Skip to main content
  • This chapter is unavailable for purchase
  • Cited by 134
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Hvannberg, Ebba Thora Law, Effie L.-C. and Halldorsdottir, Gyda 2019. Argumentation Models for Usability Problem Analysis in Individual and Collaborative Settings. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, Vol. 35, Issue. 3, p. 256.

    van den Eeden, Claire A. J. de Poot, Christianne J. and van Koppen, Peter J. 2019. The Forensic Confirmation Bias: A Comparison Between Experts and Novices. Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 64, Issue. 1, p. 120.

    Sasidharan, Sharath 2019. Knowledge Value, Task Complexity, and Enterprise Technology Implementation. International Journal of Technology Diffusion, Vol. 10, Issue. 1, p. 19.

    Boesch, Brandon 2019. Skill Transmittance in Science Education. Science & Education,

    Caruso, Valentina Cattaneo, Alberto Gurtner, Jean-Luc and Ainsworth, Shaaron 2018. Professional Vision in Fashion Design: Practices and Views of Teachers and Learners. Vocations and Learning,

    GÜLÇAY, Çiğdem 2018. USTALIĞIN SIRRI: YETENEK Mİ KASITLI ALIŞTIRMA MI?. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, p. 415.

    Tang, Victor Otto, Kevin and Seering, Warren 2018. Executive Decision Synthesis. p. 107.

    Lee, Eunsil Carberry, Adam R. Diefes-Dux, Heidi A. Atwood, Sara A. and Siniawski, Matt T. 2018. Faculty perception before, during and after implementation of standards-based grading. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, p. 1.

    Roscoe, Rod D. Branaghan, Russell J. Cooke, Nancy J. and Craig, Scotty D. 2018. End-User Considerations in Educational Technology Design. p. 1.

    Hollingshead, Aleksandra Williamson, Pamela and Carnahan, Christina 2018. Cognitive and Emotional Engagement for Students with Severe Intellectual Disability Defined by the Scholars with Expertise in the Field. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, Vol. 43, Issue. 4, p. 269.

    Siklander, Pirkko and Impiö, Niina 2018. Common features of expertise in working life: implications for higher education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, p. 1.

    Jardat, Rémi Méric, Jérôme and Sfez, Flora 2018. Comprendre les pratiques des experts pour être en mesure de contrôler leur activité - l’exemple du trading. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, Vol. 35, Issue. 3, p. o17.

    Jardat, Rémi Meric, Jérôme and Sfez, Flora 2018. Understanding expert practices in order to control expert activities: The case of trading. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, Vol. 35, Issue. 3, p. 349.

    Heinrichs, Karin and Jäcklin, Benjamin 2018. Assessing critical incidents in the post-formation phase: a matter of entrepreneurial expertise?. Journal of International Education in Business, Vol. 11, Issue. 2, p. 144.

    Tomasi, Stella Schuff, David and Turetken, Ozgur 2018. Understanding novelty: how task structure and tool familiarity moderate performance. Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 406.

    Roscoe, Rod D. Branaghan, Russell J. Cooke, Nancy J. and Craig, Scotty D. 2018. Online Course Management. p. 2028.

    Marsh, Jessecae K. De Los Reyes, Andres and Lilienfeld, Scott O. 2018. Leveraging the Multiple Lenses of Psychological Science to Inform Clinical Decision Making: Introduction to the Special Section. Clinical Psychological Science, Vol. 6, Issue. 2, p. 167.

    Lelebina, Olga and Gand, Sébastien 2018. Beyond “Hero-based” Management: Revisiting HRM Practices for Managing Collective Expertise. Relations industrielles, Vol. 73, Issue. 1, p. 39.

    Stobart, Gordon 2018. The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback. p. 29.

    Fisher, Rick 2018. Reconciling Disciplinary Literacy Perspectives With Genre-Oriented Activity Theory: Toward a Fuller Synthesis of Traditions. Reading Research Quarterly,

  • Print publication year: 2006
  • Online publication date: June 2012

2 - Two Approaches to the Study of Experts' Characteristics


This chapter differentiates two approaches to the study of expertise, which I call the “absolute approach” and the “relative approach,” and what each approach implies for how expertise is assessed. It then summarizes the characteristic ways in which experts excel and the ways that they sometimes seem to fall short of common expectations.

Two Approaches to the Study of Expertise

The nature of expertise has been studied in two general ways. One way is to study truly exceptional people with the goal of understanding how they perform in their domain of expertise. I use the term domain loosely to refer to both informal domains, such as sewing and cooking, and formal domains, such as biology and chess. One could choose exceptional people on the basis of their well-established discoveries. For example, one could study how Maxwell constructed a quantitative field concept (Nersessian, 1992). Or one could choose contemporary scientists whose breakthroughs may still be debated, such as pathologist Warren and gastroenterologist Marshall's proposal that bacteria cause peptic ulcers (Chi & Hausmann, 2003; Thagard, 1998; also see the chapters by Wilding & Valentine, Chapter 31, Simonton, Chapter 18, and Weisberg, Chapter 42).

Several methods can be used to identify someone who is truly an exceptional expert. One method is retrospective. That is, by looking at how well an outcome or product is received, one can determine who is or is not an expert.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance
  • Online ISBN: 9780511816796
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
Adelson, B. (1984). When novices surpass experts: The difficulty of a task may increase with expertise. Journal of Experimental Psy-chology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 483–495.
Alexander, P. A. (2003). Can we get there from here? Educational Researcher, 32, 3–4.
Bedard, J., & Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Expertise. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 135–139.
Chi, M. T. H. (1978). Knowledge structure and memory development. In Siegler, R. (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 73–96). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chi, M. T. H., & Bassok, M. (1989). Learning from examples via self-explanations. In Resnick, L. B. (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 251–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (Eds.) (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 7–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chi, M. T. H., & Hausmann, R. G. M. (2003). Do radical discoveries require ontological shifts? In Shavinina, L. V. (Ed.), International handbook on innovation (pp. 430–444). New York: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Cho, K. (2004). When experts give worse advice than novices: The type and impact of feedback given by students and an instructor on student writing. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
Christensen, C., Heckerling, P. S., Mackesy, M. E., Berstein, L. M., & Elstein, A. S. (1991). Framing bias among expert and novice physicians. Academic Medicine, 66 (suppl): S76–S78.
Dawes, R. M. (1971). A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making. American Psychologist, 26, 180–188.
Groot, A. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.
Elo, A. E. (1965). Age changes in master chess performance. Journal of Gerontology, 20, 289–299.
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.)The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.
Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: evidence on maximal adaptations on task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273–305.
Ericsson, K. A., Patel, V. L., & Kinstch, W. (2000). How experts' adaptations to representative task demands account for the expertise effect in memory recall: Comment on Vincente and Wang (1998). Psychological Review, 107, 578–592.
Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Prospects and limits of empirical study of expertise: An introduction. In Ericsson, K. A. & Smith, J. (Eds.). Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 1–38).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feltovich, P. J., & Barrows, H. S. (1984). Issues of generality in medical problem solving. In Schmidt, H. G. & Volder, M. L. (Eds.), Tutorials in problem-based learning (pp. 128–142). Maaastricht, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
Feltovich, P. J., Ford, K. M., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.) (1997). Expertise in context. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Ford, K. M., & Adams-Webber, J. R. (1992). Knowledge acquisition and constuctivist epistemology. In Hoffman, R. R. (Ed.), The psychology of expertise: Cognitive research and empirical AI (pp. 121–136). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Gilhooly, K. J., McGeorge, P., Hunter, J., Rawles, J. M., Kirby, I. K., Green, C., & Wynn, V. (1997). Biomedical knowledge in diagnostic thinking: the case of electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 199–223.
Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1987). Inexpert calibration of comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 15, 84–93.
Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Recall of rapidly presented random chess positions is a function of skill. Psychonomic Bulletin and Reviews, 3, 159–163.
Hashem, A., Chi, M. T. H., & Friedman, C. P. (2003). Medical errors as a result of specialization. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 36, 61–69.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In Stevenson, H., Azmuma, H., & Hakuta, K. (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). New York, NY: W. Y. Freeman and Company.
Hecht, H., & Proffitt, D. R. (1995). The price of expertise: Effects of experience on the water-level task. Psychological Science, 6, 90–95.
Hinds, P. J. (1999). The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on prediction of novice performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 205–221.
Hobus, P. P. M., Schmidt, H. G., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Patel, V. L. (1987). Context factors in the activation of first diagnostic hypotheses: Expert-novice differences. Medical Education, 21, 471–476.
Hoffman, R. R. (Ed.) (1992). The psychology of expertise: Cognitive research and empirical AI. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hoffman, R. R. (1998). How can expertise be defined?: Implications of research from cognitive psychology. In Williams, R., Faulkner, W., & Fleck, J. (Eds.), Exploring expertise (pp. 81–100). New York: Macmillan.
Hoffman, R. R., Trafton, G., & Roebber, P. (2005). Minding the weather: How expert forecasters think. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Johnson, E. J. (1988). Expertise and decision under uncertainty: Performance and process. In Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J.(Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 209–228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Klein, G. A. (1993). A recognition primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.), Decision-making in action: Models and methods (pp. 138–147). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Kozbelt, A. (2004). Creativity over the lifespan in classical composers: Reexamining the equal-odds rule. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4, 317–345.
Lemaire, P., & Siegler, R. S. (1995). Four aspects of strategic change: Contributions to children's learning of multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 83–97.
Lesgold, A., Rubinson, H., Feltovich, P., Glaser, R., Klopfer, D., & Wang, Y. (1988). Expertise in a complex skill: Diagnosing X-ray pictures. In Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R.,   Farr, M. J. (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 311–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lewandowsky, S., Dunn, J. C., Kirsner, K., & Randell, M. (1997). Expertise in the management of bushfires: Training and decision support. Australian Psychologist, 32(3), 171–177.
Marchant, G., Robinson, J., Anderson, U., & Schadewald, M. (1991). Analogical transfer and expertise in legal reasoning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making, 48, 272–290.
Masunaga, H., & Horn, J. (2000), Expertise and age-related changes in components of intelligence. Psychology & Aging, Special Issue: Vol. 16(2), 293–311.
Minsky, M., & Papert, S. (1974). Artificial intelligence. Condon Lectures, Oregon /State System of Higher Education, Eugene, Oregon.
Nersessian, N. J. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In Giere, R. N. (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, Vol. XV (pp. 3–44). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Oskamp, S. (1965). Overconfidence in case-study judgments. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 261–265.
Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the decision rule in Piaget's developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 32, 301–345.
Patel, V. L., & Kaufman, D. R. (1995). Clinical reasoning and biomedical knowledge: implications for teaching. In Higgs, J. & Jones, M. (Eds.), Clinical reasoning in the health professions (pp. 117–128). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.
Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (1993). Proportional reasoning in and out of school. In Light, P. & Butterworth, G. (Eds.), Context and cognition: Ways of learning and knowing (pp. 47–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schmidt, H. G., & Boshuizen, P. A. (1993). On acquiring expertise in medicine. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 205–220.
Schneider, W. (1985). Training high performance skills: Fallacies and guidelines. Human Factors, 27(3), 285–300.
Shanteau, J. (1984). Some unasked questions about the psychology of expert decision makers. In Hawaray, M. El (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1984 IEEE conference on systems, man, and cybernetics. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1978). Individual differences in solving physics problems. In Siegler, R. (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 325–348). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Simonton, D. K. (1977). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 791–804.
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Costs of expertise. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 347–354). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sternberg, R. J., & Frensch, P. A. (1992). On being an expert; A cost-benefit analysis. In Hoffman, R. R. (Ed.), The psychology of expertise: Cognitive research and empirical AI (pp. 191–203). New York: Springer Verlag.
Thagard, P. (1998). Ulcers and bacteria I: Discovery and acceptance. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 29, 107–136.
Vicente, K. J. (1992). Memory recall in a process control system: A measure of expertise and display effectiveness. Memory and Cognition, 20, 356–373.
Vicente, K. J., & Wang, J. H. (1998). An ecological theory of expertise effects in memory recall. Psychological Review, 105, 33–57.
Voss, J. F., Greene, T. R., Post, T., & Penner, B. C. (1983). Problem solving skill in the social sciences. In Bower, G. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. (pp. 165–213). New York: Academic Press.
Voss, J. F., Vesonder, G., & Spilich, H. (1980). Text generation and recall by high-knowledge and low-knowledge individuals. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 651–667.
Walther, E., Fiedler, K., & Nickel, S. (2003). The influence of prior knowledge on constructive biases. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 219–231.
Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and know-ledge: A challenge to theories. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 226–250). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wiley, J. (1998). Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 26, 716–730.