Boter, Gerard J. 2015. Two Interpolations in Plato’s Symposium. Mnemosyne, Vol. 68, Issue. 5, p. 825.
Sheffield, Frisbee C. C. 2011. VIII-BeyondEros: Friendship in thePhaedrus. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback), Vol. 111, Issue. 2pt2, p. 251.
Bryan, Charles S Wise, Brian K and Briggs, Ward W 2003. William Osier and Basil Gildersleeve on Plato's Eryximachus. Journal of Medical Biography, Vol. 11, Issue. 1, p. 35.
Plato does not have a comprehensive theory of love. Rather, he diverts certain received opinions about love to his own peculiarly philosophic ends. He is not interested in telling us what it would be like to live with someone as a platonic lover. Or so I shall argue, from a reading of the Symposium and the Phaedrus. I shall ignore the social regulations for sexuality proposed in the Republic (III 402d-403c, V 459-461) and the Laws (VIII 835c-842a) as not directly relevant to what has most fascinated Plato's readers about his approach to love, and is the topic of this essay: namely, the bridge he constructs between love and philosophy. I shall also ignore the potentially relevant discussion of friendship (against the background of a love affair) in that subtle and complex dialogue, the Lysis, in order to leave room to stretch myself to something worthwhile on the Symposium and Phaedrus. Of these two works, I shall focus on the former, for it alone among the dialogues is concerned exclusively with love.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.