Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2017
  • Online publication date: May 2017

1 - Economics of Innovation

from Part I - Economics of Antitrust-IP
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge Handbook of Antitrust, Intellectual Property, and High Tech
  • Online ISBN: 9781316671313
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671313
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Arrow, KJ. 1962. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 609–25.
Brennan, TJ. 2007. Should Innovation Rationalize Supra-Competitive Prices? A Skeptical Speculation. In Fredenberg, A. (ed.), The Pros and Cons of High Prices. Stockholm: Konkurrensverket/Swedish Competition Authority, pp. 88127.
Carlton, D., Gans, JS., and Waldman, M.. 2010. Why Tie a Product Consumers Do Not Use? American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2(3), 85105.
Department of Justice. 2010. Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Proposed. Washington, DC: Mimeo.
Evans, DS. and Schmalensee, R.. 2002. Some Economic Aspects of Antitrust Analysis in Dynamically Competitive Industries. In Jaffe, A.B., Lerner, J. and Stern, S. (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 2, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, chapter 1.
Fisher, FM. 2000. The IBM and Microsoft Cases: What’s the Difference? American Economic Review, 90(2) 180–3.
Gans, JS. 2009. Negotiating for the Market. Melbourne: Mimeo.
Gans, J.S. 2010. When is Static Analysis a Sufficient Proxy for Dynamic Considerations? Reconsidering Innovation and Antitrust. In Lerner, J. and Stern, S. (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 11. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
Gans, J.S. 2013. Intel and Blocking Practices (2010). In Kwoka, J. and White, L. (eds.), The Antitrust Revolution, 6th edition. Oxford University Press.
Gans, JS. and Persson, L.. 2013. Entrepreneurial Commercialization Choices and the Interaction between IPR and Competition Policy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(1), 131–51.
Gans, JS. and Stern, S.. 2000. Incumbency and R&D Incentives: Licensing the Gale of Creative Destruction. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 9(4), 485511.
Gans, J.S. and Stern, S.. 2003. The Product Market and the “Market for Ideas”: Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 32(2), 333–50.
Gilbert, R. 2006. Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where Are We in the Competition Innovation Debate? In Jaffe, Adam B., Lerner, Josh, and Stern, Scott (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy, 6, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Gilbert, R. 2007. Holding Innovation to an Antitrust Standard. Competition Policy International, 3, 4777.
Gilbert, R. and Newbery, D.. 1982. Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly. American Economic Review, 72(3), 514–26.
Manne, G. and Wright, J.. 2009. “Innovation and the Limits of Antitrust,” George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 09–54; Lewis & Clark Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009–26. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1490849.
Ordover, J. and Willig, R.. 1981. An Economic Definition of Predation: Pricing and Product Innovation. Yale Law Journal, 9, 853.
Rasmussen, E. 1988. Entry for Buyout. Journal of Industrial Economics, 36(3), 281–99.
Reinganum, J.F. 1989. On the Timing of Innovation. In Schmalansee, R. and Willig, R. (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 849908.
Segal, I. and Whinston, M.. 2007. Antitrust in Innovative Industries. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1703–30.
Teece, DJ. 1987. Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing, and Public Policy. In Teece, DJ. (ed.), The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 185220.