Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2017
  • Online publication date: September 2017

16 - Creativity in the Domain of Mathematics

from Part III - Creativity in the Sciences
Summary
Abstract

In this chapter, we first review mathematical creativity with an emphasis on the nature of novelty in mathematics. We compare mathematical creativity to creativity in other domains, provide examples of novelty, and contrast these to novelty in other domains and explain types of creativity in mathematics based on perspectives in philosophy. All the theoretical perspectives we reviewed led us to synthesize that mathematical creativity involves knowledge production which is either discovery or invention. The chapter also covers pioneers and their contributions to the study of mathematical creativity, such as Polya and Krutetskii. The last part of the chapter includes a review and critique of the assessment of mathematical creativity, such as paper and pencil assessments, observations and interviews, and self-assessment.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity across Domains
  • Online ISBN: 9781316274385
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316274385
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Aiken, L. R. (1973). Ability and creativity in mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 43(4), 405432.
Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173177.
Bal-Sezerel, B., & Sak, U. (2013). The Selective Problem Solving Model (SPS) and its social validity in solving mathematical problems. International Journal of Problem Solving and Creativity, 23(1), 7186.
Balka, D. S. (1974). The development of an instrument to measure creative ability in mathematics. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Edith University of Missouri, USA.
Bewersdorff, J. (2006). Galois theory for beginners: A historical perspective. Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society.
Carlton, L. V. (1959). An analysis of the educational concepts of fourteen outstanding mathematicians, 1790–1940, in the areas of mental growth and development, creative thinking and symbolism and meaning. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). IL: Northwestern University, USA.
Casakin, H., & Kreitler, S. (2006). Self-assessment of creativity: Implications for design education. In DS 38: Proceedings of E&DPE 2006, The 8th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (pp. 16). Salzburg, Austria.
Chamberlin, S. A., & Moon, S. M. (2005). Model-eliciting activities as tool to develop and identify creativity gifted mathematicians. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 3747.
Charters, E. (2003). The use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research an introduction to think-aloud methods. Brock Education, 12(2), 6882.
Cohen, P. (2002). The discovery of forcing. Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, 32(4), 10711100.
Davis, P. J., Hersh, R., & Marchisotto, E. A. (1995). The mathematical experience: Study edition. Boston: Birkhäuser.
De Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Devlin, K. (2000). The math gene: How mathematical thinking evolved and why numbers are like gossip. New York: Basic Books.
Dowker, A. (2005). Individual differences in arithmetic: Implications for psychology, neuroscience and education. New York: Psychology Press.
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), 1113.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1983). Verbal protocol analysis. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Ernest, P. (2002). The philosophy of mathematics education. Briston, PA: The Falmer Press.
Evans, E. W. (1964).Measuring the ability of students to respond in creative mathematical situations at the late elementary and early junior high school level. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, USA.
Fetterly, J. M. (2010). An exploratory study of the use of a problem-posing approach on pre-service elementary education teachers’ mathematical creativity, beliefs, and anxiety. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida State University, USA.
Gauss, C. F. (1966). Disquisitiones arithmeticae (Vol. 157). US: Yale University Press.
Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1961). Family environment and cognitive style: A study of the sources of highly intelligent and of highly creative adolescents. American Sociological Review, 26(3), 351359.
Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. American Journal of Sociology, 68(2), 278279.
Gindikin, S. (2007). Tales of mathematicians and physicists. NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
Hadamard, J. (1945). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. New York: Dover Publications.
Han, K. S., & Marvin, C. (2002). Multiple creativities? Investigating domain specificity of creativity in young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(2), 98109.
Handal, B. (2009). Philosophies and pedagogies of mathematics. Elementary Education Online, 8(1), 16.
Haylock, D. W. (1984). Aspects of mathematical creativity in children aged 11–12. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chelsea Collage, University of London, England.
Haylock, D. W. (1985). Conflicts in the assessment and encouragement of mathematical creativity in schoolchildren. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 16(4), 547553.
Haylock, D. W. (1987). A framework for assessing mathematical creativity in school children. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18,1, 5974.
Herrera, H. (2002). Frida: A biography of Frida Kahlo. New York: HarperCollins.
Kantowski, M. G. (1977). Processes involved in mathematical problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8(3), 163180.
Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Creativity 101 (2nd edn.). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Kettenmann, A. (1993). Frida Kahlo: Pain and passion. Köln: Taschen GmbH.
Khatena, J., & Torrance, E. P. (1976). Manual for Khatena-Torrance creative perception inventory. Chicago: Stoelting Company.
Kilic, S. (2012). Scientific art/artistic science. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 5(1), 193203.
Kilpatrick, J., & Wirszup, I. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Kim, H., Cho, S., & Ahn, C. (2003). Development of mathematical creative problem solving ability test for identification of the gifted in math. Gifted Education International, 18(2), 164174.
Koichu, B., & Berman, A. (2005). When do gifted high school students use geometry to solve geometry problems? The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(4), 168179.
Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In Leikin, R., Berman, A., & Koichu, B. (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129145). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Leikin, R., & Stanger, O. (2011). Teachers’ images of gifted students and the roles assigned to them in heterogeneous mathematics classes. In Sriraman, B. & Lee, K. E. (Eds.), The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics (pp. 14). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Leikin, R., & Lev, M. (2013). Mathematical creativity in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents: What makes the difference? ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(2), 183197.
Leu, Y. C., & Chiu, M. S. (2015). Creative behaviours in mathematics: Relationships with abilities, demographics, affects and gifted behaviours. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 4050.
Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 7390.
Levenson, E. (2011). Exploring collective mathematical creativity in elementary school. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(3), 215234.
Liljedahl, P. (2008). Mathematical creativity: In the words of the creators. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students, Israel, 24–28 February 2008 (pp. 153159).
Livne, N. L., & Milgram, R. M. (2000). Assessing four levels of creative mathematical ability in Israeli adolescents utilizing out‐of‐school activities: A circular three‐stage technique. Roeper Review, 22(2), 111116.
Lopez-Real, F. (2006). A new look at a Polya problem. Mathematics Teaching, 196, 1216.
Mamona-Downs, J. (1993). On analyzing problem posing. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Tsukuba, Japan, 18–23 July 1993 (Vol. 3, pp. 4147).
Mann, E. L. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 236260.
Mann, E. L. (2009). The search for mathematical creativity: Identifying creative potential in middle school students. Creativity Research Journal, 21(4), 338348.
Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2007). Designing and using mathematical tasks. London: Tarquin Pubns.
Mayer, R. E. (2013). Implications of cognitive psychology for instruction in mathematical problem solving. In Silver, E. A. (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 123138). New York: Routledge.
McCallum, R. S., & Bracken, B. (2005). The universal nonverbal intelligence test: A multidimensional measure of intelligence. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, test, and assessment (pp. 425440). New York: The Guilford Press.
Meyer, R. W. (1969). The identification and encouragement of mathematical creativity in first grade students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Münz, M. (2013). The elements of mathematical creativity and the function of the attachment style in early childhood. In Online proceedings of the POEM conference, (pp. 111).
Nadjafikhah, M., Yaftian, N., & Bakhshalizadeh, S. (2012). Mathematical creativity: Some definitions and characteristics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 285291.
Pelczer, I., & Rodriguez, F. G. (2011). Creativity assessment in school settings through problem posing tasks. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 8, 383398.
Peng, S. L., Cherng, B. L., & Chen, H. C. (2013). The effects of classroom goal structures on the creativity of junior high school students. Educational Psychology, 33(5), 540560.
Piirto, J. (2004). Understanding creativity. Scottsdale: Great Potential Press.
Pittalis, M., Christou, C., Mousoulides, N., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2004). A structural model for problem posing. In Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 4956). Bergen, Norway.
Polya, D. (1954a). Induction and analogy in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Polya, D. (1954b). Patterns of plausible inference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Polya, D. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). NJ: Princeton University Press.
Polya, D. (1962). Mathematical discovery. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Poincare, H. (1951). Bilim ve metot [Science and method]. (Atademir, H. R. & Ölçen, S., Trans.). İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
Poincare, H. (1952). Science and hypothesis. New York: The Modern Library.
Poincare, H. (1958). The value of science. New York: The Modern Library.
Prabhu, V., & Czarnocha, B. (2013). Democratizing mathematical creativity through Koestler’s Bisociation Theory. Mathematıcs Teachıng-Research Journal Online, 6(2), 3346.
Preckel, F., Goez, T., Pekrun, R., & Kleine, M. (2008). Self-concept, interest, and motivation in mathematics gender differences in gifted and average-ability students: Comparing girls’ and boys’ achievement. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(2), 146159.
Prouse, H. L. (1967). Creativity in school mathematics. The Mathematics Teacher, 60, 876879.
Rothman, T. (1982). Genius and biographers: The fictionalization of Evariste Galois. American Mathematical Monthly, 89(2), 84106.
Runco, M. A. (1996). Personal creativity: Definition and developmental issues. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 330
Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657687.
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 9296.
Sak, U. (2005). M³: The three-mathematical minds model for the identification of mathematically gifted students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Arizona, USA.
Sak, U. (2009). Test of the three-mathematical minds (M3) for the identification of mathematically gifted students. Roeper Review, 31, 5367.
Sak, U. (2011). Selective Problem Solving (SPS): A model for teaching creative problem solving. Gifted Education International, 27(3), 349357.
Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schaefer, C. E., & Bridges, C. I. (1970). Development of a creativity attitude survey for children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 31(3), 861862.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). What do we know about mathematics curricula? Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13, 5580.
Sheffield, L. J. (2000). Creating and developing promising young mathematicians. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6(6), 416419.
Sheffield, L. J. (2009). Developing mathematical creativity – questions may be the answer. In Leikin, R., Berman, A., & Koichu, B. (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 87100). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Sheffield, L. J. (2013). Creativity and school mathematics: Some modest observations. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(2), 325332.
Shriki, A. (2010). Working like real mathematicians: Developing prospective teachers’ awareness of mathematical creativity through generating new concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(2), 159179.
Siegle, D., & Powell, T. (2004). Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(1), 2129.
Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem solving. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 1928.
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM Mathematics Education, 29(3), 7580.
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin, 104(2), 251267.
Simonton, D. K. (1991). Career landmarks in science: Individual differences and interdisciplinary contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 119130.
Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Singer, F. M., Pelczer, I., & Voica, C. (2011). Problem posing and modification as a criterion of mathematical creativity. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 7) (pp. 11331142). Rzeszow, Poland.
Sriraman, B. (2004). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Educator, 14, 1924.
Sriraman, B., & Lee, K. E. (2011). What are the elements of giftedness and creativity in mathematics? In Sriraman, B. & Lee, K. E. (Eds.), The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics (pp. 14). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Stanley, J. (2005). Fallibilism and concessive knowledge attributions. Analysis, 65(2), 126131.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: The Free Press.
Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2008). Applied intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Constrains on creativity: Obvious and not so obvious. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 467482). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stoyanova, E. N. (1997). Extending and exploring students’ problem solving via problem posing: A study of years 8 and 9 students involved in Mathematics Challenge and Enrichment Stages of Euler Enrichment Program for Young Australians. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Edith Cowan University, Australia.
Suydam, M. N., & Weaver, J. F. (1971). Research on mathematics education (K-12) reported in 1970. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2(4), pp. 257298.
Tjoe, H. H. (2011). Which approaches do students prefer? Analyzing the mathematical problem solving behavior of mathematically gifted students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbia University, USA.
Urban, K. K. (1991). Recent trends in creativity research and theory in Western Europe. European Journal of High Ability, 1(1), 99113.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Middleton, J. A., & Streefland, L. (1995). Student-generated problems: Easy and difficult problems on percentage. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(3), 2127.
Van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modelling cognitive processes. London: Academic Press.
Vivona, R. F. (1998). Toward a theory of mathematical creativity. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Union Institute, USA.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. New Jersey: Wiley.
Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226250). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wiles, A. (1995). Modular eliptic curves and Fermat’s last theorem. Annals of Mathematics, 142, 443551.
Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. New York: Harper.