to an alternate, more practical goal. That is, the goal might be to encourage some balance of domestic mitigation and technology development across individual countries in the near term – embracing a fairly wide range of efforts driven by domestic capacity in each nation – while laying the groundwork for a more coordinated international mitigation effort in the future.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Architectures for Agreement
  • Online ISBN: 9780511802027
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *