Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Hrbková, Lenka Zagrapan, Jozef and Chytilek, Roman 2017. Mathematical-Statistical Models and Qualitative Theories for Economic and Social Sciences. Vol. 104, Issue. , p. 55.

    Blings, Steffen and Maxey, Sarah 2017. Teaching Students to Engage with Evidence: An Evaluation of Structured Writing and Classroom Discussion Strategies. Journal of Political Science Education, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 15.

    Craig, Stephen C. and Cossette, Paulina S. 2017. WHOSE ISSUE IS IT ANYWAY . . . AND DOES IT REALLY MATTER? Issue Ownership and Negative Campaigning. World Affairs, Vol. 180, Issue. 3, p. 72.

    Craig, Stephen C. and Rippere, Paulina S. 2014. Political Trust and Negative Campaigns: Two Tests of the Figure-Ground Hypothesis. Politics & Policy, Vol. 42, Issue. 5, p. 693.

    Craig, Stephen C. Rippere, Paulina S. and Grayson, Marissa Silber 2014. Attack and Response in Political Campaigns: An Experimental Study in Two Parts. Political Communication, Vol. 31, Issue. 4, p. 647.

    Sances, Michael W. 2013. Is Money in Politics Harming Trust in Government? Evidence from Two Survey Experiments. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 53.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: June 2012

15 - Candidate Advertisements

Summary

Nowhere can democracy be better seen “in action” than during political campaigns. As Lau and Pomper (2002) argue, “Democracy is a dialogue between putative leaders and citizens. Campaigns provide the most obvious and the loudest forums for this dialogue. Candidates try to persuade voters to cast a ballot and to support their cause. Voters respond by coming to the polls and selecting their preferred candidates” (47). Candidates make their arguments in speeches at campaign rallies and on their Web sites, but those venues are primarily experienced by the most committed of partisans. It is only through their campaign advertisements that candidates have any chance of reaching uncommitted voters. And in times of even very approximate party balance, it is uncommitted voters who usually determine election outcomes. Hence, political ads are arguably the vehicle through which democracy operates.

Consider the choices facing a political candidate at the outset of a democratic election campaign. To simplify, let us assume a candidate's goal is to win the election, but he or she is facing one or more opponents who have the same goal and therefore want to defeat him or her. All candidates must decide what strategy to follow in order to maximize their chances of winning. But all candidates face resource limits that put very real constraints on what it is possible to do. Therein lies the rub. Candidates must decide how they can get the biggest bang for their buck.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science
  • Online ISBN: 9780511921452
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921452
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1995. Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Iyengar, Shanto, and Simon, Adam. 1999. “Replicating Experiments Using Aggregate and Survey Data: The Case of Negative Advertising and Turnout.” American Political Science Review 93: 902–9.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Iyengar, Shanto, Simon, Adam, and Valentino, Nicholas. 1994. “Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate?” American Political Science Review 88: 829–38.
Arceneaux, Kevin, and Johnson, Martin. 2007. “Channel Surfing: Does Choice Reduce Videomalaise?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Bartels, Larry. 1991. “Instrument and ‘Quasi-Instrumental’ Variables.” American Journal of Political Science 35: 777–800.
Brader, Ted. 2005. “Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 388–405.
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James. 2010. “Dynamic Public Opinion: Communication Effects over Time.” American Political Science Review 104: 663–680.
Clinton, Joshua, and Lapinski, John. 2004. “‘Targeted’ Advertising and Voter Turnout: An Experimental Study of the 2000 Presidential Election.” Journal of Politics 66: 69–96.
Clinton, Joshua, and Owen, Andrew. 2009. “An Experimental Investigation of Advertising Persuasiveness: Is Impact in the Eye of the Beholder?” Working paper, Vanderbilt University.
Franz, Michael M., Freedman, Paul, Goldstein, Kenneth M., and Ridout, Travis N.. 2007. Campaign Advertising and American Democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Gerber, Alan, Gimpel, James, Green, Donald, and Shaw, Daron. 2007. “The Influence of Television and Radio Advertising on Candidate Evaluations: Results from a Large Scale Randomized Experiment.” Working paper, Yale University.
Haddock, Geoffrey, and Zanna, Mark. 1997. “Impact of Negative Advertising on Evaluations of Political Candidates: The 1993 Canadian Federal Elections.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 19: 205–23.
Hovland, Carl. 1959. “Reconciling Conflicting Results Derived from Experimental and Survey Studies of Attitude Change.” American Psychologist 14: 8–17.
Kaid, Lynda Lee. 1997. “Effects of the Television Spots on Images of Dole and Clinton.” American Behavioral Scientist 40: 1085–94.
Kam, Cindy, Wilking, Jennifer, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth. 2007. “Beyond the ‘Narrow Data Base’: Another Convenience Sample for Experimental Research.” Political Behavior 29: 415–40.
Kinder, Donald R. 2003. “Communication and Politics in the Age of Information.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, eds. Sears, David O., Huddy, Leonie, and Jervis, Robert. New York: Oxford University Press, 357–393.
King, David C., and Matland, Richard E.. 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 31: 595–612.
Krupnikov, Yanna. 2009. “Who Votes? How and When Negative Campaigning Affects Voter Turnout.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Lau, Richard R., and Pomper, Gerald. 2002. “Effectiveness of Negative Campaigning in U.S. Senate Elections, 1988–98.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 47–66.
Lau, Richard R., and Pomper, Gerald. 2004. Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of U.S. Senate Elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield.
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing in Election Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lau, Richard R., Sigelman, Lee, and Rovner, Ivy Brown. 2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment.” Journal of Politics 69: 1176–209.
Lipsitz, Keena, Trost, Christine, Grossman, Matthew, and Sides, John. 2005. “What Voters Want from Campaign Communication.” Political Communication 22: 337–54.
Lodge, Milton, Steenbergen, Marco R., and Brau, S.. 1995. “The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 89: 309–26.
Matthews, Douglas, and Dietz-Uhler, Beth. 1998. “The Black-Sheep Effect: How Positive and Negative Advertisements Affect Voters' Perceptions of the Sponsor of the Advertisement.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28: 1903–15.
Mendelberg, Tali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rapoport, Ronald, Metcalf, Kelly, and Hartman, Jon. 1989. “Candidate Traits and Voter Inferences: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Politics 51: 917–32.
Roddy, Brian, and Garramone, Gina. 1988. “Appeals and Strategies of Negative Political Advertising.” Journal of Broadcast and Electronic Media 32: 415–27.
Schultz, Cindy, and Pancer, S. Mark. 1997. “Character Attacks and Their Effects on Perceptions of Male and Female Political Candidates.” Political Psychology 18: 93–102.
Sears, David O. 1986. “College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influence of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology's View of Human Nature.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 515–30.
Shaw, Daron. 2007. The Race to 270: The Electoral College and the Campaign Strategies of 2000 and 2004. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.