Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2020
  • Online publication date: April 2020

11 - Orchestration

from Part III - Policy Responses

Summary

Orchestration is a soft mode of governance, in which a ‘governor’ enlists the voluntary cooperation of intermediary actors to carry out governance functions that further the governor’s goals. Environmental issues figured prominently in the origin of the orchestration concept, and orchestration has since played a significant role in earth system governance research on architecture and agency. This chapter summarizes key empirical findings of this research, especially on sustainable development and climate change. It also identifies contributions of earth system governance research to orchestration theory: for example, concerning the conditions for successful orchestration, the role of orchestration platforms and orchestration’s role in institutional complexity. The chapter then engages with critiques and normative concerns, particularly relating to power, accountability and legitimacy. The chapter concludes with thoughts on an orchestration research agenda that can support the transformative goals of the new earth system governance science plan.

Abbott, K. W. (2012a). The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30 (4), 571–90.
Abbott, K. W. (2012b). Engaging the public and the private in global sustainability governance. International Affairs, 88 (3), 543–64.
Abbott, K. W. (2014). Strengthening the transnational regime complex for climate change. Transnational Environmental Law, 3 (1), 5788.
Abbott, K. W. (2015). Orchestration. In Pattberg, P. H., & Zelli, F (eds.), Encyclopedia of global environmental governance and politics (pp. 487–95). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Abbott, K. W. (2017). Orchestrating experimentation in nonstate environmental commitments. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 738–63.
Abbott, K. W. (2018). Orchestration: Strategic ordering in polycentric governance. In Jordan, A, Huitema, D, van Asselt, H, & Forster, J (eds.), Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? (pp. 188209). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Abbott, K. W., & Bernstein, S. (2015). The High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development: Orchestration by default and design. Global Policy, 6 (3), 222–33.
Abbott, K. W., & Faude, B. (2019). Choosing low-cost institutions in global governance. Unpublished manuscript.
Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2015a). Orchestration: Global governance through intermediaries. In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P, Snidal, D, & Zangl, B (eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 336). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2015b). Orchestrating global governance: From empirical findings to theoretical implications. In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P, Snidal, D, & Zangl, B (eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 349–79). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2016). Two logics of indirect governance: Delegation and orchestration. British Journal of Political Science, 46 (4), 719–29.
Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2019). Competence versus control: The governor’s dilemma. Regulation & Governance, in press.
Abbott, K. W., & Hale, T. (2014). Orchestrating global solutions networks: A guide for organizational entrepreneurs. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 9 (1–2), 195212.
Abbott, K. W., Levi-Faur, D., & Snidal, D. (2017). Theorizing regulatory intermediaries. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670 (1), 1435.
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2009a). Strengthening international regulation through transnational new governance: Overcoming the orchestration deficit. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 42, 501–78.
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2009b). The governance triangle: Regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. In Mattli, W, & Woods, N (eds.), In whose benefit? Explaining regulatory change in global politics (pp. 4984). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2010). International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration. Review of International Organizations, 5 (3), 315–44.
Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2013). Taking responsive regulation transnational: Strategies for international organizations: Taking RR transnational. Regulation & Governance, 7 (1), 95113.
Bäckstrand, K., & Kuyper, J. W. (2017). The democratic legitimacy of orchestration: The UNFCCC, nonstate actors, and transnational climate governance. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 764–88.
Bäckstrand, K., Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B. O., & Lövbrand, E. (2017). Nonstate actors in global climate governance: From Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 561–79.
Bäckstrand, K., & Kylsäter, M. (2014). Old wine in new bottles? The legitimation and delegitimation of UN public–private partnerships for sustainable development from the Johannesburg Summit to the Rio+20 Summit. Globalizations, 11 (3), 331–47.
Bernstein, S. (2011). Legitimacy in intergovernmental and nonstate global governance. Review of International Political Economy, 18 (1), 1751.
Bernstein, S. (2005). Legitimacy in global environmental governance. Journal of International Law and International Relations, 1 (1–2), 139–66.
Bernstein, S. (2017). The United Nations and the governance of Sustainable Development Goals. In Kanie, N, & Biermann, F (eds.), Governance through goals: New strategies for global sustainability (pp. 213–39). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Best, J. (2017). The rise of measurement-driven governance: The case of international development. Global Governance, 23 (2), 163–81.
Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J. et al. (2009). Earth system governance: People, places and the planet. Science and implementation plan of the Earth System Governance Project. Bonn: Earth System Governance Project.
Boas, I., Biermann, F., Kanie, N. (2016). Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: Towards a nexus approach. International Environmental Agreements, 16 (3), 449–64.
Broome, A., Homolar, A., & Kranke, M. (2018). Bad science: International organizations and the indirect power of global benchmarking. European Journal of International Relations, 24 (3), 514–39.
Burch, S., Gupta, A., Inoue, C. Y. A. et al. (2019). New directions in earth system governance research. Earth System Governance, 1.
Chan, S., van Asselt, H., Hale, T. et al. (2015). Reinvigorating international climate policy: A comprehensive framework for effective nonstate action. Global Policy, 6 (4), 466–73.
Chan, S., Brandi, C., & Bauer, S. (2016). Aligning transnational climate action with international climate governance: The road from Paris. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25 (2), 238–47.
Chan, S., Ellinger, P., & Widerberg, O. (2018). Exploring national and regional orchestration of nonstate action for a < 1.5 C world. International Environmental Agreements, 18 (1), 135–52.
Chan, S., Falkner, R., Goldberg, M., & van Asselt, H. (2018). Effective and geographically balanced? An output-based assessment of nonstate climate actions. Climate Policy, 18 (1), 2435.
Chan, S., & Pauw, P. (2014). A global framework for climate action (GFCA): Orchestrating nonstate and subnational initiatives for more effective global climate governance. Bonn: German Development Institute.
Dryzek, J. S. (2017). The meanings of life for nonstate actors in climate politics. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 789–99.
Earth System Governance (2018). Earth system governance: Science and implementation plan of the Earth System Governance Project. Utrecht: Earth System Governance Project.
Gordon, D. J. (2016). The politics of accountability in networked urban climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 16 (2), 82100.
Gordon, D. J., & Johnson, C. A. (2017). The orchestration of global urban climate governance: Conducting power in the post-Paris climate regime. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 694714.
Graham, E. R., & Thompson, A. (2015). Efficient orchestration? In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P, Snidal, D, & Zangl, B (eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 114–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Green, J. F. (2017). Transnational delegation in global environmental governance: When do non-state actors govern? Regulation & Governance, 12 (2), 263–76.
Hale, T., & Roger, C. (2014). Orchestration and transnational climate governance. Review of International Organizations, 9 (1), 5982.
Hanrieder, T. (2015). WHO orchestrates? Coping with competitors in global health. In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P, Snidal, D, & Zangl, B (eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 336). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Henriksen, La. F. (2015). The global network of biofuel sustainability standards-setters. Environmental Politics, 24 (1), 115–37.
Henriksen, L. F., & Ponte, S. (2017). Public orchestration, social networks, and transnational environmental governance: Lessons from the aviation industry: Public orchestration in aviation. Regulation & Governance, 12 (1), 2345.
Henriksen, L. F., & Seabrooke, L. (2016). Transnational organizing: Issue professionals in environmental sustainability networks. Organization, 23 (5), 722–41.
Hermwille, L. (2018). Making initiatives resonate: How can nonstate initiatives advance national contributions under the UNFCCC? International Environmental Agreements, 18 (3), 447–66.
Hermwille, L., Obergassel, W., Ott, H. E., & Beuermann, C. (2017). UNFCCC before and after Paris: What’s necessary for an effective climate regime? Climate Policy, 17 (2), 150–70.
Hickmann, T. (2016). Rethinking authority in global climate governance: How transnational climate initiatives relate to the international climate regime. Routledge Research in Global Environmental Governance. London: Routledge.
Hickmann, T., Widerberg, O., Lederer, M., & Pattberg, P. (2019). The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat as an orchestrator in global climate policymaking. International Review of Administrative Sciences, in press.
Hoffmann, M. J. (2011). Climate governance at the crossroads: Experimenting with a global response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hsu, A., Höhne, N., Kuramochi, T. et al. (2019). A research roadmap for quantifying nonstate and subnational climate mitigation action. Nature Climate Change, 9 (1), 1117.
Hsu, A., Moffat, A. S., Weinfurter, A. J., & Schwartz, J. D. (2015). Towards a new climate diplomacy. Nature Climate Change, 5 (6), 501–3.
Kanie, N., & Biermann, F. (eds.) (2017). Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B. O., & Schroeder, H. (2018). Nonstate actors in hybrid global climate governance: Justice, legitimacy, and effectiveness in a post-Paris era: Nonstate actors in hybrid global climate governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9 (1), e497.
Lelieveldt, H. (2018). Out of tune or well tempered? How competition agencies direct the orchestrating state: Directing the orchestrating state. Regulation & Governance, in press.
Lister, J., Poulsen, R. T., & Ponte, S. (2015). Orchestrating transnational environmental governance in maritime shipping. Global Environmental Change, 34, 185–95.
McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. R. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3 (2), 243–77.
Ostrom, V. (1991). Polycentricity: The structural basis of self-governing systems. In Ostrom, V (ed.), The meaning of American federalism: Constituting a self-governing society (pp. 233–44). San Francisco: ICS Press.
Pattberg, P. H. (2017). The emergence of carbon disclosure: Exploring the role of governance entrepreneurs. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35 (8), 1437–55.
Pattberg, P. H., Biermann, F., & Mert, A. (eds.) (2012). Public–private partnerships for sustainable development: Emergence, influence and legitimacy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Paulo, S., & Klingebiel, S. (2016). New approaches to development cooperation in middle-income countries: Brokering collective action for global sustainable development. Bonn: German Development Institute.
Pegram, T. (2015). Global human rights governance and orchestration: National human rights institutions as intermediaries. European Journal of International Relations, 21 (3), 595620.
Rayner, J. M., Buck, A., & Katila, P. (eds.) (2010). Embracing complexity: Meeting the challenges of international forest governance. A global assessment report. Vienna: International Union of Forest Research Organizations.
Ruggie, J. G. (2014). Global governance and ‘New Governance Theory’: Lessons from business and human rights. Global Governance, 20 (1), 517.
Schleifer, P. (2013). Orchestrating sustainability: The case of European Union biofuel governance: Orchestrating sustainability. Regulation & Governance, 7 (4), 533–46.
Shoji, M. (2019). The UN Global compact for transnational business and peace: A need for orchestration? In Mahmudur Rahim, M (ed.), Code of conduct on transnational corporations: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 89110). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Tallberg, J., Bäckstrand, K., & Scholte, J. A. (eds.) (2018). Legitimacy in global governance: Sources, processes, and consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
United Nations General Assembly (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. UN Doc. A/RES/70/1.
Van der Lugt, C., & Dingwerth, K. (2015). Governing where focality is low. In Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P, Snidal, D, & Zangl, B (eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (pp. 237–61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Van der Ven, H., Bernstein, S., & Hoffmann, M. (2017). Valuing the contributions of nonstate and subnational actors to climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 17 (1), 120.
Widerberg, O. (2017). The ‘black box’ problem of orchestration: How to evaluate the performance of the Lima-Paris action agenda. Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 715–37.
Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay and scale. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.