Skip to main content
×
×
Home
The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 11
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    REIFEGERSTE, JANA ELIN, KIRILL and CLAHSEN, HARALD 2018. Persistent differences between native speakers and late bilinguals: Evidence from inflectional and derivational processing in older speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, p. 1.

    CARROLL, SUSANNE E. 2017. Exposure and input in bilingual development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Vol. 20, Issue. 01, p. 3.

    WAGERS, MATTHEW W. 2017. Sources of variability in linguistic memory systems. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Vol. 20, Issue. 04, p. 710.

    GRÜTER, THERES 2017. Vocabulary does not equal language, but neither does morphosyntax. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Vol. 20, Issue. 01, p. 17.

    Pennisi, Antonino and Falzone, Alessandra 2016. Darwinian Biolinguistics. Vol. 12, Issue. , p. 1.

    Pennisi, Antonino and Falzone, Alessandra 2016. Darwinian Biolinguistics. Vol. 12, Issue. , p. 39.

    2014. Developments in the acquisition of Wh-interrogatives in Cypriot Greek. Linguistic Variation, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 69.

    2014. Specific language impairment in Cypriot Greek: Diagnostic issues. Linguistic Variation, Vol. 13, Issue. 2, p. 217.

    2014. Introducing socio-syntax and language acquisition. Linguistic Variation, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. vii.

    2014. Introducing language development and impairment. Linguistic Variation, Vol. 13, Issue. 2, p. vii.

    JENKINS, LYLE 2013. BIOLINGUISTICS: CURRENT STATE AND FUTURE PROSPECTS. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS, Vol. 30, Issue. 2, p. 485.

    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics
    • Online ISBN: 9780511980435
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980435
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Biolinguistics involves the study of language from a broad perspective that embraces natural sciences, helping us better to understand the fundamentals of the faculty of language. This Handbook offers the most comprehensive state-of-the-field survey of the subject available. A team of prominent scholars working in a variety of disciplines is brought together to examine language development, language evolution and neuroscience, as well as providing overviews of the conceptual landscape of the field. The Handbook includes work at the forefront of contemporary research devoted to the evidence for a language instinct, the critical period hypothesis, grammatical maturation, bilingualism, the relation between mind and brain, and the role of natural selection in language evolution. It will be welcomed by graduate students and researchers in a wide range of disciplines, including linguistics, evolutionary biology and cognitive science.

Reviews

‘A thoughtfully constructed and didactically useful perspective on a vibrant, heterogeneous area. Many chapters succeed in illustrating the potential for future interdisciplinary progress in the alignment of linguistics and biology.’

David Poeppel - New York University

‘In this comprehensive introduction to biolinguistics, twenty-five chapters by esteemed researchers provide accessible introductions to the field, building bridges between linguistics and biology, evolution, development and neuroscience. A ‘must-have’ compendium.’

Tecumseh Fitch - University of Vienna

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Page 1 of 2


  • 9 - Parameters in language acquisition
    pp 129-159
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980435.010
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This introduction presents an overview of key concepts discussed in the book. The book addresses central issues in the domain of language development: the range of evidence in favor of a language instinct, the existence of a critical period for language acquisition, the issue of maturation in the context of language acquisition, and the impact of language on other cognitive systems. It focuses on the interplay between mind, brain, and behavior. The book deals with the nature of theoretically informed experiments, working memory and language processing, modularity, language deficits, and pathologies. It focuses on a range of issues relevant to the study of language evolution: the cognitive capacities of non-human primates, the abilities of non-human vocal learners, the potential use of fossil records to shed light on the evolution of language, the possible role of natural selection, and the insights from computational modeling in the context of language evolution.
  • 11 - The role of experimental syntax in an integrated cognitive science of language
    pp 181-202
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980435.013
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter discusses the philosophical precedents and foundations for biolinguistics. It outlines scientific methods and research strategies for the study of mind that have yielded successful naturalistic scientific programs in the last few centuries, and indicated their philosophical origins and underpinnings. The chapter focuses on the origins of natural science methodology. Human cognitive capacities appear to fall into two general areas: commonsense understanding on the one hand and what Chomsky calls science formation on the other. The chapter describes the method of naturalistic scientific theory construction by outlining the desiderata for a naturalistic theory: what makes a theory a good one. The naturalistic science methodology applies to the subject matters of all naturalistic scientific research. The chapter explains the biolinguistic research program. It looks at the philosophical foundations for employing the tools of the science of biology in the study of language and other internal, modular, innate systems.
  • 13 - Computational primitives in phonology and their neural correlates
    pp 233-256
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980435.015
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The idea of a language instinct invites discussions on the role of genetics, such as the relatively recent debate about the gene for language. The selectively intact status of language in individuals with impaired non-verbal cognition presents the opposite side of the coin. The property of recursion has been shown to characterize the cognitive abilities, such as music, arithmetic, theory of mind, and visuo-spatial processing. In recent years, the use of functional neuro-imaging in brain studies has included the study of language knowledge and language processing as well. Language processing data from functional neuro-imaging in healthy adults converge on the finding that Broca's area is crucially involved in the processing of syntactic dependencies. One of the main arguments for linguistic nativism concerns the outcome of language acquisition: the language acquired is under-determined by the input, that is, the data available to the child.
  • 14 - Computational primitives in syntax and possible brain correlates
    pp 257-282
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980435.016
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter explores the fate of the species-specific language making capacity (LMC) across the lifetimes of individuals and sheds some light on the problem of how it enables them to develop grammatical knowledge about their target languages. As far as the development of a grammatical competence in a first language is concerned, there indeed exists strong evidence in support of the Critical Period Hypothesis (CPH). The more controversial question is whether critical periods also characterize successive acquisition of languages in spite of the fact that the LMC has been activated in the course of first language development. More specifically, the claim is that crucial parts of the language acquisition device (LAD) become inaccessible as a result of neural maturation, and although language acquisition continues to be possible, L2 acquisition differs in a number of crucial ways from L1 development. A grammatical development exhibits a number of sensitive phases.
  • 15 - Computational primitives in morphology and possible brain correlates
    pp 283-308
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980435.017
  • View abstract
    Summary
    In order to build their lexicon, infants firstly have to find word units in the speech stream, and then associate each word form with a meaning. This chapter discusses these two steps of lexical acquisition, and focuses more precisely on the role of two cues: phrasal prosody and function words. The main language-universal cue is the use of statistical or distributional information. The intuition behind the use of transitional probabilities between syllables or phonemes is that sound sequences that occur frequently and in a variety of contexts are better candidates for the lexicon than those that occur rarely or in few contexts. The syntactic category of words is the simplest cue that could constrain word meaning. Indeed, nouns typically refer to objects, whereas verbs generally refer to actions and adjectives to properties. Recent studies have demonstrated that young infants know something about the categories of function words.
  • 17 - Modularity and descent-with-modification
    pp 326-340
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980435.019
  • View abstract
    Summary
    In statistical modeling, there are numerous parameters defined mathematically to account for the expected shape of data distributions. In the domain of human language, both principles and parameters are often thought of as innate domain-specific abstractions that connect to many structural properties about language. Linguistic principles correspond to the properties that are invariant across all human languages. The learning path turns out to be crucial for learning the English metrical phonology systems using parameters. An increasingly common way to explore how exactly the human mind learns with parameters is to use computational modeling. Computational modeling gives us very precise control over the language acquisition process, including what hypotheses the child entertains, what data are considered relevant, and how the child changes belief in different hypotheses based on the data. The chapter also looks at a few examples of computational models that investigate language acquisition using parameters.
  • 18 - The role of Broca’s area in language function
    pp 341-349
  • https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980435.020
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter focuses on the phenomenon of bilingualism having positive collateral effects on general-domain executive control. It provides a broad introduction to what causes bilingualism to affect general-domain executive control. The chapter briefly reviews the first experimental studies with children, which started settling the guidelines of the empirical research on the issue. It discusses findings on the effect that bilingualism has on one executive control process in particular: conflict processing. Specifically, there are two different components relevant for conflict processing and, hence, to deal with the sort of experimental task: conflict resolution and conflict monitoring. The chapter also reviews evidence that being a bilingual entails the development of more efficient executive control across lifespan. The impact of bilingualism on conflict resolution seems to reflect a better functioning of inhibitory control mechanisms in bilingual compared to monolingual speakers. Finally, the chapter highlights the critical issues for future research.

Page 1 of 2


References

Abe, K. and Watanabe, D. (2011). Songbirds possess the spontaneous ability to discriminate syntactic rules. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1067–1074.
Abla, D., Katahira, K., and Okanoya, K. (2008). On-line assessment of statistical learning by event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20 (6), 952–964.
Abla, D. and Okanoya, K. (2008). Statistical segmentation of tone sequences activates the left inferior frontal cortex: A near-infrared spectroscopy study. Neuropsychologia, 46 (11), 2787–2795.
Abney, S. P. (1987). The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Dissertation. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Aboitz, F. and Garcia, V. R. (1997). The evolutionary origin of language areas in the human brain. A neuroanatomical perspective. Brain Research Reviews, 25, 381–396.
Abrahamsson, N. and Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306.
Abutalebi, J., Della Rosa, P. A., Green, D. W.et al. (in press). Bilingualism tunes the anterior cingulate cortex for conflict monitoring. Cerebral Cortex.
Abutalebi, J. and Green, D. (2007). Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20, 242–275.
Abutalebi, J., Miozzo, A., and Cappa, S. F. (2000). Do subcortical structures control “Language Selection” in polyglots? Evidence from pathological language mixing. Neurocase, 6, 51–56.
Adam, C. and Tannery, P. (eds.) (1964–74). Œuvres de Descartes, 2nd edn. Paris: Vrin.
Adger, D. (2003). Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford University Press.
Adler, M. (1977). Collective and Individual Bilingualism. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 435–483.
Alain, C., Cortese, F., and Picton, T. W. (1998). Event-related brain activity associated with auditory pattern processing. Neuroreport, 9 (15), 3537–3541.
Albright, A. and Hayes, B. (2003). Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition, 90, 119–161.
Alegre, M. and Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 41–61.
Alexander, M. P., Naeser, M. A., and Palumbo, C. (1990). Broca’s area aphasias: Aphasia after lesions including the frontal operculum. Neurology, 40, 353–362.
Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V- Movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 491–539.
Alexopoulou, T. and Keller, F. (2007). Locality, cyclicity and resumption: At the interface between the grammar and the human sentence processor. Language, 83 (1), 110–160.
Alho, K., Winkler, I., Escera, C.et al. (1998). Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: Magnetoencephalographic recordings. Psychophysiology, 35 (2), 211–224.
Alm, P. A. (2004). Stuttering and the basal ganglia circuits: A critical review of possible relations. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37 (4), 325–369.
Almasy, I. and Blangero, J. (2001). Endophenotypes as quantitative risk factors for psychiatric disease: Rationale and study design. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 105, 42–44.
Altmann, G. T. M. and Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247–264.
Alvares, R. L. and Downing, S. F. (1998). A survey of expressive communication skills in children with Angelman syndrome. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 7, 14–24.
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Amodio, D. and Frith, C. (2006). Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 268–277.
Amunts, K., Schleicher, A., Bürgel, U.et al. (1999). Broca’s region revisited: Cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 412, 319–341.
Andalman, A. S. and Fee, M. S. (2009). A basal ganglia-forebrain circuit in the songbird biases motor output to avoid vocal errors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (30), 12518–12523.
Anderson, D. J. (1992). Molecular control of neural development. In Z. W. Hall (ed.), An Introduction to Molecular Neurobiology (pp. 355–387). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Anderson, J. M., Gilmore, R., Roper, S.et al. (1999). Conduction aphasia and the arcuate fasciculus: A reexamination of the Wernicke-Geschwind model. Brain and Language, 70, 1–12.
Anderson, M. and Iwasa, Y. (1996). Sexual selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11 (2), 53–58.
Anderson, M. C. and Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In E. L. Bjork and R. A. Bjork (eds.), Handbook of Perception and Memory. Vol. X: Memory (pp. 237–313). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Anderson, S. R. and Lightfoot, D. W. (1999). The human language faculty as an organ. Annual Review of Physiology, 62, 697–722.
AndersonS. W., Barrash. J., Bechara, A., and Tranel, D. (2006). Impairments of emotion and real-world complex behavior following childhood- or adult-onset damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 224–235.
Angluin, D. (1982). Inference of reversible languages. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 29 (3), 741–765.
Angold, A., Costello, E. J., and Erkanli, A. (1999). Comorbidity. Journal of Child Psychology Psychiatry, 40, 57–87.
Ansink, B. J. J., Sarphatie, H., and Van Dongen, H. R. (1989). The Landau-Kleffner syndrome: case report and theoretical considerations. Neuropediatrics, 20, 170–172.
Anthoni, H., Zucchelli, M., and Matsson, H. (2007). A locus on 2p12 containing the co-regulated MRPL19 and C2ORF3 genes is associated to dyslexia. Human Molecular Genetics, 16, 667–77.
Anwander, A., Tittgemeyer, M., von Cramon, D. Y., Friederici, A. D., and Knosche, T. R. (2007). Connectivity-based parrellation of Broca’s area. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 816–825.
Archangeli, D. (1988). Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology, 5, 183–207.
Arensburg, B., Schepartz, L. A., Tillier, A. M.et al. (1990). A reappraisal of the anatomical basis for speech in middle Palaeolithic hominids. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 83, 137–146.
Arensburg, B., Tillier, A. M., Vandermeersch, B.et al. (1989). A middle Palaeolithic human hyoid bone. Nature, 338, 758–760.
Ariew, Roger (1986). Descartes as critic of Galileo’s scientific methodology. Synthese, 67, 77–90.
Armstrong, E. (1983). Relative brain size and metabolism in mammals. Science, 220, 1302–1304.
Arnold, K. and Zuberbühler, K. (2006). Semantic combinations in primate calls. Nature, 441, 303.
Arnold, K. and Zuberbühler, K. (2008). Meaningful call combinations in a non-human primate. Current Biology, 18, R202–R203.
Arnold, K. and Zuberbühler, K. (2012). Call combinations in monkeys: Compositional or idiomatic expressions? Brain and Language, 120 (3), 303–309.
Aronov, D., Andalman, A. S., and Fee, M. S. (2008). A specialized forebrain circuit for vocal babbling in the juvenile songbird. Science, 320 (5876), 630–634.
Arosio, F., Branchini, C., Forgiarini, M.et al. (2010). SLI children’s weakness in morphosyntax and pragmatics. In Y. Otsu (ed.), Proceedings of the Tenth Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Press.
Arsuaga, J. L. (1999). El collar del Neandertal. En busca de los primeros pensadores. Madrid: Temas de Hoy.
Arsuaga, J. L. and Martínez, I. (1998). La especie elegida. La larga marcha de la evolución humana. Madrid: Temas de Hoy.
Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., and Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9, 321–324.
Assadollahi, R. and Pulvermüller, F. (2003). Early influences of word length and frequency: A group study using MEG. Neuroreport, 14 (8), 1183–1187.
Aulanko, R., Hari, R., Lounasmaa, O. V., Näätänen, R., and Sams, M. (1993). Phonetic invariance in the human auditory cortex. Neuroreport, 4 (12), 1356–1358.
Avital, E. and Jablonka, E. (2000). Animal Traditions. Behavioural Inheritance in Evolution. Cambridge University Press.
Axer, H., von Keyserlingk, A. G., Berks, G., and von Keyserlingk, D. G. (2001). Supra- and infrasylvian conduction aphasia. Brain and Language, 76, 317–331.
Ayala, F. and Cela Conde, C. (2006). La Piedra que se Volvió Palabra. Las Claves Evolutivas de la Humanidad. Madrid: Alianza.
Ayotte, J., Peretz, I., Rousseau, I., Bard, C., and Bojanowski, M. (2000). Patterns of music agnosia associated with middle cerebral artery infarcts. Brain, 123, 1926–1938.
Baaré, W. F. C., Pol, H. E. H., and Boomsma, D. I. (2001). Quantitative genetic modeling of variation in human brain morphology. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 816–824.
Baayen, R. H. and del Prado Martín, F. M. (2005). Semantic density and past-tense formation in three Germanic languages. Language, 81, 666–698.
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., and Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.
Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., and Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94–117.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S., and Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158–173.
Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., and Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575–589.
Badecker, W. and Kuminiak, F. (2007). Morphology, agreement and working memory retrieval in sentence production: Evidence from gender and case in Slovak. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 65–85.
Badecker, W. and Straub, K. (2002). The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 748–749.
Badecker, B. and Lewis, R. (2007). A new theory and computational model of working memory in sentence production: Agreement errors as failures of cue-based retrieval. Paper presented at the 20th Annual CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. La Jolla, CA: University of California at San Diego.
Bader, M., Meng, M., and Bayer, J. (2000). Case and reanalysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 37–52.
Badre, D. and Wagner, A. D. (2007). Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory. Neuropsychologia, 45 (13), 2883–2901.
Bagri, A., Marin, O., Plump, A. S.et al. (2002). Slit proteins prevent midline crossing and determine the dorsoventral position of major axonal pathways in the mammalian forebrain. Neuron, 33, 233–248.
Bahlmann, J., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Rotte, M., and Münte, T. F. (2007). An fMRI study of canonical and noncanonical word order in German. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 940–949.
Bahlmann, J., Schubotz, R. I., and Friederici, A. D. (2008). Hierarchical artificial grammar processing engages Broca’s area. NeuroImage, 42 (2), 525–534.
Bak, P., Tang, C., and Wiesenfeld, W. (1988). Self-organized criticality. Physical Review A, 38, 364–374.
Baker, C. L. (1978). Introduction to Generative-Transformational Syntax. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Baker, M. (2001). The Atoms of Language. New York: Basic Books.
Baker, M. (2005). Mapping the terrain of language learning. Language Learning and Development, 1 (1), 93–129.
Balari, S., Benítez Burraco, A., Camps, M.et al. (2008). ¿Homo loquens neanderthalensis? En torno a las capacidades simbólicas y lingüísticas del neandertal. Munibe Antropologia-Arkeologia, 59, 3–24.
Balari, S., Benítez-Burraco, A., Camps, M., Longa, V. M., and Lorenzo, G. (2010). La importancia de ser moderno. Problemas de método e ideología en el debate sobre la cognición y la conducta de los Neandertales. Ludus Vitalis. Revista de Filosofía de las Ciencias de la Vida, XVIII (34), 143–170.
Balari, S., Benítez-Burraco, A., Camps, M., Longa, V. M., Lorenzo, G., and Uriagereka, J. (2011). The archaeological record speaks: Bridging anthropology and linguistics. International Journal of Evolutionary Biology (Special Issue: Key Evolutionary Transformations in Homo sapiens), doi:10.4061/2011/382679.
Balari, S. and Lorenzo, G. (2008). Pere Alberch’s developmental morphospaces and the evolution of cognition. Biological Theory, 3, 297–304.
Balari, S. and Lorenzo, G. (2009a). Computational phenotypes: Where the theory of computation meets evo-devo. Biolinguistics, 3, 2–60.
Balari, Sergio and Guillermo Lorenzo. (2009b). Comunicación. Donde la lingüística evolutiva se equivocó. Report de recerca CGT-09–10, Centre de Lingüística Teorica, Universidad Autònoma de Barcelona.
Balari, S. and Lorenzo, G. (2010a). ¿Para qué sirve un ballestrinque? Reflexiones sobre el funcionamiento de artefactos y organismos en un mundo sin funciones. Teorema. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 29, 57–76.
Balari, S. and Lorenzo, G. (2010b). Communication: Where evolutionary linguistics went wrong. Biological Theory, 5(3), 228–239.
Baldo, J. V. and Dronkers, N. F. (2006). The role of inferior parietal and inferior frontal cortex in working memory. Neuropsychology, 20, 529–538.
Baldo, J. V., KlostermannE. C., and Dronkers, N. F. (2008). It’s either a cook or a baker: Patients with conduction aphasia get the gist but lose the trace. Brain and Language, 105, 134–140.
Baldwin, C. Y. and Clark, K. B. (2000). Design Rules, Volume I: The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Balme, J., Davidson, I., McDonald, J., Stern, N., and Veth, P. (2009). Symbolic behaviour and the peopling of the southern arc route to Australia. Quaternary International, (202), 1–2, 59–68.
Balter, M. (2010). Animal communication reveals roots of language (News Focus, Evolution of Language). Science, 328, 969–971.
Banker, G., Churchill, L., and Cotman, C. W. (1974). Proteins of the postsynaptic density. Journal of Cellular Biology, 63, 456–465.
Bar-Yosef, O. (1998). On the nature of transitions: The Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic revolution. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 8, 141–163.
Bar-Yosef, O. (2002). The Upper Paleolithic revolution. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 363–393.
Barandiarán, I. (2006). Imágenes y adornos en el arte portátil paleolítico. Barcelona: Ariel.
Barbosa, P. (1995). Null subjects. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Bard, E. G., Robertson, D., and Sorace, A. (1996). Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language, 72, 32–68.
Barker, C. (2002). Continuations and the nature of quantification. Natural Language Semantics, 10, 211–242.
Barkovich, A. J., Ferriero, D. M., Barr, R. M.et al. (1998). Microlissencephaly: a heterogeneous malformation of cortical development. Neuropediatrics, 29, 113–119.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., and Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21 (1), 37–46.
Baron-Cohen, S. and Ring, H. (1994). A model of the mindreading system: Neuropsychological and neurobiological perspectives. In P. Mitchell and C. Lewis (eds.), Origins of an Understanding Mind (pp. 183–207). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Baron-Cohen, S., Ring, H., and Moriarty, J. (1994). The brain basis of theory of mind: The role of the orbito-frontal region. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 640–649.
BarrashJ., TranelD., and AndersonS W. (2000). Acquired personality disturbances associated with bilateral damage to the ventromedial prefrontal region. Developmental Neuropsychology, 18, 355–381.
Barrett, A. M. (1910). A case of pure word-deafness with autopsy. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 37, 73–92.
Bartels, C. and Wallesch, C. -W. (1996). Nineteenth-century accounts of the nature of the lexicon and semantics: Riddles posed by the case of Johann Voit. In C. Code, C-W. Wallesch, Y. Joanette, and A. R. Lecourse (eds.), Classic Cases in Neuropsychology (pp. 53–68). Hove: Psychology Press.
Bartke, S., Rösler, F., Streb, J., and Wiese, R. (2005). An ERP-study of German “irregular” morphology. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18, 29–55.
Bartlett, C. W., Flax, J. F., Logue, M. W.et al. (2002). A major susceptibility locus for specific language impairment is located on 13q21. American Journal of Human Genetics, 71, 45–55.
Barton, R. A., Purvis, A., and Harvey, P. H. (1995). Evolutionary radiation of visual and olfactory brain systems in primates, bats and insectivores. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 348, 381–392.
Batali, J. (1998). Computational simulations of the emergence of grammar. In J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy, and C. Knight (eds.), Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases (pp. 405–426). Cambridge University Press.
Batali, J. (2002). The negotiation and acquisition of recursive grammars as a result of competition among exemplars. In T. Briscoe (ed.), Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models. Cambridge University Press.
Bates, E. (1999). Plasticity, localization, and language development. In S. H. Broman and J. M. Fletcher (eds.), The Changing Nervous System: Neurobiological Consequences of Early Brain Disorders (pp. 214–253). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bates, E. and McWhinney, B. (1989). The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bates, E., Thal, D., Finlay, B. L., and Clancy, B. (2002). Early language development and its neural correlates. In S. J. Segalowitz and I. Rapin (eds.), Child Neurology, 2nd edn., Vol. VIII (pp. 109–176). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Bates, E. A., Thai, D., and Janowsky, J. (1992). Early language development and its neural correlates. In I. Rapin and S. Segalowitz (eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology, vol. VII, Child Neuropsychology (pp. 69–110). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Bateson, W. (1894). Materials for the Study of Variation: Treated with Especial Regard to Discontinuity in the Origin of Species. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., and Damasio, A. R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 295–307.
Beckers, G. J. L., Bolhuis, J. J., Okanoya, K., and Berwick, R. C. (2012). Birdsong neurolinguistics: songbird context-free grammar claim is premature. NeuroReport, 23 (3), 139–145.
Bedny, M., Caramazza, A., Grossman, E., Pascual-Leone, A., and Saxe, R. (2008). Concepts are more than percepts: the case of action verbs. Journal of Neuroscience, 28 (44), 11347.
Beheim-Schwarzbach, D. (1975). Further studies of the cytoarchitectonic division in the dorsal surface of the 1st temporal gyrus of a linguistic genius and 2 anthropoids. Zeitschrift für mikroskopisch-anatomische Forschung, 89, 759–776.
Beldade, P. and Brakefield, P. M. (2003). Concerted evolution and developmental integration in modular butterfly wing patterns. Evolutionary Development, 5 (2), 169–179.
Belew, R. K. and Mitchell, M. (1996). Adaptive Individuals in Evolving Populations: Models and Algorithms. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
Belletti, A., Ed. (2004). Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume III. New York, Oxford University Press.
Bellugi, U., Bihrle, A., Jernigan, T., Trauner, D., and Doherty, S. (1990). Neuropsychological, neurological, and neuroanatomical profile of Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics Supplement, 6, 115–125.
Bellugi, U., Lichtenberger, L., Jones, W., Lai, Z., and St George, M. (2000). I. The neurocognitive profile of Williams Syndrome: a complex pattern of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, Suppl 1, 7–29.
Bemis, D. and Pylkkänen, L. (2010). Domain-general mechanisms in the construction of meaning. Paper presented at the CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York City.
Bemis, D. K., and Pylkkänen, L. (2011). Simple composition: A magnetoencephalography investigation into the comprehension of minimal linguistic phrases. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31 (8), 2801.
Benazzi, S., Douka, K., Fornai, C.et al. (2011). Early dispersal of modern humans in Europe and implications for Neanderthal behavior. Nature, 479, 525–528.
Ben-Shachar, M., Hendler, T., Kahn, I., Ben-Bashat, D., and Grodzinsky, Y. (2003). The neural reality of syntactic transformations: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Psychological Science, 14, 433–440.
Ben-Shachar, M., Palti, D., and Grodzinsky, Y. (2004). Neural correlates of syntactic movement: converging evidence from two fMRI experiments. NeuroImage, 21, 1320–1336.
Benítez-Burraco, A. (2005). Caracterización neuroanatómica y neurofisiológica del lenguaje humano [Neuroanatomical and neurophysiological characterization of human language]. RSEL, 35, 461–494.
Benítez-Burraco, A. (2008). FOXP2 y la biología molecular del lenguaje: nuevas evidencias. II. Aspectos moleculares e implicaciones para la ontogenia y la filogenia del lenguaje [FOXP2 and the molecular biology of language: new evidences. II. Molecular aspects and implications for the ontogeny and phylogeny of language]Revista de Neurología, 46, 351–359.
Benítez-Burraco, A. (2009). Genes y lenguaje: aspectos ontogenéticos, filogenéticos y cognitivos [Genes and language: ontogenetic, phylogenetic, and cognitive aspects]. Barcelona: Reverté.
Benítez-Burraco, A., Longa, V. M., Lorenzo, G., and Uriagereka, J. (2008). Also sprach Neanderthalsis . . . Or did she? Biolinguistics, 2 (2–3), 225–232.
Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., and Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision, and semantic priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 343–355.
Bentin, S., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M. H., Echallier, J. F., and Pernier, J. (1999). ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: Time course and scalp distribution. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 235–260.
Beretta, A., Campbell, C., Carr, T. H.et al. (2003). An ER-fMRI investigation of morphological inflection in German reveals that the brain makes a distinction between regular and irregular forms. Brain and Language, 85, 67–92.
Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.
Berlin, H. A., Rolls, E. T., and Kischka, U. (2004). Impulsivity, time perception, emotion, and reinforcement sensitivity in patients with orbitofrontal cortex lesions. Brain, 127, 1108–1126.
Bernal, B. and Ardila, A. (2009). The role of the arcuate fasciculus in conduction aphasia. Brain, 132, 2309–2316.
Bernal, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Millotte, S., and Christophe, A. (2010). Two-year-olds compute syntactic structure on-line. Developmental Science, 13, 69–76.
Bernal, S., Lidz, J., Millotte, S., and Christophe, A. (2007). Syntax constrains the acquisition of verb meaning. Language Learning and Development, 3, 325–341.
Berndt, R. S., Haendiges, A. N., Burton, M. W., and Mitchum, C. C. (2002). Grammatical class and imageability in aphasic word production: their effects are independent. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15, 353–371.
Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., and Baayen, H. (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 489–511.
Berwick, R. C. and Chomsky, N. (2012). The biolinguistic program: the current state of its evolution and development. In A. M. Di Sciullo and C. Aguero (eds.), Biolinguistic Investigations (pp. 19–41). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Berwick, R. C., Chomsky, N., and Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (in press). Poverty of the stimulus stands: Why recent challenges fail. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini and R. C. Berwick (eds.), Rich Languages from Poor Inputs. Oxford University Press.
Berwick, R. C., Okanoya, K., Beckers, G., and Bolhuis, J. J. (2011). Song to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 113–121.
Berwick, R. C., Pietroski, P., Yankama, B., and Chomsky, N. (2011). Poverty of the stimulus revisited. Cognitive Science, 35, 1207–1242.
Berwick, R. C. and A. S. Weinberg. (1984). The Grammatical Basis of Linguistic Performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Best, W. (2005). Investigation of a new intervention for children with word-finding problems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40, 279–318.
Bever, T. (1973). Serial position and response biases do not account for the effect of syntactic structure on the location of brief noises during sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 287–288.
Bever, T. G., Lackner, J. R., and Kirk, R. (1969). The underlying structures of sentences are the primary units of immediate speech processing. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 5 (4), 225–234.
Bialystok, E. (2006). Effect of bilingualism and computer video game experience on the Simon Task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60 (1), 68–79.
Bialystok, E. (2010). Global-local and trail-making tasks by monolingual and bilingual children: Beyond inhibition. Developmental Psychology, 46 (1), 93–105.
Bialystok, E. (2011). Coordination of executive functions in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 461–468.
Bialystok, E., Barac, R., Blaye, A., and Poulin-Dubois, D. (2010). Word mapping and executive functioning in young monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11 (4), 485–508.
BialystokE., Craik, F. I. M., and Freedman, M. (2007). Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia. Neuropsychologia, 45 459–464.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M, Grady, C.et al. (2005). Effect of bilingualism on cognitive control in the Simon task: evidence from MEG. NeuroImage, 24, 40–49.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., and Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 290–303.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., and Luk, G. (2008). Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34 (4), 859–873.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., and Ruocco, A. C. (2006). Dual-modality monitoring in a classification task: The effects of bilingualism and ageing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59 (11), 1968–1983.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., and Ryan, J. (2006). Executive control in a modified antisaccade task: effects of aging and bilingualism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32 (6), 1341–1354.
Bialystok, E. and Feng, A. (2009). Language proficiency and executive control in proactive interference: Evidence from monolingual and bilingual children and adults. Brain and Language, 109, 93–100.
Bialystok, E., Martin, M. M., and Viswanathan, M. (2005). Bilingualism across the lifespan: The rise and fall of inhibitory control. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9, 103–119.
BialystokE. and SenmanL. (2004). Executive processes in appearance-reality tasks: The role of inhibition of attention and symbolic representation. Child Development, 75 (2), 562–579.
Bialystok, E. and Shapero, D. (2005). Ambiguous benefits: The effect of bilingualism on reversing ambiguous figures. Developmental Science, 8, 595–604.
Bialystok, E. and Viswanathan, M. (2009). Components of executive control with advantages for bilingual children in two cultures. Cognition, 112, 494–500.
Bick, A. S., Frost, R., and Goelman, G. (2010). Imaging implicit morphological processing: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1955–1969.
Bick, A. S., Goelman, G., and Frost, R. (2008). Neural correlates of morphological processes in Hebrew. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 406–420.
Bick, A. S., Goelman, G., and Frost, R. (2011). Hebrew brain vs. English brain: Language modulates the way it is processed. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23 (9), 2280–2290.
Bickerton, D. (1990). Language and Species. University of Chicago Press.
Bickerton, D. (2002). From protolanguage to language. In T. J. Crow (ed.), The Speciation of Modern Homo Sapiens (pp. 103–120). Oxford University Press.
Bickerton, Derek (2009). Adam’s Tongue: How Humans Made Language, How Language Made Humans. New York: Hill and Wang.
Biedermann, B., Ruh, N., Nickels, L., and Coltheart, M. (2008). Information retrieval in tip of the tongue states: New data and methodological advances. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 171–198.
Binder, J. R. (2000). The new neuroanatomy of speech perception. Brain, 123 (12), 2371–2372.
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., and Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2767–2796.
Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A.et al. (2000). Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cerebral Cortex, 10 (5), 512–528.
Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A.et al. (1997). Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 17 (1), 353.
Binder, J. and Price, C. (2006). Functional imaging of language. In R. Cabeza and A. Kingstone (eds.), Handbook on Functional Neuroimaging of Cognition (2nd edn., pp. 187–251). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Binford, L. S. (1985). Human ancestors: changing views of their behavior. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 4, 292–327.
Binford, L. S. (1989). Debating Archaeology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Binkofski, F., Amunts, K., Stephan, K. M.et al. (2000). Broca’s region subserves imagery of motion: A combined cytoarchitectonic and fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 11, 273–285.
Biran, M. and Friedmann, N. (2002). The effect of semantic and phonological cueing on the naming of aphasics with deficits in various levels of lexical processing [in Hebrew]. Israeli Journal of Language, Speech and Hearing Disorders, 24, 21–40.
Biran, M., and Friedmann, N. (2005). From phonological paraphasias to the structure of the phonological output lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 589–616.
Biran, M., and Friedmann, N. (2012). The representation of lexical-syntactic information: Evidence from syntactic and lexical retrieval impairments in aphasia. Cortex, 48, 1103–1127.
Biran, M., and Friedmann, N. (in press). “The crane is lifting the car”: Access to grammatical gender of nouns in words and sentences [in Hebrew]. Language and Brain, 10.
Bird, H., Howard, D., and Franklin, S. (2000). Why is a verb like an inanimate object? Grammatical category and semantic category deficits. Brain and Language, 72, 246–309.
Bird, H., Lambon-Ralph, M. A., Seidenberg, M. S., McClelland, J. L., and Patterson, K. (2003). Deficits in phonology and past-tense morphology: What’s the connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 502–526.
Birdsong, D. (1999). Introduction: Whys and why nots of the Critical Period Hypothesis for second language acquisition. In D. Birdsong (ed.), Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Birney, R. and Teevan, R. (eds.) (1961). Instinct. New York: Van Nostrand.
Bisang, W. (2008). Precategoriality and syntax-based parts of speech: The case of Late Archaic Chinese. Studies in Language, 32, 568–589.
Bishop, D. V. M. (2001a). Genetic and environmental risks for specific language impairment in children. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., 356, 369–380.
Bishop, D. V. M. (2001b). Genetic influences on language impairment and literacy problems in child. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 189–198.
Bishop, D. V. M. (2002). The role of genes in the etiology of specific language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 35, 311–328.
Bishop, D. V. M. and Adams, C. (1992). Comprehension problems in children with specific language impairment: literal and inferential meaning. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 119–129.
Bishop, D. V. M., Adams, C. V., and Norbury, C. F. (2006). Distinct genetic influences on grammar and phonological short-term memory deficits: Evidence from 6-year-old twins. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 5, 158–169.
Bishop, D. V. M. and Leonard, L. (2001). Speech and Language Impairments in Children: Causes, Characteristics, Intervention and Outcome. Oxford: Psychology Press.
Bishop, D. V. M., North, T., and Donlan, C. (1995). Genetic basis for specific language impairment: evidence from a twin study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 37, 56–71.
Black, M. and Chiat, S. (2002). Noun–verb dissociations: a multi-faceted phenomenon. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 231–250.
Bles, M. and Jansma, B. M. (2008). Phonological processing of ignored distractor pictures, an fMRI investigation. BMC Neuroscience, 9, 20.
Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20, 3–49.
Bloom, P. (2000). How Children Learn the Meanings of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bloom, P. (2001). Précis of how children learn the meanings of words. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 1095–1134.
Blumstein, S. E. (1998). Phonological aspects of aphasia. In M. T. Sarno (ed.), Acquired Aphasia (pp. 157–185). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Blumstein, S. E. (2009). Reflections on the cognitive neuroscience of language. In M. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences IV (pp. 1235–1240). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Blumstein, S. E. (2011). Neural systems underlying lexical competition in auditory word recognition and spoken word production: Evidence from aphasia and functional neuroimaging. In G. Gaskell and P. Zwitserlood (eds.), Lexical Representation: A Multidisciplinary Approach (pp. 123–147). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Boatman, D., Hart, J. J., Lesser, R. P.et al. (1998). Right hemisphere speech perception revealed by amobarbital injection and electrical interference. Neurology, 51, 458–464.
Bock, K. and Levelt, W. (1994). Language production. Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Bock, K. and Miller, C. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23 (1), 45–93.
Boë, L. -J., Heim, J. -L., Honda, K., and Maeda, S. (2002). The potential Neanderthal vowel space was as large as that of modern humans. Journal of Phonetics, 30(3), 465–484.
Böe, L. -J., Heim, J.-L., Honda, K., Maeda, S., Badin, P., and Abry, C. (2007). The vocal tract of newborn humans and Neanderthals. Acoustic capabilities and consequences for the debate on the origin of language. A reply to Lieberman (2007). Journal of Phonetics, 35 (4), 564–581.
Boë, L. -J., Maeda, S., and Heim, J. -L. (1999). Neanderthal man was not morphologically handicapped for speech. Evolution of Communication, 3 (1), 49–77.
Boeckx, C. (2006). Linguistic Minimalism: Origins, Concepts, Methods, and Aims. Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, C. (2008). Bare Syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.
Boeckx, C. (2009). Language in Cognition: Uncovering Mental Structures and the Rules Behind Them. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Boeckx, C. (ed.) (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism. New York: Oxford University Press.