Aitchison, J. 2003. ‘Psycholinguistic perspectives on language change’, in Joseph, B. D. and Janda, R. D. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 736–43.
Andersen, H. 1973. Abductive and deductive change, Language 49: 765–93.
Baker, J., Archangeli, D. and Mielke, J. 2011. ‘Variability in English s-retraction suggests a solution to the actuation problem’, Language Variation & Change 23: 347–374.
Bermúdez-Otero, R. 2006. ‘Phonological change in Optimality Theory’, in Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. 9, 2nd edn. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 497–505.
Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A. and Roberts, I. 2007. ‘Disharmonic word-order systems and the Final-over-Final Constraint (FOFC)’, in Bisetto, A. and Barbieri, F. (eds.), Proceedings of XXXIII incontro di grammatica generativa, pp. 86–105.
Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A. and Roberts, I. 2008. ‘Linearising disharmonic word orders: The Final-over-Final Constraint’, in Yoon, J. Y. and Kim, K.-A. (eds.), Perspectives on linguistics in the 21st Century. Seoul: Hankook Munhwasa, pp. 301–18.
Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A. and Roberts, I. 2014. ‘A syntactic universal and its consequences’, Linguistic Inquiry 45(2): 169–225.
Biberauer, T., Newton, G. and Sheehan, M. 2009. ‘Limiting synchronic and diachronic variation and change: the Final-Over-Final Constraint’, Language and Linguistics 10: 701–43.
Börjars, K. and Vincent, N. 2011. ‘Grammaticalization and directionality’, in Narrog, H. and Heine, B. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford University Press, pp. 163–76.
Campbell, L. 1975. ‘Constraints on sound change’, in Dahlstedt, K.-H. (ed.), The Nordic languages and modern linguistics, vol. 2. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, pp. 388–406.
Campbell, L. 2013. Historical linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Cheshire, J., Adger, D. and Fox, S. 2013. ‘Relative who and the actuation problem’, Lingua 126: 51–77.
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Clahsen, H. and Muysken, P. 1986. ‘The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners: A study of the acquisition of German word order’, Second Language Research 2: 93–119.
De Smet, H. 2012. ‘The course of actualization’, Language 88: 601–33.
Eitler, T. 2006. ‘Some sociolectal, dialectal and communicative aspects of word order variation in late Middle English’, unpublished PhD thesis, Eötvös Loránd University.
Farrar, K. and Jones, M.C. 2002. ‘Introduction’, in Jones, M. C. and Esch, E. (eds.), Language change: The interplay of internal, external, and extra-linguistic factors. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–16.
Filppula, M. 2010. ‘Contact and the early history of English’, in Hickey, R. (ed.), The handbook of language contact. Oxford University Press, pp. 432–53.
Fischer, O. 2007. Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Håkansson, G., Pienemann, M. and Sayehli, S. 2002. ‘Transfer and typological proximity in the context of second language processing’, Second Language Research 18: 250–73.
Hale, M. 1998. ‘Diachronic syntax’, Syntax 1: 1–18.
Harris, A. C. and Campbell, L. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Hawkins, J. A. 1990. ‘A parsing theory of word order universals’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 223–61.
Hawkins, J. A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge University Press.
Hawkins, J. A. 2002a. ‘Symmetries and asymmetries: Their grammar, typology and parsing’, Theoretical Linguistics 28: 95–149.
Hawkins, J. A. 2002b. ‘Issues at the performance-grammar interface: Some comments on the commentaries’, Theoretical Linguistics 28: 211–27.
Hawkins, J. A. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford University Press.
Hawkins, J. A. 2007. ‘Processing typology and why psychologists need to know about it’, New Ideas in Psychology 25: 87–107.
Hempel, C. G. and Oppenheim, P. 1948. ‘Studies in the logic of explanation’, Philosophy of Science 15: 135–75.
Holmberg, A. 2000. ‘Deriving OV order in Finnish’, in Svenonius, P. (ed.), The derivation of VO and OV. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 123–52.
Holt, D. E. (ed.) 2000. Optimality theory and language change. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hopper, P. and Traugott, E. C. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
Ingason, A. K., Sigurðsson, E. F. and Wallenberg, J. C. 2012. ‘Antisocial syntax: Disentangling the Icelandic VO/OV parameter and its lexical remains’, paper presented at DiGS 14, Lisbon, 6 July.
King, R. D. 1969. Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
King, R. 2000. The lexical basis of grammatical borrowing: A Prince Edward Island case study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kroch, A. S. 1989. ‘Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change’, Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244.
Kroch, A. S. 1994. ‘Morphosyntactic variation’, Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society 2: 180–201.
Kroch, A. S. 2000. ‘Syntactic change’, in Baltin, M. and Collins, C. (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 629–739.
Kroch, A. S. and Taylor, A. 1997. ‘Verb movement in Old and Middle English: Dialect variation and language contact’, in van Kemenade, A. and Vincent, N. (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change. Cambridge University Press, pp. 297–325.
Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, W. 1982. ‘Building on empirical foundations’, in Lehmann, W. P. and Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 17–92.
Labov, W. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell.
Labov, W. 2007. ‘Transmission and diffusion’, Language 83: 344–87.
Labov, W. and Harris, W. A. 1986. ‘De facto segregation of Black and White vernaculars’, in Sankoff, D. (ed.), Diversity and diachrony. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–24.
Langacker, R. W. 1977. ‘Syntactic reanalysis’, in Li, C. N. (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 57–139.
Lass, R. 1980. On explaining language change. Cambridge University Press.
Lass, R. 1997. Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge University Press.
Ledgeway, A. 2012. From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change. Oxford University Press.
Lightfoot, D. W. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge University Press.
Lightfoot, D. W. 1991. How to set parameters: Arguments from language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lightfoot, D. W. 1999. The development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lightfoot, D. W. 2002. ‘Myths and the prehistory of grammars’, Journal of Linguistics 38: 113–36.
Lightfoot, D. W. 2006. How new languages emerge. Cambridge University Press.
Lightfoot, D. W. 2013. ‘Types of explanation in history’, Language (Historical Syntax) 89: e18–e39.
Lohndal, T. 2009. ‘The copula cycle’, in van Gelderen, E. (ed.), Cyclical change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 209–42.
Lucas, C. 2009. ‘The development of negation in Arabic and Afro-Asiatic’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
Mayr, E. 1976. Evolution and the diversity of life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mayr, E. 2004. What makes biology unique? Considerations on the autonomy of a scientific discipline. Cambridge University Press.
McMahon, A. M. S. 1994. Understanding language change. Cambridge University Press.
Meillet, A. 1921. Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, 1st edn. Paris: Champion.
Milroy, J. 1992. Linguistic variation and change: On the historical sociolinguistics of English. Oxford: Blackwell.
Myers-Scotton, C. 2002. Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford University Press.
Myers-Scotton, C. 2003. ‘What lies beneath: Split (mixed) languages as contact phenomena’, in Matras, Y. and Bakker, P. (eds.), The mixed language debate: Theoretical and empirical advances. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 73–106.
Naro, A. 1981. ‘The social and structural dimensions of a syntactic change’, Language 57: 63–98.
Newmeyer, F.J. 1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Paul, H. 1880. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 1st edn. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
Pintzuk, S. 1999. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. New York: Garland.
Pintzuk, S. 2003. ‘Variationist approaches to syntactic change’, in Joseph, B. D. and Janda, R. D. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 509–28.
Pintzuk, S. 2005. ‘Arguments against a universal base: Evidence from Old English’, English Language and Linguistics 9: 115–38.
Roberts, I. 2007. Diachronic syntax. Oxford University Press.
Roberts, I. and Roussou, A. 1999. ‘A formal approach to “grammaticalization”’, Linguistics 37: 1011–41.
Roberts, I. and Roussou, A. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
Romaine, S. 1982. Socio-historical linguistics: Its status and methodology. Cambridge University Press.
Sober, E. 1980. ‘Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism’, Philosophy of Science 47: 350–83.
Timberlake, A. 1977. ‘Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change’, in Li, C. N. (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change. Austin: University of Texas Press, 141–77.
Trudgill, P. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford University Press.
van Coetsem, F. 1988. Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Dordrecht: Foris.
van Coetsem, F. 1995. ‘Outlining a model of the transmission phenomenon in language contact’, Leuvense Bijdragen 84: 63–85.
van Coetsem, F. 2000. A general and unified theory of the transmission process in language contact. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
van Gelderen, E. 2004. Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Gelderen, E. 2009. ‘Renewal in the left periphery: Economy and the complementiser layer’, Transactions of the Philological Society 107: 131–95.
van Gelderen, E. 2011. The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. Oxford University Press.
van Kemenade, A. 1987. Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris.
Walkden, G. 2009. ‘Deriving the Final-over-Final Constraint from third factor considerations’, Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 5: 67–72.
Walkden, G. 2012. ‘Against inertia’, Lingua 122: 891–901.
Weerman, F. 1993. ‘The diachronic consequences of first and second language acquisition: the change from OV to VO’, Linguistics 31: 903–31.
Weinreich, U., Labov, W. and Herzog, M. 1968. ‘Empirical foundations for a theory of language change’, in Lehmann, W. and Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 95–189.
Winford, D. 2003. An introduction to contact linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Winford, D. 2005. ‘Contact-induced changes: Classification and processes’, Diachronica 22: 373–427.