Skip to main content
×
Home
The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bibby, Andrew Scott 2017. Montesquieu’s Political Economy.


    Packham, Catherine 2017. “The common grievance of the revolution”: Bread, the Grain Trade, and Political Economy in Wollstonecraft'sView of the French Revolution. European Romantic Review, Vol. 25, Issue. 6, p. 705.


    Serrano, Elena 2017. Makingoeconomicpeople: The SpanishMagazine of Agriculture and Arts for Parish Rectors(1797–1808). History and Technology, Vol. 30, Issue. 3, p. 149.


    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought
    • Online ISBN: 9781139055413
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

This major work of academic reference provides a comprehensive overview of the development of western political thought during the European Enlightenment. Written by a distinguished team of international contributors, this Cambridge History is the latest in a sequence of volumes that is now firmly established as the principal reference source for the history of political thought. Every major theme in eighteenth-century political thought is covered in a series of essays at once scholarly and accessible, and the essays are complemented by extensive guides for further reading, and brief biographical notes of the major characters in the text, including Rousseau, Montesquieu and David Hume. Of interest and relevance to students and scholars of politics and history at all levels from beginning undergraduate upwards, this volume chronicles one of the most exciting and rewarding of all periods in the development of western thinking about politics, man (and increasingly woman), and society.

Reviews

'The six volume Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought is the triumphant embodiment of a collective effort spanning three generations. The scholarly standard is high; the array of volumes gives an impression of careful, massive and reassuring permanence.'

Source: The Times Literary Supplement

'… a definitive resource to anyone wishing to achieve a closer familiarity with these episodes in Enlightenment thought, or who wants to reconnect present philosophical outlooks with their historical beginnings.'

Source: British Journal for the History of Philosophy

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Page 1 of 2


  • 1 - The spirit of nations
    pp 7-39
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.003
  • View abstract
    Summary
    In linking history and law and making both central to political theory Montesquieu, together with the Scottish school of political economy, which he profoundly influenced, set the tone and form of modern social and political thought. The political reality of the regime was such that it had nearly always been in a state of contestation, scrutiny, and self-criticism. Voltaire, whose views may be profitably juxtaposed to those of Montesquieu, opened his first letter on the subject of England's political institutions, Sur le Parlement, by noting how very fond the English Members of Parliament were of comparing themselves to the ancient Romans. Montesquieu's intricate map presented an overview of the various levels of law from divine to human, although he warned that he would not treat political and civil laws separately as his purpose was to not to examine laws themselves but their spirit, that is the various relations which laws can have with various things.
  • 2 - The English system of liberty
    pp 40-78
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.004
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The English system of liberty was given cosmic significance when it was discovered to be implied in the very structure of God's government of the whole of creation, a theme explored in John Desaguliers's The Newtonian System of the World the Best Model of Government. This chapter examines the gamut of protests that arose against the post-Revolution state. The language of the Allegiance Controversy belonged firmly to the political theory of resistance bred in the European Reformation and its wars of religion. The Jacobites sustained a powerful ideological tradition until their decisive military defeat on the battlefield of Culloden in Scotland in 1746. The Lutheran view that the government of the church belonged to the civil magistrate had long been challenged within the Church of England by a quasi-Catholic claim that the church possessed an authority independent of the secular state. The Court Whigs were impatient with Ancient Constitutionalist notions of Saxon liberties.
  • 3 - Scepticism, priestcraft, and toleration
    pp 79-109
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.005
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The sceptical developments concentrated on questions of evidence and reasoning, and on the dubiousness of human judgements in the sciences, philosophy, and theology. The Renaissance rediscovery of ancient Greek sceptical thought, the writings of Sextus Empiricus, had an impact upon the religious controversies of the Reformation and Counter-Reformation. In the latter part of the seventeenth century, sceptical arguments were turned against the special status of the Bible, and against the knowledge claims of the Judaeo-Christian religious tradition. In France, where Catholicism was the official religion and rigid control was exercised to prevent the spread of heretical or unorthodox ideas, one finds a covert spread of sceptical irreligious ideas from the Netherlands and England. Much eighteenth-century debate on the political and social implications of religion turned on the pressing and contingent problem of religious toleration. The eirenic case for tolerance merged into a general indictment of priestly dogmatism, or priestcraft.
  • 4 - Piety and politics in the century of lights
    pp 110-144
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.006
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter explores the political ramifications of the divisions between 'orthodox' and 'heterodox' within eighteenth-century Europe's believing communities. It asks to what extent the religious and theological differences separating Jesuits from Jansenists, orthodox Lutherans or Calvinists from Pietists, and High Church Anglicans from English Dissenters took the form of differing political visions, not only about the church but also about state and society. The history of religious controversy in Catholic France during the eighteenth century is in part the history of the undoing of the Declaration of the Liberties of the Gallican Church of 1682. The chapter also explores to what extent the French case instructive in eighteenth-century Catholic Europe, in particular for Spain, Austria, and the Italian states. The synod's offensive against the excesses of baroque and popular piety maintained a certain contact with the Catholic Enlightenment of Lami and Muratori.
  • 5 - The comparative study of regimes and societies
    pp 145-171
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.007
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter addresses some of the numerous and complex ways in which European writers used comparative discourse. It examines the extent to which key concepts in this discourse were shaped by theorists' preferences and their positions on domestic controversies within their respective nations, as well as on issues during conflicts among European states within their own continent and in overseas competition for colonies. It asks whether there was any consensus about the superiority of Europeans over the rest of world, or about the legitimacy of European conquests, colonisation, and commerce, including the slave trade. In the second half of the eighteenth century, political, social, and legal theory from Russia to America centred on the categories devised by Montesquieu for comparative study. Later Montesquieu, Voltaire, Diderot, Herder, and Hume all made use of this integrating concept. Historical truth, philosophical enlightenment, as distinguished from Christian orthodoxy could be attained only by comparing the history of Europe with those of n.
  • 6 - Encyclopedias and the diffusion of knowledge
    pp 172-194
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.008
  • View abstract
    Summary
    By way of its conception, production, and distribution, the Enyclopédie illustrates, more forcefully than any other publishing venture of the eighteenth century, how innovative philosophies of the period came to be disseminated, and how the market of ideas in the age of Enlightenment was organised. In announcing the publication of the Enyclopédie, Diderot proceeded to acknowledge his debt to the vast intellectual effort made before him, since the Renaissance and the age of humanism, which had, through the multiplication of general and scientific dictionaries, established the pedagogy of Western civilisation by way of defining words and explaining the meaning of concepts. While requiring legal recognition by way of a royal copyright system of privil'eges, the book trade in France comprised a growing, and ever more popular. If the article Enyclopédie forms a part of his philosophy of history, Diderot's specifically political contributions concentrate instead on principles such as justice, authority, and natural right, illustrated with examples drawn most often from antiquity.
  • 7 - Optimism, progress, and philosophical history
    pp 195-217
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.009
  • View abstract
    Summary
    From the early seventeenth century, a new age of rationalism sprang up, with Descartes as its main progenitor, and Spinoza and Leibniz as epigones. The term optimism seems to have made its first appearance in French in 1737, in a review of Leibniz's Theodicy by the Jesuit periodical, the Memoires de Trevoux, where the author defined it as a theory according to which the world is an optimum. Voltaire had seen clearly the ultimate paradox about optimism: it was inherently pessimistic, because it contained the seeds of fatalism. During the age of Enlightenment a philosophy of history began to emerge. Like Bayle, Voltaire treated with reserve oral traditions and harangues, and made clear his wariness of historians motivated by party spirit. In a broad sense, Edward Gibbon was at one with Voltaire. For Gibbon, history was evidence of a passionate concern with promoting human development through the 'knowledge of man, morality, and politics'.
  • 8 - Naturalism, anthropology, and culture
    pp 218-248
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.010
  • View abstract
    Summary
    In opposing the idea of progress some proponents of what in the late nineteenth century came to be termed the Counter-Enlightenment are alleged to have subscribed to diverse notions of primitivism, preferring ancient mythology over modern science, popular intuitions over abstract ideas, and uncouth human nature over the refinements of culture. The erroneous identification of Vico, Rousseau, and Herder as Counter-Enlightenment thinkers has been largely based upon decontextualised interpretations of their meaning proffered by commentators inattentive to their sources or with only isolated interests in particular themes they addressed. Vico's and Herder's 'new sciences' of history challenged Christian chronocentrism as much as Copernicus and Galileo had shaken Christian geocentrism, albeit with different results. Herder's interest in the physiology of sense-impressions and its implications for an anthropology that embraced the history of the human mind informed his projects on the human senses.
  • 9 - German natural law
    pp 249-290
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.011
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The concern of modern natural law was to find a basis for moral life that, without conflicting with the tenets of Christianity, was neutral with respect to confessional religion. At a political and juridical level, natural law was an important instrument in the transformation of German politics after the Peace of Westphalia which ended the catastrophic Thirty Years War in 1648, a war fought along religious fronts and which was both civil and international. Christian Thomasius's work, Institutions of Divine Jurisprudence, was designed, as the title page proclaims, to prove and elaborate the principles of Pufendorf's natural law and to defend them against criticism. When Christian Wolff appeared in Halle at the turn of the eighteenth century, his philosophy immediately became the exemplary metaphysical opposition to Thomasius's eclectic and empirical programme. Histories of moral and political thought have commonly left the impression that natural law was killed off by Hume, Bentham, and Kant, and buried by historicism, idealism, and positivism.
  • 10 - Natural rights in the Scottish Enlightenment
    pp 291-316
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.012
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The moral philosopher who contributed most significantly to the establishment of the natural rights tradition in the universities of Scotland at the turn of the eighteenth century was Gershom Carmichael, a Reformed or Presbyterian scholastic. The dogmas of Presbyterian theology, popular and scholastic, came under fire in various parts of Reformed Europe in the early eighteenth century. Francis Hutcheson proposed that the idea of an obligation may be derived immediately from the moral sense and its idea of virtue as benevolence without the sanction of a law of nature. In A Treatise of Human Nature, David Hume addressed the sequence of questions posed by Pufendorf, Locke, Carmichael, and Hutcheson. Henry Home, Lord Kames, must be considered a figure of pivotal importance in the history of natural rights in eighteenth-century Scotland. Adam Smith, Thomas Reid, and John Millar made extensive use of the natural rights agenda in their lectures on moral philosophy and civil law at Glasgow.
  • 11 - The mixed constitution and the common law
    pp 317-346
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.013
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter concerns the relationship between English law and English liberty. Theorists of the English constitution differed over which of the institutions contributed most critically to the maintenance of political freedom, and disagreed sharply over which political forces and developments posed the most toxic threats to liberty's well-being. The Glorious Revolution of 1688 was routinely credited with the definitive clarification and vindication of the political order. The classification of the English government as a mixed constitution and the debate over parliamentary sovereignty tended to focus on somewhat narrow questions concerning the structure and extent of public power. The appropriation and adjustment of Montesquieu's 'power of judging' for domestic purposes was paralleled in the more general reception of his interpretation of the English constitution. For the theory of the constitution of greatest concern were features of common law that most directly implicated issues of state power.
  • 12 - Social contract theory and its critics
    pp 347-376
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.014
  • View abstract
    Summary
    At the heart of social contract theory is the idea that political legitimacy, political authority, and political obligation are derived from the consent of the governed, and are the artificial product of the voluntary agreement of free and equal moral agents. Political philosophy since the seventeenth century was characterised by voluntarism, by an emphasis on the will of individuals. It was natural enough that the 'Protestant' view of individual moral autonomy would pass from theology and moral philosophy into politics, forming the intellectual basis of social contract theory. It is true that excluding from Locke's system, the obligations and rights to which consent and contract give rise leaves a tolerably complete ethical doctrine based on natural law and rights. Voluntarism and contractarianism were present in French thought. This chapter discusses the Rousseau's radical transformation of contractarianism. Kant's political writings of the 1790s are rightly viewed as completing and crowning the social contract tradition.
  • 13 - The early Enlightenment debate on commerce and luxury
    pp 377-418
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.015
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter presents the work of eight important contributors to the early Enlightenment debates on commerce and luxury in France and Britain before 1748. As Saint Lambert presented, luxury was not merely an economic phenomenon, but the central moral and political issue of modernity. Archbishop Fénelon and Bernard Mandeville represented the two poles of the early eighteenth-century luxury controversy, the purest and ablest formulations of the fundamental alternatives on offer. The chapter discusses earl of Shaftesbury's critique of the psychology of luxury, and the restatement of the idea of economic growth without luxury by two of Mandeville's Protestant Irish critics, Francis Hutcheson and Bishop Berkeley. The chapter shows how Montesquieu, Voltaire, and Jean Francois Melon forged a neo-Colbertist idiom of the politics of luxury, in opposition to Fénelon's project and to attempts to resuscitate Louis XIV's project of universal monarchy. The chapter shows how luxury became a key issue in the European thought of the period not only for domestic, but also for internation.
  • 14 - Physiocracy and the politics of laissez-faire
    pp 419-442
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.016
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Physiocracy, or 'rule of nature', was a French movement in political economy that prioritised agricultural productivity over manufacturing as the source of economic growth. Physiocracy exercised intermittent influence on French administrations between the 1760s and 1780s and furthermore attracted vehement supporters and opponents outside France, especially in Italy and Spain, but also as far a field as the United States and Bengal. While the physiocrats often presented themselves as a self-contained sect, owing little to contemporary work in political economy, in fact their contribution was deeply indebted both to discussions within France in the decades since the collapse of John Law's Mississippi Company, and to the example of England, seen as both an economic phenomenon and as a source of original work in political economy. Indeed, at the most obvious level, it needs to be noted that the key watchword 'laissez-faire, laissez-passer' originated not with any of the physiocrats, but with Vincent de Gournay, appointed intendant de commerce in 1751.
  • 15 - Scottish political economy
    pp 443-464
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.017
  • View abstract
    Summary
    When David Buchanan produced the first critical edition of the Wealth of Nations and two other Scottish economists, John Ramsay McCulloch and James Mill, emerged in the 1820s as popularisers of the new science, the early nineteenth-century association of political economy with Scotland was complete. In earlier social histories of the Scottish Enlightenment political economy and the associated stadial versions of the history of civil society were viewed as responses to an emergent or hoped-for capitalism, and as anticipations of Marx's materialist version of historical development. A great deal that is essential to an understanding of Adam Smith's originality in the eighteenth century context is obscured when the Wealth of Nations is treated as a self-standing work of economic analysis. The purpose of book the Wealth of Nations was to show that in the fields of justice, defence, education, and public works, the legislator had positive duties to perform that could not be undertaken by any other agency.
  • 16 - Property, community, and citizenship
    pp 465-494
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.018
  • View abstract
    Summary
    François Noël Babeuf, called Gracchus, committed himself to a conception of the relationship between property, community, and citizenship that was to lead execution for conspiring to overthrow the government of the first French republic. This chapter identifies who Gracchus took to be his ideological allies and examines what he took to be significant in Robespierre's revisions to the foundational principles of the new regime against a wider array of normative claims about the place of property in human affairs. Morelly's view was a simplified version of a long-established tradition of humanist argument about the relationship between human liberty and the arts and sciences and, about the decorative and ceremonial origins of morally acceptable regimes of communal and individual property. The question of what Rousseau really meant became a matter of intense political conflict during the French Revolution.
  • 17 - Philosophical kingship and enlightened despotism
    pp 495-524
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.019
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The notion of the philosopher king comes from Plato's Republic. What distinguished Plato's philosopher more than anything else was his supposed ability to see behind the evidence of the senses and the superficial realities of life and politics to a deeper reality of ideal 'forms'. Leibniz profoundly admired Plato's Republic, his metaphysics, and even his mathematics. None of the notions of a philosopher king, Plato's, Hobbes's, or Leibniz's, was prominent in eighteenth-century political thought, although other aspects of Plato's thought did have considerable influence, especially on Rousseau. By far the most important and influential eighteenth-century claimant to the title of philosophe king was Frederick II of Prussia. Among this group Catherine II was pre-eminent. Not only Catherine II but also, Joseph II admired aspects of Montesquieu's work. It was during the years when the concept of despotism was being widened, varied, and rehabilitated that the phrases 'enlightened despot' and 'enlightened despotism' were coined.
  • 18 - Cameralism and the sciences of the state
    pp 525-546
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.020
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Cameralism was a form of academic pedagogy aimed at the future administrators of the eighteenth-century German territorial states. Traditionally, it has been the French Enlightenment, the French and American Revolutions, and more recently also the Scottish Enlightenment that have been identified as the leading sources of modern political theory. It is possible to trace the transmission of this conception of the 'household' as a unity of authority, ethics, and economy from classical Greece and Rome through to the scholastics. Otto Brunner identifies the work of Johannes Coler as the inception of this new Hausväterliteratur, in which Oeconomia is treated as synonymous with householding. The emergence of a new conjunction of law, economics, and political science at the end of the nineteenth century completed this process of occlusion, displacing the sciences of the state with the new science of the social.
  • 19 - Utilitarianism and the reform of the criminal law
    pp 547-572
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.021
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter charts the development of philosophical thought about crime and punishment in the latter half of the eighteenth century, with special emphasis on the writings of Montesquieu, Beccaria, and Bentham. Montesquieu was the first major writer to place the reform of the criminal law on the agenda of the Enlightenment. Due to their philosophical character, Bentham's writings on punishment stood apart from the numerous discussions of various aspects of crime and punishment which continued into the early decades of the nineteenth century. In the debate over the death penalty in Britain, there was a general acceptance by all the main parties of 'rational principles' regarding punishment. The idea of a scale of punishments was one major attempt to bring liberty to bear on this aspect of state power. In the hands of Beccaria and especially Bentham the doctrine was clearly utilitarian, but both placed the idea of liberty at the heart of their utilitarianism.
  • 20 - Republicanism and popular sovereignty
    pp 573-598
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.022
  • View abstract
    Summary
    In Rousseau's Social Contract, he depicts not so much the social origins of vice as the political characteristics of ancient virtue, deemed appropriate to all legitimate republics wherein the people as sovereign do not run headlong into their chains but rather achieve a kind of equality in which every man remains 'as free as before'. The freedom a man gains under republican rule is different from the 'natural independence' which he gives up when entering into a contractual relation with his fellow citizens. Rousseau draws a sharp distinction between a republic's sovereign and its government. By contrast with Rousseau, Kant did not assume that mankind is by nature good or perfectible, supposed that human nature was at bottom largely formless and elastic. Fichte has sometimes been described as a Jacobin like Saint-Just, although if Siey'es may be portrayed as a French revolutionary similar to Kant, Fichte does indeed appear to resemble French revolutionary democrats.
  • 21 - The American Revolution
    pp 599-625
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.023
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The American Revolution transformed thinking about politics. To appreciate properly the originality and creativity of the American revolutionaries' contribution to political theory between the end of the Seven Years War in 1763 and the making of the constitution in 1787 people have to understand the character of their thinking about government at the outset, before the revolutionary crisis began. The English constitution was the source of England's liberty, and Englishmen of every social rank and on both sides of the Atlantic revelled in their worldwide reputation for liberty. The enlightened everywhere recognised that something new in politics was being created. By the end of the revolutionary era the Americans' idea of a constitution had become very different from that of the English. The doctrine of sovereignty was the most important conception of politics in the eighteenth-century Anglo-American world, and it dominated the polemics of the entire revolutionary generation.
  • 22 - Political languages of the French Revolution
    pp 626-659
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.024
  • View abstract
    Summary
    A discourse of justice drew on the conceptual resources of a French constitutional tradition dramatically revived and reworked by defenders of the parlements in opposition to the royal despotism which was increasingly their target after 1750. The language of individual rights appeared in its most distinctively French form before the Revolution in a discourse of reason associated with the physiocrats. Both had to give way to the enlightened rule of reason in a social order reconstituted according to natural law and the principles of political economy. The political thinking of the French Revolution remained profoundly shaped by the tension between arguments framed within a discourse of will derived from classical republicanism and those framed within a discourse of reason offering a theory of modern commercial society. The law organising revolutionary government proposed by Billaud-Varenne was adopted in December 1793. Romme presented the calendar as the vehicle for recording and celebrating the regeneration of France.

Page 1 of 2


This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


D. Armitage (2000b). The Ideological Origins of the British Empire (Cambridge).

Mary Astell (1996). Political Writings, ed. P. Springborg (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

D. Berman (1975). ‘Anthony Collins’s Essays in the Independent Whig’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 13.

D. Berman (1986). ‘The Jacobitism of Berkeley’s Passive Obedience’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 47.

K. Bowie (2003). ‘Public Opinion, Popular Politics, and the Union of 1707’, Scottish Historical Review, 82.

J. Brewer (1989). The Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State, 1688–1783 (New York).

T. Claydon (1996). William III and the Godly Revolution (Cambridge).

L. Colley (1981). ‘Eighteenth-Century English Radicalism before Wilkes’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 31.

G. Gargett , and G. Sheridan , eds. (1999). Ireland and the French Enlightenment, 1700–1800 (Basingstoke).

C. Gerrard (1994). The Patriot Opposition to Walpole (Oxford).

M. Goldie (1977). ‘Edmund Bohun and Jus Gentium in the Revolution Debate, 1689–1693’, Historical Journal, 20

P. Harrison (1990). ‘Religion’ and the Religions in the English Enlightenment (Cambridge).

T. A. Horne (1980). ‘Politics in a Corrupt Society: William Arnall’s Defence of Robert Walpole’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 41

A. C. Houston (1991). Algernon Sidney and the Republican Heritage in England and America (Princeton).

H. F. Kearney (1959). ‘The Political Background to English Mercantilism, 1695–1700’, Economic History Review, 11

J. P. Kenyon (1977). Revolution Principles: The Politics of Party, 1689–1720 (Cambridge).

C. Kidd (1993). Subverting Scotland’s Past: Scottish Whig Historians and the Creation of an Anglo- British Identity, 1689–c. 1830 (Cambridge).

L. E. Klein (1994). Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness (Cambridge).

P. McDowell (1998). The Women of Grub Street: Press, Politics and Gender in the London Literary Marketplace, 1678–1730 (New York).

H. Nenner (1995). The Right to be King: The Succession to the Crown of England, 1603–1714 (Basingstoke and Chapel Hill).

R. Perry (1990). ‘Mary Astell and the Feminist Critique of Possessive Individualism’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 23: (1990).

P. Riley (1973) ‘An Unpublished MS of Leibniz on the Allegiance Due to Sovereign Powers’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 11.

T. P. Slaughter (1981). ‘“Abdicate” and “Contract” in the Glorious Revolution’, Historical Journal, 24.

H. Smith (2001). ‘English “Feminist” Writings and Judith Drake’s Essay in Defence of the Female Sex (1696)’, Historical Journal, 44.

H. Smith , ed. (1998). Women Writers and the Early-Modern British Political Tradition (Cambridge).

P. Springborg (1995). ‘Mary Astell, Critic of Locke’, American Political Science Review, 89.

D. Szechi (1997). ‘Constructing a Jacobite: The Social and Intellectual Origins of George Lockhart of Carnwath’, Historical Journal, 40.

S. Taylor (1992). ‘William Warburton and the Alliance of Church and State’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 43.

B. W. Young (1998). Religion and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century England (Oxford).

Pierre Bayle (2000a). Political Writings, ed. S. L. Jenkinson (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

O. P. Grell , J. Israel , and N. Tyacke , eds. (1991). From Persecution to Toleration: The Glorious Revolution and Religion in England (New York).

J. Walsh , C. Haydon , and S. Taylor , eds. (1993). The Church of England, c. 1689–c. 1833: From Toleration to Tractarianism (Cambridge).

D. R. Kelley (1990). The Human Measure: Social Thought in the Western Legal Tradition (Cambridge, MA).

Giambattista Vico (2002). The First New Science, ed. L. Pompa (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

F. M. Barnard (1988b). ‘Fraternity and Citizenship: Two Ethics of Mutuality in Christian Thomasius’, Review of Politics, 50

W. Busch (1979). Die Entstehung der kritischen Rechtsphilosophie Kants, 1762–1780 (Berlin).

H. Conrad (1961). Rechtsstaatliche Bestrebungen im Absolutismus Preuβens und Österreichs am Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts (Cologne).

C. A. Corr (1975). ‘Christian Wolff and Leibniz’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 36.

F. Grunert (2000). Normbegründung und politische Legitimität: Zur Rechts- und Staatsphilosophie der deutschen Frühaufklärung (Tübingen).

N. Hinske , ed. (1989). Halle: Aufklärung und Pietismus (Heidelberg).

T. J. Hochstrasser (2000). Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment (Cambridge).

I. Hunter (2001). Rival Enlightenments: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early-Modern Germany (Cambridge).

I. Hunter , and D. Saunders , eds. (2002). Natural Law and Civil Sovereignty: Moral Right and State Authority in Early Modern Political Thought (Basingstoke).

J. Moore , and M. Silverthorne (1983). ‘Gershom Carmichael and the Natural Jurisprudence Tradition in Eighteenth-Century Scotland’, in Hont and Ignatieff 1983a.

H. Rosenblatt (1997) Rousseau and Geneva: From the First Discourse to the Social Contract, 1749–1762 (Cambridge).

F. Ruello (1963) ‘Christian Wolff et la scolastique’, Traditio, 19.

F. A. J. Szabo (1994). Kaunitz and Enlightened Absolutism, 1753–1780 (Cambridge).

F. Vollhardt , ed. (2001). Selbsliebe und Geselligkeit: Untersuchungen zum Verhältnis von naturrechtlichem Denken und moraldidaktischer Literatur im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert (Tübingen).

K. Haakonssen (1996a). Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment (Cambridge).

J. Cairns (1985). ‘Blackstone, the Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law’, Historical Journal, 28.

K. Haakonssen (1993). ‘The Structure of Hume’s Political Theory’, in Norton 1993.

P. Riley (1982) Will and Political Legitimacy: A Critical Exposition of Social Contract Theory in Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant and Hegel (Cambridge, MA).

I. Hont (1983). ‘The “Rich Country – Poor Country” Debate in Scottish Classical Political Economy’, in Hont and Ignatieff 1983a. Repr. in Hont 2005.

T. Wahnbaeck (2004). Luxury and Public Happiness: Political Economy in the Italian Enlightenment (Oxford).

D. Kettler (1977). ‘History and Theory in Ferguson’s Essay on the History of Civil Society’, Political Theory, 5

J. G. A. Pocock (1985). Virtue, Commerce and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century (Cambridge).

N. Rosenberg (1960) ‘Some Institutional Aspects of the Wealth of Nations’, Journal of Political Economy, 68.

D. Winch (1978). Adam Smith’s Politics (Cambridge).

A. J. Draper (2000). ‘Cesare Beccaria’s Influence on English Discussions of Punishment, 1764–1789’, History of European Ideas, 26.

T. A. Green (1985). Verdict according to Conscience: Perspectives on the English Criminal Trial Jury, 1200–1800 (Chicago).

J. H. Langbein (1977). Torture and the Law of Proof: Europe and England in the Ancien Régime (Chicago).

J. Semple (1993). Bentham’s Prison: A Study of the Panopticon Penitentiary (Oxford).

K. M. Baker , ed. (1994b). The French Revolution and the Creation of Modern Political Culture, IV, The Terror (Oxford).

M. Gauchet (1989). La Révolution des droits de l’homme (Paris).

M. Gauchet (1995). La Révolution des pouvoirs: la souveraineté, le peuple et la représentation, 1789–1799 (Paris).

U. Adam (2003). ‘Nobility and Modern Monarchy: J. H. G. Justi and the French Debate on Commercial Nobility at the Beginning of the Seven Years War’, History of European Ideas, 29: 141–57.

Joseph Addison (1979). The Freeholder, ed. J. Leheny (Oxford).

T. Ahnert (2002). ‘The Prince and the Church in the Thought of Christian Thomasius’, in Hunter and Saunders 2002.

C. W. Akers (1964). Called unto Liberty: A Life of Jonathan Mayhew, 1720–1766 (Cambridge, MA).

M. Albrecht , E. J. Engel , and N. Hinske , eds. (1994). Moses Mendelssohn und die Kreise seiner Wirksamkeit (Tübingen).

A. O. Aldridge (1951). ‘Shaftesbury and the Deist Manifesto’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 41: 297–385.

A. O. Aldridge (1975). ‘Mandeville and Voltaire’, in Primer 1975.

H. E. Allison (1990). Kant’s Theory of Freedom (Cambridge and New York).

K. Ameriks (2000). Kant and the Fate of Autonomy (Cambridge).

J. Appleby (1982). ‘What Is Still American in the Political Philosophy of Thomas Jefferson?’, William and Mary Quarterly, 39: 287–309.

J. Appleby (1986). ‘Republicanism in Old and New Contexts’, William and Mary Quarterly, 43: 20–34.

D. Armitage (1997). ‘A Patriot for Whom? The Afterlives of Bolingbroke’s Patriot King’, Journal of British Studies, 36: 397–418.

D. Armitage (2000a). ‘Edmund Burke and Reason of State’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 61: 617–34.

S. Arntzen (1996). ‘Kant on Duty to Oneself and Resistance to Political Authority’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 34: 409–24.

J. E. Atwell (1986). Ends and Principles in Kant’s Moral Thought (Dordrecht).

P. R. Backscheider (1988). ‘The Verse Essay, John Locke and Defoe’s Jure divino’, English Literary History, 55

Isaac Backus (1968). Isaac Backus on Church, State, and Calvinism: Pamphlets, 1754–1789, ed. W. G. McLoughlin (Cambridge, MA).

B. Baczko (1988). ‘The Social Contract of the French: Sieyès and Rousseau’, Journal of Modern History, 60

Walter Bagehot (2001). The English Constitution, ed. P. Smith (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

K. M. Baker (1964). ‘The Earliest History of the Term “Social Science”’, Annals of Science, 20

K. M. Baker (1978a). ‘French Political Thought at the Accession of Louis XVI’, Journal of Modern History, 50

K. M. Baker (1978b). ‘State, Society and Subsistence in Eighteenth-Century France’, Journal of Modern History, 50

K. M. Baker (1981). ‘Enlightenment and Revolution in France’, Journal of Modern History, 53

K. M. Baker (1990). Inventing the French Revolution (Cambridge).

K. M. Baker (2001). ‘Transformations of Republicanism in Eighteenth-Century France’, Journal of Modern History, 73

G. J. Barker-Benfield (1989). ‘Mary Wollstonecraft: Eighteenth-Century Commonwealth-woman’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 50

F. M. Barnard (1965b). ‘Christian Thomasius: Enlightenment and Bureaucracy’, American Political Science Review, 59

F. M. Barnard (1971). ‘The Practical Philosophy of Christian Thomasius’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 32

F. M. Barnard (1983). ‘Self-Direction: Thomasius, Kant and Herder’, Political Theory, 11

R. Barny (1974). ‘Jean-Jacques Rousseau dans la Révolution’, Dix-huitième siècle, 6

D. E. D. Beales (1975). ‘The False Joseph II’, Historical Journal, 18

Cesare Beccaria (1995). On Crimes and Punishments and Other Writings, ed. R. Bellamy , trans. R. Davies (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

L. W. Beck (1971). ‘Kant and the Right of Revolution’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 32

C. B. A. Behrens (1975). ‘Enlightened Despotism’, Historical Journal, 18

Frederick Beiser , ed. (1996a). The Early Political Writings of the German Romantics (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

F. C. Beiser (1992). Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: The Genesis of Modern German Political Thought, 1790–1800 (Cambridge, MA).

F. C. Beiser (1996b). The Sovereignty of Reason: The Defense of Rationality in the Early English Enlightenment (Princeton).

D. A. Bell (2001b). ‘The Unbearable Lightness of Being French: Law, Republicanism and National Identity at the End of the Old Regime’, American Historical Review, 106.

Jeremy Bentham (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (London).

Jeremy Bentham (1988). A Fragment on Government, ed. J. H. Burns and H. L. A. Hart , intro. R. Harrison (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

Jeremy Bentham (1993). Official Aptitude Maximized; Expense Minimized, ed. P. Schofield (Collected Works, Oxford).

C. J. Berry (1977). ‘From Hume to Hegel: The Case of the Social Contract’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 38.

C. J. Berry (1994). The Idea of Luxury (Cambridge).

C. J. Betts (1984). Early Deism in France (The Hague).

C. Blamires (1990). ‘Etienne Dumont: Genevan Apostle of Utility’, Utilitas, 2.

T. C.W. Blanning (1990). ‘Frederick the Great and Enlightened Absolutism’, in Scott 1990.

T. C. W. Blanning , and D. Cannadine , eds. (1996). History and Biography (Cambridge).

L. Bodi (1995). Tauwetter in Wien: Zur Prosa der österreichischen Aufklärung, 1781–1795, 2nd edn (Vienna).

Henry John Viscount Bolingbroke (1982). Contributions to The Craftsman, ed. S. Varey (Oxford).

Henry John Viscount Bolingbroke (1997a). Bolingbroke’s Political Writings: The Conservative Enlightenment, ed. B. Cottret (London).

C. A. Bolton (1969). Church Reform in Eighteenth-Century Italy: The Synod of Pistoia, 1786 (The Hague).

L. Bongie (1961). ‘Hume: “Philosophe” and Philosopher in Eighteenth-Century France’, French Studies, 15.

R. Bourke (1999). ‘Sovereignty, Opinion and Revolution in Edmund Burke’, History of European Ideas, 25.

R. Bourke (2000b). ‘Liberty, Authority and Trust in Burke’s Idea of Empire’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 61.

P. Bowles (1985). ‘The Origin of Property and the Development of Scottish Historical Science’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 46.

P. Bowles (1986). ‘John Millar, the Legislator and the Mode of Subsistence’, History of European Ideas, 7.

P. Bowles (1990). ‘Millar and Engels on the History of Women and the Family’, History of European Ideas, 12.

D. G. Boyce , R. Eccleshall , and V. Geoghegan , eds. (2001). Political Discourse in Seventeenth-and Eighteenth-Century Ireland (London).

J. E. Bradley (1989). ‘The Anglican Pulpit, the Social Order, and the Resurgence of Toryism during the American Revolution’, Albion, 21.

J. E. Bradley (1990). Religion, Revolution and English Radicalism: Nonconformity in Eighteenth-Century Politics and Society (Cambridge).

B. Bradshaw , and J. Morrill , eds. (1996). The British Problem, c. 1534–1707 (London).

R. Brandt , ed. (1982b). Rechtsphilosophie der Aufklärung: Symposium Wolfenbüttel 1981 (Berlin).

T. H. Breen (1998). ‘Subjecthood and Citizenship: The Context of James Otis’s Radical Critique of John Locke’, New England Quarterly, 71.

N. Brender , and L. Krasnoff , eds. (2004). New Essays on the History of Autonomy (Cambridge).

J. Brewer (1976). Party Ideology and Popular Politics at the Accession of GeorgeIII (Cambridge).

J. Brewer (1980a). ‘English Radicalism in the Age of George III’, in Pocock 1980.

A. Broadie , ed. (2003). The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment (Cambridge).

S. C. Brown , ed. (1996). British Philosophy and the Age of Enlightenment (London).

J. H. Brumfitt (1972). The French Enlightenment (London).

G. Bryson (1945). Man and Society: The Scottish Inquiry of the Eighteenth Century (Princeton). Repr. New York, 1968.

G. Burchell , C. Gordon , and P. Miller , eds. (1991). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (London).

Edmund Burke (1993). Pre-Revolutionary Writings, ed. I. Harris (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

J. H. Burns (1962). ‘Bolingbroke and the Concept of Constitutional Government’, Political Studies, 10.

J. H. Burns , and M. Goldie , eds. (1991). The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700 (Cambridge).

S. Burtt (1992). Virtue Transformed: Political Argument in England, 1688–1740 (Cambridge).

R. Butterwick , ed. (2001). The Polish-Lithuanian Monarchy in European Context, c. 1500–1795 (Basingstoke).

J. Cairns (1991). ‘Rhetoric, Language and Roman law: Legal Education and Improvement in Eighteenth-Century Scotland’, Law and History Review, 9.

J. Cannon (1994). Samuel Johnson and the Politics of Hanoverian England (New York).

M. Canovan (1984). ‘The Un-Benthamite Utilitarianism of Joseph Priestley’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 45.

M. Cantor (1958). ‘Joel Barlow, Lawyer and Legal Philosopher’, American Quarterly, 10.

D. W. Carrithers (1991). ‘Not so Virtuous: Montesquieu, Venice and the Theory of Aristocratic Republicanism’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 52.

D. W. Carrithers (1995). ‘The Enlightenment Science of Society’, in Fox et al. 1995.

R. T. Carroll (1975). The Common-sense Philosophy of Bishop Edward Stillingfleet (The Hague).

J. Carter (1969). ‘The Revolution and the Constitution’, in Holmes 1969.

E. Cassirer (1945). Rousseau, Kant, Goethe (Princeton).

J. A. I. Champion (2003). Republican Learning: John Toland and the Crisis of Christian Culture, 1696–1722 (Manchester).

G. W. Chapman (1967). Edmund Burke: The Practical Imagination (Cambridge, MA).

G. Chaussinand-Nogaret (1985). Madame Roland: une femme en révolution (Paris).

G. L. Cherry (1950). ‘The Legal and Philosophical Position of the Jacobites, 1688–1689’, Journal of Modern History, 22.

H. Chisick (1981). The Limits of Reform in the Enlightenment: Attitudes Towards the Education of the Lower Classes in Eighteenth-Century France (Princeton).

H. Chisick (1991). ‘The Ambivalence of the Idea of Equality in the French Enlightenment’, History of European Ideas, 13: 215–41.

W. Christian (1973). ‘James Mackintosh, Burke and the Cause of Reform’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 7: 193–206.

I. R. Christie (1956). ‘Economical Reform and “the Influence of the Crown”, 1780’, Cambridge Historical Journal, 12: 144–54.

Gregory Claeys , ed. (1994a). Utopias of the British Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

G. Claeys (1986a). ‘William Godwin’s Critique of Democracy and Republicanism and its Sources’, History of European Ideas, 7: 253–70.

G. Claeys (1986b). ‘“Individualism”, “Socialism” and “Social Science”’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 47: 81–93.

G. Claeys (1989a). Citizens and Saints: Politics and Anti-Politics in Early British Socialism (Cambridge).

G. Claeys (1989b). Thomas Paine: Social and Political Thought (London).

G. Claeys (1994b). ‘The Origins of the Rights of Labor: Republicanism, Commerce and the Construction of Modern Social Theory in Britain, 1796–1805’, Journal of Modern History, 66: 249–90.

L. Cohen (1980). ‘Explaining the Revolution: Ideology and Ethics in Mercy Otis Warren’s Historical Theory’, William and Mary Quarterly, 37: 200–18.

L. Cole (2000). ‘Nation, Anti-Enlightenment and Religious Revival in Austria: Tyrol in the 1790s’, Historical Journal, 43: 475–97.

S. Collini , R. Whatmore , and B. Young , eds. (2000a), Economy, Polity and Society: British Intellectual History, 1750–1950 (Cambridge).

S. Collini , R. Whatmore , and B. Young , eds. (2000b), History, Religion and Culture: British Intellectual History, 1750–1950 (Cambridge).

S. Collini , D. Winch , and J. Burrow (1983). That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History (Cambridge).

Condillac , Etienne Bonnot (2001). Essay on the Origin of Human Knowledge, ed. H. Aarsleff (Cambridge).

C. Condren (1997). Satire, Lies and Politics: The Case of Dr Arbuthnot (Basingstoke).

J. Conniff (1999). ‘Edmund Burke and his Critics: The Case of Mary Wollstonecraft’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 60: 299–318.

J. E. Cookson (1982). The Friends of Peace: Anti-War Liberalism in England, 1793–1815 (Cambridge).

J. Corrigan (1987). The Hidden Balance: Religion and the Social Theories of Charles Chauncy and Jonathan Mayhew (New York).

Uriel Costa (1993). Examination of Pharasaic Traditions, ed. H. P. Saloman (Leiden).

J. Crimmins (1990). Secular Utilitarianism: Social Justice and the Critique of Religion in the Thought of Jeremy Bentham (Oxford).

J. Crimmins (1994). ‘Bentham’s Political Radicalism Re-examined’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 55: 259–81.

L. Crocker (1985). ‘Interpreting the Enlightenment: A Political Approach’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 46: 211–30.

R. Darnton (1971). ‘The High Enlightenment and the Low-Life of Literarature in Pre-Revolutionary France’, Past and Present, 51: 81–115.

R. Darnton (1973). ‘The Encyclopédie Wars of Prerevolutionary France’, American Historical Review, 78: 1331–52.

S. Deane (1988). The French Revolution and Enlightenment in England, 1789–1832 (Cambridge, MA).

R. Dekker (1992). ‘“Private Vices, Public Virtues” Revisited: The Dutch Background to Bernard Mandeville’, History of European Ideas, 14: 481–98.

L. Dickey (1986). ‘Historicizing the “Adam Smith Problem”: Conceptual, Historiographical and Textual Issues’, Journal of Modern History, 58: 579–609.

L. Dickey (1990). ‘Pride, Hypocrisy and Civility in Mandeville’s Social and Historical Theory’, Critical Review, 4: 387–429.

H. T. Dickinson (1976). ‘The Eighteenth–Century Debate on the Glorious Revolution’, History, 61: 28–45.

Denis Diderot (1992). Political Writings, ed. J. H. Mason and R. Wokler (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

J. Dinwiddy (1975). ‘Bentham’s Transition to Political Radicalism, 1809–10’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 36: 683–700.

J. V. Douthwaite (2002). The Wild Girl, Natural Man and the Monster: Dangerous Experiments in the Age of Enlightenment (Chicago).

H. Dreitzel (2003). ‘The Reception of Hobbes in the Political Philosophy of the Early German Enlightenment’, History of European Ideas, 29:255–89.

F. A. Dreyer (1983). ‘Faith and Experience in the Thought of John Wesley’, American Historical Review, 88:12–30.

J. Dunn (1969a). The Political Thought of John Locke (Cambridge).

J. Dunn (1980). Political Obligation in its Historical Contexts (Cambridge).

J. Dunn , ed. (1990). The Economic Limits to Modern Politics (Cambridge).

R. F. Durden (1951). ‘Joel Barlow and the French Revolution’, William and Mary Quarterly, 8:327–54.

E. Dziembowski (2001). ‘The English Political Model in Eighteenth-Century France’, Historical Research, 74:151–71.

D. Echevarria (1972). ‘The Pre-Revolutionary Influence of Rousseau’s Contrat social’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 33:543–60.

M. Edling (2003). A Revolution in Favor of Government: Origins of the US Constitution and the Making of the American State (New York).

P. Edwards (1989). ‘Introduction’ to Voltaire: Selections (London).

H. Erskine-Hill (1979). ‘Literature and the Jacobite Cause’, Modern Language Studies, 9:15–28.

H. Erskine-Hill (1996). Poetry of Opposition and Revolution: Dryden to Wordsworth (Oxford).

G. Feaver , and F. Rosen , eds. (1987). Lives, Liberties, and the Public Good (London).

Francôis Salignac Mothe Fénelon (1994). Telemachus, ed. P. Riley (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought). 1st publ. 1699.

R. R. Fennessy (1963). Burke, Paine and the Rights of Man (The Hague).

Robert Filmer (1991). Patriarcha and Other Writings, ed. J. P. Sommerville (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

M. Fitzsimmons (1994). The Remaking of France: The National Assembly and the Constitution of 1791 (Cambridge).

S. Fleischacker (1988). ‘Kant’s Theory of Punishment’, Kant-Studien, 79:434–49.

B. Fontana (1985). Rethinking the Politics of Commercial Society: The Edinburgh Review, 1802–1832 (Cambridge).

B. Fontana , ed., (1994). The Invention of the Modern Republic (Cambridge).

D. Forbes (1978). ‘The European, or Cosmopolitan, Dimension in Hume’s Science of Politics’, British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 1:57–60.

P. Force (2003). Self-Interest before Adam Smith (Cambridge).

C. Fox , R. S. Porter , and R. Wokler , eds. (1995). Inventing Human Science: Eighteenth-century Domains (Berkeley).

Benjamin Franklin (2004). The Autobiography and Other Writings on Politics, Economics, and Virtue, ed. A. Houston (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

M. Fulbrook (1983). Piety and Politics: Religion and the Rise of Absolutism in England, Württemberg and Prussia (Cambridge).

W. Gareth Jones (1984). Nikolay Novikov, Enlightener of Russia (Cambridge).

J. Gascoigne (1986). ‘Anglican Latitudinarianism and Political Radicalism in the Late Eighteenth Century’, History, 71:22–38.

J. Gascoigne (1989). Cambridge in the Age of Enlightenment (Cambridge).

E. S. Gausted (1979). ‘George Berkeley and New World Community’, Church History, 48:5–17.

R. L. Gawthrop (1993). Pietism and the Making of Eighteenth-Century Prussia (Cambridge).

N. Geras , and R. Wokler , eds. (2000). The Enlightenment and Modernity (Basingstoke).

N. W. Gilbert (1963). ‘The Concept of the Will in Early Latin Philosophy’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 1

S. Gilley (1981). ‘Christianity and Enlightenment: An Historical Survey’, History of European Ideas, 1:

L. K. J. Glassey , ed. (1997). The Reigns of Charles II and James VII and II (London).

D. Gobetti (1992). Private and Public: Individuals, Households and Body Politic in Locke and Hutcheson (London).

M. Goldie (1991c). ‘The Theory of Religious Intolerance in Restoration England’, in Grell et al. 1991.

M. Goldie (1993a). ‘Priestcraft and the Birth of Whiggism’, in Phillipson and Skinner 1993.

M. Goldie (1993b). ‘John Locke, Jonas Proast and Religious Toleration, 1688–1692’, in Walsh et al. 1993.

M. Goldie (1997). ‘Restoration Political Thought’, in Glassey 1997.

L. Goldman (1983). ‘The Origins of British “Social Science”: Political Economy, Natural Science and Statistics, 1830–1835’, Historical Journal, 26

M. M. Goldsmith (1977). ‘Mandeville and the Spirit of Capitalism’, Journal of British Studies, 17

M. M. Goldsmith (1979). ‘Faction Detected: Ideological Consequences of Robert Walpole’s Decline and Fall’, History, 64:

D. Goodman (1991). ‘Governing the Republic of Letters: The Politics of Culture in the French Enlightenment’, History of European Ideas, 13

J. W. Gough (1976). ‘James Tyrrell, Whig Historian, and Friend of John Locke’, Historical Journal, 19

W. Grossmann (1979). ‘Toleration - exercitium religionis privatum’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 40

J. A. W. Gunn (1968). ‘The Civil Polity of Peter Paxton’, Past and Present, 40

P. Guyer (2000). Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness (Cambridge).

P. Guyer , ed. (1992). The Cambridge Companion to Kant (Cambridge).

K. Haakonssen , ed. (2006). The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy (Cambridge).

K. Haakonssen (1981). The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith (Cambridge).

K. Haakonssen (1985b). ‘Hugo Grotius and the History of Political Thought’, Political Theory, 13

K. Haakonssen (2002). ‘The Moral Conservatism of Natural Rights’, in Hunter and Saunders 2002.

K. Haakonssen (2003). ‘Natural Jurisprudence and the Theory of Justice’, in Broadie 2003.

K. Haakonssen , ed. (1998). Adam Smith (Aldershot).

T. E. Hall (1969). ‘Thought and Practice of Enlightened Government in French Corsica’, American Historical Review, 74

P. Hamburger (1985). ‘The Development of the Law of Seditious Libel and the Control of the Press’, Stanford Law Review, 37

Hamilton , Alexander , Madison , James , and John Jay (2003). The Federalist, with The Letters of Brutus, ed. T. Ball (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

R. Hammersley (2001). ‘Camille Desmoulin’s La Vieux Cordelier: A Link between English and French Republicanism’, History of European Ideas, 27

R. Hammersley (2004). ‘English Republicanism in Revolutionary France: The Case of the Cordelier Club’, Journal of British Studies, 43

I. Hampsher-Monk (1979). ‘Civic Humanism and Parliamentary Reform: The Case of the Society of the Friends of the People’, Journal of British Studies, 18

I. Hampsher-Monk (1991). ‘John Thelwall and the Eighteenth-Century Radical Response to Political Economy’, Historical Journal, 34

I. Hampsher-Monk (1998). ‘Burke and the Religious Sources of Skeptical Conservatism’, in Zande and Popkin 1998.

I. Hampsher-Monk (2005). ‘Edmund Burke’s Changing Justification for Intervention’, Historical Journal, 48

R. M. Hare (1993). ‘Could Kant have been a Utilitarian?’, Utilitas, 5

P. Harling (1996). The Waning of ‘Old Corruption’: The Politics of Economical Reform in Britain, 1779–1846 (New York).

H. L. A. Hart (1982). Essays on Bentham: Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory (New York).

C. H. Hay (1979b). ‘The Making of a Radical: The Case of James Burgh’, Journal of British Studies, 18

D. Hay (1982). ‘War, Dearth and Theft in the Eighteenth Century’, Past and Present, 95

C. Haydon , and W. Doyle , eds. (1999). Robespierre (Cambridge).

B. Head (1982). ‘The Origins of “La science sociale” in France, 1770–1800’, Australian Journal of French Studies, 19

B. Head (1985). Ideology and Social Science: Destutt de Tracy and French Liberalism (Boston MA).

P. Higonnet (1988). Sister Republics: The Origins of French and American Republicanism (Cambridge MA).

T. J. Hochstrasser (1993). ‘Conscience and Reason: The Natural Law Theory of Jean Barbeyrac’, Historical Journal, 36

R. Hole (1989). Pulpits, Politics and Public Order in England, 1760–1832 (Cambridge).

M. Hollis (1981). ‘Economic Man and Original Sin’, Political Studies, 29

G. Holmes , ed. (1969). Britain after the Glorious Revolution, 1689–1714 (London).

P. Honigsheim (1952). ‘The American Indian in the Philosophy of the Enlightenment’, Osiris, 10

I. Hont , and M. Ignatieff , eds. (1983a). Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment (Cambridge).

N. Hope (1990). ‘The View from the Provinces: A Dilemma for Protestants in Germany, 1648–1918’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 41

H. Höpfl (1978). ‘From Savage to Scotsman: Conjectural History in the Scottish Enlightenment’, Journal of British Studies, 17

H. Höpfl , and M. P. Thompson (1979). ‘The History of Contract as a Motif in Political Thought’, American Historical Review, 84

T. A. Horne (1978). The Social Thought of Bernard Mandeville (London).

T. A. Horne (1985). ‘“The Poor Have a Claim Founded in the Law of Nature”: William Paley and the Rights of the Poor’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 23

J. R. Howe (1966). The Changing Political Thought of John Adams (Princeton).

J. Hruschka (1991). ‘The Greatest Happiness Principle and Other Early German Anticipations of Utilitarian Theory’, Utilitas, 3

M. Hulliung (1994). The Autocritique of Enlightenment: Rousseau and the Philosophes (Cambridge MA).

Wilhelm Humboldt (1969). The Limits of State Action, ed. J. W. Burrow (Cambridge).

David Hume (1757). The Natural History of Religion, in Four Dissertations (London).

David Hume (1975). Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge , 3rd edn, revised by P. H. Nidditch (Oxford).

David Hume (1994a). Political Essays, ed. K. Haakonssen (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

L. J. Hume (1981). Bentham and Bureaucracy (Cambridge).

E. J. Hundert (1986). ‘Bernard Mandeville and the Rhetoric of Social Science’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 22

E. J. Hundert (1994). The Enlightenment’s Fable: Bernard Mandeville and the Discovery of Society (Cambridge).

E. J. Hundert (1995). ‘Bernard Mandeville and the Enlightenment’s Maxims of Modernity’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 56

I. Hunter (2002). ‘The Morals of Metaphysics: Kant’s Groundwork as Intellectual Paideia’, Critical Inquiry, 28

I. Hunter (2005). ‘Kant’s Religion and Prussian Religious Policy’, Modern Intellectual History, 2

M. Hunter , and D. Wootton , eds. (1992). Atheism from the Reformation to the Enlightenment (New York).

G. G. Iggers (1959). ‘Further Remarks about the Early Uses of the Term “Social Science”’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 20

M. Ignatieff (1978). A Just Measure of Pain: The Penitentiary in the Industrial Revolution, 1750–1850 (London).

M. Ignatieff (1983a). ‘John Millar and Individualism’, in Hont and Ignatieff 1983a.

J. Innes , and J. Styles (1986). ‘The Crime Wave: Recent Writings on Crime and Criminal Justice in Eighteenth-Century England’, Journal of British Studies, 25

J. I. Israel (1985). European Jewry in the Age of Mercantilism, 1550–1750 (New York).

J. I. Israel (2001). Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650–1750 (Oxford).

Thomas Jefferson (1999). Political Writings, ed. J. Appleby and T. Ball (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

J. Jennings (1992). ‘The Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen and its Critics in France’, Historical Journal, 35. 839–59.

N. Jolley (1975). ‘Leibniz on Hobbes, Locke’s Two Treatises and Sherlock’s Case of Allegiance’, Historical Journal, 18 21–35.

P. M. Jones (1995). Reform and Revolution in France: The Politics of Transition, 1774–1791 (Cambridge).

T. E. Kaiser (1991), ‘Money, Despotism and Public Opinion in Early Eighteenth-Century France: John Law and the Debate on Royal Credit’, Journal of Modern History, 63: 1–18

Immanuel Kant (1996b). Religion and Rational Theology, trans. and ed. A. Wood and G. Giovanni (Cambridge).

Immanuel Kant (1998). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. M. Gregor and C. M. Korsgaard (Cambridge).

S. L. Kaplan (1976). Bread, Politics and Political Economy in the Reign of Louis XIV, 2 vols. (The Hague).

B. Kapossy (2001). ‘The Sociable Patriot: Isaak Iselin’s Protestant Reading of Jean-Jacques Rousseau’, History of European Ideas, 27: 153–70

G. Kelly (1992). Revolutionary Feminism: The Mind and Career of Mary Wollstonecraft (Basingstoke).

G. Kelly (1993). Women, Writing and Revolution, 1790–1827 (New York).

G. A. Kelly (1968). ‘Rousseau, Kant and History’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 29: 347–64

C. Kenyon (1958). ‘Alexander Hamilton: Rousseau of the Right’, Political Science Quarterly, 73: 161–78

J. Kilcullen (1988). Sincerity and Truth: Essays on Arnauld, Bayle and Toleration (New York).

J. K. Kinnaird (1979). ‘Mary Astell and the Conservative Contribution to English Feminism’, Journal of British Studies, 19: 53–75

P. Kitromilides (1992). The Enlightenment as Social Criticism: Iosipos Moisiodox and Greek Culture in the Eighteenth Century (Princeton).

L. E. Klein (1989). ‘Liberty, Manners and Politeness in Early Eighteenth-Century England’, Historical Journal, 32: 583–606

J. B. Knudsen (1986). Justus Möser and the German Enlightenment (Cambridge).

R. Koebner (1951). ‘Despot and Despotism: Vicissitudes of a Political Term’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 14: 275–302

I. Kramnick (1972). ‘On Anarchism and the Real World: William Godwin and Radical England’, American Political Science Review, 66: 114–28

I. Kramnick (1982). ‘Republican Revisionism Revised’, American Historical Review, 87: 629–64

I. Kramnick (1986). ‘Eighteenth-Century Science and Radical Social Theory: The Case of Joseph Priestley’s Scientific Liberalism’, Journal of British Studies, 25: 1–30

S. Krause (2000). ‘The Spirit of Separate Powers in Montesquieu’, Review of Politics, 62:231–65.

M. Kuehn (2001). Kant: A Biography (Cambridge).

D. F. Lach (1953). ‘The Sinophilism of Christian Wolff’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 14: 561–74

J. H. Langbein (1983). ‘Albion’s Fatal Flaws’, Past and Present, 98: 96–120

P. Langford (1988). ‘Property and “Virtual Representation” in Eighteenth-Century England’, Historical Journal, 31: 83–115

J. C. Laursen (1986). ‘The Subversive Kant: The Vocabulary of “Public” and “Publicity”’, Political Theory, 14: 584–603

J. C. Laursen (1992). The Politics of Skepticism: In the Ancients, Montaigne, Hume and Kant (Leiden).

J. P. LeDonne (1984). Ruling Russia: Politics and Administration in the Age of Absolutism, 1762–1796 (Princeton).

J. Lee (1982). ‘Political Antiquarianism Unmasked: The Conservative Attack on the Myth of the Ancient Constitution’, Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, 55: 166–79.

I. L. Leeb (1973). The Ideological Origins of the Batavian Revolution (The Hague).

W. C. Lehmann (1971). Henry Home, Lord Kames, and the Scottish Enlightenment (The Hague).

Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz (1996). New Essays concerning Human Understanding, ed. P. Remnant and J. Bennett (Cambridge). Written c. 1704.

C. D. A. Leighton (1994). Catholicism in a Protestant Kingdom: A Study of the Irish Ancien Regime (Basingstoke).

S. Lestition (1993). ‘Kant and the End of the Enlightenment in Prussia’, Journal of Modern History, 65: 57–112.

G. Lewis (1999). ‘Robespierre through the Chartist Looking Glass’, in Haydon and Doyle 1999.

D. Lieberman (1988). ‘Blackstone’s Science of Legislation’, Journal of British Studies, 27: 117–49.

D. Lieberman (1989). The Province of Legislation Determined: Legal Theory in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge).

D. Lieberman (2000). ‘Economy and Polity in Bentham’s Science of Legislation’, in Collini , et al. 2000a.

M. Linton (1999). ‘The Unvirtuous King?: Clerical Rhetoric on the French Monarchy, 1760–1774’, History of European Ideas, 25: 55–74.

M. Linton (2000a). ‘Virtue Rewarded? Women and the Politics of Virtue in Eighteenth-Century France’, History of European Ideas, 26: 35–49, 51–65.

M. Lobban (1987). ‘Blackstone and the Science of Law’, Historical Journal, 30: 311–35.

John Locke (1988). Two Treatises of Government, ed. P. Laslett (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought). 1st publ. 1689 (but bearing date 1690). This edn 1st publ. 1960.

J. Lough (1985). ‘Reflections on Enlightenment and Lumières’, British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 8: 1–15.

K. Luig (1972). ‘Zur Verbreitung des Naturrechts in Europa’, Tidjschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, 40: 539–57.

J. T. Lukowski (1994). ‘Recasting Utopia: Montesquieu, Rousseau and the Polish Constitution of 3 May 1791’, Historical Journal, 37: 65–88.

G. MacLean , ed. (1995). Culture and Society in the Stuart Restoration (Cambridge).

I. Madariaga (1982). ‘Autocracy and Sovereignty’, Canadian American Slavic Studies, 16: 369–87.

J. Mali (1992). The Rehabilitation of Myth: Vico’s New Science (Cambridge).

M. Mann (1986–93). The Sources of Social Power, 2 vols. (Cambridge).

H. C. Mansfield (1965). Statesmanship and Party Government: A Study of Burke and Bolingbroke (Chicago).

H. C. Mansfield (1978). The Spirit of Liberalism (Cambridge, MA).

J. Marshall (1994). John Locke: Resistance, Religion and Responsibility (Cambridge).

H. T. Mason (1982). French Writers and their Society, 1715–1800 (London).

S. Mason (1975). Montesquieu’s Idea of Justice (The Hague).

S. Mason (1988). ‘Ferguson and Montesquieu: Tacit Reproaches?’, British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 11: 193–203.

F. C. Mather (1992). High Church Prophet: Bishop Samuel Horsley (1733–1806) and the Caroline Tradition in the Later Georgian Church (New York).

T. Mautner (1994). ‘Moses Mendelssohn and the Right of Toleration’, in Albrecht et al. 1994.

T. McConnell (1996). ‘The Inalienable Right of Conscience: A Madisonian Argument’, Social Theory and Practice, 22: 397–416.

G. L. McDowell (1998). ‘The Language of Law and the Foundations of American Constitutionalism’, William and Mary Quarterly, 55: 375–98.

L. A. McKenzie (1981). ‘The French Revolution and English Parliamentary Reform: James Mackintosh and the Vindiciae Gallicae’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 14: 264–82.

F. J. McLynn (1985). ‘The Ideology of Jacobitism on the Eve of the Rising of 1745’, History of European Ideas, 6: 1–18, 173–88.

B. McPhail (1993). ‘Scotland’s Sovereignty Asserted: The Debate over the Anglo-Scottish Union of 1707’, Parergon, 11: 27–44.

H. Méchoulan (1990). Amsterdam au temps de Spinoza (Paris).

J. H. Melton (2001). The Rise of the Public in Enlightenment Europe (Cambridge).

Moses Mendelssohn (1997). Philosophical Writings, ed. D. O. Dahlstrom (Cambridge).

S. Mendus (1988). Justifying Toleration (Cambridge).

W. W. Menzel (1996). Vernakuläre Wissenschaft: Christian Wolffs Bedeutung für die Herausbildung und Durchsetzung des Deutschen als Wissensschaftssprache (Tübingen).

J. Miller (1982). ‘The Glorious Revolution: “Contract” and “Abdication” Reconsidered’, Historical Journal, 25.

P. N. Miller (1994). Defining the Common Good: Empire, Religion and Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge).

H. Mizuta , and C. Sugiyama , eds. (1993). Adam Smith: International Perspectives (New York).

J. Moore (2002). ‘Utility and Humanity: The Quest for the Honestum in Cicero, Hutcheson, and Hume’, Utilitas, 14.

C. Morazé (1948). ‘Finance et despotisme: essai sur les despotes éclairés’, Annales, 3.

S. E. Morison , ed. (1956). ‘William Manning’s The Key of Liberty’, William and Mary Quarterly, 13.

J. Morrow (1990). Coleridge’s Political Thought (Basingstoke).

J. Morrow (1991). ‘Republicanism and Public Virtue:William Godwin’s History of the Commonwealth of England’, Historical Journal, 34.

A. E. Murphy (1997). John Law: Economic Theorist and Policy-Maker (New York).

J. G. Murphy (1970). Kant: The Philosophy of Right (London).

D. Nicholls (1995). God and Government in an ‘Age of Reason’ (London).

C. Noel (1990). ‘Charles III of Spain’, in Scott 1990.

D. F. Norton , ed. (1993). The Cambridge Companion to Hume (Cambridge).

K. O’Brien (1997). Narratives of Enlightenment: Cosmopolitan History from Voltaire to Gibbon (Cambridge).

G. Oestreich (1982). Neostoicism and the Early Modern State (Cambridge).

T. O’Hagan (1999). Rousseau (London).

J. O’Higgins (1970). Anthony Collins: The Man and his Works (The Hague).

P. J. Olscamp (1970). The Moral Philosophy of George Berkeley (Oxford).

P. S. Onuf (1989). ‘Reflections on the Founding: Constitutional Historiography in Bicentennial Perspective’, William and Mary Quarterly, 46.

M. J. Osler , ed. (1991). Atoms, Pneuma and Tranquillity: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought (Cambridge).

F. Oz-Salzberger (1995). Translating the Enlightenment: Scottish Civic Discourse in Eighteenth-Century Germany (New York).

F. Oz-Salzberger (2003). ‘The Political Theory of the Scottish Enlightenment’, in Broadie 2003.

M. Ozouf (1989). L’Homme régénéré: essais sur la Révolution française (Paris).

A. Pagden , ed. (1987). The Languages of Political Theory in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge).

A. Pagden , ed. (2002). The Idea of Europe: From Antiquity to the European Union (Cambridge).

G. Parry (1963). ‘Enlightened Government and its Critics in Eighteenth-Century Germany’, Historical Journal, 6: 178–92.

G. Parry (1982). ‘Locke on Representation in Politics’, History of European Ideas, 3.403–14.

J. A. Passmore (1951). Ralph Cudworth: An Interpretation (Cambridge).

S. Pedersen (1986). ‘Hannah More Meets Simple Simon: Tracts, Chapbooks, and Popular Culture in Late Eighteenth-Century England’, Journal of British Studies, 25: 84–113.

N. Phillipson (1981). ‘The Scottish Enlightenment’, in Porter and Teich 1981.

N. Phillipson (1983). ‘Adam Smith as Civic Moralist’, in Hont and Ignatieff 1983a.

N. Phillipson , and Q. Skinner , eds. (1993). Political Discourse in Early Modern Europe (Cambridge).

M. Philp , ed. (1991). The French Revolution and British Popular Politics (Cambridge).

M. G. H. Pittock (1994). Poetry and Jacobite Politics in Eighteenth-Century Britain and Ireland (Cambridge).

M. G. H. Pittock (1997). Inventing and Resisting Britain: Cultural Identities in Britain and Ireland, 1685–1789 (Basingstoke).

J. Pitts (2005). A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France (Princeton).

M. Plohmann (1992). Ludwig Julius Friedrich Höpfner (1743–1797): Naturrecht und positives Privatrecht am Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts (Berlin).

J. H. Plumb (1967). The Growth of Political Stability in England, 1675–1725 (London).

J. G. A. Pocock (1999–2003). Barbarism and Religion, 3 vols. (Cambridge).

J. G. A. Pocock (1960). ‘Burke and the Ancient Constitution’, Historical Journal, 3: 125–43.

J. G. A. Pocock (1982). ‘The Political Economy of Burke’s Analysis of the French Revolution’, Historical Journal, 25: 331–49.

J. G. A. Pocock (1987). The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law (Cambridge). 1st publ. 1957.

J. G. A. Pocock (1998). ‘Catharine Macaulay, Patriot Historian’, in Smith 1998.

B. C. Poland (1957). French Protestantism and the French Revolution (Princeton).

J. R. Pole (1966). Political Representation in England and the Origins of the American Republic (London).

L. Pompa (1990b). Human Nature and Historical Knowledge: Hume, Hegel, and Vico (Cambridge).

J. D. Popkin (1995). ‘Dutch Patriots, French Journalists and Declarations of Rights: The Leidse Ontwerp of 1785 and its Diffusion in France’, Historical Journal, 38: 553–65.

J. D. Popkin , and R. H. Popkin , eds. (2000). The Abbé Grégoire and his World (Boston, MA).

R. H. Popkin (1971). ‘The Philosophy of Bishop Stillingfleet’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 9: 303–19.

R. H. Popkin (1987a). Isaac la Peyrère (1596–1676) (Leiden).

R. H. Popkin (1988). ‘The Dispersion of Bodin’s Dialogues in England, Holland, and Germany’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 49: 157–60.

R. H. Popkin (1991). ‘The Deist Challenge’, in Grell et al. 1991.

R. H. Popkin (1992). ‘Jewish Anti-Christian Arguments as a Source of Irreligion from the Seventeenth to the Early Nineteenth Century’, in Hunter and Wootton 1992.

R. H. Popkin (1993). ‘Sources of Knowledge of Sextus Empiricus in Hume’s Time’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 54: 137–41.

R. H. Popkin (1996). ‘Prophecy and Scepticism in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries’, British Journal of the History of Philosophy, 4: 1–20.

R. Porter , and M. Teich , eds. (1981). The Enlightenment in National Context (Cambridge).

J. Potter (1983). The Liberty We Seek: Loyalist Ideology in Colonial New York and Massachusetts (Cambridge, MA).

K. B. Price (1957). ‘Ernst Cassirer and the Enlightenment’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 18: 101–12.

Joseph Priestley (1993). Political Writings, ed. P. N. Miller (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

I. Primer , ed. (1975). Mandeville Studies (The Hague).

I. Prothero (1997). Radical Artisans in England and France, 1830–1870 (Cambridge).

A. Quinton (1973). Utilitarian Ethics (London).

E. Radcliffe (1993). ‘Revolutionary Writing, Moral Philosophy and Universal Benevolence in the Eighteenth Century’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 54: 221–40.

M. Raeff (1975). ‘The Well-Ordered Police State and the Development of Modernity in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Europe’, American Historical Review, 80:1221–43.

H. S. Reiss (1956). ‘Kant and the Right of Rebellion’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 17: 179–92.

P. P. Remec (1960). The Position of the Individual in International Law According to Grotius and Vattel (The Hague).

J. Rendall (1978). The Origins of the Scottish Enlightenment (London).

W. E. Rex (1965). Essays on Pierre Bayle and Religious Controversy (The Hague).

M. Richter (1969). ‘Comparative Analysis in Montesquieu and Tocqueville’, Comparative Politics, 1: 129–60.

M. Richter (1998) ‘Montesquieu and the Concept of Civil Society’, European Legacy, 3.

P. Riley (1996) Leibniz’ Universal Jurisprudence: Justice as the Charity of the Wise (Cambridge, MA).

P. Riley (2001).. ‘Rousseau, Fénelon and the Quarrel between the Ancients and Moderns’, in Riley 2001b.

P. Riley , ed. (2001b). The Cambridge Companion to Rousseau (Cambridge).

C. Robbins (1959) The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman (Cambridge, MA).

M. Roberts (1986) The Age of Liberty: Sweden, 1719–1772 (Cambridge).

J. Robertson (1983b). ‘The Scottish Enlightenment at the Limits of the Civic Tradition’, in Hont and Ignatieff 1983a.

J. Robertson (1997) ‘The Enlightenment above National Context: Political Economy in Eighteenth-Century Scotland and Naples’, Historical Journal, 40.

P. Rogers (1970) ‘Swift and Bolingbroke on Faction’, Journal of British Studies, 9.

M. Rosa (1972) ‘Encyclopédie, “Lumières” et traditions au XVIIIe siècle en Italie’, Dix-huitième siècle, 4.

F. Rosen (1992) Bentham, Byron and Greece: Constitutionalism, Nationalism and Early Liberal Political Thought (Oxford).

F. Rosen (2000) ‘The Idea of Utility in Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments’, History of European Ideas, 26.

N. L. Rosenblum (1978) Bentham’s Theory of the Modern State (Cambridge, MA).

I. S. Ross (1995) The Life of Adam Smith (Oxford).

C. Rossiter (1953) ‘Richard Bland: The Whig in America’, William and Mary Quarterly, 10.

L. Rothkrug (1965) Opposition to Louis XIV: The Political and Social Origins of the French Enlightenment (Princeton).

J. Rudolph (2002) Revolution by Degrees: James Tyrrell and Whig Political Thought in the Late Seventeenth Century (Basingstoke).

D. Rutherford , ed. (2004). Dictionary of British Economists (Bristol).

M. Ryder (1982) ‘The Bank of Ireland, 1721: Land, Credit and Dependency’, Historical Journal, 25.

J. H. M. Salmon (1995) ‘Constitutions Old and New: Henrion de Pansey before and after the French Revolution’, Historical Journal, 38.

D. Saunders (2003) ‘The Natural Jurisprudence of Jean Barbeyrac’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 36.

J. Schmidt (1989) ‘The Question of Enlightenment: Kant, Mendelssohn and the Mittwochgesellschaft’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 50.

W. Schmidt-Biggemann , and T. Stammen , eds. (1998). Jacob Brucker (1696–1770): Philosoph und Historiken der europäischen Aufklärung (Berlin).

T. P. Schofield (1986) ‘Conservative Political Thought in Britain in Response to the French Revolution’, Historical Journal, 29.

M. Schonhorn (1991) Defoe’s Politics: Parliament, Power, Kingship and Robinson Crusoe (Cambridge).

H. M. Scott (1983). ‘Whatever Happened to the Enlightened Despots?’, History, 68: 245–57.

H. M. Scott (1996). ‘The Rise of the First Minister in Eighteenth-Century Europe’, in Blanning and Cannadine 1996.

H. M. Scott , ed. (1990). Enlightened Absolutism: Reform and Reformers in Later Eighteenth-Century Europe (Ann Arbor).

R. Scurr (2000). ‘Social Equality in Pierre-Louis Roederer’s Interpretation of the Modern Republic, 1793’, History of European Ideas, 26: 105–26.

J. Seed (1985). ‘Gentlemen Dissenters: The Social and Political Meanings of Rational Dissent in the 1770s and 1780s’, Historical Journal, 28: 299–325.

M. N. S. Sellers (1994). American Republicanism: Roman Ideology in the United States Constitution(Basingstoke).

P. R. Senn (1958). ‘The Earliest Use of the Term “Social Science”’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 19: 568–70.

W. H. Sewell (1980). Work and Revolution in France: The Language of Labor from the Old Regime to 1848 (Cambridge).

R. Shackleton (1949). ‘Montesquieu, Bolingbroke and the Separation of Powers’, French Studies, 3: 25–38.

R. E. Shalhope (1972). ‘Toward a Republican Synthesis: The Emergence of an Understanding of Republicanism in American Historiography’, William and Mary Quarterly, 29: 49–80.

R. E. Shalhope (1982). ‘Republicanism and Early American Historiography’, William and Mary Quarterly, 39: 334–56.

C. A. Sheehan , and G. L. McDowell , eds. (1998). Friends of the Constitution: Writings of the ‘Other’ Federalists, 1787–1788 (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund).

G. Shelton (1981). Dean Tucker and Eighteenth-Century Economic and Political Thought (London).

Emmanuel Sieyès (1982). Essai sur les privilèges, in Sieyès , Qu’est-ce que le Tiers-Etat?, ed. E. Champion (Paris). 1st publ. 1788.

P. Sigmund (1963). Nicholas of Cusa and Medieval Political Thought (Cambridge, MA).

B. C. J. Singer (1986). Society, Theory and the French Revolution (New York).

A. S. Skinner (1993). ‘The Shaping of Political Economy in the Enlightenment’, in Mizuta and Sugiyama 1993.

A. S. Skinner (1996). A System of Social Science: Papers relating to Adam Smith, 2nd edn (Oxford).

Q. R. D. Skinner (1978). The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, 2 vols. (Cambridge).

Q. R. D. Skinner (2002). Visions of Politics iii: Renaissance Virtues (Cambridge).

S. Small (2002). Political Thought in Ireland, 1776–1798 (Oxford).

R. Smith (1995). Handel’s Oratorios and Eighteenth-Century Thought (Cambridge).

R. J. Smith (1987). The Gothic Bequest: Medieval Institutions in British Thought, 1688–1863 (Cambridge).

M. Sonenscher (1984). ‘The sans-culottes of the Year II: Rethinking the Language of Labour in Revolutionary France’, Social History, 9: 301–28.

M. Sonenscher (1998a). ‘Enlightenment and Revolution’, Journal of Modern History, 70: 371–83.

J. Spurlick (1986). ‘What Price Economic Prosperity? Public Attitudes to Physiocracy in the Reign of Louis XIV’, British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 9: 183–96.

W. Stafford (1987). Socialism, Radicalism, and Nostalgia: Social Criticism in Britain, 1775–1830 (Cambridge).

M. Staum (1980a). Cabanis: Enlightenment and Medical Philosophy in the French Revolution (Princeton).

M. Staum (1980b). ‘The Class of Moral and Political Sciences, 1795–1803’, French Historical Studies, 11: 371–97.

M. Staum (1985–6). ‘The Enlightenment Transformed: The Institute Prize Contests’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 19: 153–79.

M. Staum (1987a). ‘Individual Rights and Social Control: Political Science in the French Institute’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 48: 4111–30.

M. Staum (1987b). ‘Human Geography in the French Institute’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 23: 332–40.

L. Stephen (1876). History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century, 2 vols. (London). Many later editions.

M. A. Stewart (1991). ‘The Stoic Legacy in the Early Scottish Enlightenment’, in Osler 1991.

M. Stolleis , ed. (1983). Hermann Conring (1606–1681): Beiträge zu Leben und Werk (Berlin).

H. S. Stone (1997). Vico’s Cultural History: The Production and Transmission of Ideas in Naples, 1685–1750 (Leiden).

A. Strugnell (1973). Diderot’s Politics (The Hague).

R. J. Sullivan (1989). Immanuel Kant’s Moral Theory (Cambridge).

Carl Gottlieb Svarez , (1960). Vorträge über Recht und Staat, ed. H. Conrad and G. Kleinheyer (Cologne). Lectures 1791–2.

T. Tackett (1986). Religion, Revolution and Regional Culture in Eighteenth-Century France (Princeton).

S. Targett (1994). ‘Government and Ideology during the Age of the Whig Supremacy: The Political Argument of Sir Robert Walpole’s Newspaper Propagandists’, Historical Journal, 37: 289–317.

R. F. Teichgraeber (1987). ‘“Less Abused than I had Reason to Expect”: The Reception of The Wealth of Nations in Britain, 1776–1790’, Historical Journal, 30: 337–66.

M. Thale (1989). ‘London Debating Societies in the 1790s’, Historical Journal, 32: 57–86.

P. D. G. Thomas (1996). John Wilkes, A Friend to Liberty (Oxford).

M. P. Thompson (1976). ‘The Reception of Locke’s Two Treatises of Government’, Political Studies, 24: 184–91.

M. P. Thompson (1986). ‘The History of Fundamental Law in Political Thought from the French Wars of Religion to the American Revolution’, American Historical Review, 91: 1103–28.

S. Tomaselli (1985). ‘The Enlightenment Debate on Women’, History Workshop, 20: 101–24.

S. Tomaselli (1992). ‘Remembering Mary Wollstonecraft on the Bicentenary of the Publication of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman’, British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 15: 125–33.

Z. M. Trachtenberg (1993). Making Citizens: Rousseau’s Political Theory of Culture (London).

H. Trevor Roper (1996). ‘Pietro Giannone and Great Britain’, Historical Journal, 39: 657–75.

K. Tribe (1984). ‘Cameralism and the Science of Government’, Journal of Modern History, 56: 263–84.

K. Tribe (1995). Strategies of Economic Order: German Economic Discourse, 1750–1950 (Cambridge).

R. Trousson (1969–70). ‘J.-J. Rousseau et son oeuvre dans la presse périodique allemande de 1750 à 1800’, Dix-huitième siècle, 1: 289–310, and 2: 227–64.

R. Tuck (1979). Natural Rights Theories (Cambridge).

R. Tuck (1993). Philosophy and Government, 1572–1651 (Cambridge).

F. Turner (1986). ‘British Politics and the Demise of the Roman Republic, 1700–1939’, Historical Journal, 29: 577–99.

G. Vaggi (1987). The Economics of François Quesnay (Basingstoke).

M. Van Gelderen , and Q. R. D. Skinner , eds. (2002). Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage, 2 vols. (Cambridge).

D. Van Kley (1979). ‘The Church, State, and the Ideological Origins of the French Revolution: The Debate over the General Assembly of the Gallican Clergy in 1765’, Journal of Modern History, 51: 629–66.

A. Vartanian (1960). La Mettrie’s l’homme machine (Princeton)

F. Venturi (1971). Utopia and Reform in the Enlightenment (Cambridge). 1st publ. in Italian in 1970.

M. Viroli (1988). Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the ‘Well-ordered Society’ (Cambridge).

G. Vivenza (2001). Adam Smith and the Classics (Oxford).

U. Vogel (1988). ‘When the Earth Belonged to All: The Land Question in Eighteenth-Century Justifications of Property’, Political Studies, 36: 102–22.

F. Vollhardt , ed. (1997). Christian Thomasius (1655–1728) (Tübingen).

Voltaire (François Marie Arouet) (1963a). Essai sur les moeurs et sur l’esprit des nations, ed. R. Pomeau , 2 vols. (Paris). 1st publ. 1756.

H. Vyverberg (1958). Historical Pessimism in the French Enlightenment (Cambridge, MA).

M. H. Waddicor (1970). Montesquieu and the Philosophy of Natural Law (The Hague).

J. Waldron (2002). God, Locke and Equality (Cambridge).

D. Walker (2003). ‘Addison’s Cato and the Transformation of Republican Discourse in the Early Eighteenth Century’, British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies, 26: 91–108.

E. Walter (1973). ‘Sur l’intelligentsia des lumières’, Dix-huitième siècle, 5: 173–201.

A. Ward (1964). ‘The Tory View of Roman History’, Studies in English Literature, 4: 412–56.

W. R. Ward (1992). The Protestant Evangelical Awakening (Cambridge).

W. R. Ward (1999). Christianity under the Ancien Régime, 1648–1789 (Cambridge).

G. J. Warnock (1986). ‘On Passive Obedience’, History of European Ideas, 7: 555–62.

N. Waszek (1988). The Scottish Enlightenment and Hegel’s Account of Civil Society (Dordrecht).

A. Webster (1993). ‘J. Barnave: Philosopher of a Revolution’, History of European Ideas, 17

E. Weis (1986). ‘Enlightenment and Absolutism in the Holy Roman Empire: Thoughts on Enlightened Absolutism in Germany’, Journal of Modern History, 58, Supplement.

C. C. Weston , and J. R. Greenberg (1981). Subjects and Sovereigns: The Grand Controversy over Legal Sovereignty in Stuart England (Cambridge).

J. Whaley (1985). Religious Toleration and Social Change in Hamburg, 1529–1819 (Cambridge).

R. Whatmore (1996). ‘Commerce, Constitutions and the Manners of a Nation: Etienne Clavière’s Revolutionary Political Economy, 1788–93’, History of European Ideas, 22

J. O. Whitman (1990). The Legacy of Roman Law in the German Romantic Era (Princeton).

Samuel Williams (1794). The Natural and Civil History of Vermont (Walpole, NH).

R. Willman (1983). ‘Blackstone and the “Theoretical Perfection” of the English Law in the Reign of Charles II’, Historical Journal, 26

D. Winch (1985). ‘The Burke–Smith Problem and Late Eighteenth-Century Political and Economic Thought’, Historical Journal, 28

D. Winch (1992). ‘Adam Smith: Scottish Moral Philosopher as Political Economist’, Historical Journal, 35

R. Wokler , (1987b). ‘Rousseau’s Two Concepts of Liberty’, in Feaver and Rosen 1987.

R. Wokler (1987d). ‘Saint-Simon and the Passage from Political to Social Science’, in Pagden 1987.

R. Wokler (1995b). ‘The Enlightenment Science of Politics’, in Fox et al. 1995.

R. Wokler (1998b). ‘Contextualizing Hegel’s Phenomenology of the French Revolution and the Terror’, Political Theory, 26

R. Wokler (2000a). ‘The Enlightenment, the Nation-State and the Primal Patricide of Modernity’, in Geras and Wokler 2000.

R. Wokler (2001a). Rousseau, 2nd edn (Oxford). 1st publ. 1995.

R. Wokler (2001b). ‘Ancient Postmodernism in the Philosophy of Rousseau’, in Riley (2001b).

R. P. Wolff , ed. (1967). Kant: A Collection of Critical Essays (Notre Dame, IN).

Mary Wollstonecraft (1995). A Vindication of the Rights of Men, with A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, ed. S. Tomaselli (Cambridge: Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought).

D. Wootton (2000). ‘Helvétius: from Radical Enlightenment to Revolution’, Political Theory, 28

B. W. Young (1996). ‘Christianity, Commerce and the Canon: Josiah Tucker and Richard Woodward on Political Economy’, History of European Ideas, 22

J. Zande (1995). ‘In the Image of Cicero: German Philosophy between Wolff and Kant’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 56

J. Zande (1998). ‘The Microscope of Experience: Christian Garve’s Translation of Cicero’s De officiis (1783)’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 59

J. Zande , and R. H. Popkin , eds. (1998). The Skeptical Tradition Around 1800 (Dordrecht).

J. P. Zinsser (2002). ‘Emilie de Breteuil, Marquise du Châtelet and Bernard Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees’, French Historical Studies, 25

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 5124 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 4767 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.