Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Kidd, Ian James 2017. New Atheism: Critical Perspectives and Contemporary Debates. Vol. 21, Issue. , p. 51.

    2013. Geschichtsmythen über Hispanoamerika.. p. 41.

    LeDrew, Stephen 2012. The evolution of atheism. History of the Human Sciences, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 70.

    2011. Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences, 2011. Isis, Vol. 102, Issue. S1, p. i.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: July 2010

1 - The fate of science in patristic and medieval Christendom

from Part I - Historical interactions
Summary

“The pagan party . . . asserted that knowledge is to be obtained only by the laborious exercise of human observation and human reason. The Christian party asserted that all knowledge is to be found in the Scriptures and in the traditions of the Church; that, in the written revelation, God had not only given a criterion of truth, but had furnished us with all that he intended us to know. The Scriptures, therefore, contain the sum, the end of all knowledge. The clergy, with the emperor at their back, would endure no intellectual competition. / [O]ne finds a combination of factors behind 'the closing of the Western mind': the attack on Greek philosophy by [the apostle] Paul, the adoption of Platonism by Christian theologians and the enforcement of orthodoxy by emperors desperate to keep good order. The imposition of orthodoxy went hand in hand with a stifling of any form of independent reasoning. By the fifth century, not only has rational thought been suppressed, but there has been a substitution for it of 'mystery, magic, and authority.'” / A widespread myth that refuses to die, illustrated by these two quotations, maintains that consistent opposition of the Christian church to rational thought in general and the natural sciences in particular, throughout the patristic and medieval periods, retarded the development of a viable scientific tradition, thereby delaying the Scientific Revolution and the origins of modern science by more than a millennium. Historical scholarship of the past half-century demonstrates that the truth is otherwise.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge Companion to Science and Religion
  • Online ISBN: 9780511781537
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521885386
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×