Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:11:40.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Hegemony and Religious Conflict: British Imperial Control and Political Cleavages in Yorubaland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2010

Peter B. Evans
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Dietrich Rueschemeyer
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Theda Skocpol
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

There is a hierarchy of cleavage bases in each system and these orders of political primacy not only vary among polities, but also tend to undergo changes over time. Such differences and changes in the political weight of sociocultural cleavages set fundamental problems for comparative research: When is region, language, or ethnicity most likely to prove polarizing? When will class take the primacy and when will denominational commitments and religious identities prove equally important cleavage bases? … what we want to know is when the one type of cleavage will prove more salient than the other, what kind of alliances they have produced and what consequences these constellations of forces have had for consensus-building within the nation-state.

A Puzzle

The Yoruba, a nationality comprising some 10 million people who dominate the political scene in the five states of southwestern Nigeria, have experienced three generations of religious differentiation. Since the late 1890s, when nearly everyone shared a common allegiance to a religious framework, about 40 percent of the Yorubas have converted to Christianity and about the same percentage have become Muslims. In a previous publication, I reported that, in the past century, two religious subcultures have indeed emerged. Christian Yorubas conceptualize authority relations, responsibility, and the meaning of participation differently from Muslim Yorubas, but when it comes to issues on the political agenda of the day, the two subcultures hold virtually identical views.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×