Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Lugea, Jane 2018. The year’s work in stylistics 2017. Language and Literature, Vol. 27, Issue. 4, p. 329.

    Booij, Geert 2018. The Construction of Words. Vol. 4, Issue. , p. 3.

    HOFFMANN, THOMAS 2017. Construction Grammar as Cognitive Structuralism: the interaction of constructional networks and processing in the diachronic evolution of English comparative correlatives. English Language and Linguistics, Vol. 21, Issue. 02, p. 349.

    ×

Book description

The best survey of cognitive linguistics available, this Handbook provides a thorough explanation of its rich methodology, key results, and interdisciplinary context. With in-depth coverage of the research questions, basic concepts, and various theoretical approaches, the Handbook addresses newly emerging subfields and shows their contribution to the discipline. The Handbook introduces fields of study that have become central to cognitive linguistics, such as conceptual mappings and construction grammar. It explains all the main areas of linguistic analysis traditionally expected in a full linguistics framework, and includes fields of study such as language acquisition, sociolinguistics, diachronic studies, and corpus linguistics. Setting linguistic facts within the context of many other disciplines, the Handbook will be welcomed by researchers and students in a broad range of disciplines, including linguistics, cognitive science, neuroscience, gesture studies, computational linguistics, and multimodal studies.

Reviews

‘This is the definitive introduction to cognitive linguistics that the mature field deserves, written by the leading practitioners in cognitive approaches to grammar, semantics, conceptual structure, phonology, and everything in-between (and all around). I can't imagine a better introduction for students of language.'

Benjamin K. Bergen - University of California, San Diego

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Page 1 of 2



Page 1 of 2


Achard, Michel. 2008. Teaching construal: cognitive pedagogical grammar. In Robinson, R. and Ellis, N. C. (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, 432–55. London: Routledge.
Ackerman, Farrell, Blevins, James P., and Malouf, Robert. 2009. Parts and wholes: implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In Blevins, Jim P. and Blevins, Juliette (eds.), Analogy in grammar, 5482. Oxford University Press.
Ackerman, Joshua, Nocera, Christopher C., and Bargh, John A.. 2010. Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science 328, 1712–15.
Ahlers, Jocelyn. 1999. Proposal for the use of cognitive linguistics in Hupa language revitalization. PhD dissertation. University of California at Berkeley.
Aijmer, Karin. 2005. Conversational routines in English: convention and creativity. London: Addison Wesley Longman.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2008. Semi-direct speech: Manambu and beyond. Language Sciences 30, 383422.
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1999. Towards a theory of desirability in conditional reasoning. In Kamio, A. and Takami, K. (eds.), Function and structure: in honor of Susumu Kuno, 195213. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Akhtar, Nameera. 1999. Acquiring basic word order: evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language 26, 339–56.
Alexander, Marc, and Bramwell, Ellen. 2014. Mapping metaphors of wealth and want: a digital approach. Studies in the Digital Humanities 1, 119.
Alibali, Martha W., Heath, Dana C., and Myers, Heather J.. 2001. Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory and Language 44, 169–88.
Alibali, Martha W., Bassok, Miriam, Solomon, Karen O., Syc, Sharon E., and Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 1999. Illuminating mental representations through speech and gesture. Psychological Science 10(4), 327–33.
Alibali, Martha W., Spencer, Robert C., Knox, Lucy, and Kita, Sotaro. 2011. Spontaneous gestures influence strategy choices in problem solving. Psychological Science 22(9), 1138–44.
Allan, Kathryn. 2008. Metaphor and metonymy: a diachronic approach. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Al-Sharafi, Abdul. 2004. Textual metonymy: a semiotic approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Alverson, Hoyt. 1994. Semantics and experience: universal metaphors of time in English, Mandarin, Hindi, and Sesotho. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Amberger, Mengistu (ed.). 2007. The language of memory in a crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ambridge, Ben, and Goldberg, Adele E.. 2008. The island status of clausal complements: evidence in favor of an information structure explanation. Cognitive Linguistics 19, 357–89.
Ambridge, Ben, and Rowland, C. F.. 2009. Predicting children’s errors with negative questions: testing a schema-combination account. Cognitive Linguistics 20(2), 225–66.
Ambridge, Ben, Kidd, E., Rowland, C. F., and Theakston, A. L.. 2015. The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 42(02), 239–73.
Ambridge, Ben, Pine, Julian M., Rowland, Caroline F., Freudenthal, Daniel, and Chang, Franklin. 2012. Avoiding dative overgeneralisation errors: semantics, statistics, or both? Language and Cognitive Processes 29(2), 218–43.
Ambridge, Ben, Pine, Julian M., Rowland, C. F., Chang, F., and Bidgood, A.. 2013. The retreat from overgeneralization in child language acquisition: word learning, morphology, and verb argument structure. WIREs Cognitive Science 4(1), 4762.
Anderson, John R. 2000. Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Anderson, John R. 2014. Cognitive psychology and its implications, 8th edn. New York: Worth.
Anderson, Michael L. 2010. Neural reuse: a fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33, 245313.
Anderwald, Lieselotte, and Kortmann, Bernd. 2013. Applying typological methods in dialectology. In Krug, Manfred and Schlüter, Julia (eds.), Research methods in language variation and change, 313–33. Cambridge University Press.
Andrén, Mats. 2010. Children’s gestures between 18 and 30 months. Lund: Media Tryck.
Anketa. 1997. Anketa aspektologičeskogo seminara filologičeskogo fakulteta MGU. Trudy aspektologičeskogo seminara filologičeskogo fakulteta MGU, vol. 2.
Anscombre, Jean-Claude, and Ducrot, Oswald. 1983. L’argumentation dans la langue. Bruxelles: P. Mardaga.
Antić, Eugenia. 2012. Relative frequency effects in Russian morphology. In Gries, Stefan Th. and Divjak, Dagmar S. (eds.), Frequency effects in language learning and processing, 83107. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Antilla, Raimo. 2008. Analogy: the warp and woof of cognition. In Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard (eds.), Blackwell handbook of historical linguistics, 425–40. Oxford: Blackwell.
Archangeli, Diana, 1988. Aspects of Underspecification Theory. Phonology 5(2), 183208.
Arendholz, Jenny, Bublitz, Wolfram, Kirner, Monika, and Zimmermann, Iris. 2013. Food for thought – or, what’s (in) a recipe? A diachronic analysis of cooking instructions. In Gerhardt, Cornelia, Frobenius, Maximiliane, and Ley, Susanne (eds.) Culinary linguistics: the chef’s special, 119–37. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Armstrong, David F. 1983. Iconicity, arbitrariness, and duality of patterning in signed and spoken language: perspectives on language evolution. Sign Language Studies 38, 5169.
Armstrong, David F., and Wilcox, Sherman. 2007. The gestural origin of language. Oxford University Press.
Armstrong, David F., Stokoe, William C., and Wilcox, Sherman E.. 1994. Signs of the origin of syntax. Current Anthropology 35(4), 349–68.
Armstrong, David F., Stokoe, William C., and Wilcox, Sherman E.. 1995. Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge University Press.
Arppe, Antti. 2008. Univariate, bivariate and multivariate methods in corpus-based lexicography – a study of synonymy. PhD dissertation. University of Helsinki.
Athanasiadou, Amgeliki, and Dirven, René. 1997. Conditionality, hypotheticality, counterfactuality. In Athanasiadou, A. and Dirven, R. (eds.), On conditionals again, 6196. Amsterdam: Philadelphia.
Atkins, Sue, Rundell, Michael, and Sato, Hiroaki. 2003. The contribution of FrameNet to practical lexicography. International Journal of Lexicography 16(3), 333–57.
Auer, Peter and Pfänder, Stefan (eds.). 2011. Constructions: emerging and emergent. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Austin, John L. 1961. The meaning of a word. In Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, Geoffrey (eds.), Philosophical papers, 5575. Oxford University Press.
Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Aziz-Zadeh, Lisa, Wilson, Stephen M., Rizzolatti, Giacomo, and Iacoboni, Marco. 2006. Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Biology 16(18), 1818–23.
Baayen, R. Harald. 1992. Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In Booij, G. and Marle, J. V. (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1991, 109–50. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge University Press.
Baayen, R. Harald. 2009. Corpus linguistics in morphology: morphological productivity. In Lüdeling, Anke and Kytö, Mirya (eds.), Corpus linguistics: an international handbook, 900–17. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Baayen, R. Harald. 2011. Corpus linguistics and naive discriminative learning. Brazilian Journal of Applied Linguistics 11, 295328.
Baayen, R. Harald, Dijkstra, Ton, and Schreuder, Robert. 1997. Singulars and plurals in Dutch: evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language 36, 94117.
Baayen, R. Harald, Milin, P., Durdjevic, D. Filipovic, Hendrix, P., and Marelli, M.. 2011. An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review 118, 438–82.
Baayen, R. Harald, Endresen, Anna, Janda, Laura A., Makarova, Anastasia, and Nesset, Tore. 2013. Making choices in Russian: pros and cons of statistical methods for rival forms. Space and time in Russian temporal expressions. Special issue of Russian Linguistics 37(3), 253–91.
Backus, Ad, and Mos, Maria. 2011. Islands of productivity in corpus data and acceptability judgments: contrasting two potentiality constructions in Dutch. In Schönefeld, Doris (ed.), Converging evidence: methodological and theoretical issues for linguistic research, 165–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Badarneh, Muhammad A. 2003. The rhetorical question as a discursive and stylistic device in the Quran. PhD Dissertation. Arizona State University.
Bakeman, Roger, and Adamson, Lauren B.. 1984. Coordinating attention to people and objects in mother-infant and peer-infant interaction. Child Development 55(4), 1278–89.
Baker, Collin. 2012. FrameNet, current collaborations and future goals. Language Resources and Evaluation 46, 269–86.
Baker, Collin. 2014. FrameNet: a knowledge base for natural language processing. Proceedings of Frame Semantics in NLP: a workshop in honor of Chuck Fillmore at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL 2014), 15, Baltimore, Maryland.
Baker, Collin, and Ruppenhofer, Josef. 2002. FrameNet’s frames vs. Levin’s verb classes. In Larson, J. and Paster, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 2738. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley Linguistics Department.
Baker, Collin, Fillmore, Charles J., and Cronin, Beau. 2003. The structure of the FrameNet database. International Journal of Lexicography 16, 281–96.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1963 [1984]. Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Trans. Emerson, Caryl. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1975 [1981]. The dialogic imagination. Ed. Holquist, Michael, trans. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1979 [1986]. Speech genres and other late essays. Trans. McGee, V. W.. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bal, Mieke. 2009. Narratology: introduction to the theory of narrative, 3rd edn. University of Toronto Press.
Banfield, Ann. 1982. Unspeakable sentences: narration and representation in the language of fiction. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bangerter, Adrian. 2004. Using pointing and describing to achieve joint focus of attention in dialogue. Psychological Science 15, 415–19.
Bannard, Colin, and Matthews, Danielle. 2008. Stored word sequences in language learning: the effect of familiarity on children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science 19(3), 241–48.
Bánréti, Zoltán. 2010. Recursion in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 24(11), 906–14.
Banville, John. 2005. The sea. London: Picador.
Barabási, Albert-László. 2003. Linked: how everything is connected to everything else and what it means. New York: Plume.
Barcelona, Antonio (ed.). 2000. Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Barcelona, Antonio. 2003. The case for a metonymic basis of pragmatic inferencing: evidence from jokes and funny anecdotes. In Panther, Klaus-Uwe and Thornburg, Linda (eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing, 81102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Barcelona, Antonio. 2010. Metonymic inferencing and second language acquisition. AILA Review 23, 134–55.
Barcelona, Antonio. 2011. Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In Benczes, Reka, Barcelona, Antonio, and de Mendoza, Francisco Ruiz (eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: towards a consensus view, 757. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2008. Productivity: evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2011. Lexical vs. structural case: a false dichotomy. Morphology 21(1), 619–54.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2013. Construction-based historical-comparative reconstruction. In Hoffmann, Thomas and Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 438–57. Oxford University Press.
Barðdal, Jóhanna, and Eythórsson, Thorhallur. 2012. Reconstructing syntax: construction grammar and the comparative method. In Boas, Hans C. and Sag, Ivan A. (eds.), Sign-based construction grammar, 261312. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2000. Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: form, meaning and use. Oxford: Blackwell.
Barlow, Michael, and Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.). 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Barnden, John. 2010. Metaphor and metonymy: making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics 21(1), 134.
Barr, Dale J., and Keysar, Boaz. 2004. Making sense of how we make sense: the paradox of egocentrism in language use. In Colston, H. and Katz, A. (eds.), Figurative language processing: social and cultural influences, 2141. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 577660.
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2008. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59, 617–45.
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2009. Simulation, situated conceptualization and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364, 1281–89.
Barsalou, Lawrence W., and Wiemer-Hastings, Katja. 2005. Situating abstract concepts. In Pecher, D. and Zwaan, R. (eds.), Grounding cognition: the role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought, 129–61. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barth, Danielle, and Kapatsinski, Vsevolod. 2014. A multimodel inference approach to categorical variant choice: construction, priming and frequency effects on the choice between full and contracted forms of am, are and is. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2, 158.
Bartlett, Frederic C. 1932 [1967]. Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camioni, L., and Volterra, V.. 1979. The emergence of symbols: cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.
Bates, E., Thal, D., Trauner, D., Fenson, J., Aram, D., Eisele, J., and Nass, R.. 1997. From first words to grammar in children with focal brain injury. Developmental Neuropsychology 13, 275343.
Bates, E., Reilly, J., Wulfeck, B., Dronkers, N., Opei, M., Fenson, J., et al. 2001. Differential effects of unilateral lesions on language production in children and adults. Brain and Language 79, 223–65.
Battison, Robbin. 1978. Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linkstok Press.
Baudouin de Courtenay, . 1972. An attempt at a theory of phonetic alternations. In Stankiewicz, Edward (ed.), A Baudouin de Courtenay anthology: the beginnings of Structural Linguistics, 144213. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle, and Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford University Press.
Bavelas, Janet B. 2005. The two solitudes: reconciling social psychology and social interaction. In Fitch, K. L. and Sanders, R. E. (eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction, 179200. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bavelas, Jane B., Coates, Linda, and Johnson, Trudy. 2002. Listener responses as a collaborative process: the role of gaze. International Communication Association 52, 566–80.
Bavelas, Janet B., Chovil, Nicole, Lawrie, Douglas A., and Wade, Allan. 1992. Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes 15, 469–89.
Bavelas, Janet B., Gerwing, Jennifer, Sutton, Chantelle, and Prevost, Danielle. 2008. Gesturing on the telephone: independent effects of dialogue and visibility. Journal of Memory and Language 58(2), 495520.
Bavelier, D., Corina, D., Jezzard, P., Clark, V., Karni, A., Lalwani, A., et al. 1998. Hemispheric specialization for English and ASL: left invariance‐right variability. Neuroreport 9(7), 1537–42.
Beattie, Geoffrey, and Shovelton, Heather. 2002. An experimental investigation of some properties of individual iconic gestures that mediate their communicative power. British Journal of Psychology 93(2), 179–92.
Beaudoin-Ryan, Leanne, and Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2014. Teaching moral reasoning through gesture. Developmental Science 17(6), 984–90.
Bechtel, William, and Abrahamsen, Adele. 2002. Connectionism and the mind: parallel processing, dynamics, and evolution in networks. Oxford: Blackwell.
Beck, Sigrid. 1997. On the semantics of comparative conditionals. Linguistics and Philosophy 20(3), 229–71.
Beckner, Clay, Blythe, Richard, Bybee, Joan, Christiansen, Morten H., Croft, William, Ellis, Nick C., et al. 2009. Language is a complex adaptive system: position paper. Language Learning 59, 126.
Beeke, Suzanne, Maxim, Jane, and Wilkinson, Ray. 2007. Using conversation analysis to assess and treat people with aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language 28(2), 136–47.
Beekhuizen, Barend, Bod, Rens, and Zuidema, Willem. 2013. Three design principles of language: the search for parsimony. Language and Speech 56, 265–90.
Behrens, Heike. 2006. The input-output relationship in first language acquisition. Language and Cognitive Processes 21, 224.
Beilock, Sian L., and Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2010. Gesture changes thought by grounding it in action. Psychological Science 21(11), 1605–10.
Bell, Alan, Jurafsky, Daniel, Fosler-Lussier, Eric, Girand, Cynthia, Gregory, Michelle, and Gildea, Daniel. 2003. Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113(2), 1001–24.
Bencini, Giulia M. L. 2013. Psycholinguistics. In Hoffmann, Thomas and Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 379–96. Oxford University Press.
Bencini, Giulia M. L., and Goldberg, Adele E.. 2000. The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 43, 640–51.
Bencini, Giulia M. L., and Valian, Virginia. 2008. Abstract sentence representations in 3-year-olds: evidence from comprehension and production. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 97113.
Benczes, Réka, Barcelona, Antonio, and de Mendoza, Francisco Ruiz (eds.). 2011. Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: towards a consensus view. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bender, Andrea, Beller, Sieghard, and Bennardo, Giovanni. 2010. Temporal frames of reference: conceptual analysis and empirical evidence from German, English, Mandarin Chinese, and Tongan. Journal of Cognition and Culture 10, 283307.
Bennett, Jonathan. 2003. A philosophical guide to conditionals. Oxford University Press.
Berber-Sardinha, Tony. 2010. A program for finding metaphor candidates in corpora. The Especialist (PUCSP) 31, 4968.
Beréndi, Marta, Csábi, Szilvia, and Kövecses, Zoltán. 2008. Using conceptual metaphors and metonymies in vocabulary teaching. In Boers, Frank and Lindstromberg, Seth (eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology, 65100. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Berez, Andrea L., and Gries, Stefan Th.. 2010. Correlates to middle marking in Dena’ina iterative verbs. International Journal of American Linguistics 76(1), 145–65.
Bergen, Benjamin K. 2003. Towards morphology and agreement in Embodied Construction Grammar. www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~bkbergen/papers/ECGmorph.pdf.
Bergen, Benjamin K. 2004. The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language 80(2), 290311.
Bergen, Benjamin K. 2007. Experimental methods for simulation semantics. In Gonzalez-Marquez, Monica, Mittelberg, Irene, Coulson, Seana, and Spivey, Michael J. (eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics, 277301. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bergen, Benjamin K. 2012. Louder than words: the new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.
Bergen, Benjamin, and Chang, Nancy C.. 2005. Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In Östman, Jan-Ola and Fried, Mirjam (eds.), Construction grammars: cognitive and cross-language dimensions, 147–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bergen, Benjamin, and Chang, Nancy C.. 2013. Embodied construction grammar. In Hoffman, T. and Trousdale, G. (eds.), Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 168–90. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bergen, Benjamin, and Chan Lau, T. T.. 2012. Writing direction affects how people map space onto time. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 109.
Bergen, Benjamin, and Feldman, Jerome. 2008. Embodied concept learning. In Calvo, Paco and Gomila, Toni (eds.), Handbook of cognitive science: an embodied approach, 313–31. San Diego: Elsevier.
Bergen, Benjamin, and Plauché, Madelaine. 2001. Voilà voilà: extensions of deictic constructions in French. In Cienki, Alan, Luka, Barbara, and Smith, Michael (eds.), Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure, 238–49. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Bergmann, Kirsten, and Kopp, Stefan. 2012. Gestural alignment in natural dialogue. In Cooper, R. P., Peebles, D., and Miyake, N. (eds.). Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2012), 1326–31. Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
Bergmann, Till, and Matlock, Teenie. In prep. Fictive motion in the wild: discourse data from the TV News Archive in the wild.
Bergs, Alexander. 2008. Shall and shan’t in Contemporary English. In Trousdale, Graeme and Gisbourne, Nick (eds.), Constructional explanations in English grammar, 113–44. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bergs, Alexander. 2010. Expressions of futurity in contemporary English: a Construction Grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics 14(2), 217–38.
Bergs, Alexander. 2012a. Construction Grammar. In Bergs, Alexander and Brinton, Laurel (eds.), English historical linguistics, 1631–46. Vol 2. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Bergs, Alexander. 2012b. The uniformitarian principle and the risk of anachronisms in language and social history. In Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel, and Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo (eds.), The Blackwell handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 8098. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bergs, Alexander, and Diewald, Gabriele (eds.). 2008. Constructions and language change. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bergs, Alexander, and Diewald, Gabriele. 2009. Contexts and constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bergs, Alexander, and Pentrel, Meike. 2015. Ælc þara þe þas min word gehierþ and þa wyrcþ…: Psycholinguistic perspectives on early English. In Adams, Michael, Fulk, Robert D., and Brinton, Laurel J. (eds.), Studies in the history of the Englishl VI: Evidence and method in histories of English, 249–78. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Berko, Jean. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word-Journal of the International Linguistic Association 14(2–3), 150–77.
Berlin, Brent, and Kay, Paul. 1969. Basic color terms. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Berman, Ruth, and Slobin, Dan. 1994. Relating events in narrative: a crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bernolet, Sarah, and Colleman, Timothy. In prep. Sense-based and lexeme-based alternation biases in the Dutch dative alternation. In Yoon, Jiyoung and Gries, Stefan Th. (eds.), Corpus-based approaches to Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bertoldi, Anderson, and de Oliveira Chishman, Rove Luize. 2011. Developing a frame-based lexicon for the Brazilian legal language: the case of the Criminal_Process frame. AICOL, 256–70.
Beukeboom, Camiel J., Finkenauer, Catrin, and, Wigboldus, Daniël H. J.. 2010. The negation bias: when negations signal stereotypic expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99(6), 978–92.
Bex, Tony, Burke, Michael, and Stockwell, Peter. 2000. Contextualized stylistics: in honour of Peter Verdonk. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Biber, Douglas. 1994. An analytical framework for register studies. In Biber, Douglas and Finegan, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register, 3156. Oxford University Press.
Biber, Douglas, and Finegan, Edward. 1994. Introduction: situating register in sociolinguistics. In Biber, Douglas and Finegan, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register, 312. Oxford University Press.
Bienfait, Frits, and van Beek, Walter E. A.. 2001. Right and left as political categories: an exercise in ‘not-so-primitive’ classification. Anthropos 96, 169–78.
Biernacka, Eva. 2013. The role of metonymy in political discourse. PhD dissertation. Open University, Milton Keynes.
Binder, Jeffrey R., and Desai, Rutvik H.. 2011. The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in cognitive sciences 15(11), 527–36.
Binder, Jeffery R., Desai, Rutvik H., Graves, William W., and Conant, Lisa L.. 2009. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex 19(12), 2767–96.
Bitzer, Lloyd. 1969. The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 1(1), 114.
Blank, I., Balewski, Z., Mahowald, K., and Fedorenko, E.. 2016. Syntactic processing is distributed across the language system. NeuroImage 127, 307–23.
Blevins, James P. 2006. Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42, 531–73.
Bleys, Joris, Stadler, Kevin, and De Beule, Joachim. 2011. Search in linguistic processing. In Steels, Luc (ed.), Design patterns in fluid construction grammar, 149–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Blomberg, Johan. 2015. The expression of non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai. Cognitive Linguistics 26(4), 657–96.
Blomberg, Johan and Zlatev, Jordan. 2014. Actual and non-actual motion: why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13(3), 395418.
Blomberg, Johan and Zlatev, Jordan. 2015. Non-actual motion: phenomenological analysis and linguistic evidence. Cognitive Processing 16, 153–57.
Blommaert, Jan. 2014. From mobility to complexity in sociolinguistic theory and method. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies 103, 124.
Blommaert, Jan, and Rampton, Ben. 2011. Language and superdiversity. Diversities 13, 121.
Bloom, Paul. 2000. How children learn the meanings of words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.
Blumberg, Mark S. 2006. Basic instinct: the genesis of behavior. New York: Basic Books.
Sheila, Blumstein, and Amso, Dima. 2013. Dynamic functional organization of language: insights from functional neuroimaging. Perspectives on Psychological Science 8(1), 4448.
Boas, Hans C. 2001. Frame Semantics as a framework for describing polysemy and syntactic structures of English and German motion verbs in contrastive computational lexicography. In Rayson, P., Wilson, A., McEnery, T., Hardie, A., and Khoja, S. (eds.), Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2001 Conference, 6473. Lancaster University UCREL.
Boas, Hans C. 2002. Bilingual FrameNet dictionaries for machine translation. In Rodríguez, M. González and Araujo, C. Paz Suárez (eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Vol. IV, 1364–71, Las Palmas, Spain.
Boas, Hans C. 2003a. A constructional approach to resultatives. Stanford: CSLI.
Boas, Hans C. 2003b. A lexical-constructional account of the locative alternation. In Carmichael, L., Huang, C.-H., and Samiian, V. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2001 Western Conference in Linguistics. Vol. 13, 2742.
Boas, Hans C. 2005a. Determining the productivity of resultative constructions: a reply to Goldberg and Jackendoff. Language 81(2), 448–64.
Boas, Hans C. 2005b. From theory to practice: Frame Semantics and the design of FrameNet. In Langer, S. and Schnorbusch, D. (eds.), Semantik im Lexikon, 129–60. Tübingen: Narr.
Boas, Hans C. 2005c. Semantic frames as interlingual representations for multilingual lexical databases. International Journal of Lexicography 18(4), 445–78.
Boas, Hans C. 2006. A frame-semantic approach to identifying syntactically relevant elements of meaning. In Steiner, Petra, Boas, Hans C., and Schierholz, Stefan (eds.), Contrastive studies and valency: studies in honor of Hans Ulrich Boas, 119–49. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Boas, Hans C. 2008a. Resolving Form-meaning Discrepancies in Construction Grammar. In Leino, J. (ed.), Constructional Reorganization, 1136. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Boas, Hans C. 2008b. Determining the structure of lexical entries and grammatical constructions in Construction Grammar. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6, 113–44.
Boas, Hans C. 2008c. Towards a frame-constructional approach to verb classification. In Acevedo, E. Sosa and Rodríguez, F. J. Cortés (eds.), Grammar, Constructions, and Interfaces. Special issue of Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 57, 1748.
Boas, Hans C. (ed.). 2009. Multilingual FrameNets in computational lexicography. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Boas, Hans C. 2010a. Linguistically relevant meaning elements of English communication verbs. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 24, 5482.
Boas, Hans C. 2010b. Comparing constructions across languages. In Boas, H. C. (ed.), Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar, 120. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Boas, Hans C. (ed.). 2010c. Contrastive studies in construction grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Boas, Hans C. 2011a. Zum Abstraktionsgrad von Resultativkonstruktionen. In Engelberg, Stefan, Holler, Anke, and Proost, Kristel (eds.), Sprachliches Wissen zwischen Lexikon und Grammatik, 3769. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Boas, Hans C. 2011b. A frame-semantic approach to syntactic alternations with build-verbs. In Medina, P. Guerrero (ed.), Morphosyntactic alternations in English, 207–34. London: Equinox.
Boas, Hans C. 2011c. Coercion and leaking argument structures in Construction Grammar. Linguistics 49(6), 1271–303.
Boas, Hans C. 2013a. Cognitive Construction Grammar. In Hoffmann, Thomas and Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 233–52. Oxford University Press.
Boas, Hans C. 2013b. Wie viel Wissen steckt in Wörterbüchern? Eine frame-semantische Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 57, 7597.
Boas, Hans C. 2013c. Frame Semantics and translation. In Rojo, A. and Ibarretxte-Antunano, I. (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics and Translation, 125–58. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Boas, Hans C. 2014. Zur Architektur einer konstruktionsbasierten Grammatik des Deutschen. In Ziem, A. and Lasch, A. (eds.), Grammatik als Inventar von Konstruktionen? Sprachliches Wissen im Fokus der Konstruktionsgrammatik. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Boas, Hans C. 2016. Frames and constructions for the study of oral poetics. In Cánovas, C. Pagán and Antović, M. (eds.), Oral Poetics and Cognitive Science, 99124. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Boas, Hans C., and Dux, Ryan. 2013. Semantic frames for foreign language education: towards a German frame-based dictionary. Veridas On-line. Special Issue on Frame Semantics and its Technological Applications 82100.
Boas, Hans C., and Sag, Ivan A. (eds.). 2012. Sign-based construction grammar. Stanford: CSLI.
Boas, Hans C., Dux, Ryan, and Ziem, Alexander. 2016. Frames and constructions in an online learner’s dictionary of German. In De Knop, S. and Gilquin, G. (eds.), Applied Construction Grammar, 303326. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Bock, Kathryn. 1986a. Meaning, sound and syntax: lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 12, 575–86.
Bock, Kathryn. 1986b. Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18, 355–87.
Bock, Kathryn, and Griffin, Zenzi. 2000. The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129, 177–92.
Bod, Rens. 2000. The storage vs. computation of three-word sentences. Paper presented at AMLaP-2000.
Bod, Rens, Hay, Jennifer, and Jannedy, Stefanie. 2003. Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Boers, Frank. 2000a. Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21, 553–71.
Boers, Frank. 2000b. Enhancing metaphoric awareness in specialized reading. English for Specific Purposes 19, 137–47.
Boers, Frank. 2011. Cognitive semantic ways of teaching figurative phrases: an assessment. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9, 227–61.
Boers, Frank. 2013. Cognitive Linguistic approaches to second language vocabulary: assessment and integration. Language Teaching: Surveys and Studies 46(2), 208–24.
Boers, Frank, and Lindstromberg, Seth (eds.). 2008a. Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Boers, Frank, and Lindstromberg, Seth. 2008b. From empirical findings to pedagogical practice. In Boers, Frank and Lindstromberg, Seth (eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology, 375–94. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Boers, Frank, Lindstromberg, Seth, Littlemore, Jeannette, Stengers, Hélène, and Eyckmans, June. 2008. Variables in the mnemonic effectiveness of pictorial elucidation. In Boers, Frank and Lindstromberg, Seth (eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology, 65100. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2010. The language-specificity of conceptual structure: path, fictive motion, and time relations. In Malt, Barbara and Wolff, Philip (eds.), Words and the mind: how words capture human experience, 111–37. Oxford University Press.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1949. The sign is not arbitrary. Boletín del Instituto Caro y Cuervo (= Thesaurus) 5, 5262.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1985. The inherent iconism of intonation. In Haiman, John (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, 97108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Boogaart, Ronny. 2009. Semantics and pragmatics in construction grammar: the case of modal verbs. In Bergs, Alexander and Diewald, Gabriele (eds.), Contexts and constructions, 213–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Boogaart, Ronny, and Fortuin, Egbert. 2016. Modality and mood in cognitive linguistics and construction grammar(s). In Van der Auwera, Johan and Nuyts, Jan (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 514–34. Oxford University Press.
Boogaart, Ronny, Colleman, Timothy, and Rutten, Gijsbert. 2014. Constructions all the way everywhere: four new directions in constructionist research. In Boogaart, Ronny, Colleman, Timothy, and Rutten, Gijsbert (eds.), Extending the scope of Construction Grammar, 114. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
Booij, Geert. 2002. The morphology of Dutch. Oxford University Press.
Booij, Geert. 2009. Lexical integrity as a morphological universal, a constructionist view. In Scalise, Sergio, Magni, Elizabeta, and Bisetto, Antonietta (eds.), Universals of language today, 83100. Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media.
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction morphology. Oxford University Press.
Booij, Geert. 2013. Morphology in construction grammar. In Hoffmann, Thomas and Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 255–73. Oxford University Press.
Booij, Geert. 2014. Language use and the architecture of grammar. Suvremena lingvistika (Contemporary linguistics) 40, 192212.
Booij, Geert. 2015. The nominalization of Dutch particle verbs: schema unification and second order schemas. Nederlandse Taalkunde 20, 285314.
Booij, Geert. 2016. Inheritance and motivation in construction morphology. In Gisborne, Nik and Hippisley, Andrew (eds.), Default inheritance, n. pag. Oxford University Press.
Booij, Geert, and Audring, Jenny. 2016. Construction morphology and the parallel architecture of grammar. Cognitive Science. doi:10.1111/cogs.12323.
Booij, Geert, and Audring, Jenny. In prep. Category change in construction morphology. In Van Goethem, Kristel, Norde, Muriel, Coussé, Evie, and Vanderbauwhede, Gudrun (eds.), Category change from a constructional perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Booij, Geert, and Hüning, Matthias. 2014. Affixoids and constructional idioms. In Boogaart, Ronny, Colleman, Timothy, and Rutten, Gijsbert (eds.), Extending the scope of construction grammar, 77105. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Booij, Geert, and Masini, Francesca. 2015. The role of second order schemas in word formation. In Bauer, Laurie, Kőrtvélyessy, Livia, and Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), Semantics of complex words, 4766. Cham: Springer.
Borin, Lars, Dannélls, Dana, Forsberg, Markus, Gronostaj, Maria Toporowska, and Kokkinakis, Dimitrios. 2009. Thinking green: toward Swedish FrameNet+. In FrameNet Masterclass and Workshop, n. pag. Milan: Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore.
Borin, Lars, Dannélls, Dana, Forsberg, Markus, Gronostaj, Maria Toporowska, and Kokkinakis, Dimitrios. 2010. The past meets the present in the Swedish FrameNet++. https://svn.spraakdata.gu.se/sb/fnplusplus/pub/SweFN_Euralex_extended.pdf.
Borkent, Mike. 2010. Illusions of simplicity: a cognitive approach to visual poetry. English Text Construction 3(2), 145–64.
Borkent, Mike, Dancygier, Barbara, and Hinnell, Jennifer (eds.). 2013. Language and the creative mind. University of Chicago Press.
Boroditsky, Lera. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75(1), 128.
Boroditsky, Lera. 2001. Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43(1), 122.
Boroditsky, Lera, and Gaby, Alice. 2010. Remembrance of times East: absolute spatial representations of time in an Australian Aboriginal Community. Psychological Science 21(11), 1635–39.
Boroditsky, Lera, and Ramscar, Michael. 2002. The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science 13, 185–88.
Boroditsky, Lera, Fuhrman, Orly, and McCormick, Kelly. 2011. Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition 118(2), 123–29.
Boroditsky, Lera, Gaby, Alice, and Levinson, Stephen C.. 2007. Time in space. In Majid, A. (ed.), Field manual volume 10, 5980. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Borsley, Robert D. 2004. An approach to English comparative correlatives. In Müller, Stephan (ed.), Proceedings of the 11th international conference on head-driven phrase structure grammar, 7092. Stanford: CSLI.
Borsley, Robert D. 2006. Syntactic and lexical approaches to unbounded dependencies. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 49, 3157.
Borsley, Robert D. 2007. Hang on again! Are we ‘on the right track’? Martin Atkinson the minimalist muse. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics 53, 4370.
Bottini, Roberto. 2011. An interdisciplinary study of time in language and mind. PhD dissertation. Università degli Studi di Bergamo, Italy.
Bottini, Roberto, and Casasanto, Daniel. 2010. Implicit spatial length modulates time estimates, but not vice versa. In Ohlsson, Stellan and Catrambone, Richard (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1348–53. Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
Bottini, Roberto, and Casasanto, Daniel. 2013. Space and time in the child’s mind: metaphoric or ATOMic? Frontiers in Psychology 4, 19.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.
Bouveret, Myriam. 2012. GIVE frames and constructions in French. In Bouveret, M. and Legallois, D. (eds.), Constructions in French, 99126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bowdle, Brian F., and Gentner, Deirdre. 2005. The career of metaphor. Psychological Review 112(1), 193216.
Bowerman, Melissa. 1982. Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In Wanner, E. and Gleitman, L. R. (eds.), Language acquisition: the state of the art, 319–46. Cambridge University Press.
Bowerman, Melissa. 1988. The ‘no negative evidence’ problem: how do children avoid constructing an overgeneral grammar? In Hawkins, J. A. (ed.), Explaining language universals, 73101. Oxford: Blackwells.
Bowerman, Melissa. 1996. The origins of children’s spatial semantic categories: cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In Gumperz, J. J. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 145–76. Cambridge University Press.
Bowerman, Melissa, and Pederson, Eric. 1992. Topological relations picture series. In Levinson, Stephen C. (ed.), Space stimuli kit 1.2: November 1992, 51. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Boyd, William. 2009. Ordinary thunderstorms. London: Bloomsbury.
Boye, Kasper, and Harder, Peter. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88, 144.
Bradlow, Ann R., Nygaard, Lynne, and Pisoni, David. 1999. Effects of talker, rate and amplitude variation on recognition memory. Perception and Psychophysics 61, 206–19.
Braine, Martin D., and Brooks, Patricia J.. 1995. Verb argument structure and the problem of avoiding an overgeneral grammar. In Tomasello, Michael and Merriman, William E. (eds.), Beyond names for things: young children’s acquisition of verbs, 352–76. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brandt, Line. 2008. A semiotic approach to fictive interaction as a representational strategy in communicative meaning construction. In Oakley, Todd and Hougaard, Anders (eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction, 109–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brandt, Line. 2013. The communicative mind: a linguistic exploration of conceptual integration and meaning construction. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Brandt, Line, and Brandt, Per Aage. 2005. Making sense of a blend. A cognitive semiotics approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3, 216–49.
Brandt, Line, and Pascual, Esther. 2016. ‘Say yes hello to this ad’: the persuasive rhetoric of fictive interaction in marketing. In Pascual, Esther and Sandler, Sergeiy (eds.), The conversation frame: forms and functions of fictive interaction, 303–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brandt, Per Aage. 2004. Spaces, domains, and meaning: essays in cognitive semiotics. Bern: Peter Lang.
Brandt, Silke, , E., Kidd, Evan, Lieven, Elena, and Tomasello, Michael. 2009. The discourse bases of relativization: an investigation of young German and English-speaking children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Cognitive Linguistics 20(3), 539–70.
Branigan, Holly, Pickering, Martin J., and Cleland, Alexandra A.. 2000. Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition 75, 1325.
Brasoveanu, Adrian. 2008. Comparative and equative correlatives as anaphora to differentials. Poster presented at Semantics and Linguistic Theory 18, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Massachusetts, and at the 9th Semfest, Stanford, California.
Bråten, Stein. 2006. Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny. Cambridge University Press.
Brdar, Mario, and Brdar-Szabó, Rita. 2009. The (non) metonymic use of place names in English, German, Hungarian and Croatian. In Panther, Klaus-Uwe, Thornburg, Linda, and Barcelona, Antonio (eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar, 229–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brdar, Mario, Gries, Stephan, and Fuchs, Milena Zic (eds.). 2011. Cognitive linguistics: convergence and expansion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brdar-Szabó, Rita, and Brdar, Mario. 2011. What do metonymic chains reveal about the nature of metonymy? In Benczes, Réka, Barcelona, Antonio, and de Mendoza, Francisco Ruiz (eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: towards a consensus view, 217–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brems, Lieselotte, and Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2012. Grammaticalization. In Bergs, Alexander and Brinton, Laurel (eds.), English historical linguistics: vol. 2, 1558–76. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Brennan, Susan E., and Clark, Herbert H.. 1996. Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22, 1482–93.
Brentari, Diane. 1998. A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bressler, Steven L. and Menon, Vinod. 2010 Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(6), 277–90.
Brezina, Vaclav, McEnery, Tony, and Wattam, Stephen. 2015. Collocations in context: a new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20(2), 139–73.
Brindöpke, Christel, Häger, J., Johanntokrax, Michaela, Pahde, Arno, Schwalbe, Michael, and Wrede, Britta. 1995. Darf ich Dich Marvin nennen? Instruktionsdialoge in einem Wizard-of-Oz Szenario: Szenario-design und auswertung. Universität Bielefeld: SFB-Report ‘Situierte künstliche Kommunikatoren’ 95/16.
Brinton, Laurel. 2012. Lexicalization. In Bergs, Alexander and Brinton, Laurel (eds.), English historical linguistics: vol. 2, 1577–98. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Brinton, Laurel, and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge University Press.
Brisard, Frank. 2006. Logic, subjectivity and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. In Anthanasiadou, Angeliki, Canakis, Costas, and Cornillie, Bert (eds.) Subjectification: various paths to subjectivity, 4174. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Broaders, Sarah C., Cook, Susan Wagner, Mitchell, Zachary, and Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 2007. Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136(4), 539–50.
Broccias, Cristiano. 2013. Cognitive grammar. In Hoffmann, Thomas and Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 191210. Oxford University Press.
Brône, Geert. 2008. Hyper- and misunderstanding in interactional humour. Journal of Pragmatics 40(12), 2027–61.
Brône, Geert. 2010. Bedeutungskonstitution in verbalem Humor: ein kognitiv-linguistischer und diskurssemantischer Ansatz. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Brône, Geert. 2012. Humour and irony in cognitive pragmatics. In Schmid, Hans-Jörg (ed.), Handbook of cognitive pragmatics, vol. 4: cognitive pragmatics, 463504. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Brône, Geert, and Coulson, Seana. 2010. Processing deliberate ambiguity in newspaper headlines: double grounding. Discourse Processes 47(3), 212–36.
Brône, Geert, and Feyaerts, Kurt. 2005. Headlines and cartoons in the economic press: double grounding as a discourse supportive strategy. In Erreygers, Guido and Jacobs, Geert (eds.), Language, communication and the economy, 7399. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brône, Geert, and Oben, Bert. 2013. Resonating humour: a corpus-based approach to creative parallelism in discourse. In Feyaerts, Kurt, Veale, Tony, and Forceville, Charles (eds.), Creativity and the agile mind: a multi-disciplinary study of a multi-faceted phenomenon, 181204. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Brône, Geert, and Oben, Bert. 2015. InSight Interaction: a multimodal and multifocal dialogue corpus. Language Resources and Evaluation 49, 195214.
Brône, Geert, and Vandaele, Jeroen (eds.). 2009. Cognitive poetics: goals, gains, and gaps. New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Brône, Geert, and Zima, Elisabeth. 2014. Towards a dialogic construction grammar: a corpus-based approach to ad hoc routines and resonance activation. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3), 457–95.
Brône, Geert, Feyaerts, Kurt, and Veale, Tony (eds.). 2015. Cognitive linguistic humor research: current trends and new developments. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Brône, Geert, Oben, Bert, and Feyaerts, Kurt. 2017. Eye gaze and viewpoint in multimodal interaction management. Special issue on Viewpoint phenomena in multimodal communication. Dancygier, Barbara and Vandelanotte, Lieven (eds.) Cognitive Linguistics 28(3).
Brooks, Patricia, and Tomasello, Michael. 1999a. Young children learn to produce passives with nonce verbs. Developmental Psychology 35, 2944.
Brooks, Patricia, and Tomasello, Michael. 1999b. How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language 75, 720–38.
Brooks, Patricia, Tomasello, Michael, Dodson, Kelly, and Lewis, Lawrence B.. 1999. Young children’s overgeneralizations with fixed transitivity verbs. Child Development 70, 1325–37.
Brown, Amanda, and Chen, Jidong. 2013. Construal of manner in speech and gesture in Mandarin, English, and Japanese. Cognitive Linguistics 24(4), 605–31.
Brown, Penelope 2012. Time and space in Tzeltal: Is the future uphill? Frontiers in Psychology 3, 212.
Brown, Penelope, and Levinson, Stephen C.. 1987. Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Brugman, Claudia. 1983. The use of body-part terms as locatives in Chalcatongo Mixtec. Survey of California and Other Indian Languages 4, 235–90.
Bruner, Jerome S. 1983. Child’s talk: learning to use language. New York: W. W. Norton.
Bruner, Jerome S. 1990. Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brunyé, Tad T., Gardony, Aaron, Mahoney, Caroline R., and Taylor, Holly A.. 2012. Body-specific representations of spatial location. Cognition 23(2), 229–39.
Brunyé, Tad T., Ditman, Tali, Mahoney, Caroline R., Augustyn, Jason S., and Taylor, Holly A.. 2009. When you and I share perspectives: pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science 20(1), 2732.
Büchel, Christian, Price, Cathy, Frackowiak, R. S., and Friston, Karl. 1998. Different activation patterns in the visual cortex of late and congenitally blind subjects. Brain 121, 409–19.
Bucholtz, Mary. 2010. White kids: language and white youth identities. Cambridge University Press.
Bucholtz, Mary, and Hall, Kira. 2005. Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7, 585614.
Budwig, Nancy, Narasimhan, Bhuvana, and Srivastava, Smita. 2006. Interim solutions: the acquisition of early verb constructions in Hindi. In Clark, Eve V. and Kelly, Barbara F. (eds.), Constructions in acquisition, 163–83. Stanford: CSLI.
Buescher, Kimberly, and Strauss, Susan. In prep. Conceptual frameworks and L2 pedagogy: the case of French prepositions. In Tyler, Andrea, Ortega, Lourdes, Uno, Mariko, and Park, Hae In (eds.), Usage-inspired L2 instruction: researched pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Burchardt, Aljoscha, Erk, Katrin, Frank, Anette, Kowalski, Andrea, Padó, Sebastian, and Pinkal, Manfred. 2009. Using FrameNet for the semantic analysis of German: annotation, representation, and automation. In Boas, Hans C. (ed.), Multilingual FrameNets: methods and applications, 209–44. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Burling, Robbins, 1966. The metrics of children’s verse: a cross-linguistic study, American Anthropologist 68(6), 1418–41.
Burton, H, Snyder, A. Z., Conturo, T. E., Akbudak, E., Ollinger, J. M., and Raichle, M. E.. 2002a. Adaptive changes in early and late blind: a fMRI study of Braille reading. Journal of Neurophysiology 87, 589611.
Burton, H., Snyder, A. Z., Diamond, J. B., and Raichle, M. E.. 2002b. Adaptive changes in early and late blind: a FMRI study of verb generation to heard nouns. Journal of Neurophysiology 88(6), 3359–71.
Busse, Dietrich. 2012. Frame-Semantik: Ein Kompendium. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Butler, Christopher. 1985. Statistics in linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Butterworth, George, and Grover, Lesley. 1990. Joint visual attention, manual pointing, and preverbal communication in human infancy. In Jeannerod, M. (ed.), Attention and performance, vol. XIII, motor representation and control, 605–24. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(5), 425–55.
Bybee, Joan. 2000. The phonology of the lexicon: evidence from lexical diffusion. Usage-based models of language, 6585.
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: the role of frequency. In Joseph, Brian D., and Janda, Richard D. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–23. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: the mind’s response to repetition. Language 82, 711–33.
Bybee, Joan. 2007. Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan. 2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In Hoffmann, Thomas and Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 4969. Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan, and Hopper, Paul (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan, and Scheibman, Joanne. 1999. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics 37, 575–96.
Bylund, Emanuel. 2011. Segmentation and temporal structuring of events in early Spanish-Swedish bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism 15(1), 5684.
Caballero, Rosario. 2006. Re-viewing space: figurative language in architects’ assessment of built space. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Cabeza, Roberto. 2002. Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. Psychology and Aging 17(1), 85.
Cabeza, Roberto, and Nyberg, Lars. 2000. Imaging cognition II: an empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12(1), 147.
Cadierno, Teresa. 2004. Expressing motion events in a second language: a cognitive typological approach. In Achard, Michel and Neimeier, Suzanne (eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching, 1349. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cadierno, Teresa. 2008. Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In Robinson, Peter and Ellis, Nick C. (eds.) Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, 239–75. London: Routledge.
Cadierno, Teresa, and Eskildsen, Søren Wind. 2016. In Cadierno, Teresa and Eskildsen, Søren Wind (eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning, 121223. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cadierno, Teresa, Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide, and Hijazo-Gascón, Alberto. 2016. Semantic categorization of placement verbs in L1 Danish and Spanish. Language Learning 66(1), 191223.
Cai, Zhenguang G., and Connell, Louise. 2015. Space-time interdependence: evidence against asymmetric mapping between time and space. Cognition 136, 268–81.
Calbris, Genevieve. 1990. The semiotics of French gesture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Caldwell-Harris, Catherine, Berant, Jonathan, and Edelman, Shimon. 2012. Measuring mental entrenchment of phrases with perceptual identification, familiarity ratings, and corpus frequency statistics. In Divjak, Dagmar S. and Gries, Stefan Th. (eds.), Frequency effects in language representation, 165–94. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cameron, Lynne. 2011. Metaphor and reconciliation: the discourse dynamics of empathy in post–conflict conversations. London: Routledge.
Cameron, Lynne, and Deignan, Alice. 2003. Combining large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 18(3), 149–60.
Cameron, Lynne, and Deignan, Alice. 2006. The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics 27(4), 671–90.
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea, Lieven, Elena, and Theakston, Anna. 2007. What part of no do children not understand? A usage-based account of multiword negation. Journal of Child Language 34(2), 251–82.
Cantrall, William R. 1974. Viewpoint, reflexives, and the nature of noun phrases. The Hague: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cappelle, Bert. 2011. The the… the… construction: meaning and readings. Journal of Pragmatics 43(1), 99117.
Cappelle, Bert, Shtyrov, Yury, and Pulvermüller, Friedemann. 2010. Heating up or cooling up the brain? MEG evidence that phrasal verbs are lexical units. Brain and Language 115(3), 189201.
Carden, Guy, and Dieterich, Thomas G.. 1980. Introspection, observation and experiment: an example where experiment pays off. Journal of the Philosophy of Science Association 2, 583–97.
Cardin, Velia, Orfanidou, Eleni, Rönnberg, Jerker, Capek, Cheryl M., Rudner, Mary, and Woll, Bencie. 2013. Dissociating cognitive and sensory neural plasticity in human superior temporal cortex. Nature Communications 4, 1473.
Carlson, Richard A., Avraamides, Marios N., Cary, Melanie, and Strasberg, Stephen. 2007. What do the hands externalize in simple arithmetic? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33(4), 747–56.
Caron-Pargue, Josiane and Caron, Jean. 1991. Psychopragmatics vs. sociopragmatics: the function of pragmatic markers in thinking-aloud protocols. In Verschueren, Jef (ed.), Pragmatics at issue: selected papers of the International Pragmatics Conference, 2936. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Carpenter, Bob. 1992. The logic of typed feature structures. Cambridge University Press.
Carpenter, Malinda, Akhtar, Nameera, and Tomasello, Michael. 1998. Fourteen-through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development 21(2), 315–30.
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and utterances: the pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
Carter, Ronald. 2004. Language and creativity, the art of common talk. London: Routledge.
Casad, Eugene. 1982. Cora locationals and structured imagery. PhD dissertation. University of California at San Diego.
Casad, Eugene, and Langacker, Ronald W.. 1985. ‘Inside’ and ‘outside’ in Cora grammar. IJAL 51, 247–81.
Casad, Eugene, and Palmer, Gary (eds.). 2003. Cognitive linguistics and non-Indo-European languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Casasanto, Daniel. 2008a. Similarity and proximity: when does close in space mean close in mind? Memory and Cognition 36, 1047–56.
Casasanto, Daniel. 2008b. Who’s afraid of the big bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning 58(1), 6379.
Casasanto, Daniel. 2009. Embodiment of abstract concepts: good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138(3), 351–67.
Casasanto, Daniel. 2010. Space for thinking. In Evans, Vyvyan and Chilton, Paul (eds.), Language, cognition, and space: state of the art and new directions, 453–78. London: Equinox.
Casasanto, Daniel. 2013. Experiential origins of mental metaphors: language, culture, and the body. In Landau, Mark J., Robinson, Michael D., and Meier, Brian P. (eds.), The power of metaphor: examining its influence on social life, 249–68. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
Casasanto, Daniel. 2014. Development of metaphorical thinking: the role of language. In Borkent, Mike, Dancygier, Barbara, and Hinnel, Jennifer (eds.), Language and the creative mind, 318. Stanford: CSLI.
Casasanto, Daniel. 2016a. A shared mechanism of linguistic, cultural, and bodily relativity. Language Learning 66(3), 714–30.
Casasanto, Daniel. 2016b. Relationships between space, time, and number: insights from language acquisition. Paper presented at the International Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Granada, Spain.
Casasanto, Daniel, and Boroditsky, Lera. 2008. Time in the mind: using space to think about time. Cognition 106(2), 579–93.
Casasanto, Daniel, and Bottini, Roberto. 2014. Mirror reading can reverse the flow of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143(2), 473–79.
Casasanto, Daniel, and Chrysikou, Evangelia G.. 2011. When left is ‘right’: motor fluency shapes abstract concepts. Psychological Science 22(4), 419–22.
Casasanto, Daniel, and Dijkstra, Katinka. 2010. Motor action and emotional memory. Cognition 115, 179–85.
Casasanto, Daniel, and Gijssels, Tom. 2015. What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor? Linguistics Vanguard 1(1), 327–37.
Casasanto, Daniel, and Henetz, Tania. 2012. Handedness shapes children’s abstract concepts. Cognitive Science 36 359–72.
Casasanto, Daniel, and Jasmin, Kyle. 2010. Good and bad in the hands of politicians: Spontaneous gestures during positive and negative speech. PLoS ONE 5(7), e11805.
Casasanto, Daniel, and Jasmin, Kyle. 2012. The hands of time: temporal gestures in English speakers. Cognitive Linguistics 23(4), 643–74.
Casasanto, Daniel, Fotakopoulou, Olga, and Boroditsky, Lera. 2010. Space and time in the child’s mind: evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry. Cognitive Science 34, 387405.
Casasanto, Daniel, Boroditsky, Lera, Phillips, Webb, Greene, Jesse, Goswami, Shima, Bocanegra-Thiel, Simon, et al. 2004. How deep are effects of language on thought? Time estimation in speakers of English, Indonesian, Greek, and Spanish. In Forbus, Kenneth, Gentner, Dedre, and Regier, Terry (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 186–91. Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
Casenhiser, Devin, and Goldberg, Adele E.. 2005. Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science 8(6), 500–08.
Cassell, Justine, McNeill, David, and McCullough, Karl-Erik. 1998. Speech-gesture mismatches: evidence for one underlying representation of linguistic and nonlinguistic information. Pragmatics and Cognition 7(1), 133.
Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2013. Interaction in Early Modern news discourse: the case of English witchcraft pamphlets and their prefaces (1566–1621). Text and Talk 33(2), 167–88.
Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2014. Dramatic monologues: the grammaticalization of speaking roles in courtroom opening statements. Pragmatics 24(4), 757–84.
Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2015. Communicating with silent addressees: engagement features in the opening statement. Language and Communication 43, 3546.
Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2016. Persuading and arguing with the reader: fictive interaction strategies in witchcraft pamphlet prefaces (1566–1621). In Pascual, Esther and Sandler, Sergeiy (eds.), The conversation frame: forms and functions of fictive interaction, 113–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chafe, Wallace. 1962. Phonetics, semantics, and language. Language 38, 335–44.
Chafe, Wallace. 1965. Meaning in language. American Anthropologist 67 (5), 2336.
Chafe, Wallace. 1967. Language as symbolization. Language 43, 5791.
Chafe, Wallace. 1968. Idiomaticity as an anomaly in the Chomskyan paradigm. Foundations of Language 4, 109127.
Chafe, Wallace. 1970a. Meaning and the structure of language. University of Chicago Press.
Chafe, Wallace. 1970b. A semantically based sketch of Onondaga. IJAL Memoir 25, supplement to vol. 36(2).
Chafe, Wallace. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Tomlin, Russell S. (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, 2151. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: the flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. University of Chicago Press.
Chafe, Wallace. 2002. Searching for meaning in language: a memoir. Historiographia Linguistica 29, 245–61.
Chakravarty, Auditi, and Boehme, Bonnie. 2004. Grammar and usage for better writing. New York: Amsco School Publications.
Chambers, Jack. 2001. Vernacular universals. In Fontana, Josep M., McNally, Louise, Turell, M. Teresa, and Vallduví, Enric (eds.), ICLaVE 1: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Language Variation in Europe, 5260. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Chan, Angel, Lieven, Elena, and Tomasello, Michael. 2009. Children’s understanding of the agent-patient relations in the transitive construction: cross-linguistic comparison between Cantonese, German and English. Cognitive Linguistics 20(2), 267300.
Chan, Ting Ting and Bergen, Benjamin. 2005. Writing direction influences spatial cognition. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, University of California, San Diego.
Chang, Franklin. 2002. Symbolically speaking: a connectionist model of sentence production. Cognitive Science 26, 609–51.
Chang, Franklin, Bock, J. Kathryn, and Goldberg, Adele E.. 2003. Can thematic roles leave traces of their places? Cognition 90, 2949.
Chang, Franklin, Dell, Gary S., Bock, J. Kathryn, and Griffin, Zenzi M.. 2000. Structural priming as implicit learning: a comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29, 217–29.
Chang, Nancy. 2008. Constructing grammar: a computational model of the emergence of early constructions. PhD dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2001. Blood sweat and tears: a corpus based cognitive analysis of ‘blood’ in English phraseology. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 30(2), 273–87.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2003. Speaking with forked tongue: a comparative study of metaphor and metonymy in English and Malay phraseology. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(4), 289310.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2005. Politicians and rhetoric: the persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2012. Shattering the bell jar: metaphor, gender and depression. Metaphor and Symbol 27(3), 199216.
Chen, Jenn-Yeu. 2007. Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky 2001. Cognition 104, 427–36.
Chenu, Florence, and Jisa, Harriet. 2006. Caused motion constructions and semantic generality in early acquisition of French. In Clark, Eve V. and Kelly, Barbara F. (eds.), Constructions in acquisition, 233–61. Stanford: CSLI.
Childers, Jane B., and Tomasello, Michael. 2001. Two-year-olds learn novel nouns, verbs, and conventional actions from massed or distributed exposures. Developmental Psychology 37(6), 739–48.
Chilton, Paul. 2013. Frames of reference and the linguistic conceptualization of time: present and future. In Jaszczolt, K. M. and de Saussure, L. (eds.), Time: language, cognition, and reality, 236–58. Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton and Co.
Chomsky, Noam. 1959. A review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal behavior. Language 35(1), 2658.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000a. New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000b. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In Martin, Roger, Michaels, David and Uriagereka, Juan (eds.), Step by step: essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2011. Language and other cognitive systems: what is special about language? Language Learning and Development 7(4), 263–78.
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1965. Some controversial issues in phonological theory, Journal of Linguistics 1, 97138.
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
Christiansen, Morten H., and Chater, Nick. 2015. The now-or-never bottleneck: a fundamental constraint on language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38, 152.
Chu, Mingyuan, and Kita, Sotaro. 2011. The nature of gestures’ beneficial role in spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 140(1), 102–16.
Chui, Kawai. 2011. Conceptual metaphors in gesture. Cognitive Linguistics 22(3), 437–58.
Chung, Siaw-Fong. 2008. Cross-linguistic comparison of the MARKET metaphors. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 4(2), 141–75.
Church, R. Breckinridge, and Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 1986. The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition 23, 4371.
Church, R. Breckinridge, Ayman-Nolley, Saba, and Mahootian, Shahrzad. 2004. The role of gesture in bilingual education: does gesture enhance learning? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 7(4), 303–19.
Cienki, Alan. 1998. Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphorical expressions. In Koenig, Jean-Pierre (ed.), Discourse and cognition: bridging the gap, 189204. Stanford: CSLI.
Cienki, Alan. 2013. Image schemas and mimetic schemas in cognitive linguistics and gesture studies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11(2), 417–32.
Cienki, Alan. 2015. Spoken language usage events. Language and Cognition 7(4), 499514.
Cienki, Alan, and Giansante, Gianluca. 2014. Conversational framing in televised political discourse: a comparison from the 2008 elections in the United States and Italy. Journal of Language and Politics 13(2), 255–88.
Cienki, Alan, and Müller, Cornelia (eds.). 2008a. Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cienki, Alan, and Müller, Cornelia (eds.). 2008b. Metaphor, gesture, and thought. In Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 483501. Cambridge University Press.
Citron, Francesca, and Goldberg, Adele. 2014. Social context modulates the effect of hot temperature on perceived interpersonal warmth: a study of embodied metaphors. Language and Cognition 6, 111.
Clancy, Steven J. 2006. The topology of Slavic case: semantic maps and multidimensional scaling. Glossos 7, 128.
Clark, Eve V. 1971. On the acquisition of the meaning of before and after. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 10(3), 266–75.
Clark, Eve V. 1987. The principle of contrast: a constraint on language acquisition. In MacWhinney, Brian (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition, 133. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Clark, Eve V. 1997. Conceptual perspective and lexical choice in acquisition. Cognition 64(1), 137.