Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Dyer, Robert James Gillings, Simon Pywell, Richard F. Fox, Richard Roy, David B. Oliver, Tom H. and Collen, Ben 2017. Developing a biodiversity-based indicator for large-scale environmental assessment: a case study of proposed shale gas extraction sites in Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 54, Issue. 3, p. 872.

    Hallatt, Trevor Winston Retief, Francois Pieter and Sandham, Luke Alan 2015. The Quality of Biodiversity Inputs to EIA in Areas with High Biodiversity Value — Experience from the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 17, Issue. 03, p. 1550025.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: July 2014

6 - Biodiversity in environmental impact assessment

Summary

Introduction

As the importance of biodiversity for human well-being is increasingly brought to the forefront by scientific endeavours in the fields of natural sciences, resource economics, and conservation ecology, the need for better representation of biodiversity in the processes that steer development decisions has clearly emerged. Furthermore, outspoken stakeholders actively participating in impact assessment processes bring the importance of biodiversity to the forefront, contributing to the need for better representation of biodiversity. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is one of few internationally recognised and often legally embedded instruments to predict the potential consequences of human activities. In recent years the impact assessment community realised that it was not doing well in defining the impact on biological diversity. Implicitly biodiversity was always considered to be part of impact assessment, but the tools to explicitly define biodiversity impacts were not enough. Box 6.1 provides some messages on biodiversity emerging from EIA practice.

This chapter provides extensive first-hand background documentation on the EIA guidelines adopted by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD, 2006) and further elaborates on the concepts behind the guidelines. Reference is made to Chapter 2 elaborating CBD objectives and explaining recent scientific developments in biodiversity science, Chapter 4 providing the conceptual framework underlying the EIA as well as SEA chapters, and Chapter 5 providing a general overview of recent thinking on EIA. In this chapter the screening and scoping stages of EIA are emphasised for two reasons. First, the need for an impact assessment study when a proposed activity has potential significant effects on biodiversity has to be defined by good screening criteria and procedures; second, the impact assessment study has to be carried out in such a manner that all relevant issues are properly dealt with, providing sufficient information for decision makers to come to a well-founded decision. Because scoping determines the quality of the terms of reference of the impact study, good scoping procedures and guidance on the scoping process are of fundamental importance.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Biodiversity in Environmental Assessment
  • Online ISBN: 9781139195775
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139195775
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×