Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Elder-Vass, Dave 2014. Debate: Seven Ways to be A Realist About Language. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Vol. 44, Issue. 3, p. 249.

    Saxton, Matthew 2009. Language Acquisition. p. 62.

    DWYER, SUSAN 2009. Moral Dumbfounding and the Linguistic Analogy: Methodological Implications for the Study of Moral Judgment. Mind & Language, Vol. 24, Issue. 3, p. 274.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2005
  • Online publication date: May 2007

7 - Empiricism and rationalism as research strategies

from Part II - Chomsky on the human mind
Summary

Introduction

A major influence on Chomsky’s approach to the study of mind has come from rationalist philosophers such as Descartes. Like these thinkers, Chomsky’s work can be usefully seen in opposition to empiricist approaches to mind articulated by thinkers such as Locke. The aim of this chapter is to provide a conceptual backdrop against which one can locate some of Chomsky’s claims. I try to do this by outlining the different ways that the empiricist and rationalist traditions (actually, idealized versions of each) try to reconcile an apparent tension in epistemology (the theory of knowledge). The tension comes in trying to combine a theory of mind with a theory of truth to yield an account of how it is possible for humans to know anything, i.e. have true beliefs in some domain, especially true beliefs about the “outside world.” The two traditions endorse very different conceptions of the relation of minds to the world. However, it is possible to construct a shared conception of what the epistemological project amounts to that plausibly animates the details of the particular proposals that have been advanced. Doing this, I believe, allows for a better evaluation of the intuitions that drive these programs and thereby permits one to more fully appreciate some of Chomsky’s main philosophical proposals. In what follows, I will try to outline these general conceptions. I will then try to relate them to some of the concerns that Chomsky has raised in his linguistic and philosophical writing.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky
  • Online ISBN: 9781139001120
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521780136
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×