Book contents
- Frontmatter
- PART 5 INSTITUTIONS
- 18 IRANIAN SOCIETY AND LAW
- 19 POLITICAL, SOCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INSTITUTIONS, TAXES AND TRADE
- 20 GEOGRAPHICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISIONS: SETTLEMENTS AND ECONOMY
- 21(a) TIME-RECKONING
- (b) IRANIAN FESTIVALS
- PART 6 RELIGIOUS HISTORY
- PART 7 ART HISTORY
- PART 8 LANGUAGES AND LITERATURE
- PART 9 BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Bibliography
- Index
- Index of Greek words
- References
21(a) - TIME-RECKONING
from PART 5 - INSTITUTIONS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
By
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- PART 5 INSTITUTIONS
- 18 IRANIAN SOCIETY AND LAW
- 19 POLITICAL, SOCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE INSTITUTIONS, TAXES AND TRADE
- 20 GEOGRAPHICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISIONS: SETTLEMENTS AND ECONOMY
- 21(a) TIME-RECKONING
- (b) IRANIAN FESTIVALS
- PART 6 RELIGIOUS HISTORY
- PART 7 ART HISTORY
- PART 8 LANGUAGES AND LITERATURE
- PART 9 BIBLIOGRAPHY
- Bibliography
- Index
- Index of Greek words
- References
Summary
ELEMENTS OF TIME-RECKONING
Every method of time-reckoning uses and combines three natural time elements: day, lunation, and year. Since the day is the indispensable component of time measurement, three combinations of natural time units are possible: (a) days plus lunations; (b) days, lunations, and year; and (c) days and year. The extant evidence shows that the Persian, Macedonian and Parthian rulers of Iran, from the 6th century b.c. until the 3rd century a.d., used the second scheme (b). The Sasanians in the 3rd to 7th centuries a.d. used the third scheme (c), as do the Zoroastrians to this day. Before explaining the intricacies and history of these calendar types in pre-Islamic Iran, some comments on the chronological terms used in this chapter may be of use.
For the purposes of time-reckoning, the “day” includes the night-period between two successive daylights. The peoples who used the moon as a marker of time, for instance the Babylonians, counted the complete night and day as a single “day”, (from onset of evening to onset of evening), whereas the Zoroastrians, who disregarded the lunar reckoning entirely, insisted that the calendar day was the period between two sunrises.
The waxing and the waning of the moon recur about every 29 days, and the calendar month began at the appearance of the new moon. As its visibility depends on many accidental and variable factors, e.g. the cloudiness of the sky, the month for the purpose of the calendar was counted as having twenty-nine or thirty days.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of IranSeleucid Parthian, pp. 778 - 791Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1983
References
Siyar al-Mulūk (Siyāsat-nāma), ed. , 2nd. ed. Tehran, 1968. Tr. as The Book of Government or Rules for Kings, 2nd. ed. London, 1978.Google Scholar
“The ‘Zoroastrian’ calendar”, Archiv Orientdlni (Quarterly Journal of African, Asian and Latin American Studies) (Prague) XXXV (1967), (This article is disfigured with misprints; the unintelligible paragraph 3 on p. 205, “In the absence of dated documents”, should be omitted).Google Scholar
. al-Āthār al-bāqiya, ed. . Leipzig, 1876–8. Tr. as The Chronology of Ancient Nations. London, 1879.Google Scholar
. Kitāb al-taf hīm li awā'il ⊡inā‘ at al-tanjīm, ed. and tr. as The Book of Instruction in the Elements of the Art of Astrology. Longon, 1934.Google Scholar
“Rapithwin, Nō Rūz and the feast of Sade”, in , and (eds), Pratidanam.… Studies presented to F.B. J. Kuiper (The Hague, 1968), (Janua Linguarum 34).Google Scholar
Mihragan among the Irani Zoroastrians”, in (ed.), Mithraic Studies I (Manchester, 1975).Google Scholar
“On the calendar of Zoroastrian feasts”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XXXIII (1970).Google Scholar
A History of Zoroastrianism I. Leiden, 1975 (Handbuch der Orientalistik, ed. (Leiden-Cologne) I.VIII. 1.2.2a).Google Scholar
Zoroastrians: their religious beliefs and practices. London, 1979 (Library of Religious Beliefs and practices 2).Google Scholar
Les types du premier homme et du premier roi dans I'histoire légendaire des Iraniens I (Stockholm, 1917), : “La fête de Sädäh” II (Leiden, 1934) : ”Le Nowroz” (Archives d'études orientales 14.1, 2).Google Scholar
Le Zend-Avesta, traduction nouvelle avec commentaire historique et philologique, 3 vols. Paris, 1892–3; repr. 1960 (Annales du Musee Guimet 21, 22, 24).Google Scholar
The Persian Rivāyats of Hormazyar Framarz and others, their version with introduction and notes. Bombay, 1932.Google Scholar
‘On certain Persian and Armenian month-names as influenced by the Avestan calendar”, Journal of the American Oriental Society (New York) XXVIII (1907).Google Scholar
“Die sasanidische Inschrift von Mishkinshahr in Azarbaidjān”, Archäofogiuhe Mitteilungen aus Iran (old series 9 vols 1929–38; new series 1968–) (Berlin) I (Berlin, 1968).Google Scholar
and “The Compendium of the Doctrines and Styles of the Teaching of Mani, the Buddha of Light”, Asia Major III (1952).Google Scholar
Essays on the sacred language, writings and religion of the Parsis, 3rd ed. London, 1884.Google Scholar
“Ein manichaisches Hcnochbuch”, Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen (Deutschen) Akademie der Wissenschajten 1934.Google Scholar
and “Ein griechischer Mani-Codex (P. Colon, inv. nr. 4780)”, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik V (Bonn, 1970).Google Scholar
and Recherches sur les Res Gestae divi Saprois. Brussels, 1953 (Mémoires de l'Académie royale de Belgique, serie in 8°, classe des lettres XLVII.4).Google Scholar
. Kitāb al-maḥāsin wa'l-aḍdād, ed. . Leiden, 1898, repr. 1966. Tr. as “The celebration and gifts of the Persian New Year (Nawruz) according to an Arabic source”, in Dr. Modi Memorial Volume (Bombay, 1930).Google Scholar
“The day Khordād of the month Farvardin commonly called Khordādsāl: translated from the original Pahlavi text”, in (ed.), The K. R. Cama Memorial Volume (Bombay, 1900).Google Scholar
Jashn-i Sada, a collection of articles by II scholars, with an introduction by . Tehran 1946 (Nashriyya-yi Anjuman-i Īrānshināsī 2).Google Scholar
“Das Nauroz, seine Geschichte und seine Bedeutung”, in Dr. Modi Memorial Volume (Bombay, 1930)Tr. into English by , Journal of the K. R. Cama Oriental Institute, 29 vols (Bombay, 1922–35) XXXI (1937).Google Scholar
. Kitāb al-tanbīh wa'l-ishrāf, ed. . Leiden, 1894 (Bibliotheca Arabicorum 8). Tr. as Le livre de l'avertissement et de la revision. Paris, 1896.Google Scholar
. Les Prairies d'or(Murūj al-dhahab), ed. and tr. by and , 9 vols. Paris, 1861–77; revised and corrected tr. by , 3 vols. Paris, 1962–5.Google Scholar
“Parchments of the Parthian Period from Avroman in Kurdistan”, Journal of Hellenic Studies (London) XXXV (1915).Google Scholar
Texte zum mazdajanischen Kalender. Uppsala, 1934 (Uppsala Universitets Årsskrift 1934. II).Google Scholar
and Babylonian Chronology 626B.C.-A.D. 75. Providence, R. L., 1956 (Brown University Studies 19).Google Scholar
“Encore une inscription grecque de l'lran”, Comptes rendus de rAcademie des inscriptions et belles lettres 1967.Google Scholar
“Der Kalender des Avesta und die so-gennanten Gahanbār”, Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft (Wiesbaden) XXXIV (1880).Google Scholar
. “The celebration of the gāhambār in Persia”, in Sir Jamsetjee Jejeebhoy Madressa Jubilee Volume (Bombay, 1914).Google Scholar
“Zur Chronologie der Sassaniden”, Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenldndischen Gesellschaft XCI (1937).Google Scholar
“Various Eras and Calendars of Islam”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies IX (1937-9).Google Scholar
Old Iranian calendars. London, 1938 (Royal Asiatic Society Prize Publication Fund 16).Google Scholar
“Some chronological data relating to the Sasanian period”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental StudiesUniversity of London IX (1937–9).Google Scholar
“An ancient Persian practice preserved by a non-Iranian people”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental StudiesUniversity of London IX (1937–9).Google Scholar
“The Iranian festivals adopted by the Christians and condemned by the Jews”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) X.3 (1940).Google Scholar
“The early Sasanians”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XI (1943).Google Scholar
“The Old Iranian Calendars again”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XIV (1952).Google Scholar
. Histoire des rots des Perses (Ghurar akhbār mulūk al-furs va siyarihim), ed. and tr. by . Paris, 1900.Google Scholar
The “Indian Bundahisn”, chapter XXV in Der Bundehesh, ed. and tr. (Leipzig, 1868; repr. 1976); tr. in* Pahlavi Texts 1.Google Scholar
The “Iranian Bundahisn”, chapter XXV, in The Būndahishn, ed. (Bombay, 1908); tr. , Zand-ākāsīh (Bombay, 1956).Google Scholar
“A few Parsee festivals (jashans) according to an old Parsee manuscript”, in (ed.), Spiegel Memorial Volume (Bombay, 1908).Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by