Skip to main content
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    ANDREJČ, GORAZD 2012. Bridging the gap between social and existential-mystical interpretations of Schleiermacher's ‘feeling’. Religious Studies, Vol. 48, Issue. 03, p. 377.

  • Print publication year: 2005
  • Online publication date: August 2006

1 - Metaphysical foundations: a look at Schleiermacher’s Dialectic

from Part I - Schleiermacher as Philosopher


Strictly speaking, Schleiermacher does not have a metaphysics, if by this is meant a foundational philosophical doctrine. He was not convinced that metaphysics could grasp the highest object of the human mind, or that it could exhaustively deal with the essential interests of the human spirit. He reserved the expression “metaphysics” for the systematic exposition of descriptive truths. Alongside such a system he placed ethics, or morals, as a system of action (not only right action). The “highest” lies beyond the knowledge claims of both, and as such, must be named their transcendent ground. It cannot be represented adequately through the means of either discipline. This ground is called “transcendent” because it “lies beyond every possible experience and every possible determined thought” (Zusatz to x85 of the 1831 lectures). Schleiermacher wished to “dispense entirely” with the distinction, introduced by Kant, between the “transcendental” (grounding the knowability of objects of experience) and the “transcendent” (extending beyond the limits of experience) (Dial J, 38).

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge Companion to Friedrich Schleiermacher
  • Online ISBN: 9781139000796
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *