Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 1999
  • Online publication date: March 2008

4 - Introduction

from PART II - LOGIC AND LANGUAGE
Summary
The Stoics were the innovative logicians of the Hellenistic period. The leading logician of the school was its third scholarch, Chrysippus. The Stoics divided logikē into two subparts, rhetoric and dialectic, and logic is a part of dialectic. Dialectic was subdivided into two parts. One part studied signifiers or utterances, the other part studied things signified or sayables or objects. According to orthodox Stoicism, dialectic is not only an essential element of philosophy, it is actually a virtue or excellence. The only dialecticians are Sages and gods. The history of Hellenistic logic can be traced to three time periods: before the birth of Chrysippus, during his time, and after his death. Chrysippus was the chief figure in Stoic logic. Chrysippus' logical books number about 130, and the titles themselves give an idea of the range and balance of Chrysippus' logical interests.
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy
  • Online ISBN: 9781139053617
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521250283
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
Angeli A., ed. (1988a) Filodemo: Agli amici di scuola (PHerc. 1005), La scuola di Epicuro 7 (Naples).
Atherton C. (1993) The Stoics on Ambiguity (Cambridge).
Barnes J. (1983b) ‘Terms and sentences’, PBA 69.
Barnes J. (1985) ‘Theophrastus and hypothetical syllogistic’, in Wiesner (1985–87) I, also in Fortenbaugh et al. (1985).
Barnes J. (1986a) ‘Peripatetic negations’, OSAP 4.
Barnes J. (1986b) ‘The Logical Investigations of Chrysippus’, Wissenschaftskolleg Jahrbuch 1984/5 (Berlin).
Barnes J. (1991) ‘Enseigner la Vertu?’, RPh 116.
Barnes J. (1993a) ‘“A third kind of syllogism”: Galen and the logic of relations’, in Sharples (1993).
Barnes J. (1993d) ‘Galen and the utility of logic’, in Kollesch & Nickel (1993).
Bochenski I. (1947) La logique de Théophraste, Collectanea Friburgensia, N.S. 32 (Fribourg).
Dorandi T., ed. (1990a) ‘Filodemo: gli orientamenti della ricerca attuale’, in Haase W., ed., ANRW II 36.4 (Berlin/New York).
Dörrie H. & Baltes M. (1996) Der Platonismus in der Antike IV (Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt).
Ebert T. (1987) ‘The origin of the Stoic theory of signs in Sextus Empiricus’, OSAP 5.
Ebert T. (1991) Dialektiker und frühe Stoiker bei Sextus Empiricus, Hypomnemata 95 (Göttingen).
Egli U. (1981) Das Dioklesfragment bei Diogenes Laertios, Sonderforschungsbereich 99 Linguistik 55 (Konstanz).
Frede M. (1974a) Die stoische Logik, Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Gottingen. Philol.-hist. Kl. Folge 3, Nr. 88 (Göttingen).
Goulet R. (1989) ‘Aulu Gelle’, in Goulet (1989–94) 1.
Graeser A., ed. (1973) Die Logischen Fragmente des Theophrast (Berlin).
Graeser A. (1975) Zenon von Kition, Positionen und Probleme (Berlin).
Hadot P. (1979) ‘Les divisions des parties de la philosophie dans l'antiquité’, Museum Helveticum 36.
Hagius H. (1979) ‘The Stoic theory of the parts of speech’ (dissertation Columbia).
Hülser K.-H. (1987–8) Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker. 4 vols. (Stuttgart/Bad Cannstatt).
Ierodiakonou K. (1993b) ‘The Stoic division of philosophy’, Phronesis 38.
Ioppolo A. M. (1980a) Aristone di Chio e lo stoicismo antico, Elenchos 1 (Naples).
Kidd I. G. (1978b) ‘Posidonius and logic’, in Brunschwig (1978a).
Kidd I. G. (1988) Posidonius, II: The Commentary, 2 vols., Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 14 A & B (Cambridge) (vol. I see Edelstein & Kidd 1972).
Lee Tae-Soo (1984) Die Griechische Tradition der Aristotelischen Syllogistik in der Spätantike: eine Untersuchung über die Kommentare zu den Analytica Prioravon Alexander Aphrodisiensis, Ammonius und Philoponus, Hypomnemata 79 (Göttingen).
Lloyd A. C. (1978b) ‘Definite propositions and the concept of reference’, in Brunschwig (1978a).
Long A. A. (1971d) ‘Aisthesis, prolepsis and linguistic theory in Epicurus’, BICS 18.
Long A. A. (1978c) ‘Dialectic and the Stoic sage’, in Rist (1978b) ; repr. in Long (1996).
Long A. A. & Sedley D. N., edd. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols.: i. Translations of the principal sources with philosophical commentary; ii. Greek and Latin texts with notes and bibliography (Cambridge, various reprints).
Marrone L. (1982) ‘Nuove letture nel PHerc. 307 (Questioni Logiche di Crisippo)’, CErc 12.
Marrone L. (1984) ‘Proposizione e predicato in Crisippo’, CErc 14.
Marrone L. (1992) ‘L'ambiguità verbale nel PHerc. 307 (Questioni logiche di Crisippo)’, in Proceed. XIX Intern. Congr. Papyrology (Cairo) 1.
Marrone L. (1993) ‘Gnoseologia stoica nel PHerc. 307’, in Franchi dell’Orto L., ed., Ercolano 1738–1988. 250 anni di ricerca archeologica (Rome).
Pearson A. C., ed. (1891) The Fragments of Zeno and Cleanthes (Cambridge).
Repici L. (1977) La Logica di Teofrasto: studio critico e raccolta dei frammenti e delle testimonianze (Bologna).
Rist J. M. (1978a) ‘Zeno and the origins of Stoic logic’, in Brunschwig (1978a).
Schofield M. (1983) ‘The syllogisms of Zeno of Citium’, Phronesis 28.
Sedley D. N. (1977) ‘Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic philosophy’, PCPhS 23.
Sedley D. N. (1984) ‘The negated conjunction in Stoicism’, Elenchos 5.
Solmsen F. (1929) ‘Ancora il frammento logico fiorentino’, RFIC 7 ; repr. in Solmsen (1968–82) II.
Spinelli E. (1986) ‘Metrodoro contro i dialettici?’, CErc 16.
Tepedino Guerra A. (1992) ‘Metrodoro “Contro i dialettici”?’, CErc 22.
Wehrli F., ed. (1969b) Eudemos von Rhodos, Die Schule des Aristoteles, H. 8, Zweite Auflage (Basle/Stuttgart).
Wehrli F., ed. (1969c) Phainias von Eresos, Chamaileon, Praxiphanes, Die Schule des Aristoteles, H. 9, Zweite Auflage (Basle/Stuttgart).