Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • This chapter is unavailable for purchase
  • Cited by 40
  • Print publication year: 2006
  • Online publication date: June 2012

42 - Modes of Expertise in Creative Thinking: Evidence from Case Studies

from PART VI - GENERALIZABLE MECHANISMS MEDIATING EXPERTISE AND GENERAL ISSUES

Summary

Introduction

The study of expertise has in the last several decades become an area of interest to scholars from a broad range of disciplines. In much of the research literature, expertise is taken to mean consistent superior performance, resulting from deliberate practice (Ericsson, 1996, 1998, Chapter 38). Deliberate practice is the intentional repeated execution, usually under the instruction of a coach, of skills directly relevant to improving the performance in question. The study of expertise can be traced in psychology to de Groot's (1965) study of chess playing, although expertise has been of interest to psychologists since the beginning of scientific psychology (see Shiffrin, 1996, Feltovich, Prietula, & Ericsson, Chapter 4). Examination of the development and functioning of expertise now encompasses a wide range of domains, including medical diagnosis; problem solving in physics; radiologists' skill in reading X-rays; swimming, tennis, soccer, and other athletic domains; performance of classical music; and the perhaps unlikely domain of memory span for digits (see chapters in Ericsson, 1996, and in this volume, especially those in Section V, for representative studies and reviews).

The present chapter examines the question of whether expertise plays a role in creativity, where creativity is defined as the goal-directed production of novelty (Weisberg, 1993). A creative product (an innovation) emerges when an individual intentionally produces something new in attempting to meet some goal (Weisberg, 1993, 1999, 2003). The creative process – or creative thinking – consists of the cognitive processes that play a role in production of innovations.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Arnason, H. H. (1986). History of modern art. Painting. Sculpture. Architecture. Photography. (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bassok, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 153–166.
Calder, A. (1966). Calder. An autobiography with pictures. New York: Pantheon.
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). The mind's eye in chess. In Chase, W. G. (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215–281). New York: Academic Press.
Chipp, H. B. (1988). Picasso's “Guernica.” Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
Groot, A. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence. The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ericsson, K. A. (1998). The scientific study of expert levels of performance: General implications for optimal learning and creativity. High Ability Studies, 9, 75–100.
Ericsson, K. A. (1999). Creative expertise as superior reproducible performance: Innovative and flexible aspects of expert performance. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 329–333.
Everett, W. (2001). The Beatles as musicians. The Quarry Men through “Rubber Soul.” New York: Oxford.
Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. R., & Coulson, R. L. (1997). Issues of expert flexibility in contexts characterized by complexity and change. In Feltovich, P. J., Ford, K. M., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), Expertise in context (pp 125–146). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/MIT Press.
Fleck, J. I., & Weisberg, R. W. (2004). The use of verbal protocols as data: An analysis of insight in the candle problem. Memory & Cognition, 32, 990–1006.
Friedel, R., & Israel, P. (1986). Edison's electric light. Biography of an invention. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic.
Hayes, J. R. (1989). Cognitive processes in creativity. In Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 135–145). New York: Plenum.
Heppenheimer, T. A. (2003). First flight. The Wright brothers and the invention of the airplane. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
James, W. (1880). Great men, great thoughts, and the environment. Atlantic Monthly, 46, 441–459.
Kozbelt, A. (2004). Reexamining the equal odds rule in classical composers. In Frois, J. P., Andrade, P., & Marques, J. F. (Eds.), Art and science. Proceedings of the XVIII Congress of the International Association of Empirical Esthetics, 540–543. Lisbon, Portugal: IAEA.
Landau, E. (1989). Jackson Pollock. New York: Abrams.
Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1959). Rigidity of behavior. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Press.
Marter, J. (1991). Alexander Calder. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Newell, A. (1973). Artificial intelligence and the concept of mind. In Shank, R. C. & Colby, K. M. (Eds.), Computer models of language and thought. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Olby, R. (1994). The path to the double helix. The discovery of DNA. New York: Dover.
Pariser, D. (1987). The juvenile drawings of Klee, Toulouse-Lautrec, and Picasso. Visual Arts Research, 13, 53–67.
Perkins, D. N. (1981). The mind's best work. Cambridge, MA: Havard.
Reeves, L. M., & Weisberg, R. W. (1994). Models of analogical transfer in problem solving. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 381–400.
Reising, R. (2002). Every sound there is. The Beatles' “Revolver” and the transformation of rock and roll. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Scheerer, M. (1963). On problem-solving. Scientific American, 208, 118–128.
Shiffrin, R. M. (1996). Laboratory experimentation on the genesis of expertise. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence. The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 337–346). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius. Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford.
Sloboda, J. (1996). The acquisition of musical performance expertise: Deconstructing the “talent” account of individual differences in musical expressivity. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence. The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 107–126). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Solomon, M. (1977). Beethoven. New York: Schirmer.
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Costs of expertise. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence. The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 347–354). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sternberg, R. (Ed.) (1999). Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge.
Watson, J. D. (1968). The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. New York: New American Library.
Weisberg, R. W. (1980). Memory, thought, and behavior. New York: Oxford.
Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman.
Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226–250). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Weisberg, R. W. (2003). Case studies of innovation. In Shavinina, L. (Ed.), International handbook of innovation. New York: Elsevier Science.
Weisberg, R. W. (2004). On structure in the creative process: A quantitative case-study of the creation of Picasso's Guernica . Empirical Studies in the Arts, 22, 23–54.
Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Weisberg, R. W., Buonanno, J. & Israel, P. (2006). Edison and the Electric Light: A Case Study in Technological Creativity. Unpublished manuscript, Temple University.
Weisberg, R. W., & Sturdivant, N. (2006). Career development of classical composers: An examination of the “equal-odds” rule. Unpublished manuscript, Temple University, Philadelphia PA.
Weisberg, R. W., & Suls, J. M. (1973). An information-processing model of Duncker's candle problem. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 255–276.
Winner, E. (1996). The rage to master: The decisive role of talent in the visual arts. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence. The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 271–301). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.