Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:10:08.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Chomsky and Moral Philosophy

from Part II - The Human Mind and Its Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2017

By
John Mikhail
Edited by
James McGilvray
James McGilvray
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky , pp. 235 - 254
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, H. C. et al. 2016. “Small-scale Societies Exhibit Fundamental Variation in the Role of Intentions in Moral Judgment.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 113:4688–4693.Google Scholar
Butler, J. 1983/1736. “A Dissertation on the Nature of Virtue.” In Darwall, S., ed., Five Sermons. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1964. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of a Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1980. Rules and Representations. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1988a. Language and Politics. Otero, C. P., ed. Montreal: Black Rose.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1988b. Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2016. What Kind of Creatures Are We? New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Crowe, M. 1977. The Changing Profile of the Natural Law. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Dancy, J. 1983. “Ethical Particularism and Morally Relevant Properties.” Mind 92:530–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, J. 1993. Moral Reasons. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1981/1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Donagan, A. 1977. The Theory of Morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dwyer, S. 1999. “Moral Competence.” In Murasugi, K. and Stainton, R., eds. Philosophy and Linguistics. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Gill, M. 2014. Humean Moral Pluralism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, R. 1997. “Instinct of Nature: Natural Law, Synderesis, and the Moral Sense.” Journal of the History of Ideas 58:173–198.Google Scholar
Harman, G. 2000. Explaining Value and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilliard, F. 1859. The Law of Torts (2 vols.). Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1968/1651. Leviathan. MacPherson, C. B., ed. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Horwich, P. 1984. “Critical Notice: Saul Kripke: Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language.” Philosophy of Science 51:163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. 1978/1739–1740. A Treatise of Human Nature. Nidditch, P. H., ed. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1983/1751. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. Schneewind, J. B., ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
James, W. 1890. The Principles of Psychology (2 vols.). New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1965/1787. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Smith, N. K.. New York: St. Martins.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. 1981/1705. New Essays on Human Understanding. Remnant, P. and Bennett, J., eds. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1991/1689. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Nidditch, P., ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahlmann, M. 1999. Rationalismus in der praktishen Theorie: Normentheorie und praktische Kampetenz. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
McGilvray, J. 2014. Chomsky: Language, Mind, and Politics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mikhail, J. 2007a. “Universal Moral Grammar: Theory, Evidence, and the Future.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11:143–152.Google Scholar
Mikhail, J. 2007b. “Plucking the Mask of Mystery from Its Face: Jurisprudence and H.L.A. Hart.” Georgetown Law Journal 95:733–779.Google Scholar
Mikhail, J. 2009. “Is the Prohibition of Homicide Universal? Evidence from Comparative Criminal Law.” Brooklyn Law Review 75:497–515.Google Scholar
Mikhail, J. 2011. Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls’ Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikhail, J. 2012. “Moral Grammar and Human Rights: Some Reflections on Cognitive Science and Enlightenment Rationalism.” In Goodman, R., Jinks, D., and Woods, A., eds. Understanding Social Action, Promoting Human Rights. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mikhail, J. 2013. “New Perspectives on Moral Cognition: Reply to Zimmerman, Enoch, and Chemla, Egré, and Schlenker.” Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 8:66–114.Google Scholar
Potts, T. 1980. Conscience in Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pound, R. 1939. The History and System of the Common Law. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Saxe, R. 2016. “Moral Status of Accidents,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 113:4555–4557.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. 1990. Moral Philosophy from Montaigne to Kant: An Anthology, Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×