Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:18:55.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - The atomism debate

from 4 - Philosophy and the new physics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Eli Zahar
Affiliation:
London School of Economics
Thomas Baldwin
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The Greeks put forward atomism in response to a philosophical problem: that of reconciling the Parmenidean thesis of the immutability of Being with the undeniable existence of phenomenal change. Democritus postulated a void containing a plurality of indivisible and immutable particles called atoms. The flux of appearances was to be explained in terms of different configurations of the same particles within the same empty space. Thus the only change admitted by the atomists was that of spatial position with respect to time. Through the work of chemists like Boyle and Dalton, atomism was gradually transformed into a testable theory. It proved to be a remarkably successful explanatory conjecture.

In the nineteenth century, atomism faced a serious challenge posed by a rival programme: phenomenological thermodynamics. The latter was based on two principles: those [A] of the conservation and [B] of the degradation of energy. [A] was familiar; [B] novel and challenging. [B] enabled Clausius to define entropy as a function S of the state of a system Ω such that S never decreases over time; intuitively, S is a measure of the disorder within Ω In all real, as opposed to idealised processes, S actually increases and can therefore be used to explain the unidirectionality of time. The increase of S also entails that no quantity of heat can be converted into an equivalent amount of (useful) mechanical work.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boltzmann, L. (1891). Vorlesungen über Maxwells Theorie der Elektricität und des Lichts (Lectures on Maxwell’s Theory of Electricity and Light), Leipzig: J. Barth.Google Scholar
Boltzmann, L. (1896). Vorlesungen über Gastheorie, Leipzig: J. Barth. Trans. 1964 Brush, S. G., Lectures on Gas Theory, Oxford and London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Boltzmann, L. (1979). Populäre Schriften (Popular Essays), Braunschweig/Wiesbaden: Vieweg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, S. J. (1966). Kinetic Theory, vol. II, Oxford and London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Clark, P. (1976). ‘Atomism versus Thermodynamics’ in Howson, C. (ed.), Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. (1906). La Théorie Physique: son Objet, sa Structure, Paris: Marcel Rivière. Trans. 1954 Wiener, P. P., The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. (1911). Traité d'Energétique ou de Thermodynamique Générale (Treatise on Energetics or General Thermodynamics), Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
Duhem, P. (1913). Le Système du Monde (The World System), Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1872). Die Geschichte und die Wurzel des Satzes von der Erhaltung der Arbeit, Leipzig: G. Fischer. Trans. 1910 Jourdain, P. E. B., The History and the Root of the Principle of the Conservation of Energy, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1883). Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung historisch-kritisch dargestellt, Leipzig: G. Fischer. Trans. 1960 Mc.Cormack, T. J., The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of its Development, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1886). Die Analyse der Empfindungen, Leipzig: G. Fischer. Trans. 1959 Williams, C. M. and Waterlow, S., The Analysis of Sensations, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Mach, E. (1905). Erkenntnis und Irrtum. Skizzen zur Psychologie der Forschung, Leipzig: J. Barth. Trans. 1976 Mc.Cormack, T. J. and Foulkes, P., Knowledge and Error – Sketches on the Psychology of Inquiry, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Ostwald, W. (1908). Grundriβ der Naturphilosophie (Outline of Natural Philosophy), Leipzig: Reclam.Google Scholar
Ostwald, W. (1937). L'Energie (Energy), Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Sears, W. S. and Salinger, G. L. (1975). Thermodynamics, Kinetic Theory and Statistical Thermodynamics, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Sears, W. S. (1953). Thermodynamics, the Kinetic Theory of Gases and Statistical Mechanics, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Stachel, J. (ed.) (1989). The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. II, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zahar, E. (1989). Einstein’s Revolution. A Study in Heuristic, La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Zahar, E. (1996). ‘Poincaré’s Structural Realism and his Logic of Discovery’ in Greffe, J. L., Heinzmann, G., and Lorenz, K., Henri Poincaré: Science and Philosophy, Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Zahar, E. (1997). Leçons d'Epistémologie (Lessons in Epistemology), Paris: Cahiers du CREA.Google Scholar
Zermelo, E. (1966). ‘On the Mechanical Explanation of Irreversible Processes’ in Brush, S. G. (ed.), Kinetic Theory 2, Oxford and London: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The atomism debate
  • Edited by Thomas Baldwin, University of York
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The atomism debate
  • Edited by Thomas Baldwin, University of York
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The atomism debate
  • Edited by Thomas Baldwin, University of York
  • Book: The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521591041.015
Available formats
×