Kerry, Stephen Craig 2017. Australian Queer Science Fiction Fans. Journal of Homosexuality, p. 1.
Bardzell, Jeffrey and Bardzell, Shaowen 2015. Humanistic HCI. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, Vol. 8, Issue. 4, p. 1.
Bardzell, Jeffrey and Bardzell, Shaowen 2014. “A great and troubling beauty”: cognitive speculation and ubiquitous computing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 18, Issue. 4, p. 779.
Byrne, Deirdre and Levey, David 2013. Memory as a Distorting and Refracting Mirror in Short Science Fiction by Vandana Singh and Kathleen Anne Goonan. English Studies in Africa, Vol. 56, Issue. 2, p. 60.
KERRY, STEPHEN 2009. “There's Genderqueers on the Starboard Bow”: The Pregnant Male inStar Trek. The Journal of Popular Culture, Vol. 42, Issue. 4, p. 699.
Williams, Genevieve 2008. Antelopes of Desire: Knowledge, Documentation, and Love in the Novels of Geoff Ryman. Extrapolation, Vol. 49, Issue. 2, p. 261.
Axiom 1: People are different from each other.
It is astonishing how few respectable conceptual tools we have for dealing with this self-evident fact. A tiny number of inconceivably coarse axes of categorization have been painstakingly inscribed in current critical and political thought: gender, race, class, nationality, sexual orientation are pretty much the available distinctions.
‘We have to hide,’ the other said gently. ‘You still kill anything that’s . . . different’.
Science fiction and the idea of sexuality
Knowing sf’s potential for using the future to explore contemporary reality and its alternatives, one might think the genre ideal for the examination of alternative sexualities. Critics of sf have generally agreed that science fiction is a ‘literature of ideas’. Indeed, for many people, it is the ideational content of sf that is its primary characteristic. Sexuality is also an idea. In this sense, one might well expect to find an intrinsic compatibility between sf as a genre and the exploration of human sexuality. For many people, however, sexuality – and particularly heterosexuality – can be envisioned only within the category of the ‘natural’. To these people, sexuality is quite specifically not an idea; it is the very reverse of the ideational – instinctive, sensate, animalistic. It is at once both ‘common sense’, as in the apparent logic of procreative sex, and unthinkable, since even apparently procreative sex calls into play emotions, positions, actions and desires whose potential for perversity, even if it is merely the perversity of pleasure, are too frightening to contemplate. And yet, even for these people, sex is an idea because it is, after all, an ideology and one which contemporary Western societies have tried very hard indeed both to propagate and to control.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.