Aalders, G. J. D. (1953) “Date and intention of Xenophon’s Hiero,” Mnemosyne 6: 208–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbott, H. P. (2008) The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative, 2nd edn. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, C. D. (1912) “Are the political ‘speeches’ of Demosthenes to be regarded as political pamphlets?” AJP 43: 5–22.Google Scholar

Addison, J. (1794) Interesting Anecdotes, Memoirs, Allegories, Essays, and Poetical Fragments, Tending to Amuse the Fancy, and Inculcate Morality. Vol IV. London.Google Scholar

Ahn, D. (2008) “The politics of royal education: Xenophon’s Education of Cyrus in early eighteenth-century Europe,” The Leadership Quarterly 19: 439–52.Google Scholar

Akrigg, B. (2007) “The nature and implications of Athens’ changed social structure and economy,” in Debating the Athenian Cultural Revolution: Art, Literature, Philosophy, and Politics, 430–380 BC, ed. Osborne, R.. Cambridge: 27–43.Google Scholar

Albury, W. R. (2011) “Castiglione’s Francescopaedia: Pope Julius II and Francesco Maria della Rovere in The Book of the Courtier,” Sixteenth Century Journal 42.2: 323–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allan, R. J. and Buijs, M. (eds.) (2007) The Language of Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar

Allen, R. E. (1959) “Anamnesis in Plato’s Meno and Phaedo,” The Review of Metaphysics 13: 165–74.Google Scholar

Aloni, A. (2001) “The proem of Simonides’ Plataea Elegy and the circumstances of its performance,” in The New Simonides: Contexts of Praise and Desire, eds. Boedeker, D. and Sider, D.. Oxford: 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alonso-Núñez, J. M. (2002) The Idea of Universal History in Greece: From Herodotus to the Age of Augustus. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Althoff, J. (2005) “Form und Funktion der beiden hippologischen Schriften Xenophons Hipparchicus und De re equestri (mit einem Blick auf Simon von Athen),” in Antike Fachtexte: Ancient Technical Texts, ed. Fögen, T.. Berlin and New York: 235–52.Google Scholar

Alvey, J. E. (2011) “The ethical foundation of economics in ancient Greece, focussing on Socrates and Xenophon,” International Journal of Social Economics 38: 714–33.Google Scholar

Ambler, W. H. (1996) “On the Oeconomicus,” in Xenophon: The Shorter Socratic Writings, ed. Bartlett, R. C.. Ithaca, NY: 102–31.Google Scholar

Ameling, W. (1984) “L. Flavius Arrianus neos Xenophon,” Epigraphica Anatolica 3: 119–22.Google Scholar

Amory, T. (1733) A Dialogue on Devotion, after the Manner of Xenophon; in which the Reasonableness, Pleasure and Advantages of it are Considered. London.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. K. (1974a) Xenophon. New York.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. K. (1974b) “The battle of Sardis in 395 BC,” CSCA 7: 27–53.Google Scholar

Andreades, A. M. (1933) A History of Greek Public Finance. Vol. I. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Andrewes, A. (1970) “Lysias and the Theramenes papyrus,” ZPE 6: 35–8.Google Scholar

Ankersmit, F. (2010) “Truth in history and literature,” Narrative 18: 29–50.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1981) An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Anon, . (1703) An Universal, Historical, Geographical, Chronological and Poetical Dictionary. London.Google Scholar

Anon, . (1815) The Paragon of Alphabets. London.Google Scholar

Anon, . (1832) “Exhibition at the Egyptian Hall,” The Original: A New Miscellany, no. 1, Saturday March 3, 126.Google Scholar

Anon, . (1851) The Rhyming Alphabet; or, Sarah Bell and Fanny Blake. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Anon, . (1872) A Journey to the Centre of the Earth, from the French of Jules Verne. London.Google Scholar

Anon, . (1974) Review of J. K. Anderson, Xenophon, Times Literary Supplement 3782 (August 30): 927.Google Scholar

Apfel, H. V. (1935) Literary Quotation and Allusion in Demetrius’ περὶ ἑρμηνείας and Longinus’ περὶ ὕψους. Diss. Columbia.Google Scholar

Ash, R., Mossman, J., and Titchener, F. B. (eds.) (2015) Fame and Infamy: Essays for Christopher Pelling on Characterization in Greek and Roman Biography and Historiography. Oxford.Google Scholar

Asper, M. (2007) Griechische Wissenschaftstexte: Formen, Funktionen, Differenzierungsgeschichte. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Atak, C. (forthcoming) “Plato’s Statesman and Xenophon’s Cyrus,” in Danzig, and Alon, (eds.) (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Azoulay, V. (2004a) Xénophon et les grâces du pouvoir: de la charis au charisme. Paris.Google Scholar

Azoulay, V. (2004b) “The Medo-Persian ceremonial: Xenophon, Cyrus and the King’s body,” in Tuplin, (ed.) (2004a): 147–73.Google Scholar

Azoulay, V. (2004c) “Xénophon, la Cyropédie et les eunuques,” Revue française d’histoire des idées politiques 11: 3–26.Google Scholar

Azoulay, V. (2006a) “L’Archidamos d’Isocrate: une politique de l’espace et du temps,” REG 119: 504–31.Google Scholar

Azoulay, V. (2006b) “Isocrate, Xénophon ou le politique transfiguré,” REA 108: 133–53.Google Scholar

Azoulay, V. (2007a) “Sparte et la Cyropédie: du bon usage de l’analogie,” Ktèma 32: 435–56.Google Scholar

Azoulay, V. (2007b) “Panthée, Mania et quelques autres: les jeux du genre dans l’oeuvre de Xénophon,” in Problèmes du genre en Grèce ancienne, eds. Sébillote-Cuchet, V. and Ernoult, N.. Paris, 277–87.Google Scholar

“B.”, S. (1893) “Hero Alphabet,” St. Nicholas: An Illustrated Magazine for Young Folks 20: 558.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1993) “Thucydides and the outbreak of the Peloponnesian War,” in From Plataea to Potidaea: Studies in the History and Historiography of the Pentekontaetia. Baltimore: 125–62.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1995) “The ghost of empire: reflections on Athenian foreign policy in the fourth century BC,” in Die athenische Demokratie im 4. Jahrhundert v. Chr.: Vollendung oder Verfall einer Verfassungsform?, ed. Eder, W.. Stuttgart: 79–106.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (2004) “Xenophon the Athenian,” in Tuplin, (ed.) (2004a): 33–53.Google Scholar

Bakker, E. J. (1997a) Grammar as Interpretation. Leiden.Google Scholar

Bakker, E. J. (1997b) “Verbal aspect and mimetic description in Thucydides,” in Bakker (1997a): 7–54.Google Scholar

Bakker, E. J. (ed.) (2010) A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language. Malden, MA, Oxford, and Chichester.Google Scholar

Balot, R. K. (2006) Greek Political Thought. Malden, MA and Oxford.Google Scholar

Balot, R. K. (ed.) (2009) A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Malden, MA, Oxford, and Chichester.Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E. (2012a) “A noble alliance: Herodotus, Thucydides, and Xenophon’s Procles,” in Thucydides and Herodotus, eds. Foster, E. and Lateiner, D.. Oxford: 316–44.Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E. (2012b) “The wonder of freedom: Xenophon on slavery,” in Hobden, and Tuplin, (eds.) (2012a): 631–63.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (ed.) (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 vols. Princeton.Google Scholar

Barnes, W. (1868) Poems of Rural Life. London.Google Scholar

Bartlett, R. C. (1996) “Editor’s Introduction,” in Xenophon: The Shorter Socratic Writings: Apology of Socrates to the Jury, Oeconomicus, and Symposium. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Baz, F. (2007) “Ein neues Ehrenmonument für Flavius Arrianus,” ZPE 163: 123–7.Google Scholar

Bearzot, C. (2001) “Il ‘papiro di Teramene’ e le Elleniche di Ossirinco,” Sileno 27: 9–32.Google Scholar

Beck, H. (2001) “‘The Laws of the Fathers’ versus ‘The Laws of the League’: Xenophon on federalism,” CP 96: 355–75.Google Scholar

Benner, E. (2013) Machiavelli’s Prince: A New Reading. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ben-Tov, A. (2009) Lutheran Humanists and Greek Antiquity: Melanchthonian Scholarship between Universal History and Pedagogy. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin, I. (1972) “The originality of Machiavelli,” in Studies in Machiavelli, ed. Gilmore, M. P.. Florence: 147–206.Google Scholar

Bers, V. (2010) “Kunstprosa: philosophy, history, oratory,” in Bakker, (ed.) (2010): 455–67.Google Scholar

Beversluis, J. (1993) “Vlastos’s quest for the historical Socrates,” Ancient Philosophy 13: 293–312.Google Scholar

Bigalke, J. (1933) Der Einfluß der Rhetorik auf Xenophons Stil. Diss. Greifswald.Google Scholar

Billows, R. (2009) “The authorship of the ‘Hellenika Oxyrhynchia’,” Mouseion 9: 219–38.Google Scholar

Black, R. (2001) Humanism and Education in Medieval and Renaissance Italy: Tradition and Innovation in Latin Schools from the Twelfth to the Fifteenth Century. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Blanchard, K. C., Jr. (1994) “The middle road of classical political philosophy: Socrates’ dialogues with Aristippus in Xenophon’s Memorabilia,” Review of Politics 56: 671–96.Google Scholar

Bleckmann, B. (2006) Fiktion als Geschichte: neue Studien zum Autor der Hellenika Oxyrhynchia und zur Historiographie des vierten vorchristlichen Jahrhunderts. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Bloch, H. (1940) “Studies in historical literature of the 4th Century BC,” in Athenian Studies Presented to W. S. Ferguson. HSCPh Supplement 1. Cambridge, MA: 303–76.Google Scholar

Bobonich, C. (2011) “Socrates and eudaimonia,” in The Cambridge Companion to Socrates, ed. Morrison, D. R.. Cambridge: 293–332.Google Scholar

Bodei Giglioni, G. (1970) Xenophontis De Vectigalibus. Florence.Google Scholar

Boeckh, A. (1886) Die Staatshaushaltung der Athener. 3rd edn. 2 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (2001) “Paths to heroization at Plataea,” in The New Simonides: Contexts of Praise and Desire, eds. Boedeker, D. and Sider, D.. Oxford: 148–63.Google Scholar

Bona, G. (1974) “ΛΟΓΟΣ e ΑΛΗΘΕΙΑ nell’ Encomio di Elena di Gorgia,” RFIC 102: 5–33.Google Scholar

Bond, D. F. (1987) The Tatler. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bonsal, S. (1946) Suitors and Suppliants: The Little Nations at Versailles. New York.Google Scholar

Boswell, J. (2008 [1791]) The Life of Samuel Johnson. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar

Bosworth, A. B. (1972) “Arrian’s literary development,” CQ 22: 163–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bosworth, A. B. (1976) “Arrian in Baetica,” GRBS 17: 55–64.Google Scholar

Bosworth, A. B. (1980) A Historical Commentary on Arrian’s History of Alexander. Vol. I. Oxford.Google Scholar

Botley, P. (2004) Latin Translation in the Renaissance. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Botley, P. (2010) Learning Greek in Western Europe, 1396–1529. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Bourriot, F. (1996) “Kaloi kagathoi, kalokagathia à Sparte aux époques archaiques et classiques,” Historia 45: 129–40.Google Scholar

Bowden, H. (2004) “Xenophon and the scientific study of religion,” in Tuplin, (ed.) (2004a): 229–46.Google Scholar

Bowen, A. J. (ed.) (1998) Xenophon: Symposium. Warminster.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W. (1967) “A new inscription of Arrian,” GRBS 8: 279–80.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W. (1994) Fiction as History. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (1995) “Names and a gem: aspects of allusion in the Aethiopica of Heliodorus,” in Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for Donald Russell on his Seventy-fifth Birthday, eds. Innes, D. C., Hine, H. M., and Pelling, C. B. R.. Oxford: 269–80.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (2002) “The chronology of the earlier Greek novels since B. E. Perry: revisions and precisions,” Ancient Narrative 2: 47–63.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (2006) “Viewing and listening on the novelist’s page,” in Authors, Authority and Interpreters in the Ancient Novel: Papers in Honour of Gareth Schmeling. Ancient Narrative, Supplementum 5, eds. Byrne, S. N., Cueva, E. P., and Alvares, J.. Groningen: 69–82.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (2007) “Links between Antonius Diogenes and Petronius,” in The Greek and the Roman Novel: Parallel Readings. Ancient Narrative, Supplementum 8, eds. Paschalis, M., Frangoulidis, S., Harrison, S. J., and Zimmerman, M.. Groningen: 121–32.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (2014a) “Becoming Wolf, staying sheep,” in Roman Rule in Greek and Latin Writing, eds. Rees, R. and Madsen, J. M.. Leiden: 39–78.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (2014b) “Greek culture in Arrian’s Bithynia,” in Le monde d’Arrien de Nicomédie, eds. Lalanne, S. and Hostein, A., Ktèma 39: 37–49.Google Scholar

Bradeen, D. W. (1974) The Athenian Agora XVII. Inscriptions: The Funerary Monuments. Princeton.Google Scholar

Bradley, P. (2001) “Irony and the narrator in Xenophon’s Anabasis,” in Essays in Honor of Gordon Williams, eds. Tylawsky, E. I. and Weiss, C. G.. New Haven: 59–84, reprinted in Gray, (ed.) (2010a): 520–52.Google Scholar

Bradley, P. (2011) “Xenophon’s Anabasis: reading the end with Zeus the Merciful,” Arethusa 44.3: 279–310.Google Scholar

Braun, T. (2004) “Xenophon’s dangerous liaisons,” in Fox, Lane (ed.) (2004): 97–130.Google Scholar

Breebaart, A. B. (1983) “From victory to peace: some aspects of Cyrus’ state in Xenophon’s Cyropaedia,” Mnemosyne 36: 117–34.Google Scholar

Breitenbach, H. R. (1950) Historiographische Anschauungsformen Xenophons. Freiburg.Google Scholar

Breitenbach, H. R. (1967) “Xenophon von Athen,” RE 2nd series, vol. IX: 1567–2052.Google Scholar

Briant, P. (1990) “Hérodote et la société perse,” in Hérodote et les peuples non-grecs, ed. Narcy, M.. Geneva: 69–104.Google Scholar

Briant, P. (ed.) (1995) Dans le pas des Dix-Mille: peuples et pays du Proche-Orient vus par un grec. Toulouse.Google Scholar

Briant, P. (1996) Histoire de l’empire perse. Paris.Google Scholar

Briant, P. (2002) From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire. 2nd edn. Tr. P. T. Daniels. Winona Lake, IN.Google Scholar

Brickhouse, T. C. and Smith, N. D. (1989) Socrates on Trial. Princeton.Google Scholar

Brickhouse, T. C. and Smith, N. D. (2000) The Philosophy of Socrates. Boulder, CO.Google Scholar

Brock, R. (2004) “Xenophon’s political imagery,” in Tuplin, (ed.) (2004a): 247–57.Google Scholar

Brock, R. (2013) Greek Political Imagery from Homer to Aristotle. London.Google Scholar

Browning, E. A. (2011) Review of Gray (2011), BMCR 2011.09.35.Google Scholar

Bruce, I. A. F. (1967) An Historical Commentary on the Hellenica Oxyrhynchia. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bruell, C. (1987) “Xenophon,” in History of Political Philosophy, eds. Strauss, L. and Cropsey, J.. 3rd edn, orig. pub. 1963. Chicago: 90–117.Google Scholar

Brulé, P. (2003) Women of Ancient Greece. Tr. A. Nevill. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Bruns, I. (1896) Das literarische Porträt der Griechen. Berlin.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1977) “From Epictetus to Arrian,” Athenaeum 55: 19–48.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1980) “On historical fragments and epitomes,” CQ 30: 477–94.Google Scholar

Buckler, J. (1980) The Theban Hegemony, 371–362 BC. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Buckler, J. (2003) Aegean Greece in the Fourth Century BC. Leiden.Google Scholar

Buckler, J. (2004) “The incident at Mount Parnassus, 395 BC,” in Tuplin, (ed.) (1990): 397–411.Google Scholar

Buckler, J. and Beck, H. (2008) Central Greece and the Politics of Power in the Fourth Century BC. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bugh, G. R. (1988) The Horsemen of Athens. Princeton.Google Scholar

Buijs, M. (2005) Clause Combining in Ancient Greek Narrative Discourse: The Distribution of Subclauses and Participial Clauses in Xenophon’s Hellenica and Anabasis. Leiden.Google Scholar

Buijs, M. (2007) “Aspectual differences and narrative technique: Xenophon’s Hellenica and Anabasis,” in Allan, and Buijs, (eds.) (2007): 122–53.Google Scholar

Bundy, E. L. (1986) Studia Pindarica. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Burke, E. M. (1984) “Eubulus, Olynthus and Euboea,” TAPA 114: 111–20.Google Scholar

Burke, S. (1998) The Death and Return of the Author: Criticism and Subjectivity in Barthes, Foucault, and Derrida. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Burnet, J. (1911) Plato’s Phaedo. Oxford.Google Scholar

Burnet, J. (1914) Greek Philosophy: Thales to Plato. London.Google Scholar

Burrell, S. (1794) The Thymbriad (from Xenophon’s Cyropoedia [sic]). London.Google Scholar

Buxton, R. F. (2016) “Novel Leaders for Novel Armies: Xenophon’s Focus on Willing Obedience in Context,” Histos Supplement 5: 163–97.Google Scholar

Cabrini, A. M. (2007) “Alberti e Senofonte,” in Alberti e la tradizione: per lo smontaggio dei mosaici albertiani, eds. Regoliosi, M. and Cardini, R.. Florence: 19–44.Google Scholar

Cairns, D. (1993) Aidos: The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar

Callender, J. T. (1795) The Political Progress of Britain; or, An Impartial History of Abuses in the Government of the British Empire, in Europe, Asia, and America. Philadelphia and London.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. (1756) The Rational Amusement, Comprehending a Collection of Letters on a Great Variety of Subjects. Cork.Google Scholar

Canfora, D. (1996) “La topica del ‘principe’ e l’uso umanistico delle fonti in Poggio Bracciolini,” Humanistica Lovaniensia 45: 1–92.Google Scholar

Canfora, L. (1970) Tucidide continuato. Padova.Google Scholar

Canfora, L. (1990) “Eduard Meyer tra Cratippo e Teopompo,” in Eduard Meyer: Leben und Leistung eines Universalhistorikers, eds. Calder, W. M. and Demandt, A.. Leiden: 74–96.Google Scholar

Canfora, L. (2013) “PSI 1304,” in Teopompo: Elleniche, Libro II, eds. Canfora, L. and Otranto, R.. Bari: 75–100.Google Scholar

Carlier, P. (1978/2010) “The idea of imperial monarchy in Xenophon’s Cyropaedia,” in Gray, (ed.) (2010a): 327–66 (= “L’idée de monarchie imperiale dans la Cyropédie de Xénophon,” Ktèma 3 (1978): 133–63).Google Scholar

Carlsen, J. (2002) “Estate managers in ancient Greek agriculture,” in Ancient History Matters: Studies Presented to Jens Erik Skydsgaard on his Seventieth Birthday, ed. K. Ascani. Rome: 117–26.Google Scholar

Carlucci, G. (2013) “Vita di Teopompo di Chio: una ipotesi di ricostruzione,” in Teopompo: Elleniche, Libro II, eds. Canfora, L. and Otranto, R.. Bari: 7–24.Google Scholar

Cartledge, P. (1987) Agesilaos and the Crisis of Sparta. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Cartledge, P. (1999) “The Socratics’ Sparta and Rousseau’s,” in Sparta: New Perspectives, eds. Hodkinson, S. and Powell, A.. Swansea: 311–37.Google Scholar

Cartledge, P. (2002) Sparta and Lakonia: A Regional History 1300–362 B.C. 2nd edn. London.Google Scholar

Cartledge, P. (2004) “What have the Spartans done for us? Sparta’s contribution to the western civilization,” G&R 51/2: 164–79.Google Scholar

Cartledge, P. (2009) “Spartan government and society” in Strassler, (ed.) (2009): 347–58.Google Scholar

Cartledge, P. and Spawforth, A. (2002) Hellenistic and Roman Sparta: A Tale of Two Cities. 2nd edn. London.Google Scholar

Cast, D. (1974) “Aurispa, Petrarch and Lucian: an aspect of Renaissance translation,” Renaissance Quarterly 27: 157–73.Google Scholar

Cavenaile, R. (1975) “Aperçu sur la langue et le style de Xénophon,” Les études classiques 43: 238–52.Google Scholar

Cawkwell, G. (1963) “Eubulus,” JHS 83: 47–67.Google Scholar

Cawkwell, G. (1972) “Introduction,” in Xenophon: The Persian Expedition, tr. Rex Warner. Harmondsworth: 9–48.Google Scholar

Cawkwell, G. (ed.) (1979) Xenophon: A History of My Times. London.Google Scholar

Cawkwell, G. (1997) “The Peace between Athens and Persia,” Phoenix 51: 115–30.Google Scholar

Cawkwell, G. (2004) “When, how, and why did Xenophon write the Anabasis?” in The Long March: Xenophon and the Ten Thousand, ed. Fox, R. Lane. New Haven: 47–67.Google Scholar

Chambers, M. (ed.) (1993) Hellenica Oxyrhynchia: Post Victorium Bartoletti. Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar

Chantraine, P. (1949) Xénophon: Économique. Paris.Google Scholar

Chernyakhovskaya, O. (2014) Sokrates bei Xenophon: Moral – Politik – Religion. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Cheshire, N. M. and Heath, M. J. (trs.) (1986) “The Education of a Christian Prince,” in Collected Works of Erasmus. Vol. XXVII, ed. Levi, A. H. T.. Toronto: 199–288.Google Scholar

Christ, M. R. (2012) The Limits of Altruism in Democratic Athens. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Christ, M. R. (2013) “Demosthenes on philanthropia as a democratic virtue,” CP 108: 202–22.Google Scholar

Christesen, P. (2006) “Xenophon’s Cyropaedia and military reform in Sparta,” JHS 126: 47–65.Google Scholar

Christesen, P. (2012) “Athletics and social order in Sparta in the Classical period,” CA 31: 193–255.Google Scholar

Christesen, P. (2013) “Sport and society in Sparta,” in A Companion to Sport and Spectacle in Greek and Roman Antiquity, eds. Christesen, P. and Kyle, D.. Malden, MA, Oxford, and Chichester: 146–58.Google Scholar

Christophides, L. N. (1992) “On share contracts and other economic contributions of Xenophon,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 39: 111–22.Google Scholar

Chroust, A.-H. (1945) “Socrates: a source problem,” The New Scholasticism 19: 48–72.Google Scholar

Clarke, M. L. (1959) Classical Education in Britain 1500–1900. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Classen, C. J. (1984/1986) “Xenophons Darstellung der Sophistik und der Sophisten,” Hermes 112: 154–67, reprinted in Ansätze: Beiträge zum Verständnis der frühgriechischen Philosophie (1986). Amsterdam: 175–90.Google Scholar

Clay, D. (1994) “The origins of the Socratic dialogue,” in Waerdt, Vander (ed.) (1994a): 23–47.Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (2011) “Sailing to Nuceria: evidence for the date of Xenophon of Ephesus,” Acta Classica 54: 27–41.Google Scholar

Connor, W. R. (1984) Thucydides. Princeton.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. (1999) “Notes on Xenophon’s Socrates,” in Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory. Princeton: 3–28.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. F. (1840) The Pathfinder; or, The Inland Sea. Paris.Google Scholar

Cramsie, J. (2006) “The philosophy of imperial kingship and the interpretation of James VI and I,” in James VI and I: Ideas, Authority, and Government, ed. Houlbrooke, R.. Aldershot: 43–60.Google Scholar

Croft, H. H. S. (ed.) (1883) The Boke Named the Gouernour, devised by Sir Thomas Elyot, Knight. London.Google Scholar

Csapo, E. and Slater, W. J. (1994) The Context of Ancient Drama. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Curtis, J. (2013) The Cyrus Cylinder and Ancient Persia: A New Beginning for the Middle East. London.Google Scholar

Dakyns, H. G. (1914) (tr.) The Education of Cyrus. London and New York.Google Scholar

Dalby, A. (1992) “Greeks abroad: social organisation and food among the Ten Thousand,” JHS 112: 16–30.Google Scholar

Danzig, G. (2002) “La prétendue rivalité entre Platon et Xénophon,” Revue française d’histoire des idées politiques 2.16: 351–68.Google Scholar

Danzig, G. (2003) “Why Socrates was not a farmer: Xenophon’s Oeconomicus as a philosophical dialogue,” G&R 50: 57–76.Google Scholar

Danzig, G. (2004) “Apologetic elements in Xenophon’s Symposium,” Classica et Mediaevalia 55: 17–48.Google Scholar

Danzig, G. (2005) “Intra-Socratic polemics: the Symposia of Plato and Xenophon,” GRBS 45: 331–57.Google Scholar

Danzig, G. (2009) “Big boys and little boys: justice and law in Xenophon’s Cyropaedia and Memorabilia,” Polis 26.2: 271–95.Google Scholar

Danzig, G. (2010) Apologizing for Socrates: How Plato and Xenophon Created Our Socrates. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar

Danzig, G. (2012) “The best of the Achaemenids: benevolence, self-interest, and the ‘ironic’ reading of the Cyropaedia,” in Hobden, and Tuplin, (eds.) (2012a): 499–539.Google Scholar

Danzig, G. (2013) “Plato’s Charmides as a political act: apologetics and the promotion of ideology,” GRBS 53: 486–519.Google Scholar

Danzig, G. (2014a) “Xenophon on virtue, happiness and the human telos,” paper presented at the conference “Plato and Xenophon: Comparative Studies,” Bar-Ilan University, Israel.Google Scholar

Danzig, G. (2014b) “The use and abuse of Critias: conflicting portraits in Plato and Xenophon,” CQ 64: 507–24.Google Scholar

Danzig, G. (2014c) “Alcibiades versus Pericles: apologetic strategies in Xenophon’s Memorabilia,” GR 61: 7–28.Google Scholar

Danzig, G. (forthcoming) “Nature, culture and oligarchic rule in Xenophon’s Socratic theory of friendship: Memorabilia Book Two,” in Socrates and the Socratic Dialogue, eds. Stavru, A. and de Luise, F..Google Scholar

Danzig, G. and Alon, N. (eds.) (forthcoming) Plato and Xenophon: Comparative Studies (proceedings of a conference held at Tzuba in June 2014).Google Scholar

Daryaee, T. (2006) “The construction of the past in late antique Persia,” Historia 55.4: 493–503.Google Scholar

Davenant, C. (1698) Discourses on the Publick Revenues, and on the Trade of England. In Two Parts … To which is Added, a Discourse upon Improving the Revenue of the State of Athens by Xenophon, now Made English. London.Google Scholar

Daverio Rocchi, G. (2007) “La présentation de Sparte par Xénophon dans les Hélleniques, la République des Lacédémoniens et l’Agésilas,” Ktèma 32: 391–404.Google Scholar

David, E. (1979) “The pamphlet of Pausanias,” PP 34: 94–116.Google Scholar

Davidson, J. (1990) “Isocrates against imperialism: an analysis of the De Pace,” Historia 39: 20–36.Google Scholar

Davies, J. K. (1971) Athenian Propertied Families, 600–300 B.C. Oxford.Google Scholar

Davies, J. K. (2007) “Classical Greece: production,” in The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World, eds. Scheidel, W., Morris, I., and Saller, R. P.. Cambridge: 333–61.Google Scholar

Davies, P. (2013) “‘Kalos kagathos’ and scholarly perceptions of Spartan society,” Historia 62: 259–79.Google Scholar

de Jong, I., Nünlist, R., and Bowie, A. (eds.) (2004) Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature. Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative 1. Leiden.Google Scholar

De Keyser, J. (2012) Francesco Filelfo: Traduzioni da Senofonte e Plutarco. Alexandria.Google Scholar

De Luise, F. and Stavru, A. (eds.) (2013) Socratica III: Studies on Socrates, the Socratics, and the Ancient Socratic Literature. Sankt Augustin.Google Scholar

De Nichilo, M. (2013) “Fortuna e tradizione della versione bruniana dello Ierone di Senofonte,” Cahiers de recherches médiévales et humanistes 25: 327–40.Google Scholar

De Romilly, J. (1954) “Les modérés athéniens vers le milieu du IVe siècle: échos et concordances,” REG 67: 327–54.Google Scholar

De Romilly, J. (1992) The Great Sophists in Periclean Athens. Tr. J. Lloyd, orig. pub. 1988. Oxford.Google Scholar

De Temmerman, K. (2014) Crafting Characters: Heroes and Heroines in the Ancient Greek Novel. Oxford.Google Scholar

Delatte, A. (1933) Le troisième livre des Souvenirs Socratiques de Xénophon. Liége and Paris.Google Scholar

Delbrück, J. F. F. (1829) Xenophon: zur Rettung seiner durch B. G. Niebuhr gefährdeten Ehre. Bonn.Google Scholar

Delebecque, E. (1957) Essai sur la vie de Xénophon. Paris.Google Scholar

Deman, T. (1942) Le témoignage d’Aristote sur Socrate. Paris.Google Scholar

Demont, P. (2003) “L’Enquête de Xénophon sur le pouvoir de Cyrus (Cyropédie VII, 5, 57–VIII),” in Grecs et Romains aux prises avec l’histoire: représentations, récits et idéologie, eds. Lachenaud, G. and Longrée, D.. Rennes: 189–202.Google Scholar

Demont, P. (2006) “Xénophon et les homotimes,” Ktèma 31: 277–90.Google Scholar

Dik, H. H. (1995) Word Order in Ancient Greek: A Pragmatic Account of Word Order Variation in Herodotus. Leiden.Google Scholar

Dillery, J. (1993) “Xenophon’s Poroi and Athenian imperialism,” Historia 42: 1–11.Google Scholar

Dillery, J. (1995) Xenophon and the History of His Times. London and New York.Google Scholar

Dillery, J. (1996) “Reconfiguring the past: Thyrea, Thermopylae and narrative patterns in Herodotus,” AJP 117: 217–54.Google Scholar

Dillery, J. (2001) “Introduction,” in Xenophon: Anabasis. Reprinted with corrections. Cambridge, MA: 1–37.Google Scholar

Dillery, J. (2004) “Xenophon, the military review and Hellenistic pompai,” in Tuplin, (ed.) (2004a): 259–76.Google Scholar

Dillery, J. (2009) “Building a house: I Cor. 3.6ff., Xenophon’s Memorabilia, and the persistence of an image,” in Ἀντιφίλησις: Studies on Classical, Byzantine and Modern Greek Literature and Culture. In Honour of John-Theophanes A. Papademetriou, eds. Karamalengou, E. and Makrygianni, E.. Stuttgart: 414–16.Google Scholar

Dillery, J. (2015) Clio’s Other Sons: Berossus and Manetho. With an Afterword on Demetrius. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Dobski, B. (2009) “Athenian democracy refounded: Xenophon’s political history in the Hellenika,” Polis 26: 316–38.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (1960) Euripides Bacchae. 2nd edn. Oxford.Google Scholar

Donlan, W. (1973) “The origin of καλὸς κἀγαθός,” AJP 94: 365–74.Google Scholar

Dorati, M. (2007) “Alcune ambiguità del narratore dell’Anabasi,” QUCC 85:105–13.Google Scholar

Döring, K. (2011) “The students of Socrates,” in The Cambridge Companion to Socrates, ed. Morrison, D. R.. Cambridge: 24–47.Google Scholar

Dorion, L.-A. (2000) “Introduction,” in Xénophon: Mémorables, eds. Dorion, L.-A. and Bandini, M.. Vol. I. Paris: vii–cclii.Google Scholar

Dorion, L. (2006) “Xenophon’s Socrates,” in A Companion to Socrates, eds. Ahbel-Rappe, S. and Kamtekar, R.. Malden, MA and Oxford: 93–109.Google Scholar

Dorion, L. (2008) “Socrate oikonomikos,” in Xénophon et Socrate: actes du colloque d’Aix-en-Provence (6–9 novembre 2003), eds. Narcy, M. and Tordesillas, A.. Paris: 253–81.Google Scholar

Dorion, L. (2009) “Xenophon’s Socrates,” in A Companion to Socrates, eds. S. Ahbel-Rappe and R. Kamtekar. Oxford: 93–109.Google Scholar

Dorion, L. (2010) “The Straussian exegesis of Xenophon: the paradigmatic case of Memorabilia IV 4,” in Gray, (ed.) (2010a): 283–323 (= “L’exégèse strausienne de Xénophon: le cas paradigmatique de Mémorables IV 4,” PA 1 (2001): 87–118).Google Scholar

Dorion, L. (2011) “The rise and fall of the Socratic Problem,” in The Cambridge Companion to Socrates, ed. Morrison, D. R.. Cambridge: 1–23.Google Scholar

Dorion, L. (2013a) L’autre Socrate: études sur les écrits socratiques de Xénophon. Paris.Google Scholar

Dorion, L. (2013b) “La responsabilité de Cyrus dans le déclin de l’empire perse selon Platon et Xénophon,” in Dorion (2013a): 393–412.Google Scholar

Dorion, L. (2014) “Le statut et la fonction de la rhétorique dans les écrits socratiques de Xénophon,” in Pontier, (ed.) (2014): 17–40.Google Scholar

Dorion, L. (2016) “L’influence des chapitres théologiques des Mémorables (I 4 et IV 3) sur le livre II du De natura deorum de Cicéron,” Philosophie Antique 16: 181–208.Google Scholar

Dorion, L. (forthcoming) “Plato and Xenophon on the different reasons why Socrates always obeys the Law,” in Danzig, and Alon, (eds.) (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Dorion, L.-A. and Bandini, M. (eds.) (2000) Xénophon: Mémorables. Tome I: Introduction génerale, Livre I. Paris.Google Scholar

Dorion, L.-A. and Bandini, M. (2011a). Xénophon: Mémorables. Tome II: Livres II–III. Paris.Google Scholar

Dorion, L.-A. and Bandini, M. (2011b). Xénophon: Mémorables. Tome III: Livre IV. Paris.Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1968) Lysias and the Corpus Lysiacum. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1981) “Appendix 2: strata of composition,” in A Historical Commentary on Thucydides, eds. A. W. Gomme, A. Andrewes, and K. J. Dover. Vol. V. Oxford: 384–444.Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1997) The Evolution of Greek Prose Style. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dow, S. (1965) “The greater demarkhia of Erchia,” BCH 89.1: 180–213.Google Scholar

Drucker, P. F. (1954) The Practice of Management. New York.Google Scholar

Due, B. (1983) “The trial of the generals in Xenophon’s Anabasis,” C&M 34: 33–44.Google Scholar

Due, B. (1989) The Cyropaedia: Xenophon’s Aims and Methods. Aarhus.Google Scholar

Ellis, A. (2014) “A Socratic history: theology and didacticism in Xenophon’s rewriting of the Herodotean Croesus Logos,” paper presented at the conference “Plato and Xenophon: Comparative Studies,” Bar-Ilan University, Israel.Google Scholar

Elyot, T. (1531) The Boke Named the Gouernour. London.Google Scholar

Engels, J. (1993a) “Der Michigan-Papyrus über Theramenes und die Ausbildung des ‘Theramenes-Mythos’,” ZPE 99: 125–55.Google Scholar

Engels, J. (1993b) “Die Ὑπομνήματα-Schriften und die Anfänge der politischen Biographie und Autobiographie in der griechischen Literatur,” ZPE 96: 16–36.Google Scholar

Erbse, H. (1961) “Die Architektonik im Aufbau von Xenophons Memorabilien,” Hermes 89: 257–87.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (2002) “Stoic oikeiosis and Xenophon’s Socrates,” in The Philosophy of Zeno, eds. Scaltsas, T. and Mason, A. S.. Larnaka, 241–57.Google Scholar

Euben, J. P. (1994) “Democracy and political theory: a reading of Plato’s Gorgias,” in Euben, et al. (eds.) (1994): 198–226.Google Scholar

Euben, J. P., Wallach, J. R., and Ober, J. (eds.) (1994) Athenian Political Thought and the Reconstruction of American Democracy. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Fantazzi, C. (ed.) (2000) Education of a Christian Woman: A Sixteenth Century Manual by Juan Luis Vives. Chicago.Google Scholar

Farber, J. J. (1979) “The Cyropaedia and Hellenistic kingship,” AJP 100.4: 497–514.Google Scholar

Farrell, C. A. (2012) Xenophon in Context: Advising Athens and Democracy. Diss. King’s College London.Google Scholar

Fehling, D. (1969) Die Wiederholungsfiguren und ihr Gebrauch bei den Griechen vor Gorgias. Berlin.Google Scholar

Fehling, D. (1979) Herodotus and his “Sources”: Citation, Invention, and Narrative Art. Tr. J. G. Howie, orig. publ. 1971. Leeds.Google Scholar

Ferrari, G. R. F. (ed.) (2007) The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ferrario, S. (2012) “Historical agency and self-awareness in Xenophon’s Hellenica and Anabasis,” in Hobden, and Tuplin, (eds.) (2012): 341–76.Google Scholar

Ferrario, S. (2014) Historical Agency and the ‘Great Man’ in Classical Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ferrau, G. (ed.) (1979) Bartholomaei Platinae De principe. Palermo.Google Scholar

Field, L. K. (2012) “Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: educating our political hopes,” Journal of Politics 74.3: 723–38.Google Scholar

Figueira, T. J. (2012) “Economic thought and economic fact in the works of Xenophon,” in Hobden, and Tuplin, (eds.) (2012a): 665–87.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (1992) “Inquiry in the Meno,” in Kraut, (ed.) (1992): 200–26.Google Scholar

Finkel, I. (ed.) (2013) The Cyrus Cylinder: The King of Persia’s Proclamation from Ancient Babylon. New York.Google Scholar

Finley, M. I. (1973) The Ancient Economy. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Finley, M. I. (1975/1990) The Use and Abuse of History. Reprinted with corrections 1990. London.Google Scholar

Finley, M. I. (1977) The World of Odysseus. 2nd edn. New York.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (1992) “Thucydides and the Pylos Debate (4.27–29),” Historia 41: 40–57.Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (1994) Theopompus of Chios: History and Rhetoric in the Fourth Century BC. Oxford.Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (2000) “From Simonides to Isocrates: the fifth-century origins of fourth-century panhellenism,” CA 19: 65–101.Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (2012) Xenophon’s Anabasis; or, The Expedition of Cyrus. New York.Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (2015) “Implied characterization and the meaning of history in Xenophon’s Hellenica,” in Ash, et al. (eds.) (2015): 110–27.Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (2016) “Piety in Xenophon’s theory of leadership,” in Aspects of Leadership in Xenophon, ed. Buxton, R. F.. Histos Supplement 5: 85–119.Google Scholar

Flower, M. and Marincola, J. (2002) Herodotus: Histories Book IX. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (2011) Aristotle as Poet: The Song of Hermias and Its Contexts. Oxford and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fornara, C. W. (1983) The Nature of History in Ancient Greece and Rome. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Forsdyke, S. (2009) “The uses and abuses of tyranny,” in Balot, (ed.) (2009): 231–46.Google Scholar

Foster, E. (2012) “Some recent work on direct and indirect discourse in the ancient historians,” Histos 6: 329–42.Google Scholar

Gagarin, M. and MacDowell, D. M. (1998) Antiphon & Andocides. Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Gaile-Irbe, A. (2011) Réformer la tyrannie: étude de Hiéron de Xénophon. 2 vols. Diss. Strasbourg.Google Scholar

Gallaher, J. E. (1898) Best Lincoln Stories Tersely Told. Chicago.Google Scholar

Gangloff, A. (2006) Dion Chrysostome et les mythes. Grenoble.Google Scholar

Garlan, Y. (1994) “Warfare,” in Cambridge Ancient History, 2nd edn, VI: 678–92.Google Scholar

Gauthier, P. (1976) Un commentaire historique des Poroi de Xénophon. Geneva and Paris.Google Scholar

Gauthier, P. (1984/2010) “Le programme de Xénophon dans les Poroi,” Rev. Phil. 58: 181–99, reprinted as “Xenophon’s programme in the Poroi,” in Gray, (ed.) (2010a): 113–36.Google Scholar

Gautier, L. (1911) La langue de Xénophon. Geneva.Google Scholar

Gavins, J. (2007) Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Gemoll, W. (1932) “Zu Xen. An. I 8, 18,” Philologische Wochenschrift 2: 62–4.Google Scholar

Georges, P. (1994) Barbarian Asia and the Greek Experience: From the Archaic Period to the Age of Xenophon. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Gera, D. L. (1993) Xenophon’s Cyropaedia: Style, Genre, and Literary Technique. Oxford.Google Scholar

Giannantoni, G. (1990) Socratis et Socraticorum reliquiae. Naples.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1957) “Un nuovo frammento politico (P. Heid. 182),” Maia 9: 68–74.Google Scholar

Gilbert, A. (1938) Machiavelli’s Prince and Its Forerunners: The Prince as a Typical Book De regimine principum. New York.Google Scholar

Gilbert, A. (1989) Machiavelli: The Chief Works and Others. Vol. I. 1st edn publ. 1958. Durham, NC.Google Scholar

Gilula, D. (2002) “Entertainment at Xenophon’s Symposium,” Athenaeum 90: 207–13.Google Scholar

Gini, A. (1993) “The manly intellect of his wife: Xenophon, ‘Oeconomicus’ ch. 7,” CW 86: 483–6.Google Scholar

Giraud, J. M. (1999) Xenophon et l’histoire. Villeneuve d’Ascq.Google Scholar

Gish, D. (2012) “Defending dêmokratia: Athenian justice and the trial of the Arginusae generals in Xenophon’s Hellenica,” in Hobden, and Tuplin, (eds.) (2012a): 161–212.Google Scholar

Gish, D. and Ambler, D. (2009) The Political Thought of Xenophon = Polis 26 (2009): 181–410.Google Scholar

Glazebrook, A. (2009) “Cosmetics and sôphrosunê: Ischomachus’ wife in Xenophon’s Oikonomikos,” CW 102: 231–46.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1995) Foucault’s Virginity: Ancient Erotic Fiction and the History of Sexuality. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (1998) Review of Gray (1998), BMCR 1998.12.08.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (2002) The Invention of Prose. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gomme, A. W. (1956) A Historical Commentary on Thucydides. Vol. II. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gomme, A. W., Andrewes, A., and Dover, K. J. (1981) A Historical Commentary on Thucydides. Vol. V. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gosling, J. C. B. and Taylor, C. C. W. (1982) The Greeks on Pleasure. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gosson, S. (1582) Playes Confuted in Fiue Actions: Prouing that they are not to be Suffred in a Christian Common Weale. London.Google Scholar

Gould, J. (1989) Herodotus. London and New York.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (1979) “Two different approaches to the battle of Sardis in 395 B.C.,” CSCA 12: 183–200.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (1981) “Dialogue in Xenophon’s Hellenica,” CQ 31: 321–34.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (1985) “Xenophon’s ‘Cynegeticus’,” Hermes 113: 156–72.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (1986) “Xenophon’s Hiero and the meeting of the wise man and tyrant in Greek literature,” CQ 36: 115–23.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (1989) The Character of Xenophon’s Hellenica. London.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (1991) “Continuous history and Xenophon, Hellenica 1–2.3.10,” AJP 112: 201–28.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (1998) The Framing of Socrates: The Literary Interpretation of Xenophon’s Memorabilia. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (2000) “Xenophon and Isocrates,” in The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, eds. Rowe, C. and Schofield, M., with Harrison, S. and Lane, M.. Cambridge: 142–54.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (2003) “Interventions and citations in Xenophon, Anabasis and Hellenica,” CQ 53: 111–53, reprinted in Gray, (ed.) (2010a): 553–72.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (2004a) “Le Socrate de Xénophon et la démocratie,” Les études philosophiques 2 (Les écrits socratiques de Xénophon): 141–76.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (2004b) “Historiography: Xenophon,” in de Jong, et al. (eds.) (2004): 129–46.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (2004c) “Philosophy: Xenophon,” in de Jong, et al. (eds.) (2004): 377–88.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (2004d) “Biography: Xenophon,” in de Jong, et al. (eds.) (2004): 391–401.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (2006) “The linguistic choices of Prodicus in Xenophon’s Choice of Heracles,” CQ 56: 426–35.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (2007) Xenophon on Government. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (ed.) (2010a) Xenophon. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (2010b) “Introduction,” in Gray, (ed.) (2010a): 1–28.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (2010c) “Work in progress on Xenophon’s language,” in Proceedings of the New Zealand Universities Classics Conference, ed. Mackay, E. A. (web).Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (2011) Xenophon’s Mirror of Princes: Reading the Reflections. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gray, V. J. (2014) “Le style simple de Xénophon,” in Pontier, (ed.) (2014): 319–37.Google Scholar

Grayson, A. K. (1975) Babylonian Historical-Literary Texts. Toronto.Google Scholar

Grayson, C. H. (1975) “Did Xenophon intend to write history?,” in The Ancient Historian and His Materials: Essays in Honour of C. E. Stevens on His Seventieth Birthday, ed. Levick, B.. Westmead: 31–43.Google Scholar

Green, F. (2012) Montaigne and the Life of Freedom. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Green, P. (1994) “Text and context in the matter of Xenophon’s exile,” in Ventures into Greek History, ed. Worthington, I.. Oxford: 215–27.Google Scholar

Green, P. (2010) Diodorus Siculus: The Persian Wars to the Fall of Athens. Books 11–14.34 (480–401 BCE). Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Gregory, J. (1999) Euripides: Hecuba. Introduction, Text, and Commentary. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2012) “Xenophon’s Anabasis from character to narrator,” JHS 132: 23–40.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2013) Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography: ‘Futures Past’ from Herodotus to Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gribble, D. (1999) Alcibiades and Athens: A Study in Literary Presentation. Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A. (2006) “Stories and storytelling in the Histories,” in The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus, eds. Dewald, C. and Marincola, J.. Cambridge: 130–44.Google Scholar

Grissom, D. (2012) Thucydides’ Dangerous World: Dual Forms of Danger in Classical Greek Interstate Relations. Diss. University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar

Grogan, J. (2007) “‘Many Cyruses’: Xenophon’s Cyropaedia and English Renaissance humanism,” Hermathena 183: 63–74.Google Scholar

Grogan, J. (2014) The Persian Empire in English Renaissance Writing, 1549–1622. Basingstoke.Google Scholar

Grote, G. (1872/1888) A History of Greece. 10 vols. London.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (2011) Rethinking the Other in Antiquity. Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar

Gualdo Rosa, L. (1973) “Le lettere di dedica nelle traduzioni dal greco nel ‘400: appunti per un’analisi stilistica,” Vichiana n.s. 2: 68–85.Google Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C. (1978) A History of Greek Philosophy. Vol. V: The Later Plato and the Academy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Haake, M. (2013) “Illustrating, documenting, make-believe: the use of psephismata in Hellenistic biographies of philosophers,” in Inscriptions and their Uses in Greek and Latin Literature, eds. Liddel, P. and Low, P.. Oxford: 79–124.Google Scholar

Hackforth, R. (1913) The Authorship of the Platonic Epistles. Manchester.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (2002) What is Ancient Philosophy? Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Hågg, T. (2012) The Art of Biography in Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hågg, T. and Utas, B. (2003) The Virgin and Her Lover: Fragments of an Ancient Greek Novel and a Persian Epic Poem. Leiden.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (1989) Inventing the Barbarian: Greek Self-definition through Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (2007a) “Aeschylus’ Persians via the Ottoman Empire to Saddam Hussein,” in Cultural Responses to the Persian Wars, eds. Bridges, E., Hall, E., and Rhodes, P. J.. Oxford: 167–79.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (2007b) “Greek tragedy 430–380 BC,” in Debating the Athenian Cultural Revolution: Art, Literature, Philosophy, and Politics, 430–380 BC, ed. Osborne, R.. Cambridge: 264–87.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (2010) “Heroes of the dance floor: the missing exemplary male dancer in ancient sources,” in The Ancient Dancer in the Modern World, ed. Macintosh, F.. Oxford: 145–68.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (2013) Adventures with Iphigenia in Tauris: A Cultural History of Euripides’ Black Sea Tragedy. New York.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (2016) “Intellectual pleasure and women translators in 17th- and 18th-century England,” in Unsealing the Fountain: Women Classical Scholars from the Renaissance to Jacqueline de Romilly, eds. Wyles, R. and Hall, E.. Oxford: 103–31.Google Scholar

Hall, E. (forthcoming) “‘Romantic poet-sage of history’: Herodotus and his Arion in the long 19th Century,” in Herodotus in the Nineteenth Century, ed. Harrison, T..Google Scholar

Hall, E. and Macintosh, F. (2005) Greek Tragedy and the British Theatre 1660–1914. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hall, E. and Stead, H. (forthcoming) Classics and Class in Britain 1789–1917.Google Scholar

Hamilton, C. D. (1979) Sparta’s Bitter Victories: Politics and Diplomacy in the Corinthian War. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Hamilton, C. D. (1991) Agesilaus and the Failure of Spartan Hegemony. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Hankins, J. (ed.) (2009) Aurelio Lippo Brandolini: Republics and Kingdoms Compared. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Hansen, M. H. (1984) “Two notes on Demosthenes’ symbouleutic speeches,” C&M 35: 57–70.Google Scholar

Hansen, M. H. (1989) The Athenian Ecclesia II: A Collection of Articles 1983–89. Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Hansen, M. H. (1999) The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes. 2nd edn. Norman, OK.Google Scholar

Harding, P. (tr. and ed.) (1994) Androtion and the Atthis. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harman, R. (2008) “Viewing, power and interpretation in Xenophon’s Cyropaedia,” in The Children of Herodotus, ed. Pigon, J.. Newcastle: 69–91.Google Scholar

Harman, R. (2012) “A spectacle of Greekness: panhellenism and the visual in Xenophon’s Agesilaus,” in Hobden, and Tuplin, (eds.) (2012a): 427–53.Google Scholar

Harman, R. (2013) “Looking at the Other: visual mediation and Greek identity in Xenophon’s Anabasis,” in Ancient Ethnographies, eds. Almagor, E. and Skinner, J.. Edinburgh: 79–96.Google Scholar

Harrison, T. (1984) Selected Poems. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar

Hartog, F. (1988) The Mirror of Herodotus: The Representation of the Other in the Writing of History. Tr. J. Lloyd. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Harvey, D. (1984) “The wicked wife of Ischomachus,” EMC 28 (n.s. 3): 68–70.Google Scholar

Hatzfeld, J. (1946) “Note sur la date et l’objet du Hiéron de Xénophon,” REG 59/60: 54–70.Google Scholar

Hau, L. 2012. “Does pride go before a fall? Xenophon on arrogant pride,” in Hobden, and Tuplin, (eds.) (2012a): 591–610.Google Scholar

Havell, H. L. (1910) Stories from Xenophon. London.Google Scholar

Haywood, J. (2016) “Divine narratives in Xenophon’s Anabasis,” Histos 10: 85–110.Google Scholar

Hedrick, L. (2006) Xenophon’s Cyrus the Great: The Arts of Leadership and War. New York.Google Scholar

Henry, W. P. (1967) Greek Historical Writing: A Historiographical Essay Based on Xenophon’s Hellenica. Chicago.Google Scholar

Herchenroeder, L. (2008) “Plutarch’s Gryllus and the so-called Grylloi,” AJP 129.3: 347–79.Google Scholar

Hicks, R. D. (ed.) (1925) Diogenes Laertius. Vol. I. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Higgins, W. E. (1977) Xenophon the Athenian: The Problem of the Individual and the Society of the Polis. Albany, NY.Google Scholar

Hindley, C. (1999) “Xenophon on male love,” CQ 89: 219–40, reprinted in Gray, (ed.) (2010a): 72–110.Google Scholar

Hindley, C. (2004) “Sophron eros: Xenophon’s ethical erotics,” in Tuplin, (ed.) (2004a): 125–46.Google Scholar

Hirsch, S. W. (1985) The Friendship of the Barbarians: Xenophon and the Persian Empire. Hanover, CT and London.Google Scholar

Hirzel, R. (1895) Der Dialog. 2 vols. Reprinted 1963. Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Hobden, F. (2005) “Reading Xenophon’s Symposium,” Ramus 34.2: 93–111.Google Scholar

Hobden, F. (2013) The Symposion in Ancient Greek Society and Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hobden, F. and Tuplin, C. (eds.) (2012a) Xenophon: Ethical Principles and Historical Enquiry. Leiden.Google Scholar

Hobden, F. (2012b) “Introduction,” in Hobden, and Tuplin, (eds.) (2012a): 1–41.Google Scholar

Holzapfel, L. (1882) “Über die Abfassungszeit der dem Xenophon zugeschriebenen Πόροι,” Philologus 41: 242–69.Google Scholar

Hoover, H. C. and Hoover, L. H. (1950) Georgius Agricola, De re metallica, Translated from the First Latin Edition of 1556. New York.Google Scholar

Horn, G. (1926) Quaestiones ad Xenophontis elocutionem pertinentes. Diss. Halle.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (1991/2008) A Commentary on Thucydides. 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (1994) “Introduction,” in Greek Historiography, ed. Hornblower, S.. Oxford: 1–72.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (1995) “The fourth century and Hellenistic reception of Thucydides,” JHS 115: 47–68.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (2004) “‘This was decided’ (edoxe tauta): the army as polis in Xenophon’s Anabasis – and elsewhere,” in Lane, Fox (ed.) (2004): 243–63.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (2006) “Herodotus’ influence in antiquity,” in The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus, eds. Dewald, C. and Marincola, J.. Cambridge: 306–18.Google Scholar

Howell, E. (1949) “Meet General X,” G&R 18: 1–13.Google Scholar

Hughes, J. (1750) “An essay on allegorical poetry, with remarks on the writings of Spencer,” in The Works of Spencer. Vol. I. London: xix–xli.Google Scholar

Humbert, J. (1967) Socrate et les petits Socratiques. Paris.Google Scholar

Humble, N. (1997) “Xenophon’s View of Sparta: A Study of the Anabasis, Hellenica, and Respublica Lacedaemoniorum. Diss. McMaster.Google Scholar

Humble, N. (1999) “Sôphrosynê and the Spartans in Xenophon,” in Sparta: New Perspectives, eds. Hodkinson, S. and Powell, A.. Swansea: 339–53.Google Scholar

Humble, N. (2002a) “Was sôphrosynê ever a Spartan virtue?,” in Sparta: Beyond the Mirage, eds. Powell, A. and Hodkinson, S.. Swansea: 85–109.Google Scholar

Humble, N. (2002b) “The limits of biography: the case of Xenophon,” in Pleiades Setting: Essays for Pat Cronin on his 65th Birthday, ed. Sidwell, K.. Cork: 66–87.Google Scholar

Humble, N. (2004a) “The author, date and purpose of chapter 14 of the Lakedaimonion Politeia,” in Tuplin, (ed.) (2004a): 215–28.Google Scholar

Humble, N. (2004b) “Xenophon’s sons in Sparta? Perspectives on xenoi in the Spartan upbringing,” in Spartan Society, ed. Figueira, T.. Swansea: 231–50.Google Scholar

Humble, N. (2006) “Why the Spartans fight so well, even if they are in disorder: Xenophon’s view,” in Sparta and War, eds. Hodkinson, S. and Powell, A.. Swansea: 219–33.Google Scholar

Humble, N. (2008) “Re-dating a lost painting: Euphranor’s battle of Mantineia,” Historia 57.4: 347–66.Google Scholar

Humble, N. (forthcoming) “True history: Xenophon’s Agesilaos and the encomiastic genre,” in Powell, and Richer, (eds.) (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Humphreys, S. C. (1978) Anthropology and the Greeks. London.Google Scholar

Hunnings, L. (2010) “Paradigms of execution: managing slave death from Homer to Virginia,” in Reading Ancient Slavery, eds. Alston, R., Hall, E., and Proffitt, L.. Bristol: 51–71.Google Scholar

Hunt, P. (1998) Slaves, Warfare and Ideology in the Greek Historians. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. (2004) “Homer and Greek literature,” in The Cambridge Companion to Homer, ed. Fowler, R.. Cambridge: 235–53.Google Scholar

Huntingford, G. I. (1811) Introduction to the Writing of Greek in Two Parts: For the Use of Winchester College. 8th edn. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hurdis, J. (1790) Poems. London.Google Scholar

Huss, B. (1999a) Xenophons Symposion: Ein Kommentar. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Huss, B. (1999b) “The dancing Sokrates and the laughing Xenophon, or the other ‘Symposium’,” AJP 120.3: 381–409.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. (2000) Xenophon and the Art of Command. London.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. (2009) “Read the instructions: didactic poetry and didactic prose,” CQ 59: 196–211.Google Scholar

Hutson, L. (1994) The Usurer’s Daughter: Male Friendship and Fictions of Women in Sixteenth-Century England. London.Google Scholar

Irwin, T. H. (1974) Review of L. Strauss, Xenophon’s Socrates, Philosophical Review 83: 409–13.Google Scholar

Irwin, T. H. (1992) “Plato: the intellectual background,” in Kraut, (ed.) (1992): 51–89.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1949) Atthis: The Local Chronicles of Ancient Athens. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1950) “The authorship of the Hellenica of Oxyrhynchos,” CQ 44: 1–8, reprinted in Jacoby (1956) Abhandlungen zur greichischen Geschichtsschreibung. Leiden: 322–33.Google Scholar

Jansen, J. N. (2007) After Empire: Xenophon’s Poroi and the Reorientation of Athens’ Political Economy. Diss. University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Jansen, J. N. (2012) “Strangers incorporated: outsiders in Xenophon’s Poroi,” in Hobden, and Tuplin, (eds.) (2012a): 725–60.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. (1994) Koine Eirene: Untersuchungen zu den Befriedungs- und Stabilisierungsbemühungen in der griechischen Poliswelt des 4. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Jehne, M. (2004) “Überlegungen zu den Auslassungen in Xenophons Hellenika am Beispiel der Gründung des Zweiten Athenischen Seebunds,” in Tuplin, (ed.) (2004a): 463–80.Google Scholar

Joel, K. (1893–1901) Der echte und der xenophontische Sokrates. 3 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar

Johnson, A. (1948) “On Xenophon and Dr Strauss,” in Strauss (1948): vii–ix.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. M. (2003) “Xenophon’s Socrates on justice and the law,” Ancient Philosophy 23: 255–81.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. M. (2005a) “Xenophon’s Socrates at his most Socratic (Mem. 4.2.),” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29: 39–73.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. M. (2005b) “Persians as centaurs in Xenophon’s ‘Cyropaedia’,” TAPA 135: 177–207.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. M. (2009) “Aristippus at the crossroads: the politics of pleasure in Xenophon’s Memorabilia,” Polis 26: 204–22.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. M. (2012a) “Strauss on Xenophon,” in Hobden, and Tuplin, (eds.) (2012a): 123–59.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. M. (2012b) “Why the Cyropaedia is so dull,” comment posted in www.cyropaedia.org.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. A. (2000) “Towards a sociology of reading in Classical antiquity,” AJP 121: 593–627.Google Scholar

Johnstone, S. (1994) “Virtuous toil, vicious work: Xenophon on aristocratic style,” CP 89: 219–40, reprinted in Gray, (ed.) (2010a): 137–66.Google Scholar

Johnstone, C. L. (2009) Listening to the Logos: Speech and the Coming of Wisdom in Ancient Greece. Columbia, SC.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (1978) The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. (1981) “Did Plato write Socratic dialogues?” CQ 75: 305–20.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. (1996) Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kajanto, I. (1994) “Poggio Bracciolini’s De infelicitate principum and its classical sources,” International Journal of the Classical Tradition 1.1: 23–35.Google Scholar

Kakridis, J. (1961) Der Thukydideische Epitaphios. Munich.Google Scholar

Keller, W. J. (1911) “Xenophon’s acquaintance with the History of Herodotus,” CJ 6.6: 252–9.Google Scholar

Kelly, D. (1996) “Oral Xenophon,” in Voice into Text: Orality and Literacy in Ancient Greece, ed. Worthington, I.. Leiden: 149–63.Google Scholar

Kennell, N. (2010) Spartans: A New History. Malden, MA, Oxford, and Chichester.Google Scholar

Kermode, F. (1983) The Art of Telling. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Kindt, J. (2012) Rethinking Greek Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Klein, L. E. (1994) Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness: Moral Discourse and Cultural Politics in Early Eighteenth-century England. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kleingünther, A. (1933) ΠΡΩΤΟΣ ΕΥΡΕΤΗΣ: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte einer Fragestellung. Philologus Supplement 26.1. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Koenen, L. (1977) “Cordoba and no end,” ZPE 24: 35–40.Google Scholar

Kohl, B. G. (1978) “Francesco Barbaro,” in The Earthly Republic: Italian Humanists on Government and Society, eds. Kohl, B. G., Witt, R. G., and Welles, E. B.. Manchester: 179–230.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1997) Friendship in the Classical World. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kraus, C. S. (ed.) (1999) The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts. Leiden, Boston, and Cologne.Google Scholar

Kraut, R. (ed.) (1992) The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar

Kraye, J. (ed.) (1997) Cambridge Translations of Renaissance Philosophical Texts. Vol. II: Political Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Krentz, P. (1982) The Thirty at Athens. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Krentz, P. (ed.) (1989) Xenophon: Hellenika I–II.3.10. Warminster.Google Scholar

Krentz, P. (ed.) (1995) Xenophon: Hellenika II.3.11–IV.2.8. Warminster.Google Scholar

Kroeker, R. (2009) “Xenophon as a critic of the Athenian democracy,” HPTh 30: 197–228.Google Scholar

Kroll, J. H. (1977) “An archive of the Athenian cavalry,” Hesperia 46: 83–140.Google Scholar

Kronenberg, L. (2009) Allegories of Farming from Greece and Rome: Philosophical Satire in Xenophon, Varro and Virgil. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kuhrt, A. (1984) “The Achaemenid concept of kingship,” British Institute of Persian Studies 22: 155–60.Google Scholar

Kuhrt, A. (2007) “Cyrus the Great of Persia: images and realities,” in Representations of Political Power: Case Histories from Times of Change and Dissolving Order in the Ancient Near East, eds. Heinz, M. and Feldman, M. H.. Winona Lake, IN: 169–91.Google Scholar

Kurz, H. (ed.) (1942) Anti-Dictator: The Discours sur la servitude volontaire of Etienne de La Boétie. New York.Google Scholar

Laforse, B. (1997) Xenophon and the Historiography of Panhellenism. Diss. University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Laforse, B. (1998) “Xenophon, Callicratidas, and panhellenism,” AHB 12: 55–67.Google Scholar

Laforse, B. (2000) “Xenophon’s Clearchus,” SyllClass 11: 74–88.Google Scholar

Lalanne, S. (2006) Une éducation grecque: rites de passage et construction des genres dans le roman grec ancien. Paris.Google Scholar

Landor, W. S. (1891) Imaginary Conversations, ed. Crump, Charles G.. Vol. I. London.Google Scholar

Lane, M. (2001) Plato’s Progeny: How Plato and Socrates Still Captivate the Modern Mind. London.Google Scholar

Lane Fox, R. (ed.) (2004) The Long March: Xenophon and the Ten Thousand. New Haven.Google Scholar

Latacz, J. (1977) Kampfparänese, Kampfdarstellung und Kampfwirklichkeit in der Ilias, bei Kallinos und Tyrtaios. Munich.Google Scholar

Lazenby, J. F. (2004) The Peloponnesian War: A Military Study. London and New York.Google Scholar

Lee, J. W. I. (2007) A Greek Army on the March: Soldiers and Survival in Xenophon’s Anabasis. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1971/2010) “Die Frage nach dem BIOS EUDAIMWN: die Begegnung zwischen Kyros und Kroisos bei Xenophon,” Hermes 99: 283–96, reprinted as “The question of the BIOS EUDAIMWN: the encounter between Cyrus and Croesus in Xenophon,” in Gray, (ed.) (2010a): 401–17.Google Scholar

Lemprière, J. (1788) Bibliotheca Classica; or, A Classical Dictionary, Containing a Full Account of All the Proper Names Mentioned in Ancient Authors. Reading.Google Scholar

Lendle, O. (1995) Kommentar zu Xenophons Anabasis (Bücher 1–7). Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Lendon, J. E. (1989) “The Oxyrhynchus historian and the origins of the Corinthian War,” Historia 38: 300–13.Google Scholar

Lendon, J. E. (2006) “Xenophon and the alternative to realist foreign policy: Cyropaedia 3.1.14–31,” JHS 126: 82–98.Google Scholar

Lévy, E. (1990) “L’art de la déformation historique dans les Helléniques de Xénophon,” in Purposes of History, eds. Verdin, H., Schepens, G., and de Keyser, E.. Louvain: 125–57.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. M. (1977) Sparta and Persia. Leiden.Google Scholar

Lewis, J. D. (2009) “Xenophon’s Poroi and the foundations of political economy,” Polis 26: 370–88.Google Scholar

Liddell, H. G. and Scott, R. (1996) A Greek–English Lexicon. 9th edn. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lipka, M. (2002) Xenophon’s Spartan Constitution: Introduction, Text, Commentary. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Livingstone, N. (2001) A Commentary on Isocrates’ Busiris. Leiden.Google Scholar

Loftus, A. (2000) “A new fragment of the Theramenes Papyrus (P. Mich. 5796b),” ZPE 133: 11–20.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1988) “Socrates in Hellenistic philosophy,” CQ 38: 150–71, reprinted in Stoic Studies (1996). Cambridge: 1–33.Google Scholar

Loraux, N. (1986) The Invention of Athens: The Funeral Oration in the Classical City. Trans. A. Sheridan, orig. publ. 1981. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Lotito, M. A. (2011) Wittenberg Historiography: Philipp Melanchthon and the Reformation of Historical Thought. Diss. University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Low, P. (2007) Interstate Relations in Classical Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lowry, S. T. (1987) The Archaeology of Economic Ideas. Durham, NC.Google Scholar

Lowth, R. (1834) Sermons; and Other Remains of Robert Lowth, Sometime Bishop of London. London.Google Scholar

Luccioni, J. (1947a) Les idées politiques et sociales de Xénophon. Paris.Google Scholar

Luccioni, J. (1947b) Xénophon: Hiéron. Paris.Google Scholar

Luppino Manes, E. (1991) “L’Agesilao di Senofonte: tra encomio e commiato,” Miscellanea greca e romana 16: 133–63.Google Scholar

Luraghi, N. (2013) “Lo storico e la sua guerra: Tucidide e la grande strategia della Guerra del Peloponneso,” in American Legacy: Quaderno della Società Italiana di Storia Militare, ed. Ilari, V.. Rome: 75–92.Google Scholar

Luraghi, N. (2014) “Ephorus in context: the return of the Heraclidae and fourth-century Peloponnesian politics,” in Parmeggiani, (ed.) (2014): 133–51.Google Scholar

Ma, J. (2003) “Kings,” in A Companion to the Hellenistic World, ed. Erskine, A.. Malden, MA and Oxford: 177–95.Google Scholar

Ma, J. (2004) “You can’t go home again: displacement and identity in Xenophon’s Anabasis,” in Fox, Lane (ed.) (2004): 330–45, reprinted in Gray (ed.) (2010a): 502–19.Google Scholar

Mably, G. B. de (1783) Two Dialogues Concerning the Writing of History. London.Google Scholar

MacDowell, D. M. (1962) Andocides: On the Mysteries. Oxford.Google Scholar

Mackenzie, D. C. (1985) “The wicked wife of Ischomachus again,” EMC 29 (n.s. 4): 95–6.Google Scholar

Mackil, E. (2013) Creating a Common Polity: Religion, Economy, and Politics in the Making of the Greek Koinon. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

MacLaren, M. (1979) “A supposed lacuna at the beginning of Xenophon’s Hellenica,” AJP 100: 228–38.Google Scholar

MacNeice, L. (1963) The Burning Perch. New York.Google Scholar

Magnelli, A. (2007) “Lo storico di Ossirinco: il più antico continuatore delle Storie di Tucidide?” RAL 17: 41–73.Google Scholar

Maidment, K. J. (1941) Minor Attic Orators: Antiphon, Andocides. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Maier, H. (1913) Sokrates, sein Werk und seine geschichtliche Stellung. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Malkin, I. (2011) A Small Greek World: Networks in the Ancient Mediterranean. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

Mallowan, M. (1972) “Cyrus the Great (558–529 B.C.),” British Institute of Persian Studies 10: 1–17.Google Scholar

Mansfield, J. (1986) “Aristotle, Plato, and preplatonic doxography and chronography,” in Storiografia e dossografia nella filosofia antica, ed. Cambiano, G. Turin: 1–59, reprinted in Studies in the Historiography of Greek Philosophy (1990). Assen: 22–83.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. M. (1989) “Some suggestions on the proem and ‘second preface’ of Arrian’s Anabasis,” JHS 109: 186–9.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. M. (1997) Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. M. (1999) “Genre, convention, and innovation in Greco-Roman historiography,” in Kraus, (ed.) (1999): 281–324.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. M. (ed.) (2007a) A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography. Malden, MA and Oxford.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. M. (2007b) “Speeches in classical historiography,” in Marincola, (ed.) (2007a): 118–32.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. M. (2010) “The rhetoric of history: allusion, intertextuality, and exemplarity in historiographical speeches,” in Pausch, (ed.) (2010): 259–89.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. M. (2014) “Rethinking Isocrates and historiography,” in Parmeggiani, (ed.) (2014): 39–62.Google Scholar

Markle, M. M. (1976) “Support of Athenian intellectuals for Philip: a study of Isocrates’ Philippus and Speusippus’ letter to Philip,” JHS 96: 80–99.Google Scholar

Marr, J. L. and Rhodes, P. J. (2008) The ‘Old Oligarch’: The Constitution of the Athenians Attributed to Xenophon. Oxford.Google Scholar

Marsh, D. (1984) “Lorenzo Valla in Naples: the translation from Xenophon’s Cyropaedia,” Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 46.2: 407–20.Google Scholar

Marsh, D. (1992) “Xenophon,” in Catalogus Translationum et Commentariorum. Vol. VII, eds. Brown, V., Kristeller, P. O., and Cranz, F. E.. Washington, DC: 75–196.Google Scholar

Masaracchia, E. (1996) “La ‘Ciropedia’ di Senofonte e l’ideologia imperiale persiana,” QUCC 54.3: 163–94.Google Scholar

Maslen, R. W. (ed.) (2002) An Apology for Poetry (or The Defence of Poesy): Sir Philip Sidney. 3rd edn. Manchester.Google Scholar

Matuozzi, J. (2013) “Schoolhouse follies: Tristram Shandy and the male reader’s tutelage,” ELH 80.2: 489–518.Google Scholar

Maxson, B. J. (2009) “Kings and tyrants: Leonardo Bruni’s translation of Xenophon’s Hiero,” Renaissance Studies 24.2: 188–206.Google Scholar

McCoy, M. (2007) Plato on the Rhetoric of Philosophers and Sophists. Cambridge.Google Scholar

McKechnie, P. and Kern, S. J. (eds.) (1988) Hellenica Oxyrhynchia. Warminster.Google Scholar

McNamara, C. (2009) “Socratic politics in Xenophon’s Memorabilia,” Polis 26: 223–45.Google Scholar

McPherran, M. (1996) The Religion of Socrates. University Park, PA.Google Scholar

Meissner, B. (1992) Historiker zwischen Polis und Königshof:Studien zur Stellung der Geschichtsschreiber in der griechischen Gesellschaft in spätklassischer und frühhellenistischer Zeit. Hypomnemata 99. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Meister, K. (1990) Die griechische Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis zum Ende des Hellenismus. Stuttgart, Berlin, and Cologne.Google Scholar

Mejer, J. (1978) Diogenes Laertius and His Hellenistic Background. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Merkelbach, R. and Youtie, H. C. (1968) “Ein Michigan-Papyrus über Theramenes,” ZPE 2: 161–9.Google Scholar

Methuen, C. (1994) “Securing the Reformation through education: the Duke’s scholarship system of sixteenth-century Württemberg,” The Sixteenth Century Journal 25.4: 841–51.Google Scholar

Millar, F. G. B. (1965) “Epictetus and the imperial court,” JRS 55: 141–8.Google Scholar

Millender, E. (2001) “Spartan literacy revisited,” CA 20: 121–64.Google Scholar

Millender, E. (2012) “Spartan ‘friendship’ and Xenophon’s crafting of the Anabasis,” in Hobden, and Tuplin, (eds.) (2012a): 377–425.Google Scholar

Millender, E. (forthcoming) “Foxes at home, lions abroad: Spartan commanders in Xenophon’s Anabasis,” in Powell, and Richer, (eds.) (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Miller, M. C. (1997) Athens and Persia in the Fifth Century BC: A Study in Cultural Receptivity. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Miller, W. (ed.) (1914) Xenophon, Cyropaedia. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Minakaran-Hiesgen, E. (1970) “Untersuchungen zu den Porträts des Xenophon und Isokrates,” Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 85: 112–57.Google Scholar

Mingay, J. M. and Walzer, R. R. (1991) Aristotelis Ethica Eudemia. Oxford.Google Scholar

Missiou, A. (1992) “Doulos tou basileos: the politics of translation,” CQ 43: 377–91.Google Scholar

Mitchell, L. G. (1997) Greeks Bearing Gifts: The Public Use of Private Relationships in the Greek World, 435–323 BC. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mitchell, L. G. (2007) Panhellenism and the Barbarian in Archaic and Classical Greece. Swansea.Google Scholar

Mitchell, L. G. (2013) The Heroic Rulers of Archaic and Classical Greece. London and New York.Google Scholar

Moles, J. L. (1985) “The interpretation of the ‘second preface’ in Arrian’s Anabasis,” JHS 105: 162–8.Google Scholar

Moles, J. L. (1992) “Review of Gray (1989),” CR 42: 281–4.Google Scholar

Moles, J. L. (1993) “Truth and untruth in Herodotus and Thucydides,” in Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, eds. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P.. Austin, TX: 88–121.Google Scholar