Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Eder, Günther and Ramharter, Esther 2015. Formal reconstructions of St. Anselm’s ontological argument. Synthese, Vol. 192, Issue. 9, p. 2795.

    Ables, Travis E. 2013. The Student's Companion to the Theologians. p. 142.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2004
  • Online publication date: May 2006

3 - Anselm, Augustine, and Platonism

Summary

INTRODUCTION

When Anselm completed his Monologion, he submitted it to his teacher, Lanfranc, for his approval. Although we do not have the text of Lanfranc's reply, it seems to have called for Anselm to give appropriate sources for his assertions. In response to Lanfranc's criticism, Anselm sought to justify himself this way:

It was my intention throughout this disputation to assert nothing which could not be immediately defended either from canonical Dicta or from the words of St. Augustine. And however often I look over what I have written, I cannot see that I have asserted anything that is not to be found there. Indeed, no reasoning of my own, however conclusive, would have persuaded me to have been the first to presume to say those things which you have copied from my work, nor several other things besides, if St. Augustine had not already proved them in the great discussions in his De trinitate.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge Companion to Anselm
  • Online ISBN: 9780511999901
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521807468
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×