Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Halsmayer, Verena and Hoover, Kevin D. 2016. Solow's Harrod: Transforming macroeconomic dynamics into a model of long-run growth. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 23, Issue. 4, p. 561.

    Rubin, Goulven 2016. OSKAR LANGE AND THE WALRASIAN INTERPRETATION OF IS-LM. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 38, Issue. 03, p. 285.

    Scheall, Scott 2015. Slaves of the defunct: the epistemic intractability of the Hayek–Keynes debate. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 22, Issue. 2, p. 215.

    Carabelli, Anna M. and Cedrini, Mario A. 2014. Keynes'sGeneral Theory,Treatise on MoneyandTract on Monetary Reform: different theories, same methodological approach?. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 21, Issue. 6, p. 1060.

    Vroey, Michel De 2010. Keynes’s General Theory After Seventy Years. p. 157.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2006
  • Online publication date: November 2006

5 - Doctor Keynes: economic theory in a diagnostic science

Summary

THEORY AND PRACTICE

For the greater part of his professional life, John Maynard Keynes was known as a practical man: the author of topical tracts on current economic questions, an adviser to, and an emissary from, the British Treasury, a successful player of financial markets for himself and King's College Cambridge, a member of corporate boards and a portfolio manager for two insurance companies. He was, in this sense, a part-time academic. And although he had long been known to be a first-rate economist, it was only after the publication of the General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money in 1936 that he was able to secure his reputation as a first-rate economic theorist. Yet, of the ten volumes of books published in his lifetime, three (the General Theory and the two volumes of the Treatise on Money, volume I subtitled The Pure Theory of Money and volume II The Applied Theory of Money) feature 'theory' in their title. And if we note that three of the remaining volumes are clearly non-economic and two are as much political as economic, the proportion of his economic books self-consciously styled as theoretical rises to three-fifths. Even one of the remaining volumes, A Tract on Monetary Reform, contains a clearly theoretical core. If Keynes was indeed a theorist, what kind of a theorist was he?

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge Companion to Keynes
  • Online ISBN: 9781139001083
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521840902
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×