Skip to main content
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Liebersohn, Yosef Z. 2017. Epicurus’ Varietas and ἡ κινητικὴ ἡδονή. Mnemosyne,

  • Print publication year: 1999
  • Online publication date: March 2008

20 - Epicurean ethics

Epicurus offers a general methodology and practical advice for dealing with widely varying conditions of life on earth, as well as a foundational ethical theory. Epicurus says that he cannot conceive of the good except in terms of sensory pleasures, that is, precisely the kinds of pleasure recognized as such by Aristippus; the cradle argument is intended to support Epicurus' account of the summum bonum as katastematic pleasure, but the pleasures enjoyed by new-born animals have to be construed as kinetic. Whereas the philosophical tradition restricted natural or necessary desires to the bodily appetites, and regarded the corresponding forms of satisfaction as the lowest kinds of pleasure, Epicurus regards natural desires as the only ones a prudent person will seek habitually to satisfy. Since pleasure is the good, the only legitimate function of virtues is to furnish means to that end; and according to Epicurus we shall attain it if and only if we practise the virtues.
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy
  • Online ISBN: 9781139053617
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
Angeli, A. (1986) ‘Compendi, eklogai, tetrapharmakos: due capitoli di dissenso nell'Epicureismo’, CErc 16.
Angeli, A., ed. (1988a) Filodemo: Agli amici di scuola (PHerc. 1005), La scuola di Epicuro 7 (Naples).
Annas, J. E. (1993a) The Morality of Happiness (New York/Oxford).
Asmis, E. (1984) Epicurus' Scientific Method, Cornell studies in classical philology 42 (Ithaca/London).
Bailey, C. (1926) Epicurus. The Extant Remains (Oxford).
Brunschwig, J. (1986) ‘The cradle argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’, in Schofield & Striker (1986a).
Capasso, M., ed. (1988a) Carneisco: Il Secondo libro del Filista (PHerc. 1027) (Naples).
Capasso, M. (1988b) ‘Gli epicurei e il potere della memoria (PHerc. 1041 e 1040)’, in Mandilaras, B. G. et al., edd., Proceedings of the XVIIIth International Congress of Papyrology I (Athens).
Chilton, C. W. (1960) ‘Did Epicurus approve of marriage? A study of Diogenes Laertius X, 119’, Phronesis 5.
Clay, D. (1972) ‘Epicurus' Kuria doxa XVII’, GRBS 13.
Clay, D. (1986) ‘The cults of Epicurus’, CErc 16.
Clay, D. (1990) ‘The philosophical inscription of Diogenes of Oenoanda: New discoveries 1969–1983’, in Haase, W., ed., ANRW II 36.4 (Berlin/New York).
Diano, C. (1935) ‘Note epicuree’, SIFC 12.
Dihle, A. (1986b) ‘Philosophie-Fachwissenschaft-Allgemeinbildung’, in Flashar, & Gigon, (1986).
Dunbabin, K. M. D. (1986) ‘Sic erimus cuncti… The Skeleton in Graeco-Roman Art’, JDAI 101.
Erler, M. (1993) ‘Philologia medicans. Wie die Epikureer die Texte ihres Meisters lasen’, in Kullmann, W. & Althoff, J., edd., Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur (Tübingen).
Erler, M. & Ungern-Sternberg, J. v. (1987) ‘κακòν γμναĩκ∊ς. Griechisches zu der Rede des Metellus Macedonius De prole augenda’, MH 44.
Frischer, B. (1982) The Sculpted Word: Epicureanism and philosophical recruitment in ancient Greece (Berkeley).
Furley, D. J. (1986) ‘Nothing to us?’, in Schofield & Striker (1986a).
Gigante, M. (1975) ‘“Philosophia medicans” in Filodemo’, CErc 5.
Gigante, M. (1981) Scetticismo e epicureismo. Per l'avviamento di un discorso storiografico, Elenchos 4 (Naples).
Glidden, D. K. (1980) ‘Epicurus and the pleasure principle’, in Depew, D. J., ed. (1980) The Greeks and the Good Life (Indianapolis).
Glidden, D. K. (1985) ‘Epicurean prolēpsis’, OSAP 3.
Gosling, J. & Taylor, C. C. W. (1982) The Greeks on Pleasure (Oxford).
Hadot, I. (1969a) Seneca und die griechisch-römische Tradition der Seelenleiting, Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie 13 (Berlin).
Hadot, I. (1969b) ‘Epicure et l'enseignement philosophique hellénistique et romain’, Actes du VIIIe Congrès de l'Association Guillaume Budé (1968).
Hossenfelder, M. (1988) ‘Epicurus-hedonist malgré lui’, in Schofield, & Striker, (1986a).
Hossenfelder, M. (1991a) Epikur (Munich).
Jones, H. (1989) The Epicurean Tradition (London/New York).
Kerferd, G. B. (1971) ‘Epicurus’ doctrine of the soul’, Phronesis 16.
Long, A. A. (1986b) ‘Pleasure and social utility – the virtues of being Epicurean’, in Flashar & Gigon (1986).
Longo Auricchio, F. (1978) ‘La scuola di Epicuro’, CErc 8.
Manuwald, A. (1972) Die Prolepsislehre Epikurs, Habelts Dissertationsdrucke, Reihe klassische Philologie 15 (Bonn).
Merlan, Ph. (1960) Studies in Epicurus and Aristotle (Wiesbaden).
Mitsis, P. (1988a) Epicurus’ Ethical Theory, Cornell studies in classical philology 48 (Ithaca/London).
Nussbaum, M. C. (1986) ‘Therapeutic arguments: Epicurus and Aristotle’, in Schofield & Striker (1986a).
Nussbaum, M. C. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics (Princeton).
Puglia, E. (1980) ‘Nuove letture nei PHerc. 1012 e 1786 (Demetrii Laconis opera incerta)’, CErc 10.
Puglia, E., ed. (1988) Demetrio Lacone: Aporie testuali e esegetiche in Epicuro (PHerc. 1012), La Scuola di Epicuro 8 (Naples).
Purinton, J. S. (1993) ‘Epicurus on the telos’, Phronesis 38.
Rabbow, P. (1954) Seelenführung, Methodik der Exerzitien in der Antike (Munich).
Rist, J. M. (1972) Epicurus: An introduction (Cambridge).
Rist, J. M. (1974) ‘Pleasure: 360–300 bc’, Phoenix 28.
Rist, J. M. (1980) ‘Epicurus on friendship’, CPh 75.
Rosenbaum, S. E. (1986) ‘How to be dead and not care: a defense of Epicurus’, APhQ 23.
Sandbach, F. H. (1985) Aristotle and the Stoics, PCPhS suppl. vol. 10 (Cambridge).
Schmid, W. (1957) ‘Contritio und ultima linea rerum in neuen epikureischen Texten’, RhM 100.
Schmid, W. (1962) ‘Epikur’, in RAC Bd. 5 (Stuttgart).
Schmid, W. repr. in Erbse, H. & Küppers, J., edd. (1984) W. Schmid: Ausgewählte philologische Schriften (Berlin/New York).
Schmidt, P. L. (1978) ‘Cicero's place in Roman philosophy: a study of his prefaces’, CJ 74.
Sedley, D. N. (1976a) ‘Epicurus and his professional rivals’, in Bollack, & Laks, (1976).
Sedley, D. N. (1989a) ‘Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman World’, in Griffin, & Barnes, (1989).
Sedley, D. N. (1996) ‘The inferential foundations of Epicurean ethics’, in Giannantoni, & Gigante, (1996).
Smith, M. F., ed. (1993) Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription, La scuola di Epicuro, suppl. 1 (Naples).
Striker, G. (1993) ‘Epicurean hedonism’, in Brunschwig, & Nussbaum, (1993) ; repr. in Striker, (1996).
Sudhaus, E. S. (1911) ‘Epikur als Beichtvater’, Archiv für Religionswissenschaft 14.
Tepedino Guerra, A. (1987) ‘Una testimonianza del libro “Sul fine” di Epicuro?’, CErc 17.
Tepedino Guerra, A., ed. (1991) Polieno: Frammenti, La scuola di Epicuro 11 (Naples).
Usener, H., ed. (1887) Epicurea (Leipzig; repr. Stuttgart 1966).
Vander Waerdt, P. A. (1987) ‘The justice of the Epicurean wise man’, CQ 37.
White, N. P. (1985) ‘The role of physics in Stoic ethics’, in Epp, (1985).
Zanker, P. (1995) Die Maske des Sokrates. Das Bild des Intellektuellen in der antiken Kunst (Munich).