Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:16:50.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Personality and health

from Psychology, health and illness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Stephanie V. Stone
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University
Robert R. McCrae
Affiliation:
National Institute of Aging
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

The ways in which personality and health interact are myriad and complex. Does personality predispose us to certain diseases? Does disease lead to changes in personality? The original formulation of psychosomatic medicine sought a direct link between personality and health – anxiety and hypertension, depression and cancer – and was largely unfruitful. Current research seeks to clarify how personality is associated with health-related behaviours like smoking and exercise, which put people at risk for disease. By elucidating the link between personality and health behaviours, the field makes substantive contributions to both patient treatment and public health prevention and intervention programmes aimed at reducing the incidence and prevalence of disease.

Personality as traits

For most of history, scholars and laypersons alike viewed human beings as rational creatures with propensities, abilities and beliefs that guided their conduct. Early in the twentieth century, this view was supplanted by psychoanalysis and behaviourism which characterized personality in radically different ways: for psychoanalysts, the essence of the person was in unconscious and often irrational processes; for behaviourists, the person was no more than a collection of learned responses to environmental reinforcements. Contemporary research has in turn rejected these two extreme views of personality and returned to a more commonsense approach, in which familiar traits such as persistence and sociability are seen as important determinants of behaviour.

It does not follow, however, that personality psychology is nothing but common sense.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auerbach, S. M., Clore, J. N., Kiesler, D. J.et al. (2002). Relation of diabetic patients' health-related control appraisals and physician–patient interpersonal impacts to patients' metabolic control and satisfaction with treatment. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beisecker, A. E. & Beisecker, T. D. (1990). Patient information-seeking behaviors when communicating with doctors. Medical Care, 28, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogg, T. & Roberts, B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: a meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(6), 887–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth-Kewley, S. & Vickers, R. R. Jr. (1994). Associations between major domains of personality and health behavior. Journal of Personality, 62, 281–98.Google Scholar
Bosma, H., Sanderman, R. & Scaf-Klomp, W. (2004). Demographic, health-related and psychosocial predictors of changes in depressive symptoms and anxiety in late middle-aged and older persons with fall-related injuries. Psychology and Health, 19, 103–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmody, T. P., Brunner, R. L. & St. Jeor, S. T. (1999). Hostility, dieting, and nutrition attitudes in overweight and weight-cycling men and women. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 26, 37–42.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, A. J. & Smith, T. W. (1995). Personality and patient adherence: Correlates of the Five-Factor Model in renal dialysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 18, 305–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conner, M. & Abraham, C. (2001). Conscientiousness and the Theory of Planned Behavior: toward a more complete model of the antecedents of intentions of behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1547–61.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Trait psychology comes of age. In Sonderegger, T. B. (Ed.). Nebraska symposium on motivation: psychology and aging (pp. 169–204). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Courneya, K. S., Friedenreich, C.M, Sela, R. A., Quinney, H. A. & Rhodes, R. E. (2002). Correlates of adherence and contamination in a randomized controlled trial of exercise in cancer survivors: an application of the theory of planned behavior and the five factor model of personality. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 257–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gucht, V., Fischler, B. & Heiser, W. (2004). Personality and affect as determinants of medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: a follow-up study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 56, 279–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dembroski, T. M., MacDougall, J. M., Costa, P. T. Jr. & Grandits, G. (1989). Components of hostility as predictors of sudden death and myocardial infarction in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Psychosomatic Medicine, 51, 514–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, L. G. & Tinsley, B. J. (1999). Maternal personality and health communication in the pediatric context. Health Communication, 11, 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, R. & Engstrom, G. (2002). Personality and the perception of health in the general population. Psychological Medicine, 32, 325–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kressin, N. R., Spiro, A., Bossé, R. & Garcia, R. I. (1999). Personality traits and oral self-care behaviors: longitudinal findings from the Normative Aging Study. Psychology and Health, 14, 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, L. R. & Friedman, H. S. (2000). Comparing personality scales across time: an illustrative study of validity and consistency in life-span archival data. Journal of Personality, 68, 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R., Wan, C. K., David, J. P.et al. (1999). Style of anger expression: relation to expressivity, personality, and health. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1196–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R., &Costa, P.T., Jr. (2003). Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective (2nd edn.). New York: Guilford.CrossRef
Mc Crae, R. R.&John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, D., Murray, R. P. & Barnes, G. E. (2003). Personality differences between users of wine, beer and spirits in a community sample: the Winnipeg Health and Drinking Survey. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64, 634–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mechanic, D. (1978). Medical sociology (2nd edn.). New York: Free Press.
Miller, G. E., Cohen, S., Rabin, B., Skoner, D. P. & Doyle, W. J. (1999). Personality and tonic cardiovascular, neuroendocrine, and immune parameters. Brain, Behavior and Immunity, 13, 109–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, T. (1991). The psychotherapeutic utility of the Five-Factor Model of personality: a clinician's experience. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 415–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pervin, L. A. & John, O. P. (Eds.). (1999). Handbook of Personality: Theory, & Research (2nd edn.). New York: Guilford.
Plomin, R. & Daniels, D. (1987). Why are children in the same family so different from one another?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 1–16.Google Scholar
Roter, D. L. & Hall, J. A. (1992). Doctors talking with patients/patients talking with doctors: improving communication in medical visits. Westport, CT: Auburn House.
Stough, C., Donaldson, C. & Scarlata, B. (2001). Psychophysiological correlates of the NEO-PI-R openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness: preliminary results. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 41, 87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vollrath, M. & Torgersen, S. (2002). Who takes health risks? A probe into eight personality types. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1185–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zonderman, A. B., Herbst, J. H., Schmidt, C. Jr., Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1993). Depressive symptoms as a non-specific, graded risk for psychiatric diagnoses. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 544–52.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×